Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Validation of cardiac image-derived input functions for functional PET quantification
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Validation of cardiac image-derived input functions for functional PET quantification
Do you wish to request the book?
Validation of cardiac image-derived input functions for functional PET quantification
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Validation of cardiac image-derived input functions for functional PET quantification
2024
Overview
Purpose
Functional PET (fPET) is a novel technique for studying dynamic changes in brain metabolism and neurotransmitter signaling. Accurate quantification of fPET relies on measuring the arterial input function (AIF), traditionally achieved through invasive arterial blood sampling. While non-invasive image-derived input functions (IDIF) offer an alternative, they suffer from limited spatial resolution and field of view. To overcome these issues, we developed and validated a scan protocol for brain fPET utilizing cardiac IDIF, aiming to mitigate known IDIF limitations.
Methods
Twenty healthy individuals underwent fPET/MR scans using [
18
F]FDG or 6-[
18
F]FDOPA, utilizing bed motion shuttling to capture cardiac IDIF and brain task-induced changes. Arterial and venous blood sampling was used to validate IDIFs. Participants performed a monetary incentive delay task. IDIFs from various blood pools and composites estimated from a linear fit over all IDIF blood pools (3VOI) and further supplemented with venous blood samples (3VOIVB) were compared to the AIF. Quantitative task-specific images from both tracers were compared to assess the performance of each input function to the gold standard.
Results
For both radiotracer cohorts, moderate to high agreement (r: 0.60–0.89) between IDIFs and AIF for both radiotracer cohorts was observed, with further improvement (r: 0.87–0.93) for composite IDIFs (3VOI and 3VOIVB). Both methods showed equivalent quantitative values and high agreement (r: 0.975–0.998) with AIF-derived measurements.
Conclusion
Our proposed protocol enables accurate non-invasive estimation of the input function with full quantification of task-specific changes, addressing the limitations of IDIF for brain imaging by sampling larger blood pools over the thorax. These advancements increase applicability to any PET scanner and clinical research setting by reducing experimental complexity and increasing patient comfort.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Blood
/ Brain
/ Dihydroxyphenylalanine - analogs & derivatives
/ Dopamine
/ Female
/ Females
/ Glucose
/ Heart
/ Humans
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
/ Imaging
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Oncology
/ Original
/ Positron emission tomography
/ Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
/ Sampling
/ Scanners
/ Thorax
