Explore the vast range of titles available.

BACKGROUNDVaccines that block human-to-mosquito Plasmodium transmission are needed for malaria eradication, and clinical trials have targeted zygote antigen Pfs25 for decades. We reported that a Pfs25 protein-protein conjugate vaccine formulated in alum adjuvant induced serum functional activity in both US and Malian adults. However, antibody levels declined rapidly, and transmission-reducing activity required 4 vaccine doses. Functional immunogenicity and durability must be improved before advancing transmission-blocking vaccines further in clinical development. We hypothesized that the prefertilization protein Pfs230 alone or in combination with Pfs25 would improve functional activity.METHODSTransmission-blocking vaccine candidates based on gamete antigen Pfs230 or Pfs25 were conjugated with Exoprotein A, formulated in Alhydrogel, and administered to mice, rhesus macaques, and humans. Antibody levels were measured by ELISA and transmission-reducing activity was assessed by the standard membrane feeding assay.RESULTSPfs25-EPA/Alhydrogel and Pfs230D1-EPA/Alhydrogel induced similar serum functional activity in mice, but Pfs230D1-EPA induced significantly greater activity in rhesus monkeys that was enhanced by complement. In US adults, 2 vaccine doses induced complement-dependent activity in 4 of 5 Pfs230D1-EPA/Alhydrogel recipients but no significant activity in 5 Pfs25-EPA recipients, and combination with Pfs25-EPA did not increase activity over Pfs230D1-EPA alone.CONCLUSIONThe complement-dependent functional immunogenicity of Pfs230D1-EPA represents a significant improvement over Pfs25-EPA in this comparative study. The rhesus model is more predictive of the functional human immune response to Pfs230D1 than is the mouse model.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02334462.FUNDINGIntramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

RTS,S/AS01E has been tested in a phase 3 malaria vaccine study with partial efficacy in African children and infants. In a cohort of 1028 subjects from one low (Bagomoyo) and two high (Nanoro, Kintampo) malaria transmission sites, we analysed IgG plasma/serum concentration and avidity to CSP (NANP-repeat and C-terminal domains) after a 3-dose vaccination against time to clinical malaria events during 12-months. Here we report that RTS,S/AS01E induces substantial increases in IgG levels from pre- to post-vaccination ( p  < 0.001), higher in NANP than C-terminus (2855 vs 1297 proportional change between means), and higher concentrations and avidities in children than infants ( p  < 0.001). Baseline CSP IgG levels are elevated in malaria cases than controls ( p  < 0.001). Both, IgG magnitude to NANP (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.61 [0.48–0.76]) and avidity to C-terminus (0.07 [0.05–0.90]) post-vaccination are significantly associated with vaccine efficacy. IgG avidity to the C-terminus emerges as a significant contributor to RTS,S/AS01E-mediated protection. RTS,S/AS01E has been tested in a phase 3 malaria vaccine trial and has shown partial efficacy in children and infants. Here, the authors analyze IgG concentration and avidity to CSP in ~1000 participants and show that IgG avidity to the C-terminus of CSP is significantly associated with vaccine-mediated protection.

In a previous Phase 1/2b malaria vaccine trial testing the 3D7 isoform of the malaria vaccine candidate Merozoite surface protein 2 (MSP2), parasite densities in children were reduced by 62%. However, breakthrough parasitemias were disproportionately of the alternate dimorphic form of MSP2, the FC27 genotype. We therefore undertook a dose-escalating, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase 1 trial in healthy, malaria-naïve adults of MSP2-C1, a vaccine containing recombinant forms of the two families of msp2 alleles, 3D7 and FC27 (EcMSP2-3D7 and EcMSP2-FC27), formulated in equal amounts with Montanide® ISA 720 as a water-in-oil emulsion. The trial was designed to include three dose cohorts (10, 40, and 80 µg), each with twelve subjects receiving the vaccine and three control subjects receiving Montanide® ISA 720 adjuvant emulsion alone, in a schedule of three doses at 12-week intervals. Due to unexpected local reactogenicity and concern regarding vaccine stability, the trial was terminated after the second immunisation of the cohort receiving the 40 µg dose; no subjects received the 80 µg dose. Immunization induced significant IgG responses to both isoforms of MSP2 in the 10 µg and 40 µg dose cohorts, with antibody levels by ELISA higher in the 40 µg cohort. Vaccine-induced antibodies recognised native protein by Western blots of parasite protein extracts and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Although the induced anti-MSP2 antibodies did not directly inhibit parasite growth in vitro, IgG from the majority of individuals tested caused significant antibody-dependent cellular inhibition (ADCI) of parasite growth. As the majority of subjects vaccinated with MSP2-C1 developed an antibody responses to both forms of MSP2, and that these antibodies mediated ADCI provide further support for MSP2 as a malaria vaccine candidate. However, in view of the reactogenicity of this formulation, further clinical development of MSP2-C1 will require formulation of MSP2 in an alternative adjuvant. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12607000552482.

GMZ2 is a recombinant malaria vaccine inducing immune responses against Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) merozoite surface protein-3 and glutamate-rich protein. We used standardized controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) to assess the efficacy of this asexual blood-stage vaccine. We vaccinated 50 healthy, adult volunteers with lifelong exposure to Pf 3 times, at 4-week intervals, with 30 or 100 µg GMZ2 formulated in CAF01, a liposome-based adjuvant; 100 µg GMZ2, formulated in Alhydrogel; or a control vaccine (Verorab). Approximately 13 weeks after the last vaccination, 35/50 volunteers underwent CHMI by direct venous inoculation of 3200 Pf sporozoites (Sanaria® PfSPZ Challenge). Adverse events were similarly distributed between GMZ2 and control vaccinees. Baseline-corrected anti-GMZ2 antibody concentrations 4 weeks after the last vaccination were higher in all 3 GMZ2-vaccinated arms, compared to the control group. All GMZ2 formulations induced similar antibody levels. CHMI resulted in 29/34 (85%) volunteers with Pf parasitemia and 15/34 (44%) with malaria (parasitemia and symptoms). The proportion of participants with malaria (2/5 control, 6/10 GMZ2-Alhydrogel, 2/8 30 µg GMZ2-CAF01, and 5/11 100 µg GMZ2-CAF01) and the time it took them to develop malaria were similar in all groups. Baseline, vaccine-specific antibody concentrations were associated with protection against malaria. GMZ2 is well tolerated and immunogenic in lifelong-Pf-exposed adults from Gabon, with similar antibody responses regardless of formulation. CHMI showed no protective effect of prior vaccination with GMZ2, although baseline, vaccine-specific antibody concentrations were associated with protection. CHMI with the PfSPZ Challenge is a potent new tool to validate asexual, blood-stage malaria vaccines in Africa. Pan-African Clinical Trials: PACTR201503001038304.

Two pre-erythrocytic vaccines (R21/Matrix-M and RTS,S/AS01) are now approved for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. However, neither induces blood-stage immunity against parasites that break through from the liver. RH5.1/Matrix-M, a blood-stage P falciparum malaria vaccine candidate, was highly immunogenic in Tanzanian adults and children. We therefore assessed the safety and efficacy of RH5.1/Matrix-M in Burkinabe children. In this double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial, RH5.1/Matrix-M was given to children aged 5–17 months in Nanoro, Burkina Faso, a seasonal malaria transmission setting. Children received either three intramuscular vaccinations with 10 μg RH5.1 protein with 50 μg Matrix-M adjuvant or three doses of rabies control vaccine, Rabivax-S, given either in a delayed third-dose (0, 1, and 5 month) regimen (first cohort) or a 0, 1, and 2 month regimen (second cohort). Vaccinations were completed part way through the malaria season. Children were randomly assigned 2:1 within each cohort to receive RH5.1/Matrix-M or Rabivax-S. Participants were assigned according to a random allocation list generated by an independent statistician using block randomisation with variable block sizes. Participants, their families, and the study teams were masked to group allocation; only pharmacists who prepared the vaccines were unmasked. Vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy were evaluated. The coprimary outcomes assessed were: first, the safety and reactogenicity of RH5.1/Matrix-M; and second, the protective efficacy of RH5.1/Matrix-M against clinical malaria (measured as time to first episode of clinical malaria, using a Cox regression model) from 14 days to 6 months after the third vaccination in the per-protocol sample. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05790889). From April 6 to 13 and July 3 to 7, 2023, 412 children aged 5–17 months were screened, and 51 were excluded. A total of 361 children were enrolled in this study. In the first cohort, 119 were assigned to the RH5.1/Matrix-M delayed third-dose group, and 62 to the equivalent rabies control group. The second cohort included 120 children in the monthly RH5.1/Matrix-M group and 60 in the equivalent rabies control group. The final vaccination was administered to all groups from Sept 4 to 21, 2023. RH5.1/Matrix-M in both cohorts had a favourable safety profile and was well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild, with the most common being local swelling and fever. No serious adverse events were reported. Comparing the RH5.1/Matrix-M delayed third-dose regimen with the pooled control groups resulted in a vaccine efficacy of 55% (95% CI 20 to 75%; p=0·0071). The same analysis showed a vaccine efficacy of 40% (–3 to 65%; p=0·066) when comparing the monthly regimen with the pooled control groups. Participants vaccinated with RH5.1/Matrix-M in both cohorts showed high concentrations of anti-RH5.1 serum IgG antibodies 14 days after the third vaccination, and the purified IgG showed high levels of in vitro growth inhibition activity against P falciparum; these responses were higher in patients who received the RH5.1/Matrix-M vaccine delayed third-dose regimen, as opposed to monthly regimen (growth inhibition activity 79·0% [SD 14·3] vs 74·2% [SD 15·9]; p=0·016). RH5.1/Matrix-M appears safe and highly immunogenic in African children and shows promising efficacy against clinical malaria when given in a delayed third-dose regimen. This trial is ongoing to further monitor efficacy over time. The European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, the UK Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the US Agency for International Development, and the Wellcome Trust.

A three-antigen DNA-prime/chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) boost vaccine containing pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) circumsporozoite protein (CSP), Pf apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1) and malaria multiple epitopes (ME) fused to Pf thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (ME-TRAP) elicited higher vaccine efficacy (VE) in an open label, randomized Phase 1 trial against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) than the two-antigen vaccine DNA/Human Adenovirus 5 (HuAd5) containing CSP and AMA1. The objective of this follow-up study was to determine whether responses to CSP, AMA1 or TRAP MHC Class I-restricted epitopes were associated with VE. Protected (n = 6) and non-protected participants (n = 26) were screened in FluoroSpot interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and Granzyme B (GzB) assays using antigen-specific 15mer peptide subpools spanning CSP (n = 9 subpools), AMA1 (n = 12 subpools), and TRAP (n = 11 subpools). Individual antigen-specific 15mers in the subpools with strong responses were then deconvoluted, evaluated for activities, and MHC Class I-restricted epitopes within the active 15mers were predicted using NetMHCpan algorithms. The predicted epitopes were synthesized and evaluated in the FluoroSpot IFN-γ and GzB assays. Protected and some non-protected participants had similar responses to individual antigen-specific peptide subpools, which did not distinguish only protected participants. However, deconvoluted antigen-specific positive subpools with high magnitudes of responses revealed individual 15mer peptides containing specific and/or predicted MHC Class I (HLA) epitopes. Responses to epitopes were either IFN-γ-only, IFN-γ and GzB, or GzB-only. Due to limitation of cells, most of the analysis concentrated on the identification of protection associated AMA1 epitopes, since most of the predominant pool specific responses were generated against AMA1 15mer subpools. Furthermore, we previously identified protection associated HLA class I-restricted epitopes in a previous gene-based vaccine trial. Seven predicted minimal epitopes in AMA1 were synthesized and upon testing, five recalled responses from protected participants confirming their possible contribution and association with protection, and two recalled responses from non-protected participants. Two protection-associated epitopes were promiscuous and may have also contributed to protection by recognition of different HLA alleles. In addition, strongly positive antigen-specific 15mers identified within active antigen-specific subpools contained 39 predicted but not tested epitopes were identified in CSP, AMA1 and TRAP. Finally, some non-protected individuals recognized HLA-matched protection-associated minimal epitopes and we discuss possible reasons. Other factors such as HLA allele fine specificity or interaction between other HLA alleles in same individual may also influence protective efficacy. This integrated approach using immunoassays and bioinformatics identified and confirmed AMA1-MHC Class I-restricted epitopes and a list of predicted additional epitopes which could be evaluated in future studies to assess possible association with protection against CHMI in the Phase 1 trial participants. The results suggest that identification of protection-associated epitopes within malaria antigens is feasible and can help design potent next generation multi-antigen, multi-epitope malaria vaccines for a genetically diverse population and to develop robust assays to measure protective cellular immunity against pre-erythrocytic stages of malaria. This approach can be used to develop vaccines for other novel emerging infectious disease pathogens.

Pfs25 and Pvs25, surface proteins of mosquito stage of the malaria parasites P. falciparum and P. vivax, respectively, are leading candidates for vaccines preventing malaria transmission by mosquitoes. This single blinded, dose escalating, controlled Phase 1 study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant Pfs25 and Pvs25 formulated with Montanide ISA 51, a water-in-oil emulsion. The trial was conducted at The Johns Hopkins Center for Immunization Research, Washington DC, USA, between May 16, 2005-April 30, 2007. The trial was designed to enroll 72 healthy male and non-pregnant female volunteers into 1 group to receive adjuvant control and 6 groups to receive escalating doses of the vaccines. Due to unexpected reactogenicity, the vaccination was halted and only 36 volunteers were enrolled into 4 groups: 3 groups of 10 volunteers each were immunized with 5 microg of Pfs25/ISA 51, 5 microg of Pvs25/ISA 51, or 20 microg of Pvs25/ISA 51, respectively. A fourth group of 6 volunteers received adjuvant control (PBS/ISA 51). Frequent local reactogenicity was observed. Systemic adverse events included two cases of erythema nodosum considered to be probably related to the combination of the antigen and the adjuvant. Significant antibody responses were detected in volunteers who completed the lowest scheduled doses of Pfs25/ISA 51. Serum anti-Pfs25 levels correlated with transmission blocking activity. It is feasible to induce transmission blocking immunity in humans using the Pfs25/ISA 51 vaccine, but these vaccines are unexpectedly reactogenic for further development. This is the first report that the formulation is associated with systemic adverse events including erythema nodosum. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00295581.

Several interventional strategies have been implemented in malaria endemic areas where the burden is high, that include among others, intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), a tactic that blocks transmission and can reduce disease morbidity. However, the implementation IPT strategies raises a genuine concern, intervening the development of naturally acquired immunity to malaria which requires continuous contact with parasite antigens. This study investigated whether dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) IPT in schoolchildren (IPTsc) impairs IgG reactivity to six malaria antigens. An IPTsc trial in north-eastern Tanzania administered three doses of DP or ASAQ at four-monthly intervals and the schoolchildren were followed up. This study compared IgG reactivity against GLURP-R2, MSP1, MSP3, and CIDR domains (CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4, and CIDRa1.5) of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP-1) in intervention and control groups using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. During the study, 369 schoolchildren were available for analysis, 119, 134 and 116 participants in the control, DP and ASAQ groups, respectively. Breadth of malaria antigen recognition increased significantly during and after the intervention phases and did not differ between the study groups (Trend test: DP, z-score = 5.92, p < 0.001, ASAQ, z-score = 6.64, p < 0.001 and control, z-score = 5.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the control and ASAQ group in the recognition of any of the tested antigens at all visits. In the DP group, however, during the intervention period IPTsc did not impair antibody against MSP1, MSP3, CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4 and CIDRa1.5, but it did impair against GLURP-R2. The current study has shown that effective IPTsc with DP or ASAQ does not interfere with the development of antibodies against malaria antigens of the blood stages, suggesting that the advancement of naturally acquired immunity to malaria is not impeded by IPTsc interventions.

Gene-based vaccination using prime/boost regimens protects animals and humans against malaria, inducing cell-mediated responses that in animal models target liver stage malaria parasites. We tested a DNA prime/adenovirus boost malaria vaccine in a Phase 1 clinical trial with controlled human malaria infection. The vaccine regimen was three monthly doses of two DNA plasmids (DNA) followed four months later by a single boost with two non-replicating human serotype 5 adenovirus vectors (Ad). The constructs encoded genes expressing P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1). The regimen was safe and well-tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events that occurred at the site of injection. Only one AE (diarrhea), possibly related to immunization, was severe (Grade 3), preventing daily activities. Four weeks after the Ad boost, 15 study subjects were challenged with P. falciparum sporozoites by mosquito bite, and four (27%) were sterilely protected. Antibody responses by ELISA rose after Ad boost but were low (CSP geometric mean titer 210, range 44-817; AMA1 geometric mean micrograms/milliliter 11.9, range 1.5-102) and were not associated with protection. Ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot responses after Ad boost were modest (CSP geometric mean spot forming cells/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells 86, range 13-408; AMA1 348, range 88-1270) and were highest in three protected subjects. ELISpot responses to AMA1 were significantly associated with protection (p = 0.019). Flow cytometry identified predominant IFN-γ mono-secreting CD8+ T cell responses in three protected subjects. No subjects with high pre-existing anti-Ad5 neutralizing antibodies were protected but the association was not statistically significant. The DNA/Ad regimen provided the highest sterile immunity achieved against malaria following immunization with a gene-based subunit vaccine (27%). Protection was associated with cell-mediated immunity to AMA1, with CSP probably contributing. Substituting a low seroprevalence vector for Ad5 and supplementing CSP/AMA1 with additional antigens may improve protection. ClinicalTrials.govNCT00870987.

In this study of 400 children in Mali, an adjuvanted vaccine based on an apical membrane antigen 1 from the 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum (a blood-stage antigen) showed some strain-specific activity in preventing clinical malaria. An effective malaria vaccine would improve the prospects for eradicating malaria. 1 Vaccines that interrupt the transmission of malaria are emphasized in discussions of eradication, 2 but the ideal malaria vaccine would provide a direct clinical benefit. Vaccines targeting the blood stages of malaria are intended to reduce morbidity and mortality and are being developed in hopes of creating a multistage, multiantigen vaccine. 3 Vaccines based on two polymorphic Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage proteins, merozoite surface protein 1 4 and apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1), 5 were not shown to be effective in recent studies, probably because of insufficient cross-protection against diverse malaria strains 6 , 7 or . . .