Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Dyslipidemia and local inflammation at sites of lipid deposition on blood vessel walls have been demonstrated to be risk factors for patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD). Statins have anti-inflammatory and lipid-lowering effects, which suggest that statins may play an important role in the prevention and treatment of AAD. Some retrospective studies show that statins can protect patients with aortic dissection. However, the effect of statins on the survival of AAD patients has been scarcely investigated, especially in randomized trials. In this study, we will perform a randomized clinical trial to understand whether statins can reduce in-hospital mortality of AAD patients. Methods A total of 384 subjects diagnosed with AAD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College will be recruited. Participants will be randomly divided into an atorvastatin-treated or control group. The primary outcome will be the in-hospital mortality at 30 days. Discussion This study is designed to verify the efficacy of atorvastatin on reducing in-hospital mortality of patients with AAD. The aim is to provide a new means of improving survival as a complement to conventional drug therapy. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR1900023515 . Registered on 1 June 2019.

BackgroundAcute aortic dissection (AD) in pregnancy poses a lethal risk to both mother and fetus. However, well-established therapeutic guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to investigate clinical features, outcomes and optimal management strategies for pregnancy-related AD.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study including 67 women with acute AD during pregnancy or within 12 weeks postpartum from three major cardiovascular centres in China between 2003 and 2021. Patient characteristics, management strategies and short-term outcomes were analysed.ResultsMedian age was 31 years, with AD onset at median 32 weeks gestation. Forty-six patients (68.7%) had type A AD, of which 41 underwent immediate surgery. Overall maternal mortality was 10.4% (7/67) and fetal mortality was 26.9% (18/67). Compared with immediate surgery, selective surgery was associated with higher risk of composite maternal and fetal death (adjusted RR: 12.47 (95% CI 3.26 to 47.73); p=0.0002) and fetal death (adjusted RR: 8.77 (95% CI 2.33 to 33.09); p=0.001).ConclusionsImmediate aortic surgery should be considered for type A AD at any stage of pregnancy or postpartum. For pregnant women with AD before fetal viability, surgical treatment with the fetus in utero should be considered. Management strategies should account for dissection type, gestational age, and fetal viability.Trial registration number NCT05501145.

Background Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency frequently associated with misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. This paper aims to illustrate the diagnostic challenges of AAD in rehabilitation settings by presenting a case with atypical musculoskeletal symptoms and emphasize the importance of considering vascular emergencies with literature review. Methods A 46-year-old male presented to a rehabilitation center with migrating right shoulder pain and proximal weakness. Initial complaint suggested a musculoskeletal disorder; however, further evaluation revealed hypertension, tachycardia, and migratory, intensifying pain. A subsequent computed tomography angiography confirmed AAD. The patient underwent urgent Sun’s procedure, including ascending aorta and total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk implantation, which was followed by multidisciplinary rehabilitation due to the secondary ischemic stroke. Results The patient’s early symptoms closely mimicked musculoskeletal disorders, which delayed his prioritization of seeking medical service. After cardiovascular evaluation and successful aortic repair, the AAD was stabilized. However, he later developed right-sided hemiplegia as a secondary complication and was referred back for neurological rehabilitation, which included repetitive task training, robot-assisted therapy, and functional electrical stimulation. Three months post-surgery, he demonstrated significant functional recovery, with Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores improving from 12/66 to 58/66 for the upper extremity and from 17/34 to 32/34 for the lower extremity. Conclusion This case and literature review highlight the diagnostic challenges of AAD presenting as musculoskeletal pain and underscores the need for rehabilitation specialists to maintain a broad differential diagnosis. A high index of suspicion is essential for early recognition and timely referral, especially in patients with overlapping symptoms and vascular risk factors. Impact This case adds to the limited body of evidence on AAD presenting with musculoskeletal complaints and may serve to raise clinical awareness. Further studies, including case series and systematic investigations, are needed to better characterize such atypical presentations and guide diagnostic pathways in rehabilitation settings.

BackgroundGuideline size criteria for prophylactic repair of ascending aortic aneurysm do not account for sex, although some evidence suggests women may experience acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) at smaller diameters. We examined sex differences in ascending aortic diameter among patients with ATAAD.MethodsWe performed a single-centre, retrospective study including consecutive adult patients undergoing repair of spontaneous ATAAD (2011–2023). Maximal ascending aortic diameter was measured on index CT. Maximum diameter and diameter indexed to height and body surface area (BSA) were compared by sex. Multivariable linear regression, accounting for sex, age and comorbidities, predicted aortic diameter at time of ATAAD. Height and BSA were separately added to the model to evaluate how associations changed with body size.ResultsAmong 413 included patients, 146 (35.4%) were female. Women were older (65 years vs 58 years, p<0.001) and had a smaller height and BSA than men. Women had smaller aortic diameter at the time of dissection (46.6 mm vs 48.5 mm, p=0.035), but a larger aorta indexed to height (28.7 mm/m vs 27.2 mm/m, p=0.001) and BSA (25.7 mm/m2 vs 22.97 mm/m2, p<0.001). Female sex was associated with smaller diameter after adjusting for comorbidities (β=−1.77 (95% CI −3.12 to –0.42), p=0.010). This association disappeared after adjusting for height and BSA.ConclusionFemale sex was associated with ATAAD at a smaller absolute diameter, an association that resolved when accounting for women’s smaller body size . Sex-specific guidelines for ascending aneurysm repair or guidelines accounting for body size may reduce preventable complications among women.

Protein lactylation, a novel post-translational modification (PTM), has emerged as a critical factor in disease processes related to glycolysis and immune responses. However, its role in aortic dissection (AD) has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to investigate the involvement of protein lactylation in AD and identify key lactylation-related genes as potential diagnostic biomarkers. Transcriptomic data from public databases were analyzed to identify differentially expressed lactylation-related genes in AD. Functional enrichment analyses were performed, and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was utilized to identify gene modules associated with AD. Machine learning methods, including LASSO and Random Forest, were employed to identify key diagnostic genes. Experimental validation was performed using human aortic tissues and an AD model. Bioinformatics analysis identified 11 lactylation-related differentially expressed genes (LR-DEGs) in AD. WGCNA and machine learning revealed two optimal feature genes, PGK1 and HMGA1, which were validated in an independent dataset and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC: PGK1 = 1, HMGA1 = 0.94). Immune infiltration analysis indicated significant correlations between these genes and specific immune cell types, suggesting a role in immune regulation. Experimental validation in human and murine AD tissues confirmed the upregulation of PGK1 and HMGA1. This study underscores the importance of lactylation in the pathogenesis of AD and identifies PGK1 and HMGA1 as key biomarkers related to lactylation. These findings enhance our understanding of the metabolic and immune mechanisms involved in AD, thereby presenting new molecular targets for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.

Although there are established high-risk features in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), its management is variable. This study characterizes complicated, uncomplicated, and high-risk TBAD in addition to their management and outcomes to gain insight into the actual significance of these high-risk features and the reality of real-world practice in managing TBAD. A retrospective review of 62 patients was conducted. Patient demographics, management, and outcomes were characterized and evaluated with Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, or analysis of variance. Of the 32 high-risk TBADs, 66% (n = 21) received endovascular repair, 31% (n = 10) were medically managed, and 3% (n = 1) received hybrid (open and endovascular) repair. Refractory hypertension and pain (52%, n = 11) were the most common high-risk features in patients with high-risk TBAD who received endovascular repair. A maximum aortic diameter of >40 mm (67%, n = 6) was the most common high-risk feature in patients who received medical management. The most prevalent high-risk feature for all treatment groups in the high-risk TBADs was an aortic diameter of >40 mm (n = 16; 50%). Adverse postoperative outcomes were highest in the high-risk and complicated groups with endoleak as the most common adverse outcome (high-risk 12.9%, complicated 13.6%). Of the 62 patients, 47% (n = 26) had follow-up since their admission with an average follow-up time of 69 ± 166 days. The significance of high-risk features in the management of high-risk TBAD remains unclear. This single-center experience with managing acute TBAD reveals the reality of inadequate follow-up that may be specific to this disease process. This highlights a need to direct more efforts to assess long-term outcomes after treatment.

Background The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between admission inflammatory indexes neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality in acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 597 AAD patients (Stanford classification: Stanford type A 365 patients, Stanford type B 232 patients) at a single center. Outcomes were the incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality. The risk of all-cause death was compared between the groups with low and high inflammatory indexes using the Kaplan-Meier curve. The association between admission inflammatory indexes and outcomes was evaluated using the Cox regression model and restricted cubic splines (RCS). Stratified analysis was performed based on AAD type, age (< 50 years or ≥ 50 years), and gender. Results The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed statistically significant differences in outcomes among the low and high inflammatory indexes groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the in-hospital mortality risk was significantly high in the high inflammatory index groups. MLR was the strongest associated with in-hospital mortality risk. The RCS curve revealed that NLR was non-linearly and J-shaped correlated with in-hospital mortality, and MLR and SII were linearly correlated with in-hospital mortality. Stratified analysis showed interactions between NLR, MLR, and SII and AAD type and age for the risk of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion Admission high inflammatory indexes were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality in AAD patients. The inflammatory indexes NLR, MLR, and SII may be useful indicators for predicting in-hospital all-cause mortality in AAD patients.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) used alone or in combination with D-dimer for detecting acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AAS. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2024. Additionally, the reference lists of included studies and other systematic reviews were thoroughly searched. All diagnostic accuracy studies that assessed the use of ADD-RS alone or with D-Dimer for diagnosing AAS compared with a reference standard test (e.g. computer tomographic angiography (CTA), ECG-gated CTA, echocardiography, magnetic resonance angiography, operation, or autopsy) were included. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using QUADAS-2 tool. Data were synthesised using hierarchical meta-analysis models. We selected 13 studies from the 2017 citations identified, including six studies evaluating combinations of ADD-RS alongside D-dimer>500ng/L. Summary sensitivities and specificities (95% credible interval) were: ADD-RS>0 94.6% (90%, 97.5%) and 34.7% (20.7%, 51.2%), ADD-RS>1 43.4% (31.2%, 57.1%) and 89.3% (80.4%, 94.8%); ADD RS>0 or D-Dimer>500ng/L 99.8% (98.7%, 100%) and 21.8% (12.1%, 32.6%); ADD RS>1 or D-Dimer>500ng/L 98.3% (94.9%, 99.5%) and 51.4% (38.7%, 64.1%); ADD RS>1 or ADD RS = 1 with D-dimer>500ng/L 93.1% (87.1%, 96.3%) and 67.1% (54.4%, 77.7%). Combinations of ADD-RS and D-dimer can be used to select patients with suspected AAS for imaging with a range of trade-offs between sensitivity (93.1% to 99.8%) and specificity (21.8% to 67.1%).

Acute aortic dissection (AD) is a critical condition characterized by high mortality and frequent misdiagnoses, primarily due to symptom overlap with other medical pathologies. This study explores the diagnostic utility of ChatGPT 4.0, an artificial intelligence model developed by OpenAI, in identifying acute AD from patients’ presentations and general physical examination findings documented in published case reports. A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed database using the search term “acute aortic dissection,” applying filters for articles published within the past year and categorized as case reports. The primary symptoms and physical examination details from each case were inputted into ChatGPT 4.0, which was prompted to generate three differential diagnoses and one main provisional diagnosis based on the case presentation. The search yielded a total of 163 results, from which 10 case reports were randomly selected. The patient demographics across all 10 case reports demonstrated an age range of 29 to 82 years, with equal gender distribution (5 males, 5 females) and hypertension as the most prevalent baseline comorbidity. ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identified acute AD as one of the top three differential diagnoses in all selected cases and identified acute AD as the provisional diagnosis in five of the 10 cases. In conclusion, while ChatGPT 4.0 demonstrates potential in suggesting acute AD as a differential diagnosis based on clinical data, its role should be considered supportive rather than definitive. Based on our findings, it could serve as an early, cost-effective, and quick screening tool, helping physicians adopt a “think aorta” approach.