Explore the vast range of titles available.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is an effective strategie for patients receiving matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) and haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/kg for 13 patients in MSD-HSCT cohort and 25 mg/kg for 22 patients in haplo-HSCT cohort, on days + 3, + 4 combined with cotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) and human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). In MSD-PTCy cohort, the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter than those in the MSD-control cohort (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day + 100 (15.4%) was lower than that in the MSD-control cohort (P = 0.050). No patient developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 100% and 92.3%. In haplo-PTCy cohort, the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter than those in the haplo-control cohort (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidences of aGVHD at day + 100 and 1-year cGVHD were 31.8% and 18.2%, and the 1-year OS and EFS rates were 81.8% and 66.9%. Reduced-dose PTCy and cotransplantation of PBSCs and UC-MSCs is an acceptable alternative to patients with SAA.

Background Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have immunomodulatory and hematopoiesis-supporting properties that could potentially benefit hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engraftment and decrease the incidence and/or severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Methods Based on our previous pilot study, we established a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy of co-infusing third-party MSC (1.5–3 × 10 6 /kg) versus placebo on the day of HSC transplantation (HCT) to prevent GVHD in recipients of HLA-mismatched unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning. Results The study planned to include 120 patients to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 55 to 77% but was stopped after 9 years for low recruitment (n = 38). One-year OS was 74% in the MSC group and 80% in the placebo group. In multivariate analysis, the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was significantly lower in patients receiving MSC (HR 0.332, 95% CI 0.124–0.890, p  = 0.0284). No difference was observed in the incidences of chronic GVHD, infection or relapse, overall or progression-free survival at 1 year or long-term, or hematopoietic and immune reconstitution. Conclusions Despite premature study closure, the suggested beneficial effect of MSC co-transplantation for the prevention of acute GVHD in HLA-mismatched HCT warrants further investigation.

A record number of 40 829 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 36 469 patients (15 765 allogeneic (43%), 20 704 autologous (57%)) were reported by 656 centers in 47 countries to the 2014 survey. Trends include: continued growth in transplant activity, more so in Eastern European countries than in the west; a continued increase in the use of haploidentical family donors (by 25%) and slower growth for unrelated donor HSCT. The use of cord blood as a stem cell source has decreased again in 2014. Main indications for HSCT were leukemias: 11 853 (33%; 96% allogeneic); lymphoid neoplasias; 20 802 (57%; 11% allogeneic); solid tumors; 1458 (4%; 3% allogeneic) and non-malignant disorders; 2203 (6%; 88% allogeneic). Changes in transplant activity include more allogeneic HSCT for AML in CR1, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and aplastic anemia and decreasing use in CLL; and more autologous HSCT for plasma cell disorders and in particular for amyloidosis. In addition, data on numbers of teams doing alternative donor transplants, allogeneic after autologous HSCT, autologous cord blood transplants are presented.

This study reports on 382 COVID-19 patients having undergone allogeneic ( n  = 236) or autologous ( n  = 146) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) or to the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (GETH). The median age was 54.1 years (1.0–80.3) for allogeneic, and 60.6 years (7.7–81.6) for autologous HCT patients. The median time from HCT to COVID-19 was 15.8 months (0.2–292.7) in allogeneic and 24.6 months (−0.9 to 350.3) in autologous recipients. 83.5% developed lower respiratory tract disease and 22.5% were admitted to an ICU. Overall survival at 6 weeks from diagnosis was 77.9% and 72.1% in allogeneic and autologous recipients, respectively. Children had a survival of 93.4%. In multivariate analysis, older age ( p  = 0.02), need for ICU ( p  < 0.0001) and moderate/high immunodeficiency index ( p  = 0.04) increased the risk while better performance status ( p  = 0.001) decreased the risk for mortality. Other factors such as underlying diagnosis, time from HCT, GVHD, or ongoing immunosuppression did not significantly impact overall survival. We conclude that HCT patients are at high risk of developing LRTD, require admission to ICU, and have increased mortality in COVID-19.

Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (G-PBSC) has largely replaced unstimulated bone marrow (un-BM) for allografting because of accelerated engraftment, but with a higher morbidity and mortality of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Recent studies suggested that G-CSF-primed BM (G-BM) had similar engraftment but lower morbidity and mortality of GVHD comparing to G-PBSC. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study was conducted to compare G-BM with G-PBSC as the grafts in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute leukemia in first complete remission (CR1). Methods Totally 101 adult leukemia in CR1 undergoing HLA-identical sibling transplants were randomized into G-BM or G-PBSC group. The primary study endpoint was GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Results Both the engraftment of neutrophil and platelet were 2 days later in G-BM than in G-PBSC group ( P  = 0.412, P  = 0.39). G-BM group showed significantly lower II–IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and similar III–IV aGVHD compared with G-PBSC group (12.2% vs 28.8% for II–IV, P  = 0.048; 4.1% vs 9.6% for III–IV aGVHD, P  = 0.267, respectively). The overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 3 years were 22.3% ± 6.3% and 44.8% ± 7.6% ( P  = 0.026), respectively, and extensive cGHVD were 4.5% ± 3.1% and 15% ± 5.3% ( P  = 0.08), respectively, in G-BM and G-PBSC groups. Two groups had similar 3-year relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) (all P  > 0.05). G-BM group showed significantly higher probability of GRFS than G-PBSC group (73.5% ± 6.3% vs 55.8% ± 6.9% at 1 year, P  = 0.049; 69.0% ± 6.7% vs 49.7% ± 7.0% at 2 and 3 years, P  = 0.03, respectively). Graft content analysis revealed statistically higher frequency of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the G-BM than in G-PBSC grafts ( P  < 0.01), and recipients received statistically higher numbers of MDSCs in G-BM than in G-PBSC group ( P  = 0.045). Numbers of MDSCs infused to patients were negatively correlated with the severity of aGVHD ( P  = 0.032, r  = −0.214). Multivariate analysis showed that MDSC cell dose below the median (HR = 3.49, P  < 0.001), recipient age (HR = 2.02, P  = 0.039), and high risk of disease (HR = 2.14, P  = 0.018) were independent risk factors for GRFS. Conclusions G-BM grafts lead a better GRFS and less GVHD associated with a higher MDSCs content compared with G-PBSC grafts.

Scleroderma is a life-threatening autoimmune disease in need of more effective treatment. A randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation showed outcomes that were superior to those with monthly cyclophosphamide.

In this trial, 1-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival after stem-cell transplantation was 52.7% in the cyclophosphamide–tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil group and 34.9% in the tacrolimus–methotrexate group.

This phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety and clinical efficacy of adipose‐derived stromal cells (ASCs) in osteoarthritis. Eighteen patients with severe knee osteoarthritis were treated with a single intra‐articular injection of autologous ASCs at low (2 × 106 cells), medium (10 × 106), or high (50 × 106) doses (n = 6 each). After 6 months, no serious adverse events were reported, and patients treated with low‐dose ASCs significantly improved in pain and function. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most widespread musculoskeletal disorder in adults. It leads to cartilage damage associated with subchondral bone changes and synovial inflammation, causing pain and disability. The present study aimed at evaluating the safety of a dose‐escalation protocol of intra‐articular injected adipose‐derived stromal cells (ASCs) in patients with knee OA, as well as clinical efficacy as secondary endpoint. A bicentric, uncontrolled, open phase I clinical trial was conducted in France and Germany with regulatory agency approval for ASC expansion procedure in both countries. From April 2012 to December 2013, 18 consecutive patients with symptomatic and severe knee OA were treated with a single intra‐articular injection of autologous ASCs. The study design consisted of three consecutive cohorts (six patients each) with dose escalation: low dose (2 × 106 cells), medium dose (10 × 106), and high dose (50 × 106). The primary outcome parameter was safety evaluated by recording adverse events throughout the trial, and secondary parameters were pain and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. After 6 months of follow‐up, the procedure was found to be safe, and no serious adverse events were reported. Four patients experienced transient knee joint pain and swelling after local injection. Interestingly, patients treated with low‐dose ASCs experienced significant improvements in pain levels and function compared with baseline. Our data suggest that the intra‐articular injection of ASCs is a safe therapeutic alternative to treat severe knee OA patients. A placebo‐controlled double‐blind phase IIb study is being initiated to assess clinical and structural efficacy. Significance Although this phase I study included a limited number of patients without a placebo arm, it showed that local injection of autologous adipose‐derived stem cells was safe and well tolerated in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study also provides encouraging preliminary evidence of efficacy. Larger and controlled long‐term studies are now mandatory to confirm whether this new strategy of cell therapy can improve pain and induce structural benefit in osteoarthritis.