Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Tecfidera ® (dimethyl fumarate [DMF]) is an approved product for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Monomethyl fumarate (MMF) is the only active metabolite of DMF and is responsible for its therapeutic efficacy. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether two Bafiertam™ capsules each containing 95 mg of MMF is bioequivalent to one Tecfidera ® capsule containing 240 mg of DMF, a prodrug of MMF. Methods This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study evaluating two treatments over two periods with a washout interval between treatments. Fifty healthy subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of the test drug MMF 190 mg as 2 × 95 mg delayed-release capsules or the reference drug DMF 240 mg as a 1 × 240-mg delayed-release capsule. Blood samples were obtained prior to dosing and at prespecified time points through 24 h post-dose to determine plasma concentrations of MMF. The pharmacokinetic parameters of MMF were calculated including maximum observed concentration, time to reach maximum observed concentration, apparent half-life of the drug in plasma, AUC 0– t which is the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero (dosing time) to the last time point, t , with measurable analyte concentration, and AUC 0–inf , which is AUC 0– t plus the extrapolated AUC from time t to infinity. Results The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of the test drug MMF vs the reference drug DMF were 96.80% (92.18–101.64), 96.35% (91.81–101.12), and 104.84% (95.54–115.05) for AUC 0– t , AUC 0–inf , and maximum observed concentration, respectively. Two capsules of Bafiertam™ was safe and generally well tolerated. The most common adverse event for both products was flushing, 60% and 51%, for Bafiertam™ and Tecfidera ® , respectively. Conclusions Based on the statistical analysis results of the pharmacokinetic parameters of MMF, a single oral dose of two Bafiertam™ DR 95 mg capsules is bioequivalent to a single oral dose of one Tecfidera ® DR 240 mg capsule. Clinical Trial Registration This study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04570670) on 30 September, 2020.

Combination inhaled corticosteroid–formoterol reliever monotherapy reduces the rate of asthma attacks compared to short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) reliever monotherapy in adults. Its comparative efficacy in children has not been established. CARE was a 52-week, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial in children aged 5–15 years with asthma using SABA reliever monotherapy at 15 clinical trials sites in New Zealand. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either budesonide 50 μg–formoterol 3 μg, two actuations as needed, or salbutamol 100 μg, two actuations as needed. The primary outcome was asthma attacks as rate per participant per year. This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12620001091998. From Jan 28, 2021, to June 23, 2023, we assessed 382 participants for eligibility. We randomly assigned 360 (94%) participants to treatment (179 [50%] to the budesonide–formoterol group and 181 [50%] to the salbutamol group). The annualised rate of asthma attacks was lower in the budesonide–formoterol group than in the salbutamol group—cluster-adjusted rates 0·23 versus 0·41 per participant per year (relative rate 0·55 [95% CI 0·35–0·86]; p=0·012). The number of participants with at least one adverse event was 162 (91%) in the budesonide–formoterol group and 167 (92%) in the salbutamol group (odds ratio 0·79 [95% CI 0·35–1·79]). In children aged 5–15 years with mild asthma, budesonide–formoterol reliever monotherapy is superior to salbutamol for preventing asthma attacks, with a similar safety profile. Health Research Council of New Zealand, Cure Kids New Zealand, and the Barbara Basham Medical Charitable Trust (managed by Perpetual Guardian).

In this randomized trial involving patients with multiple sclerosis, BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) reduced clinical relapses, disability progression, and MRI lesions. BG-12 treatment resulted in reduced lymphocyte counts and elevated liver aminotransferase levels. Oral BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) is being investigated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Inflammation and oxidative stress are central pathologic factors in multiple sclerosis. 1 , 2 Immune cell activation and infiltration into the central nervous system are thought to result in widespread cellular damage, potentially owing to the dysregulated production and release of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, such as hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite, and proinflammatory stimuli. 3 This combination of toxic factors ultimately results in demyelination and neurodegeneration, causing disease activity and progression of disability. BG-12 has been shown to have beneficial effects in preclinical models of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and toxic . . .

In this trial involving patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) reduced the annualized relapse rate and number of MRI lesions but not disability progression. BG-12 was associated with flushing, diarrhea, and decreased lymphocyte counts. Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system, which is commonly treated with parenteral agents (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate). Oxidative stress and proinflammatory stimuli are important pathologic factors in multiple sclerosis. 1 – 3 Experimental data suggest that BG-12, an oral formulation of dimethyl fumarate, has antiinflammatory and cytoprotective properties that are mediated through activation of the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)–like 2 transcriptional pathway, among others. 3 – 6 Here, we report the results of the Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (CONFIRM) trial, a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 2-year study evaluating the efficacy and . . .

Oral fumarate (BG00012) might have dual anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of BG00012 in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. 257 patients, aged 18–55 years, with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned to receive 120 mg once daily (n=64), 120 mg three times daily (n=64), or 240 mg three times daily (n=64) BG00012, or placebo (n=65) for 24 weeks. During an extension period of 24 weeks for safety assessment, patients treated with placebo received BG00012 240 mg three times daily. The primary endpoint was total number of new gadolinium enhancing (GdE) lesions on brain MRI scans at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24. Additional endpoints included cumulative number of new GdE lesions (weeks 4–24), new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions, new T1-hypointense lesions at week 24, and annualised relapse rate. Analysis was done on the efficacy-evaluable population. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00168701. Treatment with BG00012 240 mg three times daily reduced by 69% the mean total number of new GdE lesions from week 12 to 24 compared with placebo (1·4 vs 4·5, p<0·0001). It also reduced number of new or enlarging T2-hyperintense (p=0·0006) and new T1-hypointense (p=0·014) lesions compared with placebo. BG00012 reduced annualised relapse rate by 32% (0·44 vs 0·65 for placebo; p=0·272). Adverse events more common in patients given BG00012 than in those given placebo included abdominal pain, flushing, and hot flush. Dose-related adverse events in patients on BG00012 were headache, fatigue, and feeling hot. The anti-inflammatory effects and favourable safety profile of BG00012 warrant further long-term phase III studies in large patient groups. Biogen Idec, Inc.

Dupilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody, inhibits interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signalling, key drivers of type-2-mediated inflammation. Adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma who are receiving medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist require additional treatment options as add-on therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma on medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist, irrespective of baseline eosinophil count. We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pivotal phase 2b clinical trial at 174 study sites across 16 countries or regions. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with an asthma diagnosis for 12 months or more based on the Global Initiative for Asthma 2009 Guidelines receiving treatment with medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous dupilumab 200 mg or 300 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks, or placebo, over a 24-week period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at week 12 in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 in L) in patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 eosinophils per μL assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients that received at least one dose or part of a dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01854047, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT number 2013-000856-16. 769 patients (158 in the placebo group and 611 in the dupilumab groups) received at least one dose of study drug. In the subgroup with at least 300 eosinophils per μL, the greatest increases (200 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0008; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0063) in FEV1 compared with placebo were observed at week 12 with doses every 2 weeks in the 300 mg group (mean change 0·39 L [SE 0·05]; mean difference 0·21 [95% CI 0·06–0·36; p=0·0063]) and in the 200 mg group (mean change 0·43 L [SE 0·05]; mean difference 0·26 [0·11–0·40; p=0·0008]) compared with placebo (0·18 L [SE 0·05]). Similar significant increases were observed in the overall population and in the fewer than 300 eosinophils per μL subgroup (overall population: 200 mg every 2 weeks, p<0·0001; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p<0·0001; <300 eosinophils per μL: 200 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0034; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0086), and were maintained to week 24. Likewise, dupilumab every 2 weeks produced the greatest reductions in annualised rates of exacerbation in the overall population (70–70·5%), the subgroup with at least 300 eosinophils per μL (71·2–80·7%), and the subgroup with fewer than 300 eosinophils per μL (59·9–67·6%). The most common adverse events with dupilumab compared with placebo were upper respiratory tract infections (33–41% vs 35%) and injection-site reactions (13–26% vs 13%). Dupilumab increased lung function and reduced severe exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma irrespective of baseline eosinophil count and had a favourable safety profile, and hence in addition to inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy could improve the lives of patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma compared with standard therapy alone. Sanofi-Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Background Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved in the USA for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. DRF is converted to monomethyl fumarate, the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF 462 mg and DMF 240 mg produce bioequivalent exposure of monomethyl fumarate and are therefore expected to have similar efficacy/safety profiles; the distinct chemical structure of DRF may contribute to its tolerability profile. Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF and DMF over 5 weeks in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Methods EVOLVE-MS-2 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF 462 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, using two self-administered gastrointestinal symptom scales: Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) and Global Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (GGISIS). The primary endpoint was the number of days with an IGISIS intensity score ≥ 2 relative to exposure. Other endpoints included the degree of gastrointestinal symptom severity measured by IGISIS/GGISIS and assessment of safety/tolerability. Results DRF-treated patients experienced a statistically significant reduction (46%) in the number of days with an IGISIS symptom intensity score ≥ 2 compared with DMF-treated patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.54 [0.39–0.75]; p  = 0.0003). Lower rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) were observed with DRF than DMF (34.8% vs 49.0%). Fewer patients discontinued DRF than DMF because of adverse events (1.6% vs 5.6%) and gastrointestinal adverse events (0.8% vs 4.8%). Conclusions DRF demonstrated an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with DMF, with less severe gastrointestinal events and fewer days of self-assessed gastrointestinal symptoms, fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of gastrointestinal adverse events. Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03093324).

Background: Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) demonstrated efficacy and safety in the Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM trials. Objective: To evaluate delayed-release DMF in newly diagnosed relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients, in a post-hoc analysis of integrated data from DEFINE and CONFIRM. Methods: Patients included in the analysis were diagnosed with RRMS within 1 year prior to study entry and naive to MS disease-modifying therapy. Results: The newly diagnosed population comprised 678 patients treated with placebo (n = 223) or delayed-release DMF 240 mg BID (n = 221) or TID (n = 234). At 2 years, delayed-release DMF BID and TID reduced the annualized relapse rate by 56% and 60% (both p < 0.0001), risk of relapse by 54% and 57% (both p < 0.0001), and risk of 12-week confirmed disability progression by 71% (p < 0.0001) and 47% (p = 0.0085) versus placebo. In a subset of patients (MRI cohort), delayed-release DMF BID and TID reduced the mean number of new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions by 80% and 81%, gadolinium-enhancing lesion activity by 92% and 92%, and mean number of new non-enhancing T1-hypointense lesions by 68% and 70% (all p < 0.0001 versus placebo). Flushing and gastrointestinal events were associated with delayed-release DMF. Conclusion: Delayed-release DMF improved clinical and neuroradiological outcomes relative to placebo in newly diagnosed RRMS patients.

Patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease who were already taking a renin–angiotensin system blocker were randomly assigned to the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren or placebo. The study was discontinued early for no benefit, or even possible harm. Mortality associated with type 2 diabetes remains nearly twice that when diabetes is absent. 1 Complications of diabetes, particularly renal and cardiovascular disease, substantially increase the risk of subsequent severe illness and death. When a patient has both renal and cardiovascular disease, the risk is magnified further. 2 , 3 Blood-pressure lowering is beneficial in slowing renal-disease progression, reducing cardiovascular disease events, and preventing premature death. 4 Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers are highly effective, with apparent benefits extending beyond simple blood-pressure lowering 5 – 8 ; such agents have become the preferred first-line interventions in high-risk persons with diabetes. Theoretically, dual RAAS blockade should be more . . .

In this randomized, controlled trial involving women in South Africa and Uganda, twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir was superior to daily oral emtricitabine–tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in preventing HIV infection.