Explore the vast range of titles available.

A national audit of accidental awareness under general anaesthesia (where a patient is aware of events despite the intention to administer general anaesthesia) identified TIVA as a risk factor, particularly when unusual techniques were used or equipment checks were incomplete.3 A Cochrane review on cognitive outcomes in older people found that postoperative cognitive dysfunction (a persistent impairment of cognition following surgery) was less likely with propofol-based TIVA,4 and a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials found that propofol based TIVA was associated with a lower incidence of emergence agitation in children.5 At present, we deem it reasonable to consider TIVA and inhalational anaesthesia equivalent from a safety perspective; three major ongoing randomised controlled trials (Vital, expected to conclude in 2026; Vapor-C, expected to conclude in 2026; and Thrive, expected to conclude in 2029) will add further information about the relative risks and benefits of both techniques.6 Evidence for the solution Multiple studies show that TIVA has a lower carbon footprint than inhalational anaesthesia.789 The studies are based on “life cycle analyses,” using 100 year global warming potential to quantify greenhouse gas emissions. Since 2021, the UK’s Royal College of Anaesthetists has specified that anaesthetists should be trained to use TIVA for non-complex cases in the first stage of training;13 further training can be sought for more complex situations. Ce=effect site concentration; Cet=effect site concentration target Anaesthetic teams should ensure that TIVA drugs and equipment are thoroughly checked before use, to minimise the risk of errors. Pharmacokinetic models are less well validated in pregnant women and children, yet these patients arguably have much to gain from TIVA (eg, because of the uterine relaxant qualities of volatile anaesthetics, and the increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and agitation on emergence in paediatric practice).1618 Uncertainties include the pharmacokinetic implications of various pathologies and stages of pregnancy, and wide pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability across the paediatric population.

According to the EU Directive 2010/63, the severity of a procedure has to be classified as mild, moderate or severe. General anesthesia is thought to be mild, but the Directive does not differentiate between single and repeated anesthesia. Therefore, we investigated the impact of repeated administration of isoflurane, the most commonly used inhalation anesthetic, on the well-being of adult C57BL/6JRj mice, in comparison to single administrations and to untreated animals, when applied six times for 45 min at an interval of 3-4 days. For the animals anesthetized, excitations, phases of anesthesia, and vital parameters were monitored. Well-being after anesthesia was assessed using a behavioral test battery including luxury behavior like burrowing and nest building behavior, the Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS), the free exploratory paradigm for anxiety-related behavior, home cage activity and the rotarod test for activity, as well as food intake and body weight. Additionally, hair corticosterone and fecal corticosterone metabolites were measured. Our results show that nest building behavior, home cage activity, body weight, and corticosterone concentrations were not influenced by anesthesia, whereas changes in burrowing behavior, the MGS, food intake, and the free exploratory behavior indicated that the well-being of the mice was more affected by repeated than single isoflurane anesthesia. This effect depended on the sex of the animals, with female mice being more susceptible than male mice. However, repeated isoflurane anesthesia caused only short-term mild distress and impairment of well-being, mainly in the immediate postanesthetic period. Well-being stabilized at 8 days after the last anesthesia, at the latest. Therefore, we conclude that when using our anesthesia protocol, the severity of both single and repeated isoflurane anesthesia in C57BL/6JRj mice can be classified as mild. However, within the mild severity category, repeated isoflurane anesthesia ranks higher than single isoflurane anesthesia. Additionally, our results imply that male and female mice can differently perceive the severity of a procedure.

Orthognathic surgery has a high incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) and vomiting (POV), delaying mobility initiation and postoperative recovery. Bleeding is another risk associated with this surgical procedure. We aimed to compare total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anesthesia in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence and hemodynamic changes. This retrospective study included 82 patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies at Saga University Hospital between April 2016 and April 2021. We compared the effects of TIVA and volatile anesthesia on PONV onset after surgery, acute postoperative hemodynamic changes (blood pressure and heart rate), and factors contributing to PONV. PON was significantly lower in the TIVA group than in the volatile anesthesia group. The total dose of fentanyl contributed to the onset of POV, while the onset of PON was associated with low volumes of fluid infusion and urine in the TIVA and volatile anesthesia groups, respectively. Furthermore, post-extubation hemodynamic change was significantly smaller in the TIVA group than in the volatile anesthesia group. Therefore, TIVA could have a reduced risk of PONV and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Employing TIVA could mitigate perioperative complications and enhance patient safety.

Background The relationship between the type of anesthesia and the survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients is uncertain. This study compared the overall outcome of gastric cancer patients after surgery with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or inhalation anesthesia (IHA). Methods Clinicopathological variables of gastric cancer patients were retrieved from the database of the Surgical Gastric Cancer Patient Registry in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients were grouped according to whether they received TIVA or IHA during the operation. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to balance the baseline variables, and survival outcomes were compared between these two groups. In addition, studies comparing survival outcomes between TIVA and IHA used for gastric cancer surgery and published before April 20th, 2020, were identified, and their data were pooled. Results A total of 2827 patients who underwent surgical treatment from Jan 2009 to Dec 2016 were included. There were 323 patients in the TIVA group and 645 patients in the IHA group, with 1:2 PS matching. There was no significant difference in overall survival outcomes between the TIVA and IHA groups before matching the cohort ( p  = 0.566) or after matching the cohort ( p  = 0.679) by log-rank tests. In the Cox hazard regression model, there was no significant difference between the TIVA and IHA groups before (HR: 1.054, 95% CI: 0.881–1.262, p  = 0.566) or after (HR: 0.957, 95% CI: 0.779–1.177, p  = 0.679) PS matching. The meta-analysis of survival outcomes between the TIVA and IHA groups found critical statistical value in the before PS matching cohort (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57–0.96 p  < 0.01) and after PS matching cohort (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.94, p < 0.01). Conclusions Combined with the results of previous studies, total intravenous anesthesia has been shown to be superior to inhalation anesthesia in terms of overall survival for gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. The selection of intravenous or inhalation anesthesia for gastric cancer surgery should take into account the long-term prognosis of the patient.

Background Improving outcomes after surgery is a major public health research priority for patients, clinicians and the NHS. The greatest burden of perioperative complications, mortality and healthcare costs lies amongst the population of patients aged over 50 years who undergo major non-cardiac surgery. The Volatile vs Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for major non-cardiac surgery (VITAL) trial specifically examines the effect of anaesthetic technique on key patient outcomes: quality of recovery after surgery (quality of recovery after anaesthesia, patient satisfaction and major post-operative complications), survival and patient safety. Methods A multi-centre pragmatic efficient randomised trial with health economic evaluation comparing total intravenous anaesthesia with volatile-based anaesthesia in adults (aged 50 and over) undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. Discussion Given the very large number of patients exposed to general anaesthesia every year, even small differences in outcome between the two techniques could result in substantial excess harm. Results from the VITAL trial will ensure patients can benefit from the very safest anaesthesia care, promoting an early return home, reducing healthcare costs and maximising the health benefits of surgical treatments. Trial registration ISRCTN62903453. September 09, 2021.

Brain tumors and craniotomy surgeries can induce both systemic and neuronal inflammation. Currently, there is a limited amount of literature addressing the influence of anesthetic agents on neuronal and systemic inflammation in neurosurgical settings and its impact on the occurrence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PND). Our primary objective is to assess the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia (INHA) with respect to the levels of perioperative inflammatory markers, specifically neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumor surgery. Our secondary objective is to evaluate the correlation of neuronal, systemic inflammatory markers, and the incidence of PND and functional outcomes in patients receiving TIVA versus INHA for supratentorial tumor surgeries. This study protocol details the methodology of a prospective, randomized, and single-center trial approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India. The study focuses on patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial glioma decompression. Assessing changes in the biomarker level is the primary objective and correlation of this change in biomarker with PND and functional outcome is our secondary objective. The sample size of 45 patients in each group was calculated using n master software by considering alpha of 5%, power of 80%, a mean difference of 79.2 between the groups, and an effect size of 0.603. We describe the study protocol of the single-center trial. The first patient was recruited on September 17, 2023, and we will complete recruitment before March 2025. Our study is expected to inform the impact of anesthesia technique on the biomarkers of the inflammation and consequently PND. Knowledge about this will help the anesthesiologist to select the appropriate anesthetic drug in their clinical practice.

Perioperative factors are probably essential for different oncological outcomes. This systematic review investigates the literature concerning overall mortality and postoperative complications after cancer surgery with inhalational (INHA) and intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). A search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, including studies with patients undergoing surgery for cancer and where TIVA was compared with INHA. Two investigators identified relevant papers in the databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Risks of bias assessment tools from the Cochrane Collaboration were used for evaluating quality of evidence. Eight studies with a total of 10,696 patients were included. Four studies reported data regarding overall mortality and four studies reported data regarding postoperative complications. Evidence was evaluated to be of moderate to serious risk of bias. Three retrospective studies presented a hazard ratio (HR) adjusting for several confounders. One study reported an increased overall mortality after INHA with a HR of 1.47 (95% CI 1.31–1.64, p≤0.001), while another study reported a tendency of decreased overall mortality after TIVA (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72–1.00, p=0.051). A third study showed no difference in the overall mortality, but prolonged recurrence-free survival after TIVA with a HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.27–0.86, p=0.014). In one study, the rate of pulmonary complications was significantly higher after INHA compared with TIVA, while other postoperative complications were comparable. There are currently four propensity-adjusted retrospective studies indicating that TIVA might be the preferred anesthetic choice in cancer surgery. However, evidence is currently of low quality and randomized clinical trials are required for further investigation. •The perioperative period is a window of opportunity for micro-metastatic processes.•Anesthetic agents are proposed to modulate anti-metastatic immunologic mechanisms.•Inhalational anesthesia may increase overall mortality after cancer surgery.•Inhalational anesthesia may reduce recurrence-free survival after cancer surgery.•Current evidence lacks high quality randomized studies.

Sevoflurane, a commonly used anesthetic, may cause agitation in patients. However, the mechanism underlying this clinical observation remains largely unknown. We thus assessed the effects of sevoflurane on neuronal activation and behaviors in mice. Ten-day-old mice received 2% sevoflurane, 1% isoflurane, or 6% desflurane for 10 minutes. The behavioral activities were recorded and evaluated at one minute after the loss of righting reflex in the mice, which was about two minutes after the anesthetic administration. The neuronal activation was evaluated by c-Fos expression and calcium imaging at one minute after the anesthetic administration. Propofol, which reduces neuronal activation, was used to determine the cause-and-effect of sevoflurane. We found that sevoflurane caused an increase in neuronal activation in primary somatosensory cortex of young mice and behavioral hyperactivity in the mice at one minute after the loss of righting reflex. Desflurane did not induce behavioral hyperactivity and isoflurane only caused behavioral hyperactivity with borderline significance. Finally, propofol attenuated the sevoflurane-induced increase in neuronal activation and behavioral hyperactivity in young mice. These results demonstrate an unexpected sevoflurane-induced increase in neuronal activation and behavioral hyperactivity in young mice. These findings suggest the potential mechanisms underlying the sevoflurane-induced agitation and will promote future studies to further determine whether anesthetics can induce behavioral hyperactivity via increasing neuronal activation.

To compare the use of inhalation versus intravenous anaesthesia for adults undergoing on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. A systematic review. A hospital-affiliated university. The following databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 10), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (from inception to October 2016). We used the GRADE approach to rate overall certainty of the evidence. In total we included 58 studies with a total of 6105 participants. The methodological quality was difficult to assess as it was poorly reported in 35 included studies (three or more domains were rated as unclear risk of bias). Two trials of sevoflurane showed a statistically significant reduction in death within 180 to 365days of surgery (on-pump) (RR 4.10, 95% CI 1.42 to 11.79; p=0.009; I2=not applicable; high quality of evidence). There was also a statistically significant difference favouring sevoflurane compared to propofol on both inotropic (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.90; p<0.00001; I2=0%) and vasoconstrictor support needed (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.22; p=0.03; I2=0%) after coronary artery bypass grafting on-pump. Two trials of sevoflurane (MD −0.22, 95% CI −0.41 to −0.03; p=0.02; I2=0%) and two further trials of desflurane (MD −0.33, 95% CI −0.45 to −0.20; p<0.00001; I2=82%) showed a statistically significant difference on cardiac index during and after coronary artery bypass grafting on-pump, respectively. There is high quality evidence that sevoflurane reduces death within 180 to 365days of surgery and, inotropic and vasoconstrictor support compared to propofol for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. There is also some evidence showing that the cardiac index is minimally influenced by administration of sevoflurane and desflurane compared to propofol. •Inhalation anaesthetics have been shown to depress myocardial contractility in animal and human studies.•High quality evidence suggested a reduction in death within 180 to 365days of surgery with sevoflurane.•Results also suggested a significantly reduction in both inotropic and vasoconstrictor support needed with sevoflurane.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is commonly performed under total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or balanced anaesthesia using an intravenous and inhalation agent. It is still unclear which anaesthesia regimen is better for this group of patients. The present study has been conducted to compare the use of the inhalation anaesthesia technique using desflurane with the TIVA technique, using propofol and dexmedetomidine. Prospective, randomised, double-blinded study. Menoufia Univeristy Hospital. This randomised trial was carried out on 100 morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The patients were randomised into two equally sized groups; one group received the inhalation anaesthesia technique and the other received the TIVA technique. All patients received general anaesthesia, which was induced by propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium. Anaesthesia was maintained using desflurane in oxygen air mixture in the inhalation group, whilst anaesthesia was maintained by intravenous infusion of propofol and dexmedetomidine in the TIVA group. Intra-operative vital signs, anaesthesia recovery time, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain score, post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay time, total first 24h post-operative analgesic needs and the onset of first bowel movement were recorded. Main results The TIVA group had lower intra-operative heart rates and mean arterial blood pressure (P<0.0001). The TIVA group also had a lower post-operative visual analogue score for pain assessment (VAS) (P<0.0001), lower total analgesic requirements (P<0.0001), a lower incidence of nausea (P=0.01) and vomiting (P=0.03), and shorter PACU stays (P=0.01). There was no significant difference between groups with regard to the onset of bowel movement (P=0.16). TIVA using propofol and dexmedetomidine is a better anaesthetic regimen than inhalation anaesthesia using desflurane for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients. The TIVA technique provided better postoperative recovery with fewer postoperative side effects and analgesic requirements. NCT03029715. •TIVA using propofol and dexmedetomidine is a safe anaesthetic technique for morbidly obese undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.•TIVA technique can maintain a stable intraoperative haemodynamics.•TIVA can provide better postoperative recovery with fewer postoperative side effects and analgesic requirements.