Explore the vast range of titles available.

Backgrounds To explain the excess cardiovascular mortality observed in the SERVE-HF study, it was hypothesized that the high-pressure ASV default settings used lead to inappropriate ventilation, cascading negative consequences (i.e. not only pro-arrythmogenic effects through metabolic/electrolyte abnormalities, but also lower cardiac output). The aims of this study are: i) to describe ASV-settings for long-term ASV-populations in real-life conditions; ii) to describe the associated minute-ventilations (MV) and therapeutic pressures for servo-controlled-flow versus servo-controlled-volume devices (ASV-F Philips®-devices versus ASV-V ResMed®-devices). Methods The OTRLASV-study is a cross-sectional, 5-centre study including patients who underwent ASV-treatment for at least 1 year. The eight participating clinicians were free to adjust ASV settings, which were compared among i) initial diagnosed sleep-disordered-breathing (SBD) groups (Obstructive-Sleep-Apnea (OSA), Central-Sleep-Apnea (CSA), Treatment-Emergent-Central-Sleep-Apnea (TECSA)), and ii) unsupervised groups ( k -means clusters). To generate these clusters, baseline and follow-up variables were used (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), initial diagnosed Obstructive-Apnea-Index, initial diagnosed Central-Apnea-Index, Continuous-Positive-Airway-Pressure used before ASV treatment, presence of cardiopathy, and presence of a reduced left-ventricular-ejection-fraction (LVEF)). ASV-data were collected using the manufacturer’s software for 6 months. Results One hundred seventy-seven patients (87.57% male) were analysed with a median (IQ 25–75 ) initial Apnea-Hypopnea-Index of 50 (38–62)/h, an ASV-treatment duration of 2.88 (1.76–4.96) years, 61.58% treated with an ASV-V. SDB groups did not differ in ASV settings, MV or therapeutic pressures. In contrast, the five generated k -means clusters did (generally described as follows: (C1) male-TECSA-cardiopathy, (C2) male-mostly-CSA-cardiopathy, (C3) male-mostly-TECSA-no cardiopathy, (C4) female-mostly-elevated BMI-TECSA-cardiopathy, (C5) male-mostly-OSA-low-LVEF). Of note, the male-mostly-OSA-low-LVEF-cluster-5 had significantly lower fixed end-expiratory-airway-pressure (EPAP) settings versus C1 ( p  = 0.029) and C4 ( p  = 0.007). Auto-EPAP usage was higher in the male-mostly-TECSA-no cardiopathy-cluster-3 versus C1 ( p  = 0.006) and C2 ( p  < 0.001). MV differences between ASV-F ( p  = 0.002) and ASV-V ( p  < 0.001) were not homogenously distributed across clusters, suggesting specific cluster and ASV-algorithm interactions. Individual ASV-data suggest that the hyperventilation risk is not related to the cluster nor the ASV-monitoring type. Conclusions Real-life ASV settings are associated with combinations of baseline and follow-up variables wherein cardiological variables remain clinically meaningful. At the patient level, a hyperventilation risk exists regardless of cluster or ASV-monitoring type, spotlighting a future role of MV-telemonitoring in the interest of patient-safety. Trial registration The OTRLASV study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02429986 ). 1 April 2015.

Abstract Context Erectile function is important for life satisfaction and often impaired in men with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Uncontrolled studies show that treating OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves erectile function. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (e.g., vardenafil) are the first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED), but may worsen OSA. Objective To assess the effects of CPAP and vardenafil on ED. Design Sixty-one men with moderate-to-severe OSA and ED were randomized to 12 weeks of CPAP or sham CPAP, and 10 mg daily vardenafil or placebo in a two-by-two factorial design. Main Outcome Measures International Index of Erectile Function (primary end point), treatment and relationship satisfaction, sleep-related erections, sexual function, endothelial function, arterial stiffness, quality of life, and sleep-disordered breathing. Results CPAP increased the frequency of sleep-related erections, overall sexual satisfaction, and arterial stiffness but did not change erectile function or treatment or relationship satisfaction. Vardenafil did not alter erectile function, endothelial function, arterial stiffness, or sleep-disordered breathing, but did improve overall self-esteem and relationship satisfaction, other aspects of sexual function, and treatment satisfaction. Adherent CPAP improved erectile function, sexual desire, overall sexual, self-esteem, relationship, and treatment satisfaction, as well as sleepiness, and quality of life. Adherent vardenafil use did not consistently change nocturnal erection quality. Conclusion CPAP improves overall sexual satisfaction, sleep-related erections, and arterial stiffness. Low-dose daily vardenafil improves certain aspects of sexual function and did not worsen OSA. Adherent CPAP or vardenafil use further improves ED and quality of life. This randomized controlled study investigating the effect of CPAP and a PDE-5 inhibitor on erectile function highlights the importance of identifying erectile dysfunction in patients with OSA.

In infants with very low birth weight who have apnea of prematurity, caffeine therapy reduced the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia assessed at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Caffeine temporarily reduced weight gain; it did not affect the rates of death, ultrasonographic signs of brain injury, or necrotizing enterocolitis. These short-term data demonstrate an important benefit of caffeine therapy in this population, but a definitive assessment of its benefits and risks awaits results of long-term follow-up of this cohort. In infants with very low birth weight who have apnea of prematurity, caffeine therapy reduced the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Caffeine temporarily reduced weight gain; it did not affect the rates of death. Apnea of prematurity — defined as cessation of breathing that lasts for more than 15 seconds and is accompanied by hypoxia or bradycardia — occurs in at least 85 percent of infants who are born at less than 34 weeks of gestation. 1 Widely used treatments include the application of continuous positive airway pressure and the prescription of a methylxanthine. 2 The methylxanthines — aminophylline, theophylline, and caffeine — reduce the frequency of apnea and the need for mechanical ventilation during the first seven days of therapy. 3 However, it has remained uncertain whether methylxanthines have any additional short- and long-term benefits or . . .

Backgrounds As a consequence of the increased mortality observed in the SERVE-HF study, many questions concerning the safety and rational use of ASV in other indications emerged. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of ASV-treated patients in real-life conditions. Methods The OTRLASV-study is a prospective, 5-centre study including patients who underwent ASV-treatment for at least 1 year. Patients were consecutively included in the study during the annual visit imposed for ASV-reimbursement renewal. Results 177/214 patients were analysed (87.57% male) with a median (IQ 25–75 ) age of 71 (65–77) years, an ASV-treatment duration of 2.88 (1.76–4.96) years, an ASV-usage of 6.52 (5.13–7.65) hours/day, and 54.8% were previously treated via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The median Epworth Scale Score decreased from 10 (6–13.5) to 6 (3–9) ( p  < 0.001) with ASV-therapy, the apnea-hypopnea-index decreased from 50 (38–62)/h to a residual device index of 1.9 (0.7–3.8)/h ( p  < 0.001). The majority of patients were classified in a Central-Sleep-Apnea group (CSA; 59.3%), whereas the remaining are divided into an Obstructive-Sleep-Apnea group (OSA; 20.3%) and a Treatment-Emergent-Central-Sleep-Apnea group (TECSA; 20.3%). The Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) was > 45% in 92.7% of patients. Associated comorbidities/etiologies were cardiac in nature for 75.7% of patients (neurological for 12.4%, renal for 4.5%, opioid-treatment for 3.4%). 9.6% had idiopathic central-sleep-apnea. 6.2% of the patients were hospitalized the year preceding the study for cardiological reasons. In the 6 months preceding inclusion, night monitoring (i.e. polygraphy or oximetry during ASV usage) was performed in 34.4% of patients, 25.9% of whom required a subsequent setting change. According to multivariable, logistic regression, the variables that were independently associated with poor adherence (ASV-usage ≤4 h in duration) were TECSA group versus CSA group ( p  = 0.010), a higher Epworth score ( p  = 0.019) and lack of a night monitoring in the last 6 months ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions In real-life conditions, ASV-treatment is often associated with high cardiac comorbidities and high compliance. Future research should assess how regular night monitoring may optimize devices settings and patient management. Trial registration The OTRLASV study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02429986 ) on 1 April 2015.

BackgroundObese patients have a propensity to desaturate during induction of general anesthesia secondary to their reduced functional residual capacity and increased oxygen consumption. Apneic oxygenation can provide supplemental oxygen to the alveoli, even in the absence of ventilation, during attempts to secure the airway. In this study, we hypothesized that oxygen administration through a nasopharyngeal airway and standard nasal cannula during a simulated prolonged laryngoscopy would significantly prolong the safe apneic duration in obese patients.MethodsOne hundred thirty-five obese patients undergoing non-emergent surgery requiring general anesthesia were randomized to either the control group or to receive apneic oxygenation with air versus oxygen. All patients underwent a standard intravenous induction. For patients randomized to receive apneic oxygenation, a nasopharyngeal airway and standard nasal cannula were inserted. A simulated prolonged laryngoscopy was performed to determine the duration of the safe apneic period, defined as the beginning of laryngoscopy until the peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) reached 95%.ResultsThe oxygen group had a median safe apneic duration that was 103 s longer than the control group. The lowest mean SpO2 value during the induction period was 3.8% higher in the oxygen group compared to the control group. Following intubation, patients in the oxygen group had a mean end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) level that was 3.0 mmHg higher than patients in the control group.ConclusionsIn obese patients, oxygen insufflation at 15 L/min through a nasopharyngeal airway and standard nasal cannula can significantly increase the safe apneic duration during induction of anesthesia.

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often struggle with CPAP therapy adherence. The intranasal corticosteroids (INS) alone have not significantly improved CPAP adherence but the combination drugs that faster relieved symptoms were not well studied. This study aimed to assess the combined effectiveness of INS (fluticasone propionate) and intranasal antihistamines (azelastine hydrochloride) in enhancing CPAP adherence and mitigating CPAP-induced rhinitis symptoms in OSA patients. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial with stratified random sampling was conducted at Thammasat University Hospital from March 2022 to March 2023. Participants included OSA patients undergoing CPAP treatment. The patients completed questionnaires and interviews at the baseline, the second week, and one month after starting CPAP therapy, with CPAP usage electronic data collected. Among 116 enrolled patients, most had severe OSA (78.9%), with a majority being male (56.9%). The intervention group did not significantly differ from the placebo group in terms of CPAP usage, nasal symptoms, quality of life, or side effects. Subgroup analysis showed improved CPAP adherence in the treatment group when using pressure below 15 cm H 2 O (7.8% increase in CPAP usage days, P  = 0.04). This study marks the first evaluation of combination drugs for enhancing CPAP therapy adherence in OSA patients. Although these drugs did not significantly enhance overall CPAP adherence, there was a trend toward increasing CPAP adherence in patients using lower pressure levels. Thus, combining fluticasone and azelastine may benefit certain OSA patients. Further research is essential to comprehend and validate these benefits fully. Clinicaltrials.in.th number TCTR20220308003 (08/03/2022).

ObjectiveAssess the feasibility and safety of a purpose-built automated tactile stimulation device (ATSD) responding to cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants.DesignRandomised cross-over study.SettingLevel-III neonatal intensive care unit in the Netherlands.PatientsInfants born between 24 and 30 weeks gestational age, receiving non-invasive respiratory support and experiencing apnoea, bradycardia and/or hypoxia for>10 s.InterventionsInfants underwent two study periods of 24 hours. In the control period, the ATSD was attached but inactive. In the intervention period, ATSD was activated and used in addition to standard care, providing direct vibratory stimulation in response to clinical alarms.Main outcome measureFeasibility of using ATSD, expressed by the number of infants completing the study, the ability to provide stimulation on the skin and the perceived feasibility by the nurses.Results16 infants were included, of which 14 (88%) completed both study periods. Two infants were withdrawn from the study prematurely: one infant required intubation for cyanotic spells and the other developed local non-blanching erythema consistent with a mild pressure ulcer, on which the device was removed. During the intervention period, ATSD correctly detected 84% of the cardiorespiratory events, with automatic stimulation following 100% of the events. Nurses found the ATSD easy to use and rated the clinical utility neutral to positive.ConclusionApplying automated tactile stimulation in preterm infants using a purpose-built device is feasible, was well tolerated by infants and nurses considered our device useful and easy to use.Trial registration detailsDutch national trial register, NL9606.

Abstract Study Objectives Insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) commonly co-occur which makes OSA difficult to treat with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We conducted a randomized controlled trial in participants with OSA and co-occurring insomnia to test the hypothesis that initial treatment with cognitive and behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-i), versus treatment as usual (TAU) would improve insomnia symptoms and increase subsequent acceptance and use of CPAP. Methods One hundred and forty-five participants with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15) and comorbid insomnia were randomized to either four sessions of CBT-i, or TAU, before commencing CPAP therapy until 6 months post-randomization. Primary between-group outcomes included objective average CPAP adherence and changes in objective sleep efficiency by 6 months. Secondary between-group outcomes included rates of immediate CPAP acceptance/rejection, and changes in; sleep parameters, insomnia severity, and daytime impairments by 6 months. Results Compared to TAU, participants in the CBT-i group had 61 min greater average nightly adherence to CPAP (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9 to 113; p = 0.023, d = 0.38) and higher initial CPAP treatment acceptance (99% vs. 89%; p = 0.034). The CBT-i group showed greater improvement of global insomnia severity, and dysfunctional sleep-related cognitions by 6 months (both: p < 0.001), and greater improvement in sleep impairment measures immediately following CBT-i. There were no between-group differences in sleep outcomes, or daytime impairments by 6 months. Conclusions In OSA participants with comorbid insomnia, CBT-i prior to initiating CPAP treatment improves CPAP use and insomnia symptoms compared to commencing CPAP without CBT-i. OSA patients should be evaluated for co-occurring insomnia and considered for CBT-i before commencing CPAP therapy. Clinical Trial Treating comorbid insomnia with obstructive sleep apnea (COMSIA) study: A new treatment strategy for patients with combined insomnia and sleep apnea, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365184 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613001178730. Universal Trial Number: U1111-1149-4230.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly those with heart failure (HF). There are two main types of SDB, central sleep apnoea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) which frequently overlap as mixed SDB. Investigating for SDB could be considered in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, male sex, high body mass index, low ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with no dipping blood pressure pattern, recurrent paroxysms of nocturnal dyspnoea or when an apnoea is witnessed. Excessive daytime sleepiness is less likely to be reported by patients with HF than by the general population. In patients with CVD and OSA, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation for over 4 hours daily reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but there was no reduction in mortality. In patients with AF and OSA treated with AF ablation, CPAP use was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence of AF. In patients with HF and OSA, small studies have demonstrated that CPAP improves symptoms, brain natriuretic peptide levels and ejection fraction, but data on survival are lacking. Treatment remains unclear in patients with HF and CSA. The presence of CSA may be a defensive adaptive response to HF, and effectively treating CSA as demonstrated in a randomised clinical trial of adaptive servo-ventilation caused more harm than benefit when compared to optimal medical therapy. Thus, the focus of treating CSA should remain on improving the underlying HF by optimising medical therapy and, if indicated, cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Abstract Rationale Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), many of whom do not report daytime sleepiness. First-line treatment for symptomatic OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but its value in patients without daytime sleepiness is uncertain. Objectives To determine the effects of CPAP on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcome risk in patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA. Methods This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded evaluation trial was conducted between December 2005 and November 2010. Consecutive patients with newly revascularized CAD and OSA (apnea–hypopnea index ≥15/h) without daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score <10) were randomized to auto-titrating CPAP (n = 122) or no positive airway pressure (n = 122). Measurements and Main Results The primary endpoint was the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. Median follow-up was 57 months. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly in patients who did versus did not receive CPAP (18.1% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.46–1.41; P = 0.449). Adjusted on-treatment analysis showed a significant cardiovascular risk reduction in those who used CPAP for ≥4 versus <4 hours per night or did not receive treatment (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.86; P = 0.026). Conclusions Routine prescription of CPAP to patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA did not significantly reduce long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the intention-to-treat population. There was a significant reduction after adjustment for baseline comorbidities and compliance with the treatment. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00519597).