Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Language
      Language
      Clear All
      Language
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
135 result(s) for "631/208/68/2486"
Sort by:
Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression
Key Points The functional classification system introduced here divides the genes that shape the cancer epigenome into three categories: epigenetic modifiers that directly modify the cancer epigenome and are frequent targets of mutations and epimutations; epigenetic mediators that drive the tumour or its progenitor cells towards a more stem-like state; and epigenetic modulators that transmit environmental signals to epigenetic modifiers. Epigenetic mediator-induced epigenetic variation in the cells of origin might lead to increased phenotypic flexibility and heterogeneity long before the emergence of oncogenic mutations and is subsequently selected in the tumour tissue during progression. Sites of increased epigenetic variation in precancerous lesions and cancer localize to large domains, called hypomethylated blocks, that overlap with regions of repressive chromatin modifications acquired during development (large organized chromatin K9 modifications) and are particularly sensitive to ageing and cancer-predisposing environmental signals. Increased epigenetic variation is a predictor of cancer risk and cancer progression; it promotes the adaptation of the tumour tissue to changing environmental cues by continuously re-establishing tumour cell phenotypic heterogeneity. The mechanism of increased epigenetic variation is functionally intertwined with the perturbations of the 3D genome organization and the disruption of heterochromatin compartments within the nuclear architecture. Disruption to the epigenome is increasingly appreciated as a major contributor to the development of cancer. The authors discuss how conceptualizing genes affecting the epigenome as epigenetic modulators, epigenetic modifiers or epigenetic mediators provides a valuable framework for understanding diverse aspects of the causes and consequences of epigenome alteration in cancer. This year is the tenth anniversary of the publication in this journal of a model suggesting the existence of 'tumour progenitor genes'. These genes are epigenetically disrupted at the earliest stages of malignancies, even before mutations, and thus cause altered differentiation throughout tumour evolution. The past decade of discovery in cancer epigenetics has revealed a number of similarities between cancer genes and stem cell reprogramming genes, widespread mutations in epigenetic regulators, and the part played by chromatin structure in cellular plasticity in both development and cancer. In the light of these discoveries, we suggest here a framework for cancer epigenetics involving three types of genes: 'epigenetic mediators', corresponding to the tumour progenitor genes suggested earlier; 'epigenetic modifiers' of the mediators, which are frequently mutated in cancer; and 'epigenetic modulators' upstream of the modifiers, which are responsive to changes in the cellular environment and often linked to the nuclear architecture. We suggest that this classification is helpful in framing new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to cancer.
Phase separation drives aberrant chromatin looping and cancer development
The development of cancer is intimately associated with genetic abnormalities that target proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). In human haematological malignancies, recurrent chromosomal translocation of nucleoporin (NUP98 or NUP214) generates an aberrant chimera that invariably retains the nucleoporin IDR—tandemly dispersed repeats of phenylalanine and glycine residues 1 , 2 . However, how unstructured IDRs contribute to oncogenesis remains unclear. Here we show that IDRs contained within NUP98–HOXA9, a homeodomain-containing transcription factor chimera recurrently detected in leukaemias 1 , 2 , are essential for establishing liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) puncta of chimera and for inducing leukaemic transformation. Notably, LLPS of NUP98–HOXA9 not only promotes chromatin occupancy of chimera transcription factors, but also is required for the formation of a broad ‘super-enhancer’-like binding pattern typically seen at leukaemogenic genes, which potentiates transcriptional activation. An artificial HOX chimera, created by replacing the phenylalanine and glycine repeats of NUP98 with an unrelated LLPS-forming IDR of the FUS protein 3 , 4 , had similar enhancing effects on the genome-wide binding and target gene activation of the chimera. Deeply sequenced Hi-C revealed that phase-separated NUP98–HOXA9 induces CTCF-independent chromatin loops that are enriched at proto-oncogenes. Together, this report describes a proof-of-principle example in which cancer acquires mutation to establish oncogenic transcription factor condensates via phase separation, which simultaneously enhances their genomic targeting and induces organization of aberrant three-dimensional chromatin structure during tumourous transformation. As LLPS-competent molecules are frequently implicated in diseases 1 , 2 , 4 – 7 , this mechanism can potentially be generalized to many malignant and pathological settings. The NUP98–HOXA9 oncogenic fusion protein found in leukaemia undergoes phase separation in the nucleus, which helps to promote activation of leukaemic genes and to establish aberrant chromatin looping.
Metabolic control of epigenetics in cancer
Key Points The histone code is regulated by epigenetic 'readers', 'writers' and 'erasers'. This Review proposes adding to this paradigm the availability of the 'ink' needed to pen chromatin modifications, with the ink being metabolites that are substrates of chromatin-modifying enzymes (that is, for example, acetyl-CoA is the ink for acetyltransferases). This Review puts forward a three-model framework by which metabolism can regulate the epigenome: inhibitor metabolite production; nutrient sensing and chromatin regulation; and localized metabolite production. Metabolic and epigenetic changes are both common features found in all cancer types. Metabolic rewiring in cancer cells provides advantages not only through direct metabolic functions, but also by acting on the epigenetic landscape. Cell signalling has long been known to affect nutrient uptake and use. However, metabolism also feeds back onto signalling pathways to play an active part in major cellular decisions, such as proliferation or differentiation. This reciprocal feedback between cell signalling and metabolism is manipulated in cancer cells to provide growth and survival advantages. Improved understanding of the interplay between cell metabolism and the epigenome will be crucial in designing novel cancer therapeutic strategies. Alterations in the epigenome and metabolism bidirectionally regulate molecular rewiring in cancer cells. This Review discusses how metabolic remodelling can contribute to tumour epigenetic alterations, thereby affecting cancer cell differentiation, proliferation and/or apoptosis as well as therapeutic responses. Alterations in the epigenome and metabolism both affect molecular rewiring in cancer cells and facilitate cancer development and progression. However, recent evidence suggests the existence of important bidirectional regulatory mechanisms between metabolic remodelling and the epigenome (specifically methylation and acetylation of histones) in cancer. Most chromatin-modifying enzymes require substrates or cofactors that are intermediates of cell metabolism. Such metabolites, and often the enzymes that produce them, can transfer into the nucleus, directly linking metabolism to nuclear transcription. We discuss how metabolic remodelling can contribute to tumour epigenetic alterations, thereby affecting cancer cell differentiation, proliferation and/or apoptosis, as well as therapeutic responses.
Mapping the genomic diaspora of gastric cancer
Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading contributor to global cancer incidence and mortality. Pioneering genomic studies, focusing largely on primary GCs, revealed driver alterations in genes such as ERBB2, FGFR2, TP53 and ARID1A as well as multiple molecular subtypes. However, clinical efforts targeting these alterations have produced variable results, hampered by complex co-alteration patterns in molecular profiles and intra-patient genomic heterogeneity. In this Review, we highlight foundational and translational advances in dissecting the genomic cartography of GC, including non-coding variants, epigenomic aberrations and transcriptomic alterations, and describe how these alterations interplay with environmental influences, germline factors and the tumour microenvironment. Mapping of these alterations over the GC life cycle in normal gastric tissues, metaplasia, primary carcinoma and distant metastasis will improve our understanding of biological mechanisms driving GC development and promoting cancer hallmarks. On the translational front, integrative genomic approaches are identifying diverse mechanisms of GC therapy resistance and emerging preclinical targets, enabled by technologies such as single-cell sequencing and liquid biopsies. Validating these insights will require specifically designed GC cohorts, converging multi-modal genomic data with longitudinal data on therapeutic challenges and patient outcomes. Genomic findings from these studies will facilitate ‘next-generation’ clinical initiatives in GC precision oncology and prevention.This Review discusses recent foundational and translational advances in gastric cancer genomics and epigenomics and highlights how these findings have improved our understanding of basic mechanisms driving gastric cancer biology as well as emerging preclinical targets.
Towards targeting transposable elements for cancer therapy
Transposable elements (TEs) represent almost half of the human genome. Historically deemed ‘junk DNA’, recent technological advancements have stimulated a wave of research into the functional impact of TEs on gene-regulatory networks in evolution and development, as well as in diseases including cancer. The genetic and epigenetic evolution of cancer involves the exploitation of TEs, whereby TEs contribute directly to cancer-specific gene activities. This Review provides a perspective on the role of TEs in cancer as being a ‘double-edged sword’, both promoting cancer evolution and representing a vulnerability that could be exploited in cancer therapy. We discuss how TEs affect transcriptome regulation and other cellular processes in cancer. We highlight the potential of TEs as therapeutic targets for cancer. We also summarize technical hurdles in the characterization of TEs with genomic assays. Last, we outline open questions and exciting future research avenues. Transposable elements, also known as junk DNA, constitute nearly half of the human genome. This Review by Liang et al. discusses how tumours exploit these transposable elements during their evolution but also how they represent a vulnerability that could be targeted through immunotherapeutic approaches.
A non-canonical SWI/SNF complex is a synthetic lethal target in cancers driven by BAF complex perturbation
Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complexes exist in three distinct, final-form assemblies: canonical BAF (cBAF), PBAF and a newly characterized non-canonical complex (ncBAF). However, their complex-specific targeting on chromatin, functions and roles in disease remain largely undefined. Here, we comprehensively mapped complex assemblies on chromatin and found that ncBAF complexes uniquely localize to CTCF sites and promoters. We identified ncBAF subunits as synthetic lethal targets specific to synovial sarcoma and malignant rhabdoid tumours, which both exhibit cBAF complex (SMARCB1 subunit) perturbation. Chemical and biological depletion of the ncBAF subunit, BRD9, rapidly attenuates synovial sarcoma and malignant rhabdoid tumour cell proliferation. Importantly, in cBAF-perturbed cancers, ncBAF complexes maintain gene expression at retained CTCF-promoter sites and function in a manner distinct from fusion oncoprotein-bound complexes. Together, these findings unmask the unique targeting and functional roles of ncBAF complexes and present new cancer-specific therapeutic targets. Michel et al. report unique localization of non-canonical BAF to CTCF sites and promoters, which confers synthetic lethality in canonical BAF-perturbed synovial sarcoma and malignant rhabdoid tumour cells.
Distinct methylation levels of mature microRNAs in gastrointestinal cancers
The biological significance of micro (mi)RNAs has traditionally been evaluated according to their RNA expression levels based on the assumption that miRNAs recognize and regulate their targets in an unvarying fashion. Here we show that a fraction of mature miRNAs including miR-17-5p, -21-5p, and -200c-3p and let-7a-5p harbor methyl marks that potentially alter their stability and target recognition. Importantly, methylation of these miRNAs was significantly increased in cancer tissues as compared to paired normal tissues. Furthermore, miR-17-5p methylation level in serum samples distinguished early pancreatic cancer patients from healthy controls with extremely high sensitivity and specificity. These findings provide a basis for diagnostic strategies for early-stage cancer and add a dimension to our understanding of miRNA biology. In cancer it is assumed that microRNAs recognise and regulate their targets uniformly. Here, the authors show that in gastrointestinal cancers methylation of microRNAs may impact their stability, and that levels of microRNA methylation are distinct in pancreatic cancer patients compared to healthy controls with potential diagnostic implications.
NAT10-mediated mRNA N4-acetylcytidine reprograms serine metabolism to drive leukaemogenesis and stemness in acute myeloid leukaemia
RNA modification has emerged as an important epigenetic mechanism that controls abnormal metabolism and growth in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, the roles of RNA N 4 -acetylcytidine (ac4C) modification in AML remain elusive. Here, we report that ac4C and its catalytic enzyme NAT10 drive leukaemogenesis and sustain self-renewal of leukaemic stem cells/leukaemia-initiating cells through reprogramming serine metabolism. Mechanistically, NAT10 facilitates exogenous serine uptake and de novo biosynthesis through ac4C-mediated translation enhancement of the serine transporter SLC1A4 and the transcription regulators HOXA9 and MENIN that activate transcription of serine synthesis pathway genes. We further characterize fludarabine as an inhibitor of NAT10 and demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of NAT10 targets serine metabolic vulnerability, triggering substantial anti-leukaemia effects both in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, our study demonstrates the functional importance of ac4C and NAT10 in metabolism control and leukaemogenesis, providing insights into the potential of targeting NAT10 for AML therapy. Zhang, Huang, Wang, Long et al. report that NAT10 enhances serine uptake and biosynthesis in an ac4C-dependent mechanism, thereby promoting stemness and progression in acute myeloid leukaemia.
Orthotopic patient-derived xenografts of paediatric solid tumours
A protocol producing orthotopic patient-derived xenografts at diagnosis, recurrence, and autopsy demonstrates proof of principle for using these tumours for basic and translational research on paediatric solid tumours. Xenograft archive Preclinical models of paediatric solid tumours that could help identify predictive biomarkers of a patient's sensitivity to therapy have been lacking. Over five years, the authors have developed an open access collection of orthotopic xenografts of 12 types of paediatric tumour. Genomic and epigenetic characterization reveals that xenografts retain characteristics of the tumour of origin. A high-throughput drug screen provides a resource for the community to identify potentially efficacious drug combinations. Paediatric solid tumours arise from endodermal, ectodermal, or mesodermal lineages 1 . Although the overall survival of children with solid tumours is 75%, that of children with recurrent disease is below 30% 2 . To capture the complexity and diversity of paediatric solid tumours and establish new models of recurrent disease, here we develop a protocol to produce orthotopic patient-derived xenografts at diagnosis, recurrence, and autopsy. Tumour specimens were received from 168 patients, and 67 orthotopic patient-derived xenografts were established for 12 types of cancer. The origins of the patient-derived xenograft tumours were reflected in their gene-expression profiles and epigenomes. Genomic profiling of the tumours, including detailed clonal analysis, was performed to determine whether the clonal population in the xenograft recapitulated the patient’s tumour. We identified several drug vulnerabilities and showed that the combination of a WEE1 inhibitor (AZD1775), irinotecan, and vincristine can lead to complete response in multiple rhabdomyosarcoma orthotopic patient-derived xenografts tumours in vivo .
ESR1 mutant breast cancers show elevated basal cytokeratins and immune activation
Estrogen receptor alpha (ER/ ESR1 ) is frequently mutated in endocrine resistant ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer and linked to ligand-independent growth and metastasis. Despite the distinct clinical features of ESR1 mutations, their role in intrinsic subtype switching remains largely unknown. Here we find that ESR1 mutant cells and clinical samples show a significant enrichment of basal subtype markers, and six basal cytokeratins (BCKs) are the most enriched genes. Induction of BCKs is independent of ER binding and instead associated with chromatin reprogramming centered around a progesterone receptor-orchestrated insulated neighborhood. BCK-high ER+ primary breast tumors exhibit a number of enriched immune pathways, shared with ESR1 mutant tumors. S100A8 and S100A9 are among the most induced immune mediators and involve in tumor-stroma paracrine crosstalk inferred by single-cell RNA-seq from metastatic tumors. Collectively, these observations demonstrate that ESR1 mutant tumors gain basal features associated with increased immune activation, encouraging additional studies of immune therapeutic vulnerabilities. Mutations of ESR1 , the gene encoding the estrogen receptor alpha, are associated with acquired resistance to therapy in luminalbreast cancer. Here the authors show that ESR1 mutant tumors gain basal-like features with increased expression of basal cytokeratines and immune activation.