Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients hospitalized with decompensated cirrhosis and a serum albumin level of less than 30 g per liter were randomly assigned to daily albumin infusions to raise the albumin level to 30 g per liter or higher or to standard care. Albumin infusions did not reduce the incidences of infection, kidney dysfunction, and death. More serious adverse events occurred in the albumin group.

Key Words: adrenal, ACTH, cortisol, critical illness

Background Fluid loading with crystalloids is the conventional treatment of major hemorrhage but might tend to create fluid overload. We studied hemodynamic profiles of fluid replacement therapies during major surgical hemorrhage and compared the ability of pulse pressure variation (PPV), plethysmographic variation index (PVI), cardiac output (CO) and Guyton´s approach to detect hypovolemia. Methods In this single center randomized controlled trial, fluid replacement therapy to treat hemorrhage in 42 patients was randomized to consist of either 5% albumin (12 mL/kg) or 20% albumin (3 mL/kg) over 30 min, both completed by Ringer lactate replacing blood loss in a 1:1 ratio, or Ringer solution alone in a 3:1 ratio. Measurements included CO, PPV, PVI, arterial and central venous pressures, heart rate (HR) and subsequent calculation of Guyton´s physiological parameters. CO was measured by an esophageal Doppler probe. Results The Ringer-only fluid program resulted in slight hypovolemia (mean, 313 mL), decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP), increased HR, PPV values and vasopressor requirement. The 5% and 20% albumin programs were more effective in filling the vascular system, as evidenced by higher mean circulatory filling pressure and unchanged or decreased PPV over the 5 h observation period. The 20% albumin increased the systemic vascular resistance and the resistance to venous return. Receiver operating characteristics curves indicated that hypovolemia > 500 mL could only be accurately detected by PPV when 5% albumin was used, that PVI was reliable when Ringer was infused, and that CO indicated the hypovolemia when 20% albumin was administered. Conclusions The trends in PPV, PVI, and CO reflected the changes in intravascular volume, but how well they indicated hypovolemia > 500 mL may differ depending on the choice of infusion fluid. Identifying hypovolemia using non-invasive hemodynamic monitors remains challenging and associated with low predictive values. Trial registration number: NCT05391607, May 26, 2022.

In patients with severe sepsis, albumin replacement in addition to crystalloid administration conferred no benefit, as compared with crystalloids alone, with respect to mortality at 28 or 90 days. Post hoc analysis suggested a possible benefit in patients with septic shock. For decades, human albumin has been administered to patients to provide adequate oncotic pressure and intravascular volume. 1 In 1998, however, a report from the Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers indicated that the administration of albumin may be potentially harmful in critically ill patients, as compared with the administration of crystalloid solutions. 2 Subsequent meta-analyses reported contradictory findings. 3 , 4 To clarify this issue, a large, double-blind, randomized trial (the Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation [SAFE] study) 5 was conducted, in which 4% albumin solution was compared with normal saline as fluid replacement in critically ill patients, with results indicating that albumin administration was . . .

Addition of the anti–PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer significantly prolonged progression-free survival, particularly among those with PD-L1–positive tumors.

PurposeToxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare disease responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IG) therapy in paediatric TSS could improve shock and organ failure, but more consistent efficacy and safety data are needed. Our objective was to determine whether a randomised clinical trial (RCT) assessing intravenous IG in TSS in children is feasible.MethodsWe performed a multicentre, feasibility, double-blind RCT assessing efficacy of high-dose intravenous IG versus albumin 4% (control group) within the first 12 hours of shock onset. Included patients were aged above 1 month and below 18 years with suspected TSS and septic shock. Feasibility was assessed by measuring inclusion rate, protocol compliance and missing data regarding death and the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) Score. Other secondary clinical outcomes were evaluated during hospital stay, at 60 day and 1 year.Results28 patients, admitted in 6 paediatric intensive care units during 36 consecutive months and followed for 1 year, received the allocated treatment: 13 in intravenous IG group, 15 in control group. The median age was 10.6 years and the sex ratio was 1. Inclusion rate was above 50%, protocol deviations were below 30% and missing data regarding death and PELOD-2 Score below 10%. No difference concerning secondary clinical outcomes between groups was observed, and more adverse events were reported in the control group.ConclusionIt seems to be feasible to conduct an RCT assessing intravenous IG efficacy and safety in paediatric TSS but must be realised internationally, with choice of a clinically relevant endpoint and a specific design in order to be realistic.Trial registration number NCT02219165.

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.DesignPhase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial.SettingFour hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022.ParticipantsAdults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.InterventionsPatients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1).Main outcome measuresProgression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population.ResultsThe median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up.ConclusionThe nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

Background This phase I/II study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel ( nab ® -paclitaxel) plus cisplatin as treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods Patients were enrolled into 1 of 3 dose cohorts, each with 21-day treatment cycles: 1) intravenous (IV) nab -paclitaxel 260 mg/m 2 on day 1; 2) IV nab -paclitaxel 140 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8; 3) IV nab -paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15. All patients received IV cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1. Treatment continued for 4–6 cycles, or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. If more than one-third of the patients in a cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose used in the previous cohort would be designated the MTD. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression was detected by immunohistochemistry staining. Results Sixty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 64 and 67 were eligible for efficacy and safety analysis, respectively. Two DLTs occurred in cohort 1 (grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 myalgia), none occurred in cohort 2, and 2 occurred in cohort 3 (both grade 3 fatigue). The MTD was not reached. Partial responses were achieved by 42 patients, 15 had stable disease, and 7 had progressive disease, giving an overall response rate of 66 %. Median progression-free survival was 9 months (95 % CI, 6–12 months). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were mainly hematologic. There was no significant difference between the 3 cohorts with respect to efficacy or safety. Biomarker analyses indicated that stromal, rather than tumoral, SPARC may predict the response to nab-paclitaxel in NPC. Conclusions Our findings suggest that nab -paclitaxel plus cisplatin is a highly active regimen with moderate toxicity for the treatment of metastatic NPC, which warrants further investigation in a phase III study. Trial registrations ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01735409 . The trial was registered on November 20th, 2012.

In metastatic breast cancer, nab-paclitaxel has been shown to significantly increase progression-free survival compared with solvent-based paclitaxel. The GeparSepto (GBG 69) trial assessed whether weekly nab-paclitaxel could increase the proportion of patients achieving pathological complete response compared with weekly solvent-based paclitaxel, both followed by epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment. In a phase 3 randomised trial, we enrolled patients with previously untreated unilateral or bilateral primary invasive breast cancer and randomly assigned them in a 1:1 ratio using dynamic allocation and Pocock minimisation by breast cancer subtype, Ki67 and SPARC expression. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with either intravenous nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 (after study amendment, 125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 for four 3-week cycles, or solvent-based intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 for four 3-week cycles. Taxane treatment was followed in both groups by intravenous epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus intravenous cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 1 for four 3-week cycles. Patients with HER2-positive tumours received concurrent trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (loading dose 8 mg/kg) and pertuzumab 420 mg (loading dose 840 mg) on day 1 of every 3-week cycle. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab were given every 3 weeks concomitantly with chemotherapy for all cycles. This report is the final analysis of the primary endpoint, pathological complete response (ypT0 ypN0), analysed for all patients who started treatment (modified intention to treat). We used a closed test procedure to test for non-inferiority, with the nab-paclitaxel group calculated as non-inferior to the solvent-based paclitaxel group if the lower 95% CI for the OR was above 0·858 (OR equivalent to pathological complete response [33%] minus a 10% non-inferiority margin [3·3%]; 29·7%). We planned to test for superiority only in case of a positive non-inferiority test, using an α of 0·05. Safety was assessed in all patients who received study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01583426. Between July 30, 2012, and Dec 23, 2013, we randomly assigned 1229 women, of whom 1206 started treatment (606 with nab-paclitaxel and 600 with solvent-based paclitaxel). The nab-paclitaxel dose was reduced after enrolment of 464 participants to 125 mg/m2 due to increased treatment discontinuation and sensory neuropathy in this group. Pathological complete response occurred more frequently in the nab-paclitaxel group (233 [38%, 95% CI 35–42] patients) than in the solvent-based paclitaxel group (174 [29%, 25–33] patients; OR 1·53, 95% CI 1·20–1·95; unadjusted p=0·00065). The incidence of grade 3–4 anaemia (13 [2%] of 605 patients in the nab-paclitaxel group vs four [1%] of patients in the solvent-based paclitaxel group; p=0·048) and peripheral sensory neuropathy grade 3–4 (63 [10%] patients receiving any nab-paclitaxel dose; 31 [8%] of patients starting with 125 mg/m2 and 32 [15%] of patients starting with 150 mg/m2; vs 16 [3%] in the solvent-based paclitaxel group, p<0·001) was significantly higher for nab-paclitaxel than for solvent-based paclitaxel. Overall, 283 (23%) patients were noted to have at least one serious adverse event (based on study drug received), 156 (26%) in the nab-paclitaxel group and 127 (21%) in the solvent-based paclitaxel group (p=0·057). There were three deaths (during epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide treatment) in the nab-paclitaxel group (due to sepsis, diarrhoea, and accident unrelated to the trial) versus one in the solvent-based paclitaxel group (during paclitaxel treatment; cardiac failure). Substituting solvent-based paclitaxel with nab-paclitaxel significantly increases the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response rate after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. These results might lead to an exchange of the preferred taxane, solvent-based paclitaxel, for nab-paclitaxel in therapy for primary breast cancer. Celgene, Roche.