Explore the vast range of titles available.

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) is a developmental multisystem disorder frequently associated with mutations in NIPBL. CdLS is thought to arise from developmental gene regulation defects, but how NIPBL mutations cause these is unknown. Here we show that several NIPBL mutations impair the DNA loop extrusion activity of cohesin. Because this activity is required for the formation of chromatin loops and topologically associating domains, which have important roles in gene regulation, our results suggest that defects in cohesin-mediated loop extrusion contribute to the etiology of CdLS by altering interactions between developmental genes and their enhancers.

The cohesin complex topologically encircles DNA to promote sister chromatid cohesion. Alternatively, cohesin extrudes DNA loops, thought to reflect chromatin domain formation. Here, we propose a structure-based model explaining both activities. ATP and DNA binding promote cohesin conformational changes that guide DNA through a kleisin N-gate into a DNA gripping state. Two HEAT-repeat DNA binding modules, associated with cohesin’s heads and hinge, are now juxtaposed. Gripping state disassembly, following ATP hydrolysis, triggers unidirectional hinge module movement, which completes topological DNA entry by directing DNA through the ATPase head gate. If head gate passage fails, hinge module motion creates a Brownian ratchet that, instead, drives loop extrusion. Molecular-mechanical simulations of gripping state formation and resolution cycles recapitulate experimentally observed DNA loop extrusion characteristics. Our model extends to asymmetric and symmetric loop extrusion, as well as z-loop formation. Loop extrusion by biased Brownian motion has important implications for chromosomal cohesin function. When a cell divides, it has to ensure that each of its daughter cells inherits one copy of its genetic information. It does this by duplicating its chromosomes (the DNA molecules that encode the genome) and distributing one copy of each to its daughter cells. Once a cell duplicates a chromosome, the two identical chromosomes must be held together until the cell is ready to divide in two. A ring-shaped protein complex called cohesin does this by encircling the two chromosomes. Cohesin embraces both chromosome copies, as they emerge from the DNA replicating machinery. The complex is formed of several proteins that bind to a small molecule called ATP, whose arrival and subsequent breakdown release energy. Cohesin also interacts with DNA in a different way: it can create loops of chromatin (the complex formed by DNA and its packaging proteins) that help regulate the activity of genes. Experiments performed on single molecules isolated in the laboratory show that cohesin can form a small loop of DNA that is then enlarged through a process called DNA loop extrusion. However, it is not known whether loop extrusion occurs in the cell. Although both of cohesin’s roles have to do with how DNA is organised in the cell, it remains unclear how a single protein complex can engage in two such different activities. To answer this question, Higashi et al. used a structure of cohesin from yeast cells gripping onto DNA to build a model that simulates how the complex interacts with chromosomes and chromatin. This model suggested that when ATP is broken down, the cohesin structure shifts and DNA enters the ring, allowing DNA to be entrapped and chromosomes to be bound together. However, a small change in how DNA is gripped initially could prevent it from entering the ring, creating a ratchet mechanism that forms and enlarges a DNA loop. This molecular model helps explain how cohesin can either encircle DNA or create loops. However, Higashi et al.’s findings also raise the question of whether loop extrusion is possible inside cells, where DNA is densely packed and bound to proteins which could be obstacles to loop extrusion. Further research to engineer cohesin that can only perform one of these roles would help to clarify their individual contributions in the cell.

Synthetic nanobodies—also called sybodies—have proven valuable for stabilizing conformations of purified proteins, advancing structural and functional studies for example of transmembrane proteins. However, their utility in modulating protein function in living cells has remained less well explored. Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes facilitate chromosome organization, a fundamental process in all domains of life. In this study, we target the bacterial SMC complex, Smc-ScpAB, in Bacillus subtilis with synthetic nanobodies, aiming to identify key functional regions of the protein complex in a largely unbiased manner. We first isolate sybodies that specifically bind purified Smc-ScpAB and then express them in B. subtilis to select binders capable of disrupting Smc-ScpAB function, leading to chromosome segregation defects and cell death. Mapping and biochemical characterization show that the 14 disruptive sybodies belong to one of three library designs, target the Smc subunit near the same coiled coil arm interface and modulate its ATPase activity in two principal ways, highlighting the mid-region of the Smc coiled coil as critical feature of the SMC-DNA folding process. These findings underscore the potential of sybodies—and, by extension, designed binders—as versatile tools for probing dynamic protein function in living cells.

SMC complexes are widely conserved ATP-powered DNA-loop-extrusion motors indispensable for organizing and faithfully segregating chromosomes. How SMC complexes translocate along DNA for loop extrusion and what happens when two complexes meet on the same DNA molecule is largely unknown. Revealing the origins and the consequences of SMC encounters is crucial for understanding the folding process not only of bacterial, but also of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we uncover several factors that influence bacterial chromosome organization by modulating the probability of such clashes. These factors include the number, the strength, and the distribution of Smc loading sites, the residency time on the chromosome, the translocation rate, and the cellular abundance of Smc complexes. By studying various mutants, we show that these parameters are fine-tuned to reduce the frequency of encounters between Smc complexes, presumably as a risk mitigation strategy. Mild perturbations hamper chromosome organization by causing Smc collisions, implying that the cellular capacity to resolve them is limited. Altogether, we identify mechanisms that help to avoid Smc collisions and their resolution by Smc traversal or other potentially risky molecular transactions.

DNA loops can be formed by a mechanism in which the cohesin complex pulls DNA strands through its ring structure using biased Brownian motion.DNA loops can be formed by a mechanism in which the cohesin complex pulls DNA strands through its ring structure using biased Brownian motion.

Cohesin folds mammalian interphase chromosomes by extruding the chromatin fiber into numerous loops. “Loop extrusion” can be impeded by chromatin-bound factors, such as CTCF, which generates characteristic and functional chromatin organization patterns. It has been proposed that transcription relocalizes or interferes with cohesin and that active promoters are cohesin loading sites. However, the effects of transcription on cohesin have not been reconciled with observations of active extrusion by cohesin. To determine how transcription modulates extrusion, we studied mouse cells in which we could alter cohesin abundance, dynamics, and localization by genetic “knockouts” of the cohesin regulators CTCF and Wapl. Through Hi-C experiments, we discovered intricate, cohesin-dependent contact patterns near active genes. Chromatin organization around active genes exhibited hallmarks of interactions between transcribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) and extruding cohesins. These observations could be reproduced by polymer simulations in which RNAPs were moving barriers to extrusion that obstructed, slowed, and pushed cohesins. The simulations predicted that preferential loading of cohesin at promoters is inconsistent with our experimental data. Additional ChIP-seq experiments showed that the putative cohesin loader Nipbl is not predominantly enriched at promoters. Therefore, we propose that cohesin is not preferentially loaded at promoters and that the barrier function of RNAP accounts for cohesin accumulation at active promoters. Altogether, we find that RNAP is an extrusion barrier that is not stationary, but rather, translocates and relocalizes cohesin. Loop extrusion and transcription might interact to dynamically generate and maintain gene interactions with regulatory elements and shape functional genomic organization.

To separate replicated sister chromatids during mitosis, eukaryotes and prokaryotes have structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) condensin complexes that were recently shown to organize chromosomes by a process known as DNA loop extrusion. In rapidly dividing bacterial cells, the process of separating sister chromatids occurs concomitantly with ongoing transcription. How transcription interferes with the condensin loop-extrusion process is largely unexplored, but recent experiments have shown that sites of high transcription may directionally affect condensin loop extrusion. We quantitatively investigate different mechanisms of interaction between condensin and elongating RNA polymerases (RNAPs) and find that RNAPs are likely steric barriers that can push and interact with condensins. Supported by chromosome conformation capture and chromatin immunoprecipitation for cells after transcription inhibition and RNAP degradation, we argue that translocating condensins must bypass transcribing RNAPs within ∼1 to 2 s of an encounter at rRNA genes and within ∼10 s at proteincoding genes. Thus, while individual RNAPs have little effect on the progress of loop extrusion, long, highly transcribed operons can significantly impede the extrusion process. Our data and quantitative models further suggest that bacterial condensin loop extrusion occurs by 2 independent, uncoupled motor activities; the motors translocate on DNA in opposing directions and function together to enlarge chromosomal loops, each independently bypassing steric barriers in their path. Our study provides a quantitative link between transcription and 3D genome organization and proposes a mechanism of interactions between SMC complexes and elongating transcription machinery relevant from bacteria to higher eukaryotes.

Loop extrusion by structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes has been proposed as a mechanism to organize chromatin in interphase and metaphase. However, the requirements for chromatin organization in these cell cycle phases are different, and it is unknown whether loop extrusion dynamics and the complexes that extrude DNA also differ. Here, we used Xenopus egg extracts to reconstitute and image loop extrusion of single DNA molecules during the cell cycle. We show that loops form in both metaphase and interphase, but with distinct dynamic properties. Condensin extrudes DNA loops non-symmetrically in metaphase, whereas cohesin extrudes loops symmetrically in interphase. Our data show that loop extrusion is a general mechanism underlying DNA organization, with dynamic and structural properties that are biochemically regulated during the cell cycle.

Condensin is a structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex needed for the compaction of DNA into chromatids during mitosis. Lengthwise DNA compaction by condensin is facilitated by ATPase-driven loop extrusion, a process that is believed to be the fundamental activity of most, if not all, SMC complexes. In order to obtain molecular insights, we obtained electron cryomicroscopy structures of yeast condensin in the presence of a slowly hydrolyzable ATP analog and linear as well as circular DNAs. The DNAs were shown to be “clamped” between the engaged heterodimeric SMC ATPase heads and the Ycs4 subunit, in a manner similar to previously reported DNA-bound SMC complex structures. Ycg1, the other non-SMC subunit, was only flexibly bound to the complex, while also binding DNA tightly and often remaining at a distance from the head module. In the clamped state, the DNA is encircled by the kleisin Brn1 and the two engaged head domains of Smc2 and Smc4. The Brn1/Smc2/Smc4 tripartite ring is closed at all interfaces, including at the neck of Smc2. We show that the neck gate opens upon head engagement in the absence of DNA, but it remains shut when DNA is present. Our work demonstrates that condensin and other SMC complexes go through similar conformations of the head modules during their ATPase cycle. In contrast, the behavior of the Ycg1 subunit in the condensin complex might indicate differences in the implementation of the extrusion reactions, and our findings will constrain further mechanistic models of loop extrusion by SMC complexes.

Eukaryote cell division features a chromosome compaction–decompaction cycle that is synchronized with their physical and topological segregation. It has been proposed that lengthwise compaction of chromatin into mitotic chromosomes via loop extrusion underlies the compaction-segregation/resolution process. We analyze this disentanglement scheme via considering the chromosome to be a succession of DNA/chromatin loops—a polymer “brush”—where active extrusion of loops controls the brush structure. Given type-II DNA topoisomerase (Topo II)-catalyzed topology fluctuations, we find that interchromosome entanglements are minimized for a certain “optimal” loop that scales with the chromosome size. The optimal loop organization is in accord with experimental data across species, suggesting an important structural role of genomic loops in maintaining a less entangled genome. Application of the model to the interphase genome indicates that active loop extrusion can maintain a level of chromosome compaction with suppressed entanglements; the transition to the metaphase state requires higher lengthwise compaction and drives complete topological segregation. Optimized genomic loops may provide a means for evolutionary propagation of gene-expression patterns while simultaneously maintaining a disentangled genome. We also find that compact metaphase chromosomes have a densely packed core along their cylindrical axes that explains their observed mechanical stiffness. Our model connects chromosome structural reorganization to topological resolution through the cell cycle and highlights a mechanism of directing Topo II-mediated strand passage via loop extrusion-driven lengthwise compaction.