Explore the vast range of titles available.

The Sino-U.S. trade imbalance and the related debate on RMB appreciation have attracted much attention in recent years. Judging objectively, however, the trade imbalance does not necessarily result in an imbalance in the distribution of trade benefits. By analyzing the distribution of benefits in Sino-U.S. trade from 1978 to 2007, this paper finds that bilateral trade has brought positive benefits to both sides, differentially in terms of production and consumption. Simply put, China has gained benefits for production yet suffered in terms of consumption, whereas the opposite is true for the U.S.. Moreover, even during periods in which the U.S. experienced a trade deficit, its citizens gained larger total individual benefits than those in a period of trade surplus. We argue, therefore, that appreciation of the RMB would reduce the trade benefits for both sides by almost the same margin, bringing little benefit to the United States.

The social and public interest remains one of the fundamental principles and goals pursued by all legal departments. Its independence is prerequisite to its legal protection. However, the attention given to it by the jurisprudential circle is not enough. Through demonstrations and theoretical exploration, this article conducts an analysis of the independence of the social and public interests, in the hope that it can raise the attention of jurisprudential field,＂ and proposes that the social and public interest, with its independent legal appeal, is an interest pattern which exists in parallel with the personal interest or the national interest because of the independence of society.

THE expulsion from the China National Diving Team of Tian Liang, 25year-old diving champion of two Olympiads,early this year caused a storm of controversy across China. It brought to light the quandary contemporary Chinese athletes face, caught as they are in transition between the old-style planned economy sports management mechanism and a more commercial environment engendered by the market economy.

網際網路世界牽涉聲譽、隱私及資料保護最重要的挑戰之一即數位記憶無限制之本質，然「當個人的資料在已無正當目的之需要下，本人應有權使其資料不再顯現及加以刪除」，個人資料在網路上被不同之使用者以多樣之方式蒐集、儲存及使用，成為快速流通的客體，也因此，近幾年來，「被遺忘的權利」成為受到關注之焦點。歐盟率先表態在2012年提出，本人在其個人資料已經不再需要被處理或儲存時，應有權要求從網路上刪除，歐盟根據資料保護之原理以承認被遺忘的權利為起點，希冀建構一個隱私普世之權利以適用歐盟所有公民，並提供個人就其於網路上之身分及聲譽重要之自主性，該權利源自於既存歐洲之隱私法，隱私乃歐洲人權公約賦予之基本權利而長久受到歐洲國家所實踐，被遺忘的權利彰顯了一種社會價值，作為資料隱私庇護之權利，乃民主之前提以參與社會生活及公共論壇，亦能免於社會之羞辱及公眾或私人之監視，然而上開歐盟之提議在美國卻受到負面之批評，因被遺忘的權利確實與言論自由可能出現扞格，在歐盟及美國間背後長久之文化及哲學思維存在地域差異性下，如何調和以獲致利益平衡，應為未來當努力之課題。