Explore the vast range of titles available.

\"Today we perceive children and the influences on them with regard to their developing brains. This book documents how brain development became the dominant lens for understanding children's development, the benefits and missed opportunities for children that resulted, and why brain development compels our attention\"-- Provided by publisher.

The FDA has issued a warning regarding use of general anesthetic and sedation drugs in children under 3 years of age and in pregnant women in their third trimester — a warning that will change practice and raise questions that currently have no clear answers. For more than 15 years, the potential for lasting neurotoxic effects of agents used to induce general anesthesia and sedation when administered to young children — and indirectly through pregnant women to fetuses with developing brains — has been a subject of concern and considerable research interest. The topic has been the focus of three public hearings by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2007, including an FDA Science Board meeting in November 2014, to better inform the public and practitioners about this potential problem and to foster a discussion between parents and physicians about potential risks posed by . . .

•Describes the ABCD study aims and design.•Covers issues surrounding estimation of meaningful associations, including population inferences, effect sizes, and control of covariates.•Outlines best practices for reproducible research and reporting of results.•Provides worked examples that illustrate the main points of the paper. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is the largest single-cohort prospective longitudinal study of neurodevelopment and children's health in the United States. A cohort of n = 11,880 children aged 9–10 years (and their parents/guardians) were recruited across 22 sites and are being followed with in-person visits on an annual basis for at least 10 years. The study approximates the US population on several key sociodemographic variables, including sex, race, ethnicity, household income, and parental education. Data collected include assessments of health, mental health, substance use, culture and environment and neurocognition, as well as geocoded exposures, structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whole-genome genotyping. Here, we describe the ABCD Study aims and design, as well as issues surrounding estimation of meaningful associations using its data, including population inferences, hypothesis testing, power and precision, control of covariates, interpretation of associations, and recommended best practices for reproducible research, analytical procedures and reporting of results.

Background The burgeoning field of regenerative medicine has significantly advanced with recent findings on biotherapies using human platelet lysates (HPLs), derived from clinical-grade platelet concentrates (PCs), for treating brain disorders. These developments have opened new translational research avenues to explore the neuroprotective effects of platelet-extracellular vesicles (PEVs). Their potential in managing neurodegenerative conditions like traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) warrants further exploration. We aimed here to characterize the composition of a PEV preparation isolated from platelet concentrate (PC) supernatant, and determine its neuroprotective potential and neurorestorative effects in cellular and animal models of TBI and PD. Methods We isolated PEVs from the supernatant of clinical-grade PC collected from healthy blood donors utilizing high-speed centrifugation. PEVs were characterized by biophysical, biochemical, microscopic, and LC–MS/MS proteomics methods to unveil biological functions. Their functionality was assessed in vitro using SH-SY5Y neuronal cells, LUHMES dopaminergic neurons, and BV-2 microglial cells, and in vivo by intranasal administration in a controlled cortical impact (CCI)-TBI model using 8-weeks-old male C57/BL6 mice, and in a PD model induced by MPTP in 5-month-old male C57/BL6 mice. Results PEVs varied in size from 50 to 350 nm, predominantly around 200 nm, with concentrations ranging between 10 10 and 10 11 /mL. They expressed specific platelet membrane markers, exhibited a lipid bilayer by cryo-electron microscopy and, importantly, showed low expression of pro-coagulant phosphatidylserine. LC–MS/MS indicated a rich composition of trophic factors, including neurotrophins, anti-inflammatory agents, neurotransmitters, and antioxidants, unveiling their multifaceted biological functions. PEVs aided in the restoration of neuronal functions in SH-SY5Y cells and demonstrated remarkable neuroprotective capabilities against erastin-induced ferroptosis in dopaminergic neurons. In microglial cells, they promoted anti-inflammatory responses, particularly under inflammatory conditions. In vivo , intranasally delivered PEVs showed strong anti-inflammatory effects in a TBI mouse model and conserved tyrosine hydroxylase expression of dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra in a PD model, leading to improved motor function. Conclusions The potential of PEV-based therapies in neuroprotection opens new therapeutic avenues for neurodegenerative disorders. The study advocates for clinical trials to establish the efficacy of PEV-based biotherapies in neuroregenerative medicine. Graphical Abstract

Abstract In May 2014, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stated its intent to “require applicants to consider sex as a biological variable (SABV) in the design and analysis of NIH-funded research involving animals and cells.” Since then, proposed research plans that include animals routinely state that both sexes/genders will be used; however, in many instances, researchers and reviewers are at a loss about the issue of sex differences. Moreover, the terms sex and gender are used interchangeably by many researchers, further complicating the issue. In addition, the sex or gender of the researcher might influence study outcomes, especially those concerning behavioral studies, in both animals and humans. The act of observation may change the outcome (the “observer effect”) and any experimental manipulation, no matter how well-controlled, is subject to it. This is nowhere more applicable than in physiology and behavior. The sex of established cultured cell lines is another issue, in addition to aneuploidy; chromosomal numbers can change as cells are passaged. Additionally, culture medium contains steroids, growth hormone, and insulin that might influence expression of various genes. These issues often are not taken into account, determined, or even considered. Issues pertaining to the “sex” of cultured cells are beyond the scope of this Statement. However, we will discuss the factors that influence sex and gender in both basic research (that using animal models) and clinical research (that involving human subjects), as well as in some areas of science where sex differences are routinely studied. Sex differences in baseline physiology and associated mechanisms form the foundation for understanding sex differences in diseases pathology, treatments, and outcomes. The purpose of this Statement is to highlight lessons learned, caveats, and what to consider when evaluating data pertaining to sex differences, using 3 areas of research as examples; it is not intended to serve as a guideline for research design.

The Hedgehog pathway is critical for the development of diverse organs. Misactivation of the Hedgehog pathway can cause developmental abnormalities and cancers, including medulloblastoma, the most common pediatric brain tumor, and basal cell carcinoma, the most common cancer in the United States. Here, we review how basic, translational, and clinical studies of the Hedgehog pathway have helped reveal how cells communicate, how intercellular communication controls development, how signaling goes awry to cause cancer, and how to use targeted molecular agents to treat both inherited and sporadic cancers.

Background There are limited real-world data on the prevalence of brain metastases (BM) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) across the treatment pathway, especially when stratified by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) or HER2–negative (HER2−) status. The goals of this study were to estimate the prevalence of BM at metastatic diagnosis and at the start of each line of systemic therapy (LOT), and to describe treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with and without BM. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult patients in the US with mBC diagnosed between January 2013 − May 2020, with known HER2 status from an electronic health record-derived, deidentified database. Patients were followed from mBC diagnosis to last activity date or death. Descriptive statistics were used for BM prevalence, patient characteristics, and treatment patterns. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Of 12,644 patients with mBC in the database, 1923 (HER2+) and 9693 (HER2−) were included. The prevalence of BM at mBC diagnosis was 12.5% (HER2+) and 1.7% (HER2−). An NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ® ) recommended systemic treatment for BM was received by 25.0% of patients with BM (HER2+) versus 12.8% (HER2−) during first-line treatment. The prevalence of BM (documented before or within the same month of LOT start) was 11.2%, 22.8%, and 33.0% in those with HER2+ diseases who had at least one, two, and three prior LOTs, respectively. The prevalence of BM among patients with HER2− disease was 1.6%, 2.0%, and 2.8% in those who had at least one, two, and three prior LOTs, respectively. Median OS from mBC diagnosis among patients with versus without BM was 24 versus 37 months (HER2+) and 12 versus 27 months (HER2−). Conclusions In this real-world study of patients receiving care in US oncology clinics, the prevalence of BM in patients with mBC increased by LOT, and most were not receiving NCCN Guideline ® -recommended systemic therapies. OS was poorer in patients with BM versus without BM, especially in the HER2− population. These results highlight a need for more effective treatments for patients with mBC and BM.

Breast cancer molecular subtypes, categorized jointly by hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2), are utilized to guide systemic therapy. We hypothesized distinct patterns of de novo metastasis and overall survival by molecular subtype using a retrospective cohort of 399,772 women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with first primary invasive breast cancer between 2010 and 2014, of whom 13,924 were diagnosed with de novo metastasis from 2010 to 2013 and had follow up data. The relationship of molecular subtype with patient and tumor characteristics, including site of de novo metastasis, were examined using Chi-squared tests. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine overall survival by molecular subtype. Bone was the most frequent de novo metastatic site for all molecular subtypes. Compared to HR+/HER2−, patients with HR−/HER2+ experienced 4.5, 3.0, and 6.0 times the de novo brain, lung, and liver metastasis respectively. In survival analyses of women diagnosed with de novo metastasis, the mortality risk relative to HR+/HER2− was twice as high for triple-negative (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% CI 1.89–2.16) and modestly lower for HR+/HER2+ (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.88). The median survival difference between metastatic patients with and without chemotherapy was 28.6 months in HR+/HER2+ and 28.2 months in HR−/HER2+, but only 10.9 months in triple-negative and 5.2 months in HR+/HER2−. In conclusion, despite unfavorable patterns of de novo metastasis, HER2+ breast cancers had relatively better survival in recent years, probably due to treatment differences. Utilizing molecular subtype and site of de novo metastasis may predict prognosis and guide treatment.

Breast cancer is the second leading primary cause for cancer-related mortality among women and metastasis to the brain is a disastrous event for patients with increasing incidence. A previous study confirmed the critical function of RRM2 in breast cancer cell growth. Unfortunately, the role and fundamental molecular mechanism of RRM2 in breast cancer metastasis remains elusive. In the current study, higher RRM2 expression was validated in breast cancer tissues, especially in the brain metastasis group. Simultaneously, the expression of RRM2 was increased in breast cancer cells relative to the normal breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A, concomitant with higher levels of RRM2 in the highly metastatic MDA-MB-231 cell line relative to the weakly metastatic MCF-7 cell line. Knockdown of RRM2 by small interfering-RRM2 transfection notably suppressed the malignant metastatic behavior of breast cancer cells, including invasion and migration. Simultaneously, RRM2 downregulation also restrained the transcription and release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in breast cancer cells. Moreover, inhibition of RRM2 dampened the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling by decreasing phosphorylated-AKT and downstream matrix metalloproteinases-2 expression. Intriguingly, reactivation of the PI3K/AKT pathway with its agonist insulin-like growth factor-1 reversed the adverse effects of RRM2 suppression on cancer cell invasion, migration and VEGF expression. Together, these findings suggest that RRM2 may act as a pro-metastatic factor to facilitate breast cancer metastasis by evoking cell invasion, migration and VEGF expression through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. This study may provide an attractive target for metastatic intervention in breast cancer.

Glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain cancer, poses a significant global health challenge with a considerable mortality rate. With the predicted increase in glioblastoma incidence, there is an urgent need for more effective treatment strategies. In this study, we explore the potential of caerin 1.1 and 1.9, host defence peptides derived from an Australian tree frog, in inhibiting glioblastoma U87 and U118 cell growth. Our findings demonstrate the inhibitory impact of caerin 1.1 and 1.9 on cell growth through CCK8 assays. Additionally, these peptides effectively curtail the migration of glioblastoma cells in a cell scratch assay, exhibiting varying inhibitory effects among different cell lines. Notably, the peptides hinder the G 0 /S phase replication in both U87 and U118 cells, pointing to their impact on the cell cycle. Furthermore, caerin 1.1 and 1.9 show the ability to enter the cytoplasm of glioblastoma cells, influencing the morphology of mitochondria. Proteomics experiments reveal intriguing insights, with a decrease in CHI3L1 expression and an increase in PZP and JUNB expression after peptide treatment. These proteins play roles in cell energy metabolism and inflammatory response, suggesting a multifaceted impact on glioblastoma cells. In conclusion, our study underscores the substantial anticancer potential of caerin 1.1 and 1.9 against glioblastoma cells. These findings propose the peptides as promising candidates for further exploration in the realm of glioblastoma management, offering new avenues for developing effective treatment strategies.