Explore the vast range of titles available.

Artemisinin and partner-drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum are major threats to malaria control and elimination. Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies (TACTs), which combine existing co-formulated ACTs with a second partner drug that is slowly eliminated, might provide effective treatment and delay emergence of antimalarial drug resistance. In this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, we recruited patients with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria at 18 hospitals and health clinics in eight countries. Eligible patients were aged 2–65 years, with acute, uncomplicated P falciparum malaria alone or mixed with non-falciparum species, and a temperature of 37·5°C or higher, or a history of fever in the past 24 h. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two treatments using block randomisation, depending on their location: in Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Myanmar patients were assigned to either dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine or dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine; at three sites in Cambodia they were assigned to either artesunate–mefloquine or dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine; and in Laos, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo they were assigned to either artemether–lumefantrine or artemether–lumefantrine plus amodiaquine. All drugs were administered orally and doses varied by drug combination and site. Patients were followed-up weekly for 42 days. The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined by 42-day PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. A detailed assessment of safety and tolerability of the study drugs was done in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02453308, and is complete. Between Aug 7, 2015, and Feb 8, 2018, 1100 patients were given either dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (183 [17%]), dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine (269 [24%]), artesunate–mefloquine (73 [7%]), artemether–lumefantrine (289 [26%]), or artemether–lumefantrine plus amodiaquine (286 [26%]). The median age was 23 years (IQR 13 to 34) and 854 (78%) of 1100 patients were male. In Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam the 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy after dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine was 98% (149 of 152; 95% CI 94 to 100) and after dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine was 48% (67 of 141; 95% CI 39 to 56; risk difference 51%, 95% CI 42 to 59; p<0·0001). Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine in the three sites in Myanmar was 91% (42 of 46; 95% CI 79 to 98) versus 100% (42 of 42; 95% CI 92 to 100) after dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (risk difference 9%, 95% CI 1 to 17; p=0·12). The 42-day PCR corrected efficacy of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine (96% [68 of 71; 95% CI 88 to 99]) was non-inferior to that of artesunate–mefloquine (95% [69 of 73; 95% CI 87 to 99]) in three sites in Cambodia (risk difference 1%; 95% CI −6 to 8; p=1·00). The overall 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine plus amodiaquine (98% [281 of 286; 95% CI 97 to 99]) was similar to that of artemether–lumefantrine (97% [279 of 289; 95% CI 94 to 98]; risk difference 2%, 95% CI −1 to 4; p=0·30). Both TACTs were well tolerated, although early vomiting (within 1 h) was more frequent after dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine (30 [3·8%] of 794) than after dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (eight [1·5%] of 543; p=0·012). Vomiting after artemether–lumefantrine plus amodiaquine (22 [1·3%] of 1703) and artemether–lumefantrine (11 [0·6%] of 1721) was infrequent. Adding amodiaquine to artemether–lumefantrine extended the electrocardiogram corrected QT interval (mean increase at 52 h compared with baseline of 8·8 ms [SD 18·6] vs 0·9 ms [16·1]; p<0·01) but adding mefloquine to dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine did not (mean increase of 22·1 ms [SD 19·2] for dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine vs 20·8 ms [SD 17·8] for dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine; p=0·50). Dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus mefloquine and artemether–lumefantrine plus amodiaquine TACTs are efficacious, well tolerated, and safe treatments of uncomplicated P falciparum malaria, including in areas with artemisinin and ACT partner-drug resistance. UK Department for International Development, Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and US National Institutes of Health.

In this randomized, controlled trial from Europe involving patients with persistent symptoms attributed to Lyme disease, there was no benefit associated with 12 additional weeks of treatment with either doxycycline or clarithromycin–hydroxychloroquine. Patients with Lyme disease, which is caused by the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex (including B. afzelii and B. garinii in Europe), often report persistent symptoms. 1 These symptoms are also referred to as the post–Lyme disease syndrome or chronic Lyme disease and may occur after resolution of an erythema migrans rash or after other — possibly unnoticed — manifestations of early Lyme disease, regardless of whether a patient received initial appropriate antibiotic treatment. Patients present mainly with pain, fatigue, and neurologic or cognitive disturbances. 2 , 3 Previous randomized, clinical trials have not shown convincingly that prolonged antibiotic treatment has beneficial effects . . .

With the emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance, new therapies for malaria are needed. This study shows that the imidazolopiperazine KAF156, a new antimalarial compound, has in vivo antimalarial activity. Expanding artemisinin resistance and worsening partner-drug resistance in Southeast Asia threaten the global control of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. 1 – 5 New drugs are needed. KAF156 represents a new class of antimalarial agents (imidazolopiperazines) 6 identified by high-throughput phenotypic screening. KAF156 has potent in vitro activity against both asexual and sexual blood stages and the preerythrocytic liver stages of the malarial parasite. 7 The mechanism of antimalarial action is unknown, but drug resistance, mediated by mutations in the P. falciparum cyclic amine resistance locus ( PfCARL ) gene, which encodes a protein of unknown function, can be selected. 7 In a study of 70 healthy . . .

Plasmodium falciparum sporozite (PfSPZ) Vaccine is a metabolically active, non-replicating, whole malaria sporozoite vaccine that has been reported to be safe and protective against P falciparum controlled human malaria infection in malaria-naive individuals. We aimed to assess the safety and protective efficacy of PfSPZ Vaccine against naturally acquired P falciparum in malaria-experienced adults in Mali. After an open-label dose-escalation study in a pilot safety cohort, we did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial based in Donéguébougou and surrounding villages in Mali. We recruited 18–35-year-old healthy adults who were randomly assigned (1:1) in a double-blind manner, with stratification by village and block randomisation, to receive either five doses of 2·7 × 105 PfSPZ or normal saline at days 0, 28, 56, 84, and 140 during the dry season (January to July inclusive). Participants and investigators were masked to group assignments, which were unmasked at the final study visit, 6 months after receipt of the last vaccination. Participants received combined artemether and lumefantrine (four tablets, each containing 20 mg artemether and 120 mg lumefantrine, given twice per day over 3 days for a total of six doses) to eliminate P falciparum before the first and last vaccinations. We collected blood smears every 2 weeks and during any illness for 24 weeks after the fifth vaccination. The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of the vaccine, assessed as local and systemic reactogenicity and adverse events. The sample size was calculated for the exploratory efficacy endpoint of time to first P falciparum infection beginning 28 days after the fifth vaccination. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational product, whereas the efficacy analyses included only participants who received all five vaccinations. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01988636. Between Jan 18 and Feb 24, 2014, we enrolled 93 participants into the main study cohort with 46 participants assigned PfSPZ Vaccine and 47 assigned placebo, all of whom were evaluable for safety. We detected no significant differences in local or systemic adverse events or laboratory abnormalities between the PfSPZ Vaccine and placebo groups, and only grade 1 (mild) local or systemic adverse events occurred in both groups. The most common solicited systemic adverse event in the vaccine and placebo groups was headache (three [7%] people in the vaccine group vs four [9%] in the placebo group) followed by fatigue (one [2%] person in the placebo group), fever (one [2%] person in the placebo group), and myalgia (one [2%] person in each group). The exploratory efficacy analysis included 41 participants from the vaccine group and 40 from the placebo group. Of these participants, 37 (93%) from the placebo group and 27 (66%) from the vaccine group developed P falciparum infection. The hazard ratio for vaccine efficacy was 0·517 (95% CI 0·313–0·856) by time-to-infection analysis (log-rank p=0·01), and 0·712 (0·528–0·918) by proportional analysis (p=0·006). PfSPZ Vaccine was well tolerated and safe. PfSPZ Vaccine showed significant protection in African adults against P falciparum infection throughout an entire malaria season. US National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, Sanaria.

Artemisinin therapy is a first-line approach to malaria treatment in many parts of the world. Resistance to this class of agents is an emerging threat to malaria treatment and control. In two studies conducted in Thailand and Cambodia, P. falciparum was found to have reduced in vivo susceptibility to artesunate, characterized by slow parasite clearance. In two studies conducted in Thailand and Cambodia, P. falciparum was found to have reduced in vivo susceptibility to artesunate, characterized by slow parasite clearance. Artemisinins are established antimalarial agents with an excellent safety profile. 1 Artemisinin-based combination therapies are now recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as first-line treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in all areas in which malaria is endemic. 2 Replacing ineffective, failing treatments (chloroquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine) with artemisinin-based combination therapies has reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with malaria. 3 – 5 Parenteral artesunate is replacing quinine for the treatment of severe malaria. 6 Recently, there have been signs that the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy and artesunate monotherapy have declined in western Cambodia. 7 – 10 Artemisinin resistance would be disastrous for global malaria control. To . . .

DSM265 is a novel antimalarial that inhibits plasmodial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, an enzyme essential for pyrimidine biosynthesis. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of DSM265, and tested its antimalarial activity. Healthy participants aged 18–55 years were enrolled in a two-part study: part 1, a single ascending dose (25–1200 mg), double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, and part 2, an open-label, randomised, active-comparator controlled study, in which participants were inoculated with Plasmodium falciparum induced blood-stage malaria (IBSM) and treated with DSM265 (150 mg) or mefloquine (10 mg/kg). Primary endpoints were DSM265 safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Randomisation lists were created using a validated, automated system. Both parts were registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12613000522718 (part 1) and number ACTRN12613000527763 (part 2). In part 1, 73 participants were enrolled between April 12, 2013, and July 14, 2015 (DSM265, n=55; placebo, n=18). In part 2, nine participants were enrolled between Sept 30 and Nov 25, 2013 (150 mg DSM265, n=7; 10 mg/kg mefloquine, n=2). In part 1, 117 adverse events were reported; no drug-related serious or severe events were reported. The most common drug-related adverse event was headache. The mean DSM265 peak plasma concentration (Cmax) ranged between 1310 ng/mL and 34 800 ng/mL and was reached in a median time (tmax) between 1·5 h and 4 h, with a mean elimination half-life between 86 h and 118 h. In part 2, the log10 parasite reduction ratio at 48 h in the DSM265 (150 mg) group was 1·55 (95% CI 1·42–1·67) and in the mefloquine (10 mg/kg) group was 2·34 (2·17–2·52), corresponding to a parasite clearance half-life of 9·4 h (8·7–10·2) and 6·2 h (5·7–6·7), respectively. The median minimum inhibitory concentration of DSM265 in blood was estimated as 1040 ng/mL (range 552–1500), resulting in a predicted single efficacious dose of 340 mg. Parasite clearance was significantly faster in participants who received mefloquine than in participants who received DSM265 (p<0·0001). The good safety profile, long elimination half-life, and antimalarial effect of DSM265 supports its development as a partner drug in a single-dose antimalarial combination treatment. Wellcome Trust, UK Department for International Development, Global Health Innovative Technology Fund, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Artefenomel (OZ439) is a novel synthetic trioxolane with improved pharmacokinetic properties compared with other antimalarial drugs with the artemisinin pharmacophore. Artefenomel has been generally well tolerated in volunteers at doses up to 1600 mg and is being developed as a partner drug in an antimalarial combination treatment. We investigated the efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of artefenomel at different doses in patients with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax malaria. This phase 2a exploratory, open-label trial was done at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Bangkok, and the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit in Thailand. Adult patients with acute, uncomplicated P falciparum or P vivax malaria received artefenomel in a single oral dose (200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, or 1200 mg). The first cohort received 800 mg. Testing of a new dose of artefenomel in a patient cohort was decided on after safety and efficacy assessment of the preceding cohort. The primary endpoint was the natural log parasite reduction per 24 h. Definitive oral treatment was given at 36 h. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01213966. Between Oct 24, 2010, and May 25, 2012, 82 patients were enrolled (20 in each of the 200 mg, 400 mg, and 800 mg cohorts, and 21 in the 1200 mg cohort). One patient withdrew consent (before the administration of artefenomel) but there were no further dropouts. The parasite reduction rates per 24 h ranged from 0·90 to 1·88 for P falciparum, and 2·09 to 2·53 for P vivax. All doses were equally effective in both P falciparum and P vivax malaria, with median parasite clearance half-lives of 4·1 h (range 1·3–6·7) to 5·6 h (2·0–8·5) for P falciparum and 2·3 h (1·2–3·9) to 3·2 h (0·9–15·0) for P vivax. Maximum plasma concentrations, dose-proportional to 800 mg, occurred at 4 h (median). The estimated elimination half-life was 46–62 h. No serious drug-related adverse effects were reported; other adverse effects were generally mild and reversible, with the highest number in the 1200 mg cohort (17 [81%] patients with at least one adverse event). The most frequently reported adverse effect was an asymptomatic increase in plasma creatine phosphokinase concentration (200 mg, n=5; 400 mg, n=3; 800 mg, n=1; 1200 mg, n=3). Artefenomel is a new synthetic antimalarial peroxide with a good safety profile that clears parasitaemia rapidly in both P falciparum and P vivax malaria. Its long half-life suggests a possible use in a single-dose treatment in combination with other drugs. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and UK Department for International Development.

Ivermectin is being considered for mass drug administration for malaria due to its ability to kill mosquitoes feeding on recently treated individuals. However, standard, single doses of 150–200 μg/kg used for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis have a short-lived mosquitocidal effect (<7 days). Because ivermectin is well tolerated up to 2000 μg/kg, we aimed to establish the safety, tolerability, and mosquitocidal efficacy of 3 day courses of high-dose ivermectin, co-administered with a standard malaria treatment. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial at the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital (Kisumu, Kenya). Adults (aged 18–50 years) were eligible if they had confirmed symptomatic uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and agreed to the follow-up schedule. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using sealed envelopes, stratified by sex and body-mass index (men: <21 vs ≥21 kg/m2; women: <23 vs ≥23 kg/m2), with permuted blocks of three, to receive 3 days of ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day, ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day, or placebo, all co-administered with 3 days of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Blood of patients taken on post-treatment days 0, 2 + 4 h, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 was fed to laboratory-reared Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto mosquitoes, and mosquito survival was assessed daily for 28 days after feeding. The primary outcome was 14-day cumulative mortality of mosquitoes fed 7 days after ivermectin treatment (from participants who received at least one dose of study medication). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02511353. Between July 20, 2015, and May 7, 2016, 741 adults with malaria were assessed for eligibility, of whom 141 were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day (n=47), ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day (n=48), or placebo (n=46). 128 patients (91%) attended the primary outcome visit 7 days post treatment. Compared with placebo, ivermectin was associated with higher 14 day post-feeding mosquito mortality when fed on blood taken 7 days post treatment (ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day risk ratio [RR] 2·26, 95% CI 1·93–2·65, p<0·0001; hazard ratio [HR] 6·32, 4·61–8·67, p<0·0001; ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day RR 2·18, 1·86–2·57, p<0·0001; HR 4·21, 3·06–5·79, p<0·0001). Mosquito mortality remained significantly increased 28 days post treatment (ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day RR 1·23, 1·01–1·50, p=0·0374; and ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day 1·21, 1·01–1·44, p=0·0337). Five (11%) of 45 patients receiving ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day, two (4%) of 48 patients receiving ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day, and none of 46 patients receiving placebo had one or more treatment-related adverse events. Ivermectin at both doses assessed was well tolerated and reduced mosquito survival for at least 28 days after treatment. Ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day for 3 days provided a good balance between efficacy and tolerability, and this drug shows promise as a potential new tool for malaria elimination. Malaria Eradication Scientific Alliance (MESA) and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Most malaria-endemic countries, including Cambodia, use a total dose of 3·5 mg/kg of primaquine to eliminate Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites and prevent relapses. There are, however, indications that the lower dose of 3·5 mg/kg is insufficient for tropical P vivax isolates, particularly in southeast Asia, and WHO now recommends a total dose of 7·0 mg/kg in most countries. We aimed to determine the most effective regimen to eliminate P vivax hypnozoites to support elimination efforts of this malaria parasite. We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial in Kampong Speu province, western Cambodia. Patients infected with P vivax aged at least 15 years were offered to participate. Exclusion criteria were severe malaria or other diseases requiring treatment, low haemoglobin (<8·0 g/dL), pregnancy or breastfeeding, sensitivity to study drugs, and use of antimalarials in the preceding month. Enrolled patients were treated with an artesunate regimen of 2 mg/kg per day for 7 days. Patients with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) levels were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive 3·5 mg/kg (low dose [0·25 mg/kg per day]), 7·0 mg/kg (high dose [0·5 mg/kg per day]), or no primaquine for 14 days. Patients with deficient G6PD levels were assigned to the no primaquine comparator arm. Patients were relocated to the study site in Aoral town where no malaria transmission occurs to ensure that they were not reinfected during their 90-day follow-up. After 90 days of relocation, G6PD-normal patients in the no primaquine arm were provided 3·5 mg/kg of primaquine for 14 days to be taken unsupervised. At day 90, relocation was terminated, and patients were followed up monthly for 3 months until day 180. The primary outcome was P vivax recurrence within 90 days of relocated follow-up, assessed in all patients who completed treatment and complied with relocation without interruption. All patients enrolled and assigned to an intervention arm were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and recruitment is completed (NCT04706130). Between Nov 10, 2021, and Feb 10, 2024, 160 patients were enrolled and 147 were included in the primary analysis—59 were assigned to the no primaquine arm (37 assigned as G6PD deficient [median age 22 years, IQR 18–28]; 22 randomly assigned [18, 17–25]), 45 to the low-dose primaquine arm (23, 19–30), and 43 to the high-dose primaquine arm (22, 18–25). Participants were mostly male (135 [92%] of 147) and all Cambodian. 48 (81% [95% CI 69·6–89·2]) participants in the no primaquine arm had at least one P vivax recurrence within 90 days, as did 11 (24%, 14·2–38·7) in the low-dose group and two (5%, 0·8–15·5) in the high-dose group (p=0·0141 for high vs low). After imputation for missing data, low-dose primaquine remained associated with more recurrences than high-dose primaquine (hazard ratio 0·17 [95% CI 0·04–0·79], p=0·0229). Both primaquine regimens were well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Not providing primaquine to patients led to a considerable rate of P vivax recurrence. The risk of P vivax recurrence was substantially lower for 7·0 mg/kg primaquine treatment compared with 3·5 mg/kg. Tolerability and safety of both primaquine regimens in G6PD normal individuals was comparable. US National Institutes of Health (R01AI146590).

Anti-malarial artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) might be losing efficacy in east Africa, with the spread of artemisinin partial resistance and reduced partner drug activity. Our trial aimed to measure the efficacies of artemether–lumefantrine, artesunate–amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine, and artesunate–pyronaridine in three sites in Uganda. This randomised, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial was carried out at three sites in the Agago, Arua, and Busia districts of Uganda. Children aged 6 months to 10 years with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to receive either artemether–lumefantrine (20 mg artemether; 120 mg lumefantrine; twice a day for 3 days) in all sites or dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (40 mg dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine, once a day for 3 days) in Agago, artesunate–amodiaquine (25 mg artesunate and 67·5 mg amodiaquine for children <9 kg or 50 mg artesunate and 135 mg amodiaquine for children ≥9 kg, once a day for 3 days) in Busia; and artesunate–pyronaridine (60 mg artesunate and 180 mg pyronaridine for children >15 kg or 20 mg artesunate and 60 mg pyronaridine for children <15 kg, once a day for 3 days) in Arua, with follow-up to 42 days. Participants were not blinded to group assignments; however, investigators and those assessing outcome were masked. The primary outcome was parasitaemia, assessed by microscopy, either uncorrected or PCR-corrected to distinguish recrudescence from new infection. All participants who received the treatment per protocol and were not lost to follow-up were included in the primary outcome. All participants who were randomly allocated to treatment groups were included in the safety analyses. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR202301796134887, and is complete. Between Nov 7, 2022, and March 24, 2023, 808 participants (437 [54%] female) were enrolled and assigned to treatment groups; 15 (2%) were lost to follow-up and 793 (98%) completed follow-up. The uncorrected adequate clinical and parasitological response for artemether–lumefantrine was 87 (51·8%; 95% CI 44·0–59·5) of 168 participants in Arua, 88 (51·8%; 44·0–59·4) of 170 and Busia, and 131 (79·4%; 72·3–85·1) of 165 in Agago. This response for artemether–lumefantrine was lower than that of the other ACTs at all sites: 97 (98·0%; 92·2–99·6) of 99 for dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine in Agago, 95 (99·0%; 93·5–99·9) of 96 for artesunate–amodiaquine in Busia, and 73 (73·7%; 63·8–81·8) of 99 for artesunate–pyronaridine in Arua. PCR-corrected 28-day efficacies were 88 (81·5%; 72·6–88·1) of 108 for artemether–lumefantrine and 95 (100%; 95·2–100·0) of 95 for artesunate–amodiaquine in Busia; 131 (97·0%; 92·1–99·0) of 135 for artemether–lumefantrine and 97 (100%; 95·3–100·0) of 97 for dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine in Agago; and 87 (82·1%; 73·2–88·6) of 106 for artemether–lumefantrine and 73 (92·4%; 83·6–96·9) of 79 for artesunate–pyronaridine in Arua. All regimens were well tolerated. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, diarrhoea, and anaemia. None of the reported adverse events were attributed to the study drugs. There were two serious adverse events, both cases of severe malaria in Arua, one in each of the treatment groups. Parasite clearance half-lives were prolonged with parasites carrying the PfK13 Cys469Tyr (median 4·2 h; IQR 3·4–4·9) and Ala675Val (4·9 h; 3·4–5·7) mutations compared with wild-type parasites (2·8 h; 2·3–3·6; p<0·0001). Artemether–lumefantrine was associated with a higher risk of recurrent malaria than other antimalarial combinations tested, and K13 mutations were associated with delayed parasite clearance. Changes in first-line therapy for uncomplicated malaria must be considered in response to suboptimal efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine. US President's Malaria Initiative, US Agency for International Development, through the Uganda Malaria Reduction Activity and the National Institutes of Health (AI075045 and AI117001). For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.