Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction were randomly assigned to the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator vericiguat or placebo, in addition to guideline-based medical therapy. The incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or first hospitalization for heart failure was lower among patients who received vericiguat.

Vericiguat is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for heart failure in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following a recent worsening event. The aim of the VICTOR trial was to assess the effect of vericiguat in patients with HFrEF without recent heart failure worsening. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, conducted at 482 sites across 36 countries, patients aged 18 years or older with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40%) without heart failure hospitalisation within 6 months or outpatient intravenous diuretic use within 3 months before randomisation were randomly assigned (1:1) using an intervention randomisation system with interactive response technology to oral vericiguat (target 10 mg dose) or matching placebo. The primary composite endpoint was time to cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation. Efficacy endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug (safety population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05093933, and is complete. Between Nov 2, 2021, and Dec 21, 2023, 10 921 patients were screened and 6105 were randomly assigned: 3053 to vericiguat and 3052 to placebo. The median age was 68·0 years (IQR 61·0–75·0), 1440 (23·6%) patients were women, 4665 (76·4%) were men, 3934 (64·4%) were White, and 2899 (47·5%) had no previous hospitalisation for heart failure. During a median follow-up of 18·5 months (IQR 13·6–24·7), primary outcome events occurred in 549 (18·0%) patients in the vericiguat group and 584 (19·1%) patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·83–1·04]; p=0·22). As prespecified in the protocol, because the primary endpoint was not statistically significant, all analyses of secondary and exploratory endpoints are considered nominal. Cardiovascular death occurred in 292 (9·6%) patients in the vericiguat group and 346 (11·3%) patients in the placebo group (HR 0·83 [95% CI 0·71–0·97]). Hospitalisation for heart failure occurred in 348 (11·4%) patients in the vericiguat group and in 362 (11·9%) patients in the placebo group (HR 0·95 [95% CI 0·82–1·10]). Serious adverse events occurred in 717 (23·5%) of 3049 patients in the vericiguat group and 751 (24·6%) of 3049 patients in the placebo group. The most common adverse event was symptomatic hypotension (345 [11·3%] patients in the vericiguat group and 281 [9·2%] in the placebo group). All-cause death occurred in 377 (12·3%) patients in the vericiguat group and 440 (14·4%) patients in the placebo group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·74–0·97]). Among patients with HFrEF and no recent worsening, vericiguat did not reduce the risk of a composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation. Fewer cardiovascular deaths were observed in the vericiguat group than in the placebo group. Merck Sharp & Dohme (a subsidiary of Merck) and Bayer.

PurposeTo characterize the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of vericiguat in healthy males.MethodsSix phase I studies were conducted in European, Chinese, and Japanese males. Subjects received oral vericiguat as a single dose (0.5–15.0 mg solution [for first-in-human study] or 1.25–10.0 mg immediate release [IR tablets]) or multiple doses (1.25–10.0 mg IR tablets once daily [QD] or 5.0 mg IR tablets twice daily for 7 consecutive days). Bioavailability and food effects on vericiguat PK (IR tablets) were also studied in European subjects.ResultsOverall, 255 of 265 randomized subjects completed their respective studies. There were no deaths or serious adverse events. Vericiguat was generally well tolerated at doses ≤ 10.0 mg. In the first-in-human study, the most frequent drug-related adverse events were headache and postural dizziness (experienced by five subjects each [7.2%]). Three of four subjects who received vericiguat 15.0 mg (oral solution, fasted) experienced orthostatic reactions. Vericiguat (≤ 10.0 mg, IR tablets) was rapidly absorbed (median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ≤ 2.5 h [fasted]) with a mean half-life of about 22.0 h (range 17.9–27.0 h for single and multiple doses). No evidence for deviation from dose proportionality or unexpected accumulation was observed. Administration of vericiguat 5.0 mg IR tablets with food increased bioavailability by 19% (estimated ratio 119% [90% confidence interval]: 108; 131]), reduced PK variability, and prolonged vericiguat absorption relative to the fasted state.ConclusionIn general, vericiguat was well tolerated. These results supported further clinical evaluation of vericiguat QD in patients with heart failure.Registry numbersEudraCT: 2011-001627-21; EudraCT: 2012-000953-30

Following completion of the VICTORIA trial, vericiguat was approved for the treatment of worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and received a class IIb recommendation in European and North American guidelines. The subsequent VICTOR trial evaluated the use of vericiguat in patients with HFrEF and no recent worsening. We aimed to assess the effect of vericiguat on clinical endpoints through pooled analyses of patient-level data from the VICTORIA and VICTOR trials. This prespecified, pooled individual participant-level analysis was conducted on data from two trials: VICTORIA, which was active from Sept 25, 2016, to Sept 2, 2019 in 42 countries, and VICTOR, which was active from Nov 2, 2021, to Feb 5, 2025 in 36 countries. The VICTORIA trial enrolled adult (aged ≥18 years) participants with HFrEF with recent worsening (defined as either hospitalisation for heart failure within the previous 6 months or outpatient use of intravenous diuretics within the previous 3 months) and increased NT-proBNP concentrations; the VICTOR trial had similar eligibility criteria but participants had no recent worsening of heart failure. Participants in both trials received contemporary background guideline-directed heart failure therapy as appropriate. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure (also assessed individually). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420251065636. Data from 11 155 patients (5050 in the VICTORIA trial and 6105 in the VICTOR trial) were included in the pooled analysis. The primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure occurred in 1446 (25·9%) of 5579 patients in the vericiguat group and 1556 (27·9%) of 5576 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91 [95% CI 0·85–0·98]; p=0·0088), with similar reductions in its individual components of cardiovascular death (0·89 [0·80–0·98]; p=0·020) and hospitalisation for heart failure (0·92 [0·84–1·00]; p=0·043) as first events. Vericiguat reduced the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF across a broad range of clinical severity, including those receiving contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy. Vericiguat might be suitable as an additional treatment option for selected patients with HFrEF. Merck Sharp & Dohme (a subsidiary of Merck) and Bayer.

ObjectivesThis 1-year long-term extension (LTE) study (NCT04451772) followed the 48-week phase 2 SLEek study (NCT03978520) that evaluated upadacitinib (a Janus kinase inhibitor) alone or combined with elsubrutinib (a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in adults with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an additional 56 weeks of treatment.MethodsPatients randomised to upadacitinib 30 mg one time per day (QD) or upadacitinib 30 mg/elsubrutinib 60 mg QD (upadacitinib/elsubrutinib) in the SLEek study continued their assigned treatment during the LTE. Patients originally receiving placebo switched to upadacitinib/elsubrutinib in the LTE. Assessments through week 104 included SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA), Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), change from baseline in glucocorticoid dose, flare events and adverse events.ResultsThis LTE analysis included 127 patients. Efficacy responses for the groups receiving upadacitinib, upadacitinib/elsubrutinib and placebo to upadacitinib/elsubrutinib were maintained or increased from weeks 48 to 104 (week 104: SRI-4: 82.1%, 85.4% and 61.3%; BICLA: 69.2%, 78.0% and 54.8%; LLDAS: 60.0%, 78.0% and 34.4%). From weeks 48 through 104, the mean daily glucocorticoid dose was reduced, and the incidence of flares was maintained or further reduced in all treatment groups. Safety profiles were similar to those observed in the primary SLEek study.ConclusionsIn this LTE study, upadacitinib monotherapy and upadacitinib/elsubrutinib combined were well tolerated and continued to demonstrate beneficial effects on SLE disease activity, glucocorticoid dose and flares through 104 weeks.

Background Omarigliptin is a once-weekly (q.w.) oral DPP-4 inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Japan. To support approval of omarigliptin in the United States, the clinical development program included a cardiovascular (CV) safety study. Subsequently, a business decision was made not to submit a marketing application for omarigliptin in the United States, and the CV safety study was terminated. Herein we report an analysis of data from that early-terminated study. Methods In this randomized, double-blind study, 4202 patients with T2DM and established CV disease were assigned to either omarigliptin 25 mg q.w. or matching placebo in addition to their existing diabetes therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to summarize the primary endpoint of time to first major adverse CV event (MACE, the composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) and the analysis of first event of hospitalization for heart failure (hHF). Results The median follow-up was approximately 96 weeks (range 1.1–178.6 weeks). The primary MACE outcome occurred in 114/2092 patients in the omarigliptin group (5.45%; 2.96/100 patient-years) and 114/2100 patients in the placebo group (5.43%; 2.97/100 patient-years), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77, 1.29). The hHF outcome occurred in 20/2092 patients in the omarigliptin group (0.96%; 0.51/100 patient-years) and 33/2100 patients in the placebo group (1.57%; 0.85/100 patient-years), with an HR of 0.60 (95% CI 0.35, 1.05). After 142 weeks, the least-squares mean difference (omarigliptin vs. placebo) in glycated hemoglobin levels was −0.3% (95% CI −0.46, −0.14). The numbers of patients with adverse events, serious adverse events or discontinued from study medication due to adverse events were similar in the omarigliptin and placebo groups. Conclusions In this CV safety study of patients with T2DM and established CV disease, omarigliptin did not increase the risk of MACE or hHF and was generally well tolerated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01703208. Registered 05 October 2012

A novel EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib, has marked efficacy in patients with EGFR -mutated lung cancer. However, some patients show intrinsic resistance and an insufficient response to osimertinib. This study showed that osimertinib stimulated AXL by inhibiting a negative feedback loop. Activated AXL was associated with EGFR and HER3 in maintaining cell survival and inducing the emergence of cells tolerant to osimertinib. AXL inhibition reduced the viability of EGFR-mutated lung cancer cells overexpressing AXL that were exposed to osimertinib. The addition of an AXL inhibitor during either the initial or tolerant phases reduced tumor size and delayed tumor re-growth compared to osimertinib alone. AXL was highly expressed in clinical specimens of EGFR-mutated lung cancers and its high expression was associated with a low response rate to EGFR-TKI. These results indicated pivotal roles for AXL and its inhibition in the intrinsic resistance to osimertinib and the emergence of osimertinib-tolerant cells. Resistance to the new generation EGFR-TKI, Osimertinib, can emerge in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Here, the authors show that AXL, which is activated by osimertinib, can promote the emergence of tolerant lung cancer cell thus conferring resistance to osimertinib and propose the combination of Osimertinib with AXL inhibitor as a potential therapeutic approach in such resistant cancers.

Omarigliptin (MK-3102) is a potent, oral, long-acting dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor approved in Japan and in global development as a once-weekly treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of omarigliptin in obese participants with and without T2DM. This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study of 50-mg omarigliptin administered once weekly for 4 weeks. Participants included 24 obese but otherwise healthy subjects (panel A; omarigliptin, n = 18; placebo, n = 6) and 8 obese patients with T2DM (treatment naive, hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5% and ≤10.0% [panel B]; omarigliptin, n = 6; placebo, n = 2). Participants were 45 to 65 years of age with a body mass index of ≥30 and ≤40 kg/m2. Blood sampling occurred at select time points, depending on the study panel, to evaluate the PK properties of omarigliptin, DPP-4 activity, active glucagon-like peptide 1 levels, and plasma glucose concentrations. Body weight was an exploratory end point. Due to sparse sampling in panel A, a thorough PK analysis was performed in obese patients with T2DM (panel B) only. PD analyses were performed in the overall study population (pooled panels A and B). PK profiles in obese participants with and without T2DM were similar to those observed in nonobese reference subjects (historical data). Steady state was achieved after 1 or 2 weekly doses in obese participants with and without T2DM. In obese patients with T2DM, omarigliptin was rapidly absorbed, with a median Tmax of 1 to 2.5 hours (days 1 and 22). Compared with those in reference subjects, the geometric mean ratios (95% CI) (Obese T2DM/reference) for steady-state plasma AUC0–168h, Cmax, and C168h were 0.80 (0.65–0.98), 0.86 (0.53–1.41), and 1.08 (0.88–1.33), respectively. Trough DPP-4 activity was inhibited by ~90%; postprandial (PP) 4-hour weighted mean active GLP-1 concentrations were increased ~2-fold; and PP glucose was significantly reduced with omarigliptin versus placebo in the pooled population. Omarigliptin was generally well-tolerated in the pooled population, and there were no hypoglycemic events. Consistent with other DPP-4 inhibitors, omarigliptin had no effect on body weight in this short-duration study. The administration of omarigliptin was generally well-tolerated in obese participants with and without T2DM, and the favorable PK and PD profiles support once-weekly dosing. Omarigliptin may provide an important once-weekly treatment option for patients with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01088711.

Sirtuins are a class of proteins with important physiologic roles in metabolism and inflammation. Sirtuin (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog) 1, or SIRT1, activation is an unexplored therapeutic approach for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).MethodsPatients with mild to moderately active UC were blindly randomized to 50 mg or 500 mg daily of SRT2104, a selective activator of SIRT1, for 8 weeks. Colonic exposure and safety were assessed, as well as blinded endoscopic scoring and disease activity by Mayo score, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and fecal calprotectin.ResultsAcross both SRT2104 groups, only 3 of 26 evaluable subjects achieved remission on blinded endoscopic assessment. Clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1) was achieved in 4 patients (2 of 13 evaluable patients in each dose group). Fecal calprotectin levels declined with treatment in both groups, but after 56 days of treatment subjects were still found to have levels approximately 4-fold elevated above normal. One subject experienced an SAE requiring study withdrawal and another was withdrawn for a severe UC flare; 19 subjects (61%) across both treatment groups experienced at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event. Average drug exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner for escalating doses of SRT2104, and colonic exposure was 140 to 160 times higher than plasma exposures.ConclusionsSRT2104 did not demonstrate significant clinical activity in mild to moderately active UC. This suggests that further evaluation of SRT2104 as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of UC is not warranted.

Abstract Context Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a highly prevalent endocrine disorder characterized by hyperandrogenism, is the leading cause of anovulatory infertility. Objective This proof-of-concept study evaluated clinical efficacy and safety of the neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor antagonist fezolinetant in PCOS. Methods This was a phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study (EudraCT 2014-004409-34). The study was conducted at 5 European clinical centers. Women with PCOS participated in the study. Interventions included fezolinetant 60 or 180 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change in total testosterone. Gonadotropins, ovarian hormones, safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results Seventy-three women were randomly assigned, and 64 participants completed the study. Adjusted mean (SE) changes in total testosterone from baseline to week 12 for fezolinetant 180 and 60 mg/day were −0.80 (0.13) and −0.39 (0.12) nmol/L vs −0.05 (0.10) nmol/L with placebo (P < .001 and P < .05, respectively). Adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in luteinizing hormone (LH) for fezolinetant 180 and 60 mg/d were −10.17 (1.28) and −8.21 (1.18) vs −3.16 (1.04) IU/L with placebo (P < .001 and P = .002); corresponding changes in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were −1.46 (0.32) and −0.92 (0.30) vs −0.57 (0.26) IU/L (P = .03 and P = .38), underpinning a dose-dependent decrease in the LH-to-FSH ratio vs placebo (P < .001). Circulating levels of progesterone and estradiol did not change significantly vs placebo (P > .10). Fezolinetant was well tolerated. Conclusion Fezolinetant had a sustained effect to suppress hyperandrogenism and reduce the LH-to-FSH ratio in women with PCOS.