Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a large trial, the estimated incidence of stroke, systemic embolism, hemorrhage, or death was 2.8 percentage points lower to 0.5 percentage points higher with early than with later use of direct oral anticoagulants.

In a randomized trial, patients with severe Covid-19 were assigned to receive either therapeutic-dose anticoagulation or usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. At 21 days, therapeutic-dose anticoagulation did not improve hospital survival or the number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support.

In a randomized trial, patients with moderately severe Covid-19 were assigned to receive either therapeutic-dose anticoagulation or usual-care thromboprophylaxis. At 21 days, therapeutic-dose anticoagulation resulted in a higher probability of survival until hospital discharge without organ support.

In patients with venous thromboembolism at high risk of recurrence for whom extended treatment with direct oral anticoagulants has been indicated, the optimal dose is unknown. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of reduced-dose versus full-dose direct oral anticoagulants in patients in whom extended anticoagulation has been indicated. RENOVE was a non-inferiority, investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial done in 47 hospitals in France. Ambulatory patients aged 18 years or older with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or proximal deep vein thrombosis) who had received 6–24 uninterrupted months of full-dose anticoagulation and for whom extended anticoagulation has been indicated were eligible. Eligible participants were categorised as having either a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism, recurrent venous thromboembolism, presence of persistent risk factors, or other clinical situations considered to be a high risk of recurrence. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral treatment with either a reduced dose of apixaban (2·5 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) or a full dose of apixaban (5 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) using a centralised randomisation procedure with an interactive web response system. The sequence generation method was a computerised random number generator and was balanced by blocks of different sizes. Randomisation was stratified by centre, type of direct oral anticoagulant, and antiplatelet drug. Physicians and participants were unmasked to treatment allocation; recurrent venous thromboembolism, clinically relevant bleeding, and all-cause death were adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, including recurrent fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism or isolated proximal deep vein thrombosis (non-inferiority hypothesis 90% power to exclude a hazard ratio [HR] of 1·7). The primary outcome and first two secondary outcomes were included in a hierarchical testing procedure. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03285438. From Nov 2, 2017, to July 6, 2022, 2768 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the reduced-dose group (n=1383) or the full-dose group (n=1385). 970 (35·0%) participants were female, 1797 (65·0%) were male, and one (<0·1%) had sex not reported. Median follow-up was 37·1 months (IQR 24·0–48·3). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 19 of 1383 patients in the reduced-dose group (5-year cumulative incidence 2·2% [95% CI 1·1–3·3]) versus 15 of 1385 patients in the full-dose group (5-year cumulative incidence 1·8% [0·8–2·7]; adjusted HR 1·32 [95% CI 0·67–2·60]; absolute difference 0·40% [95% CI –1·05 to 1·85]; p=0·23 for non-inferiority). Major or clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 96 patients in the reduced-dose group (5-year cumulative incidence 9·9% [95% CI 7·7–12·1]) and 154 patients in the full-dose group (5-year cumulative incidence 15·2% [12·8–17·6]; adjusted HR 0·61 [95% CI 0·48–0·79]). 1136 (82·1%) of 1383 patients in the reduced-dose group and 1150 (83·0%) of 1385 in the full-dose group had an adverse event; 374 (27·0%) patients in the reduced-dose group and 420 (30·3%) in the full-dose group has a serious adverse event. 35 (5-year cumulative incidence 4·3% [95% CI 2·6–6·0]) patients in the reduced-dose group and 54 (5-year cumulative incidence 6·1% [4·3–8·0]) patients in the full-dose group died during the study period. In patients with venous thromboembolism requiring extended anticoagulation, reduction of the direct oral anticoagulant dose did not meet the non-inferiority criteria. However, the low recurrence rates in both groups and substantial reduction of clinically relevant bleeding with the reduced dose could support this regimen as an option. Further research will be needed to identify subgroups for whom the anticoagulation dose should not be reduced. French Ministry of Health.

In a randomized trial, oral apixaban was noninferior to a low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin, in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism at 6 months in patients with cancer. The use of apixaban was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding than dalteparin, even in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

In patients undergoing total knee replacement, a single injection of abelacimab (an antibody to factor XI) administered postoperatively was superior to standard care with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Bleeding events were rare.

Four new oral anticoagulants compare favourably with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, the balance between efficacy and safety in subgroups needs better definition. We aimed to assess the relative benefit of new oral anticoagulants in key subgroups, and the effects on important secondary outcomes. We searched Medline from Jan 1, 2009, to Nov 19, 2013, limiting searches to phase 3, randomised trials of patients with atrial fibrillation who were randomised to receive new oral anticoagulants or warfarin, and trials in which both efficacy and safety outcomes were reported. We did a prespecified meta-analysis of all 71 683 participants included in the RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE AF–TIMI 48 trials. The main outcomes were stroke and systemic embolic events, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. We calculated relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for each outcome. We did subgroup analyses to assess whether differences in patient and trial characteristics affected outcomes. We used a random-effects model to compare pooled outcomes and tested for heterogeneity. 42 411 participants received a new oral anticoagulant and 29 272 participants received warfarin. New oral anticoagulants significantly reduced stroke or systemic embolic events by 19% compared with warfarin (RR 0·81, 95% CI 0·73–0·91; p<0·0001), mainly driven by a reduction in haemorrhagic stroke (0·49, 0·38–0·64; p<0·0001). New oral anticoagulants also significantly reduced all-cause mortality (0·90, 0·85–0·95; p=0·0003) and intracranial haemorrhage (0·48, 0·39–0·59; p<0·0001), but increased gastrointestinal bleeding (1·25, 1·01–1·55; p=0·04). We noted no heterogeneity for stroke or systemic embolic events in important subgroups, but there was a greater relative reduction in major bleeding with new oral anticoagulants when the centre-based time in therapeutic range was less than 66% than when it was 66% or more (0·69, 0·59–0·81 vs 0·93, 0·76–1·13; p for interaction 0·022). Low-dose new oral anticoagulant regimens showed similar overall reductions in stroke or systemic embolic events to warfarin (1·03, 0·84–1·27; p=0·74), and a more favourable bleeding profile (0·65, 0·43–1·00; p=0·05), but significantly more ischaemic strokes (1·28, 1·02–1·60; p=0·045). This meta-analysis is the first to include data for all four new oral anticoagulants studied in the pivotal phase 3 clinical trials for stroke prevention or systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. New oral anticoagulants had a favourable risk–benefit profile, with significant reductions in stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality, and with similar major bleeding as for warfarin, but increased gastrointestinal bleeding. The relative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants was consistent across a wide range of patients. Our findings offer clinicians a more comprehensive picture of the new oral anticoagulants as a therapeutic option to reduce the risk of stroke in this patient population. None.

In this multicenter trial, the oral factor Xa inhibitor apixaban was compared with enoxaparin and warfarin for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Apixaban was noninferior to enoxaparin and warfarin with respect to efficacy and superior with respect to safety. Venous thromboembolism, with an annual incidence of 1 to 2 cases per 1000 persons in the general population, is the third most common cause of vascular death after myocardial infarction and stroke. 1 Conventional treatment consists of a parenteral anticoagulant, such as enoxaparin, for at least 5 days, and warfarin begun during this time and continued for at least 3 months. 2 Although effective, this regimen presents a challenge because enoxaparin requires daily subcutaneous injections, and warfarin therapy requires coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. Apixaban is an oral factor Xa inhibitor with a rapid onset of action and predictable pharmacokinetics that allow . . .

A randomized trial of the factor XIa inhibitor asundexian was stopped early owing to a higher incidence of stroke or systemic embolism than with apixaban therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation.

In this trial, patients with atrial fibrillation who required warfarin interruption for an elective procedure were assigned to either bridging anticoagulation or placebo. Forgoing bridging was noninferior to bridging for arterial thromboembolism and superior for major bleeding. For patients with atrial fibrillation who are receiving warfarin and require an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure, the need for bridging anticoagulation during perioperative interruption of warfarin treatment has long been uncertain. 1 – 3 Each year, this common clinical scenario affects approximately one in six warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. 4 , 5 Warfarin treatment is typically stopped 5 days before an elective procedure to allow its anticoagulant effect to wane; it is resumed after the procedure, when hemostasis is secured, at which point 5 to 10 days of treatment is required to attain therapeutic anticoagulation. 6 , 7 During the interruption of . . .