Explore the vast range of titles available.

Centromeric nucleosomes are composed of the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A and the core histones H2A, H2B, and H4. To establish a functional kinetochore, histone H4 lysine-20 (H4K20) must be monomethylated, but the underlying mechanism has remained enigmatic. To provide structural insights into H4K20 methylation, we here solve the crystal structure of a nucleosome containing an H3.1-CENP-A chimera, H3.1 CATD , which has a CENP-A centromere targeting domain and preserves essential CENP-A functions in vivo. Compared to the canonical H3.1 nucleosome, the H3.1 CATD nucleosome exhibits conformational changes in the H4 N-terminal tail leading to a relocation of H4K20. In particular, the H4 N-terminal tail interacts with glutamine-76 and aspartate-77 of canonical H3.1 while these interactions are cancelled in the presence of the CENP-A-specific residues valine-76 and lysine-77. Mutations of valine-76 and lysine-77 impair H4K20 monomethylation both in vitro and in vivo. These findings suggest that a CENP-A-mediated structural polymorphism may explain the preferential H4K20 monomethylation in centromeric nucleosomes. Kinetochore function depends on H4K20 monomethylation in centromeric nucleosomes but the underlying mechanism is unclear. Here, the authors provide evidence that the centromere-specific nucleosome subunit CENP-A facilitates H4K20 methylation by enabling a conformational change of the H4 N-terminal tail.

Centromeres are chromatin structures specialized in sister chromatid cohesion, kinetochore assembly, and microtubule attachment during chromosome segregation. The regional centromere of vertebrates consists of long regions of highly repetitive sequences occupied by the Histone H3 variant CENP-A, and which are flanked by pericentromeres. The three-dimensional organization of centromeric chromatin is paramount for its functionality and its ability to withstand spindle forces. Alongside CENP-A, key contributors to the folding of this structure include components of the Constitutive Centromere-Associated Network (CCAN), the protein CENP-B, and condensin and cohesin complexes. Despite its importance, the intricate architecture of the regional centromere of vertebrates remains largely unknown. Recent advancements in long-read sequencing, super-resolution and cryo-electron microscopy, and chromosome conformation capture techniques have significantly improved our understanding of this structure at various levels, from the linear arrangement of centromeric sequences and their epigenetic landscape to their higher-order compaction. In this review, we discuss the latest insights on centromere organization and place them in the context of recent findings describing a bipartite higher-order organization of the centromere.

Kinetochores assemble on distinct ‘centrochromatin’ containing the histone H3 variant CENP‐A and interspersed nucleosomes dimethylated on H3K4 (H3K4me2). Little is known about how the chromatin environment at active centromeres governs centromeric structure and function. Here, we report that centrochromatin resembles K4–K36 domains found in the body of some actively transcribed housekeeping genes. By tethering the lysine‐specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), we specifically depleted H3K4me2, a modification thought to have a role in transcriptional memory, from the kinetochore of a synthetic human artificial chromosome (HAC). H3K4me2 depletion caused kinetochores to suffer a rapid loss of transcription of the underlying α‐satellite DNA and to no longer efficiently recruit HJURP, the CENP‐A chaperone. Kinetochores depleted of H3K4me2 remained functional in the short term, but were defective in incorporation of CENP‐A, and were gradually inactivated. Our data provide a functional link between the centromeric chromatin, α‐satellite transcription, maintenance of CENP‐A levels and kinetochore stability. Here, centromeric histone marks on a human artificial chromosome are found to resemble the chromatin landscape in transcribed genes, and selective manipulation shows them to govern the incorporation of the centromere‐specifying CENP‐A histone variant.

A hallmark of mitosis is the appearance of high levels of histone phosphorylation, yet the roles of these modifications remain largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that histone H3 phosphorylated at threonine 3 is directly recognized by an evolutionarily conserved binding pocket in the BIR domain of Survivin, which is a member of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC). This binding mediates recruitment of the CPC to chromosomes and the resulting activation of its kinase subunit Aurora B. Consistently, modulation of the kinase activity of Haspin, which phosphorylates H3T3, leads to defects in the Aurora B-dependent processes of spindle assembly and inhibition of nuclear reformation. These findings establish a direct cellular role for mitotic histone H3T3 phosphorylation, which is read and translated by the CPC to ensure accurate cell division.

Chromosome segregation relies on centromeres, yet their repetitive DNA is often prone to aberrant rearrangements under pathological conditions. Factors that maintain centromere integrity to prevent centromere-associated chromosome translocations are unknown. Here, we demonstrate the importance of the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A in safeguarding DNA replication of alpha-satellite repeats to prevent structural aneuploidy. Rapid removal of CENP-A in S phase, but not other cell-cycle stages, caused accumulation of R loops with increased centromeric transcripts, and interfered with replication fork progression. Replication without CENP-A causes recombination at alpha-satellites in an R loop-dependent manner, unfinished replication, and anaphase bridges. In turn, chromosome breakage and translocations arise specifically at centromeric regions. Our findings provide insights into how specialized centromeric chromatin maintains the integrity of transcribed noncoding repetitive DNA during S phase.

Human centromeres have been traditionally very difficult to sequence and assemble owing to their repetitive nature and large size 1 . As a result, patterns of human centromeric variation and models for their evolution and function remain incomplete, despite centromeres being among the most rapidly mutating regions 2 , 3 . Here, using long-read sequencing, we completely sequenced and assembled all centromeres from a second human genome and compared it to the finished reference genome 4 , 5 . We find that the two sets of centromeres show at least a 4.1-fold increase in single-nucleotide variation when compared with their unique flanks and vary up to 3-fold in size. Moreover, we find that 45.8% of centromeric sequence cannot be reliably aligned using standard methods owing to the emergence of new α-satellite higher-order repeats (HORs). DNA methylation and CENP-A chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that 26% of the centromeres differ in their kinetochore position by >500 kb. To understand evolutionary change, we selected six chromosomes and sequenced and assembled 31 orthologous centromeres from the common chimpanzee, orangutan and macaque genomes. Comparative analyses reveal a nearly complete turnover of α-satellite HORs, with characteristic idiosyncratic changes in α-satellite HORs for each species. Phylogenetic reconstruction of human haplotypes supports limited to no recombination between the short (p) and long (q) arms across centromeres and reveals that novel α-satellite HORs share a monophyletic origin, providing a strategy to estimate the rate of saltatory amplification and mutation of human centromeric DNA. A comparison of two complete sets of human centromeres reveals that the centromeres show at least a 4.1-fold increase in single-nucleotide variation compared with their unique flanks, and up to 3-fold variation in size, resulting from an accelerated mutation rate.

Each chromosome contains a centromere, the site at which the kinetochore assembles to ensure accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. Centromeric chromatin, which anchors the kinetochore, includes three core proteins: Centromere Protein A (CENP-A), CENP-B, and CENP-C. Among these, CENP-B is unique for its sequence-specific DNA binding to a 17-base pair element known as the CENP-B box within the alpha-satellite DNA. CENP-B contains an N-terminal DNA-binding domain and a C-terminal dimerization domain that together enable juxtaposition of distant CENP-B boxes and promote higher-order centromeric structure. CENP-B also interacts directly with CENP-A and CENP-C, thereby facilitating kinetochore assembly. The CENP-B box includes two CpG dinucleotides that, when methylated, reduce CENP-B binding and limit recruitment of CENP-A and CENP-C. The recently completed human genome assembly (T2T-CHM13) revealed centromeric regions with low CpG methylation, termed centromere dip regions, that coincide with active, unmethylated CENP-B boxes. The uniform density of these unmethylated sites across chromosomes contributes to balanced kinetochore-spindle attachment. The CENP-B gene shows no pathogenic alterations in the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) GENIE cancer cohort (211,526 patients), underscoring its conserved role in chromosome stability.

Human kinetochores assemble onto centromeric DNA comprising repetitive arrays of the 171 bp α-satellite sequence. To understand the higher-order architecture of the inner kinetochore assembled onto α-satellite arrays, we show cryo-EM structures of CCAN with free DNA, and α-satellite repeat monomers and dimers with CENP-A nucleosomes. CCAN bound to free DNA and a monomeric CENP-A nucleosome engages 70 bp of DNA comprising 30 bp of an upstream α-satellite repeat. This upstream DNA interacts with the histone-fold domain subunits of the CENP-TWSX module in a manner resembling how nucleosomes wrap DNA gyres. A complex of CCAN assembled onto a dimeric α-satellite repeat with two CENP-A nucleosomes shows that CCAN can only be accommodated on the linker DNA by unwrapping DNA from both the CENP-TWSX module and the upstream nucleosome. We discuss the implications of these results for models of CCAN assembly on arrays of α-satellite chromatin containing CENP-A nucleosomes. Based on cryo-EM structures, here the authors propose three models for how the inner kinetochore and CENP-A nucleosomes are organized on repetitive alpha-satellite sequences, providing insights into the higher-order architecture of human centromeres.

Ly et al.  establish a method to selectively inactivate the centromere of the Y chromosome to follow chromosome shattering and micronuclei formation through several cell cycles, and suggest re-ligation of chromosome fragments is dependent on non-homologous end joining. Chromosome missegregation into a micronucleus can cause complex and localized genomic rearrangements 1 , 2 known as chromothripsis 3 , but the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. Here we developed an inducible Y centromere-selective inactivation strategy by exploiting a CENP-A/histone H3 chimaera to directly examine the fate of missegregated chromosomes in otherwise diploid human cells. Using this approach, we identified a temporal cascade of events that are initiated following centromere inactivation involving chromosome missegregation, fragmentation, and re-ligation that span three consecutive cell cycles. Following centromere inactivation, a micronucleus harbouring the Y chromosome is formed in the first cell cycle. Chromosome shattering, producing up to 53 dispersed fragments from a single chromosome, is triggered by premature micronuclear condensation prior to or during mitotic entry of the second cycle. Lastly, canonical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but not homology-dependent repair, is shown to facilitate re-ligation of chromosomal fragments in the third cycle. Thus, initial errors in cell division can provoke further genomic instability through fragmentation of micronuclear DNAs coupled to NHEJ-mediated reassembly in the subsequent interphase.

Background Centromere identity in eukaryotes is defined epigenetically by CENH3 (CENPA), a specialized histone H3 variant essential for kinetochore establishment and faithful chromosome segregation. However, the regulatory mechanisms governing CENH3 loading during meiosis and how they differ from mitotic patterns remain insufficiently elucidated. Results Here we characterize the dynamics of CENH3 deposition across meiosis and compare them with mitotic loading in rice. Quantitative fluorescence imaging reveals a pronounced increase of CENH3 signal during meiotic prophase I, coinciding with increased accumulation of multiple kinetochore components. Super-resolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy further confirms a distinct peak of CENH3 loading at zygotene. Through low-input ChIP-seq integrated with multi-omics profiling of purified meiocytes, we find that this meiosis-specific enrichment reflects both expanded and intensified CENH3 deposition, predominantly at Ty3-Gypsy retrotransposons. This remodeling is accompanied by reduced transcription of mRNAs and small RNAs, along with a reduction in CHG methylation and H3K9me2 heterochromatin marks. Conclusion Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized, meiotic-specific pattern of CENH3 loading in rice and highlight a coordinated regulatory network linking centromeric chromatin reorganization, transcriptional repression, and epigenetic modification during early meiotic progression.