Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) is emerging as an alternative technique for biliary drainage in patients who fail conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are being increasingly used for CDD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CDD using LAMS.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of multiple databases through May 2019 to identify studies on CDD using covered self-expanding metal stents. Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrent jaundice associated with CDD using LAMS were estimated. A subgroup analysis was performed based on use of LAMS with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system (EC-LAMS).ResultsSeven studies on CDD using LAMS (with 284 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 95.7% (95% CI 93.2–98.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 92.8–98.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.2% (95% CI 2.6–7.9). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 8.7% (95% CI 4.5–12.8).On subgroup analysis of CDD using EC-LAMS (5 studies with 201 patients), the pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 93.8% (95% CI 90.4–97.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 91.9–99.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.6% (95% CI 1.7–9.5). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 11.3% (95% CI 6.9–15.7). Heterogeneity (I2) was low to moderate in the analyses.ConclusionCDD using LAMS/EC-LAMS is an effective and safe technique for biliary decompression in patients who failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to assess CDD using LAMS as primary treatment modality for biliary obstruction.

Introduction Cholelithiasis usually can be managed successfully by endoscopic sphincterotomy. Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) is one of the surgical treatment options but its acceptance remains debated because of the risk of reflux cholangitis and sump syndrome. The aim of this study was to assess the current features and outcomes of patient undergoing CDD. Patients and methods We retrospectively analysed the surgical results of consecutive 130 patients treated by CDD between 1991 and 2013 and excluded five cases with a malignant disorder. Indications for surgery included endoscopic management where stones were difficult or failed to pass and primary common bile duct stones with choledochal dilatation. Incidences of reflux cholangitis, stone recurrence, pancreatitis or sump syndrome were investigated and the data between end-to-side and side-to-side CDD were compared. Results Reflux cholangitis and stone recurrence was 1.6% (2/125) and 0% (0/125) of cases by CDD. There is no therapeutic-related pancreatitis in CDD. Sump syndrome was not also observed in side-to-side CDD. Conclusions This study is a first comparative study between end-to-side and side-to-side CDD. The surgical outcomes for CDD treatment of choledocholithiasis were acceptable. The incidence of reflux cholangitis, stone recurrence, pancreatitis and sump syndrome was very low.

Duodeno-duodenostomy (DD) has been proposed as a more physiological alternative to conventional duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ) for pancreas transplantation. Accessibility of percutaneous biopsies in these grafts has not yet been assessed. We conducted a retrospective study including all pancreatic percutaneous graft biopsies requested between November 2009 and July 2021. Whenever possible, biopsies were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance or computed tomography (CT) guidance when the US approach failed. Patients were classified into two groups according to surgical technique (DJ and DD). Accessibility, success for histological diagnosis and complications were compared. Biopsy was performed in 93/136 (68.4%) patients in the DJ group and 116/132 (87.9%) of the DD group ( p = 0.0001). The graft was not accessible for biopsy mainly due to intestinal loop interposition (n = 29 DJ, n = 10 DD). Adequate sample for histological diagnosis was obtained in 86/93 (92.5%) of the DJ group and 102/116 (87.9%) of the DD group ( p = 0.2777). One minor complication was noted in the DD group. The retrocolic position of the DD pancreatic graft does not limit access to percutaneous biopsy. This is a safe technique with a high histological diagnostic success rate.

Objective To study the effect of antecolic vs. retrocolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and to analyze factors which may be associated with post-PD DGE. Summary Background Data DGE is a troublesome complication occurring in 30–40% of patients undergoing PD leading to increased postoperative morbidity. Many factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of DGE. Among the various methods employed to reduce the incidence, recent reports have suggested that an antecolic reconstruction of gastro/duodenojejunostomy may decrease the incidence of DGE. Methods Between Sep 2006 and Nov 2008, 95 patients requiring PD (for both malignant and benign conditions) were eligible for the study. Of these, 72 patients finally underwent a PD and were randomized to either a retrocolic or antecolic reconstruction of the gastro/duodenojejunostomy. All patients underwent the standard Whipple’s or a pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), and the randomization was stratified according to the type of PD done. DGE was assessed clinically using the Johns Hopkins criteria (Yeo et al. in Ann Surg 218: 229–37, 1993 ). In patients suspected to have DGE, mechanical causes were excluded by imaging and/or endoscopy. Occurrence of DGE was the primary endpoint, whereas duration of hospital stay and occurrence of intra-abdominal complications were the secondary end points. Results The antecolic and retrocolic groups were comparable with regard to patient demographics, diagnosis, and other preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. Overall, DGE occurred in 21 patients (30.9%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of DGE in the antecolic vs. the retrocolic group (34.4% vs. 27.8%; p  = 0.6). On univariate analysis, older age, use of octreotide, and intra-abdominal complications were significantly associated with the occurrence of DGE; however, on a multivariate analysis, only age was found to be significant ( p  = 0.02). The mean postoperative stay was longer among patients who developed DGE (21.9 ± 9.3 days vs. 13 ± 6.9 days; p  = 0.0001). Conclusions Delayed gastric emptying is a cause of significant morbidity and prolongs the duration of hospitalization following pancreaticoduodenectomy. The incidence of DGE does not appear to be related to the method of reconstruction (antecolic or retrocolic). Older age may be a risk factor for its occurrence.

Background Nutritional support influences the outcome of gastroenterological surgery, and enteral nutrition effectively mitigates postoperative complications in highly invasive surgery such as resection of esophageal cancer. However, feeding via jejunostomy can cause complications including mechanical obstruction, which could be life threatening. From 2009, we began enteral feeding via duodenostomy to reduce the likelihood of complications. In this study, we compared duodenostomy with the conventional jejunostomy feeding, mainly looking at the catheter-related complications. Methods The database records of 378 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy with retrosternal or posterior mediastinal gastric tube reconstruction in our department from January 1998 to December 2012 were examined. Of the 378 patients, 111 underwent feeding via duodenostomy (FD) and 267 underwent feeding via jejunostomy (FJ), and their records were reviewed for the following catheter-related complications: site infection, dislodgement, peritonitis, and mechanical obstruction. Results Mechanical obstruction occurred in 12 patients in the FJ group but none in the FD group (4.5 % vs. 0 %, P  = 0.023). Of the 12 cases, 7 (58.3 %) required surgery of which 2 had bowel resection due to strangulated mechanical obstruction. Catheter site infection was seen in 14 cases in the FJ group, of which 2 (14.2 %) had peritonitis following catheter dislocation, while only one case of site infection was seen in the FD group (5.2 % vs. 0.9 %, P  = 0.078). Conclusions Feeding via duodenectomy could be the procedure of choice since neither mechanical obstruction nor relaparotomy was seen during enteral feeding through this technique.

Background A retrospective analysis indicated that the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was less after using a circular stapler (CS) for duodenojejunostomy than that after hand-sewn (HS) anastomosis in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PpPD). This randomized clinical trial compared the incidence of DGE postoperative after CS duodenojejunostomy with that of conventional HS anastomosis in PpPD. Methods We randomly assigned 101 patients (age 20–80) undergoing PpPD to receive CS duodenojejunostomy (group CS, n  = 50) or HS duodenojejunostomy (group HS, n  = 51) in two Japanese cancer center hospitals between 2011 and 2013. The patients were stratified by institution and size of the main pancreatic duct (<3 or ≥3 mm). The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade B or C DGE according to the international definition with a non-inferiority margin of 5 %. This trial is registered with University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center: UMIN000005463. Results Per-protocol analysis of data on 95 patients showed that grade B or C DGE was found in 4 (8.9 %) of 45 patients who underwent CS anastomosis and in 8 (16 %) of 50 patients who underwent HS anastomosis ( P  = 0.015). There were no differences in the overall incidence of DGE ( P  = 0.98), passage of the contrast medium through the anastomosis ( P  = 0.55), or hospital stays ( P  = 0.22). Conclusions CS duodenojejunostomy is not inferior to HS anastomosis with respect to the incidence of clinically significant DGE, justifying its use as treatment option.

BackgroundPerforation is a rare but serious adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of morbidity and mortality after surgical management of ERCP-related perforation (EP).MethodsThe records of patients with EP requiring surgical intervention at a tertiary referral center in a 12-year period (2004–2016) were retrospectively analyzed for demography, indications for ERCP, risk factors, timing and type of surgical repair, post-operative course, hospital stay, and outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify the parameters predicting survival.ResultsOf 25,300 ERCPs, 380 (1.5%) had EP. Non-operative management was successful in 330 (86.8%) patients. 50 (13.2%) patients were operated for EP. Out of 50, the perforation was detected during ERCP (intra-procedure) in 32 patients (64%). In 30 patients (60%), the surgery was performed within 24 h of ERCP. Twenty patients underwent delayed surgery (after 24 h of ERCP) following the failure of initial non-operative management. The delayed surgery after an unsuccessful medical treatment had a detrimental effect on morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Post-operative duodenal leak was the only independent predictor of 90-day mortality (p = 0.02, OR = 9.1, 95% CI 1.52–54.64). Addition of T-tube duodenostomy (TTD) to the primary repair for either type I or type II perforations increased post-operative duodenal leak (type I, p = 0.048 and type II; p = 0.001) and mortality (type I, p = 0.009 and type II, p = 0.045).ConclusionAlthough EP is a rare event, it has a serious impact on morbidity and mortality. Delaying of surgery following failed non-operative management worsens the prognosis. Addition of TTD to the repair is not helpful in these patients.

After gastrectomy, the remnant stomach, a small stomach behind the lateral segment of the liver, is thought to be a relative contraindication to receiving a percutaneous endoscopy-guided gastrostomy (PEG). We successfully performed a percutaneous duodenostomy in a case with remnant stomach. We used a transhepatic pull method with computed tomography (CT) guidance and real-time visualization by using ultrasound (US) and an endoscopy. The procedure was as follows: 1. Full stretching of the remnant stomach; 2. Insertion of a fine injection needle into the duodenal lumen through the lateral segment of the liver without an intrahepatic vascular and biliary injury using real-time visualization through US; 3. Confirmation of the location of the fine needle using abdominal CT, which showed the fine needle penetrating through the lateral segment and the duodenal lumen; 4. Insertion of the thick needle of the PEG kit just laterally of the fine needle; 5. Confirmation of the location of the thick needle using a repeated CT; 6. Endoscopic confirmation of the location of the two needles; 7. Changing the direction of the thick needle using guidance with endoscopy, inserting the thick needle into the duodenal lumen, and removing the fine needle; 8. Insertion of the guide wire through the thick needle; and 9. Placement of the PEG tube using the pull method. Using a real-time US scan, we detected the puncture of the anterior wall of the duodenum or stomach and avoided intrahepatic major vascular and biliary injuries. •We performed a percutaneous transhepatic endoscopic duodenostomy for a gastrectomy case.•We used the pull method with computed tomography, real-time ultrasound guidance and an endoscopy.•Using a real-time ultrasound scan, we detected the puncture of the anterior wall of the duodenum or stomach.•Ultrasound is useful for avoiding intrahepatic vascular and biliary injuries.•Computed tomography is useful for avoiding the situation of the punctured needle.

Background Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is not widely performed because of the difficulty of esophagojejunal reconstruction. This study analyzed complication rates of two different methods for reconstruction by a circular stapler after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG). Methods Between 2010 and 2014, clinical data of 19 patients who underwent TLTG for gastric adenocarcinoma were collected retrospectively. There were two methods to fix the anvil of a circular stapler into the distal esophagus: In the single-stapling technique (SST) group, Endo-PSI(II) was used for purse-suturing on the distal esophagus for reconstruction, and in the hemi-double-stapling technique (hemi-DST) group, the esophagus was cut by linear stapler with the entry hole of the anvil shaft opened after inserting the anvil tail. In both groups, surgical procedures were the same, except for the reconstruction. Results All TLTGs were performed securely without mortality. Intracorporeal laparoscopic esophagojejunal anastomosis was performed successfully for all the patients. In the hemi-DST group, four patients experienced anastomotic stenosis, three of whom required endoscopic balloon dilation. In contrast, no stenosis was seen in the SST group ( p  = 0.033). Conclusions Anastomosis with SST is preferred to that with hemi-DST to minimize postoperative complications.

This study aims to compare the applied efficacy of barbed suture versus non-barbed suture, as well as various stitching techniques, for laparoscopic cholecystoduodenostomy (LCD) in rabbits (imitating infants) to determine the most viable suture option. LCD was performed in a total of 45 male New Zealand white rabbits. The rabbits were equally divided into three groups: the SFB group (single-layer full-thickness running suture using barbed sutures), the SSB group (simple seromuscular layer running suture using barbed sutures) and the PDS group (single-layer full-thickness running suture using PDS sutures). The incidence of anastomotic complications, and histopathological outcomes were evaluated and compared across the groups. The mean duration for LCD was 9.6 ± 1.2 min in the SFB group and 10.8 ± 1.5 min in SSB group, both significantly shorter than the 12.0 ± 0.9 min observed in the PDS group ( P  < 0.001). Three cases of bile leakage were found in SFB group. H&E staining clearly revealed two cases of ectopic mucosal tissues at the anastomotic muscular layer in the SFB group. The collagen fibers, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) of anastomotic tissues at all examined time points post-surgery were generally higher in SFB group than in the other two groups, with some statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed between the SSB group and PDS group. The findings demonstrate that for barbed sutures, full-thickness technique was inferior to PDS sutures due to a higher bile leakage rate, whereas the seromuscular technique achieved difficult to hepatic duct. As a result, barbed sutures are not recommended for use in infants.