Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
7 result(s) for "AIF (arterial input function)"
Sort by:
Validation of cardiac image-derived input functions for functional PET quantification
Purpose Functional PET (fPET) is a novel technique for studying dynamic changes in brain metabolism and neurotransmitter signaling. Accurate quantification of fPET relies on measuring the arterial input function (AIF), traditionally achieved through invasive arterial blood sampling. While non-invasive image-derived input functions (IDIF) offer an alternative, they suffer from limited spatial resolution and field of view. To overcome these issues, we developed and validated a scan protocol for brain fPET utilizing cardiac IDIF, aiming to mitigate known IDIF limitations. Methods Twenty healthy individuals underwent fPET/MR scans using [ 18 F]FDG or 6-[ 18 F]FDOPA, utilizing bed motion shuttling to capture cardiac IDIF and brain task-induced changes. Arterial and venous blood sampling was used to validate IDIFs. Participants performed a monetary incentive delay task. IDIFs from various blood pools and composites estimated from a linear fit over all IDIF blood pools (3VOI) and further supplemented with venous blood samples (3VOIVB) were compared to the AIF. Quantitative task-specific images from both tracers were compared to assess the performance of each input function to the gold standard. Results For both radiotracer cohorts, moderate to high agreement (r: 0.60–0.89) between IDIFs and AIF for both radiotracer cohorts was observed, with further improvement (r: 0.87–0.93) for composite IDIFs (3VOI and 3VOIVB). Both methods showed equivalent quantitative values and high agreement (r: 0.975–0.998) with AIF-derived measurements. Conclusion Our proposed protocol enables accurate non-invasive estimation of the input function with full quantification of task-specific changes, addressing the limitations of IDIF for brain imaging by sampling larger blood pools over the thorax. These advancements increase applicability to any PET scanner and clinical research setting by reducing experimental complexity and increasing patient comfort.
Automated extraction of the arterial input function from brain images for parametric PET studies
Background Accurate measurement of the arterial input function (AIF) is crucial for parametric PET studies, but the AIF is commonly derived from invasive arterial blood sampling. It is possible to use an image-derived input function (IDIF) obtained by imaging a large blood pool, but IDIF measurement in PET brain studies performed on standard field of view scanners is challenging due to lack of a large blood pool in the field-of-view. Here we describe a novel automated approach to estimate the AIF from brain images. Results Total body 18 F-FDG PET data from 12 subjects were split into a model adjustment group (n = 6) and a validation group (n = 6). We developed an AIF estimation framework using wavelet-based methods and unsupervised machine learning to distinguish arterial and venous activity curves, compared to the IDIF from the descending aorta. All of the automatically extracted AIFs in the validation group had similar shape to the IDIF derived from the descending aorta IDIF. The average area under the curve error and normalised root mean square error across validation data were − 1.59 ± 2.93% and 0.17 ± 0.07. Conclusions Our automated AIF framework accurately estimates the AIF from brain images. It reduces operator-dependence, and could facilitate the clinical adoption of parametric PET.
A short 18F-FDG imaging window triple injection neuroimaging protocol for parametric mapping in PET
Background In parametric PET, kinetic parameters are extracted from dynamic PET images. It is not commonly used in clinical practice because of long scan times and the requirement for an arterial input function (AIF). To address these limitations, we designed an 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) triple injection dynamic PET protocol for brain imaging with a standard field of view PET scanner using a 24-min imaging window and an input function modeled using measurements from a region of interest placed over the left ventricle. Methods To test the protocol in 6 healthy participants, we examined the quality of voxel-based maps of kinetic parameters in the brain generated using the two-tissue compartment model and compared estimated parameter values with previously published values. We also utilized data from a 36-min validation imaging window to compare (1) the modeled AIF against the input function measured in the validation window; and (2) the net influx rate ( K i ) computed using parameter estimates from the short imaging window against the net influx rate obtained using Patlak analysis in the validation window. Results Compared to the AIF measured in the validation window, the input function estimated from the short imaging window achieved a mean area under the curve error of 9%. The voxel-wise Pearson’s correlation between K i estimates from the short imaging window and the validation imaging window exceeded 0.95. Conclusion The proposed 24-min triple injection protocol enables parametric 18 F-FDG neuroimaging with noninvasive estimation of the AIF from cardiac images using a standard field of view PET scanner.
Optimal Scaling Approaches for Perfusion MRI with Distorted Arterial Input Function (AIF) in Patients with Ischemic Stroke
Background: Diagnosis and timely treatment of ischemic stroke depends on the fast and accurate quantification of perfusion parameters. Arterial input function (AIF) describes contrast agent concentration over time as it enters the brain through the brain feeding artery. AIF is the central quantity required to estimate perfusion parameters. Inaccurate and distorted AIF, due to partial volume effects (PVE), would lead to inaccurate quantification of perfusion parameters. Methods: Fifteen patients suffering from stroke underwent perfusion MRI imaging at the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei. Various degrees of the PVE were induced on the AIF and subsequently corrected using rescaling methods. Results: Rescaled AIFs match the exact reference AIF curve either at peak height or at tail. Inaccurate estimation of CBF values estimated from non-rescaled AIFs increase with increasing PVE. Rescaling of the AIF using all three approaches resulted in reduced deviation of CBF values from the reference CBF values. In most cases, CBF map generated by rescaled AIF approaches show increased CBF and Tmax values on the slices in the left and right hemispheres. Conclusion: Rescaling AIF by VOF approach seems to be a robust and adaptable approach for correction of the PVE-affected multivoxel AIF. Utilizing an AIF scaling approach leads to more reasonable absolute perfusion parameter values, represented by the increased mean CBF/Tmax values and CBF/Tmax images.
Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
Objectives Developing a method of separating intravascular contrast agent concentration to measure the arterial input function (AIF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of tumours, and validating its performance in phantom and in vivo experiments. Methods A tissue-mimicking phantom was constructed to model leaky tumour vasculature and DCE-MR images of this phantom were acquired. An in vivo study was performed using tumour-bearing rabbits. Co-registered DCE-MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images were acquired. An independent component analysis (ICA)-based method was developed to separate the intravascular component from DCE-MRI. Results were validated by comparing the time-intensity curves with the actual phantom and in vivo curves. Results Phantom study: the AIF extracted using ICA correlated well with the true intravascular curve. In vivo study: the AIFs extracted from DCE-MRI using ICA were very close to the true AIF. Intravascular component images were very similar to the CEUS images. The contrast onset times and initial wash-in slope of the ICA-derived AIF showed good agreement with the CEUS curves. Conclusion ICA has the potential to separate the intravascular component from DCE-MRI. This could eliminate the requirement for contrast medium uptake measurements in a major artery and potentially result in more accurate pharmacokinetic parameters. Key Points • Tumour response to therapy can be inferred from pharmacokinetic parameters . • Arterial input function (AIF) is required for pharmacokinetic modelling of tumours . • Independent component analysis has the potential to measure AIF inside the tumour . • AIF measurement is validated using contrast enhanced ultrasound and phantoms .
Early time points perfusion imaging: Theoretical analysis of correction factors for relative cerebral blood flow estimation given local arterial input function
If local arterial input function (AIF) could be identified, we present a theoretical approach to generate a correction factor based on local AIF for the estimation of relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) under the framework of early time points perfusion imaging (ET). If C(t), the contrast agent bolus concentration signal time course, is used for rCBF estimation in ET, the correction factor for C(t) is the integral of its local AIF. The recipe to apply the correction factor is to divide C(t) by the integral of its local AIF to obtain the correct rCBF. By similar analysis, the correction factor for the maximum derivative (MD1) of C(t) is the maximum signal of AIF and the correction factor for the maximum second derivative (MD2) of C(t) is the maximum derivative of AIF. In the specific case of using normalized gamma-variate function as a model for AIF, the correction factor for C(t) (but not for MD1) at the time to reach the maximum derivative is relatively insensitive to the shape of the local AIF. ► Correction factors for rCBF measurement by ET are derived from the integral of AIF. ► Correction factors may almost be ignored In some gamma variate model settings of AIF. ► Sources of error for rCBF estimation of experimental data are reviewed.