Explore the vast range of titles available.

A cream formulation of the phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor roflumilast, in two concentrations, led to higher percentages of patients with clearance or near-clearance of psoriatic lesions at 6 weeks than placebo. Difficult-to-treat intertriginous areas also improved as compared with placebo.

Background As chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease it is unlikely that all patients will benefit equally from a given therapy. Roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has been shown to improve lung function in moderate and severe COPD but its effect on exacerbations in unselected populations was inconclusive. This led to the question of whether a responsive subset existed that could be investigated further. Methods The datasets of two previous replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies (oral roflumilast 500 μg or placebo once daily for 52 weeks) that were inconclusive regarding exacerbations were combined in a post-hoc, pooled analysis to determine whether roflumilast reduced exacerbations in a more precisely defined patient subset. Results The pooled analysis included 2686 randomized patients. Roflumilast significantly decreased exacerbations by 14.3% compared with placebo (p = 0.026). Features associated with this reduction were: presence of chronic bronchitis with or without emphysema (26.2% decrease, p = 0.001), presence of cough (20.9% decrease, p = 0.006), presence of sputum (17.8% decrease, p = 0.03), and concurrent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; 18.8% decrease, p = 0.014). The incidence of adverse events was similar with roflumilast and placebo (81.5% vs 80.1%), but more patients in the roflumilast group had events assessed as likely or definitely related to the study drug (21.5% vs 8.3%). Conclusions This post-hoc, pooled analysis showed that roflumilast reduced exacerbation frequency in a subset of COPD patients whose characteristics included chronic bronchitis with/without concurrent ICS. These observations aided the design of subsequent phase 3 studies that prospectively confirmed the reduction in exacerbations with roflumilast treatment. Trials registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00076089 and NCT00430729 .

p38 MAPK inhibition has potential myocardial protective effects. We assessed losmapimod, a potent oral p38 MAPK inhibitor, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. From October, 2009, to November, 2011, NSTEMI patients were assigned oral losmapimod (7·5 mg or 15·0 mg loading dose followed by 7·5 mg twice daily) or matching placebo in a 3:3:2 ratio. Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations over 12 weeks, and cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischaemia, stroke, and heart failure) at 90 days. Efficacy outcomes were high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations at 72 h and 12 weeks, and troponin I area under the curve (AUC) over 72 h. The losmapimod groups were pooled for analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00910962. Of 535 patients enrolled, 526 (98%) received at least one dose of study treatment (losmapimod n=388 and placebo n=138). Safety outcomes did not differ between groups. HsCRP concentrations at 72 h were lower in the losmapimod group than in the placebo group (geometric mean 64·1 nmol/L, 95% CI 53·0–77·6 vs 110·8 nmol/L, 83·1–147·7; p=0·0009) but were similar at 12 weeks. Early geometric mean BNP concentrations were similar at 72 h but significantly lower in the losmapimod group at 12 weeks (37·2 ng/L, 95% CI 32·3–42·9 vs 49·4 ng/L, 38·7–63·0; p=0·04). Mean troponin I AUC values did not differ. p38 MAPK inhibition with oral losmapimod was well tolerated in NSTEMI patients and might improve outcomes after acute coronary syndromes. GlaxoSmithKline.

SHR6390 is an oral, potent and selective small-molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor for the treatment of human breast, ovarian and colon cancer. Previous studies have shown that SHR6390 in combination with rifampicin, a potent inducer of CYP3A4, significantly reduces exposure levels. Therefore, we further investigated the effect of efavirenz, a moderate CYP3A4 inducer, on a single oral dose of SHR6390 in healthy volunteers. Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled in this single-center, open, single-dose, self-controlled DDI study. On Day 1, subjects received a single oral dose of 150mg SHR6390; on Day 8-26, subjects received 600 mg efavirenz orally at night, with a single dose of 150 mg SHR6390 on Day 22. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected. The geometric mean ratios of the maximum concentration(C ) and the area under the concentration curve from zero to infinity (AUC ) between combination therapy and SHR6390 monotherapy (combination therapy/SHR6390 monotherapy) and their 90% confidence intervals were 0.562 (0.482, 0.654) and 0.328 (0.278, 0.386), respectively. This indicates that the Cmax and AUC0 inf of SHR6390 decreased by approximately 43.8% and 67.2%, respectively. Oral administration of 150 mg SHR6390 alone or together with efavirenz was safe and tolerable in healthy subjects. It is suggested that under the action of the moderate CPY3A4 inducer efavirenz, the exposure AUC of SHR6390 exhibits a moderate level of induction. It is recommended to avoid concomitant administration of moderate inducers of CYP3A4 during treatment with SHR6390. http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, CTR20211571/ https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04973020.

PurposeInvestigating the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (RUP) versus montelukast (MON) as adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsFrom December 2018 to December 2019, 75 patients with active RA were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three groups (n = 25 in each group); methotrexate (MTX) group which received MTX 15–25 mg/week plus placebo tablet once daily; MTX/RUP group which received MTX plus RUP 10 mg once daily; and MTX/MON group which received MTX plus MON 10 mg once daily. The treatment duration was 3 months. At baseline and 3 months after treatment, blood samples were collected for the biochemical analysis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukins 8 and 17 (IL-8, IL-17), E-selectin, and clusterin (CLU) levels. Clinical and functional assessments using Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) were performed.ResultsBoth RUP and MON produced clinical and functional improvements which were translated by significant improvements in DAS28-CRP score and MDHAQ. Rupatadine significantly reduced all measured parameters (P < 0.05) except for IL-17 and CLU. Montelukast significantly decreased all measured variables (P < 0.05) except for E-selectin. Interleukin-8 was positively correlated with IL-17 and CLU, while hs-CRP was positively correlated with E-selectin and body mass index (BMI). Both drugs were well tolerated; somnolence was the common side effect for RUP. No neuropsychiatric events were reported with MON.ConclusionRupatadine or montelukast may serve as a potential adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis secondary to the preliminary evidence of efficacy and safety.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03770923, December 10, 2018

Various therapeutic options are available for verruca. While physical destruction may be associated with scarring, immunotherapy may be effective in treating warts through stimulating body immune response. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and outcome of Candida antigen vs diphencyprone (DPCP) in the treatment of warts. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to receive either intralesional Candida antigen every 3 weeks or weekly DPCP application. Both treatments were applied only to the mother wart. Lesions’ clearance and associated side effects were observed up to 4 weeks after treatment. Two blinded physicians evaluated photos of warts before and 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Both modalities granted wart clearance and/or improvement with no statistically significant difference; however, Candida antigen was significantly better in clearing adjacent untreated warts ( p  = 0.046). Fewer side effects were observed among the Candida antigen group. The response was duration associated in the Candida groups only. Intralesional Candida antigen injection and DPCP treatments for warts yielded improvement with superiority of Candida injection in eradicating distant lesions and fewer side effects. A shorter wart duration may be associated with a better therapeutic response with Candida antigen.

Fixed-dose combination glecaprevir (GLE) 300 mg + pibrentasvir (PIB) 120 mg is an orally administered once daily antiviral regimen approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for cardiac repolarization following GLE + PIB administration in healthy adults. This placebo- and active-controlled, randomized, single-dose, 4-period, 4-sequence crossover study enrolled 48 healthy subjects. The doses of GLE 400 mg + PIB 120 mg were selected to provide exposures comparable to those with the doses that are therapeutic in the HCV-infected population, GLE 300 mg + PIB 120 mg. The doses of GLE 600 mg + PIB 240 mg were selected to provide supratherapeutic exposures without exceeding the exposures of the GLE + PIB maximal tolerated doses. Moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control/open label) was used for confirming the sensitivity of the ECG assay in detecting QTc prolongation. Time-matched plasma concentrations and triplicate ECGs were obtained on treatment days −1 and 1. The primary end point was time-matched, placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted Fridericia-corrected QT interval (ΔΔQTcF). Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analyses characterized the relationship between GLE and PIB plasma concentrations and ΔΔQTcF using a linear regression model and linear mixed-effects model. Findings from categorical analyses of ECG-interval data were also summarized. Tolerability was evaluated through adverse-events monitoring, physical examination including vital sign measurements, ECGs, and laboratory tests. A total of 48 subjects (22 women [46%], 26 men [54%]), were enrolled in the study, and 47 subjects completed all 4 periods. None of the subjects had a change from baseline in QTcF interval of >30 msec or an absolute QTcF interval of >450 msec. Peak ΔΔQTcF values observed at 5 h postdose (Tmax) were 2.9 msec (upper 95% confidence limit, 4.9 msec) with the therapeutic dose and 3.1 msec (upper 95% confidence limit, 5.1 msec) with the supratherapeutic dose, with both upper 95% confidence limits well below the 10-msec threshold. Assay sensitivity was confirmed by peak ΔΔQTcF in the positive control (12.8 ms at 2 h postdose). No statistically significant GLE or PIB concentration-dependent effects on ΔΔQTcF were observed. Headache and skin irritation from ECG electrodes were the most commonly reported AEs. No clinically significant vital sign measurements, ECG findings, or laboratory measurements were observed. There were no patterns of T- and U-wave morphologic abnormalities. The fixed-dose combination regimen of GLE/PIB does not prolong the QTc interval. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier.

Background In the OPTIMIZE study, 4 weeks of roflumilast 250 µg once daily before escalation to the approved 500 µg once daily maintenance dose reduced treatment discontinuations and improved tolerability to roflumilast among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we present the pharmacokinetic (PK) results and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) modelling data from OPTIMIZE. Methods OPTIMIZE was a multicentre, double-blind, phase III study in which patients with severe COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to receive oral roflumilast 250 μg once daily, 500 μg every other day, or 500 μg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 500 μg once daily for 8 weeks. A population PK (popPK) model characterized roflumilast exposure levels (total phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition [tPDE4i]). Furthermore, models characterized the percentage of patients with adverse events (AEs) of interest (PK/AE model), and time to discontinuation due to such AEs (PK/time-to-event model). Results The popPK model adequately described average plasma concentrations and variability from 1238 patients. The percentage of patients with AEs of interest increased with predicted tPDE4i exposure (logit scale slope 0.484; confidence interval 0.262–0.706; p  = 2 × 10 −5 ). PK/time-to-event model analysis predicted that patients receiving the 250 μg up-titration regimen had significantly lower discontinuation rates and longer time to discontinuation compared with roflumilast 500 μg every other day or 500 μg once daily ( p  = 0.0014). Conclusions In this PK/PD model, a 4-week up-titration regimen with roflumilast 250 µg once daily was found to reduce discontinuations and improve tolerability, confirming the main clinical findings of the OPTIMIZE study. However, use of this lower dose as long-term maintenance therapy may not induce sufficient phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition to exert clinical efficacy, supporting the approval of 500 µg as maintenance dose. Trial Registration OPTIMIZE: NCT02165826; REACT: NCT01329029.

Abstract Rationale The oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, roflumilast, can improve lung function in moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether treatment is effective in more severe COPD (GOLD [Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease] stages III and IV) over a longer period is unknown. Objectives To determine whether roflumilast improves lung function and decreases exacerbation frequency over 1 year in patients with stable COPD. Methods We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial for 1 year. We recruited 1,513 patients (mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 41% predicted), 760 receiving oral 500 μg roflumilast and 753 receiving placebo once daily. Measurements and Main Results We recorded post-bronchodilator FEV1, exacerbation rate, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score at the study end point, and number and type of reported adverse events during treatment. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 increased by 39 ml with roflumilast compared with placebo by 52 weeks (p = 0.001). The mean exacerbation rate was low and comparable in both treatment groups (0.86 vs. 0.92 exacerbations/patient/yr for roflumilast and placebo, respectively). In a retrospective analysis, the exacerbation rate in patients in GOLD stage IV disease was 36% lower in patients treated with roflumilast than in those treated with placebo (1.01 vs. 1.59 exacerbations/patient/year, respectively; p = 0.024). The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score did not differ between treatments. The commonest adverse events related to roflumilast treatment were diarrhea, nausea, and headache, which usually subsided during continued treatment. However, roflumilast resulted in more withdrawals within the first 3 to 4 weeks of administration. Conclusions In severe, stable COPD, PDE4 inhibition with roflumilast produced a modest but significant improvement in lung function without changing the exacerbation rate or health status. However, patients with very severe disease experienced fewer exacerbations with roflumilast.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow limitation associated with chronic inflammation. There are few treatment options for the disease. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe COPD. This phase III, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study was undertaken in an outpatient setting. 1411 patients with COPD were randomly assigned roflumilast 250 μg (n=576), roflumilast 500 μg (n=555), or placebo (n=280) given orally once daily for 24 weeks. Primary outcomes were postbronchodilator FEV 1 and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes included other lung function parameters and COPD exacerbations. Analyses were by intention to treat. 1157 (82%) patients completed the study; 32 (11%) withdrew from the placebo group, 100 (17%) from the roflumilast 250 μg group, and 124 (22%) from the roflumilast 500 μg group. Postbronchodilator FEV 1 at the end of treatment significantly improved with roflumilast 250 μg (by 74 mL [SD 18]) and roflumilast 500 μg (by 97 mL [18]) compared with placebo (p<0·0001). Improvement in health-related quality of life was greater with roflumilast 250 μg (−3·4 units [0·6]) and roflumilast 500 μg (−3·5 units [0·6]) than with placebo (−1·8 units [0·8]), although the differences between treatment groups were not significant. The mean numbers of exacerbations per patient were 1·13 (2·37), 1·03 (2·33), and 0·75 (1·89) with placebo, roflumilast 250 μg, and roflumilast 500 μg, respectively. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and resolved during the study. Roflumilast is a promising candidate for anti-inflammatory COPD treatment because it improved lung function and reduced exacerbations compared with placebo. Long-term studies are needed to fully assess the effect on health-related quality of life.