Explore the vast range of titles available.

Gentamicin (GM), a powerful aminoglycoside antibiotic, is limited in clinical use due to dose-related kidney toxicity, mainly caused by oxidative stress. Azolla pinnata, an antioxidant-rich aquatic fern, has not been extensively studied for renoprotection against GM-induced kidney damage. This research assessed the protective effects of a hydroalcoholic extract of A. pinnata on GM nephrotoxicity.BackgroundGentamicin (GM), a powerful aminoglycoside antibiotic, is limited in clinical use due to dose-related kidney toxicity, mainly caused by oxidative stress. Azolla pinnata, an antioxidant-rich aquatic fern, has not been extensively studied for renoprotection against GM-induced kidney damage. This research assessed the protective effects of a hydroalcoholic extract of A. pinnata on GM nephrotoxicity.Forty male Wistar rats were divided into five groups (n = 8): control, sham, GM (100 mg/kg/day, i.p.), and GM plus A. pinnata extract (10 or 20 mg/kg/day, orally). After seven days, renal function markers (serum creatinine and urea), oxidative stress parameters (malondialdehyde [MDA], ferric reducing antioxidant power [FRAP], catalase [CAT], and glutathione peroxidase [GPX]), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and renal histopathology were assessed.MethodsForty male Wistar rats were divided into five groups (n = 8): control, sham, GM (100 mg/kg/day, i.p.), and GM plus A. pinnata extract (10 or 20 mg/kg/day, orally). After seven days, renal function markers (serum creatinine and urea), oxidative stress parameters (malondialdehyde [MDA], ferric reducing antioxidant power [FRAP], catalase [CAT], and glutathione peroxidase [GPX]), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and renal histopathology were assessed.GM significantly damaged kidney function and induced oxidative stress, as shown by increased levels of creatinine, urea, and MDA, along with reduced FRAP and CAT activity (p < 0.05). Co-treatment with A. pinnata extract, especially at 20 mg/kg, significantly lessened these effects by restoring kidney function markers, boosting antioxidant defenses, and lowering lipid peroxidation. The extract did not have a significant impact on either GPX activity or TNF-α levels. Histopathological analysis revealed that GM-induced tubular necrosis and glomerular damage were significantly ameliorated by A. pinnata in a dose-dependent manner.ResultsGM significantly damaged kidney function and induced oxidative stress, as shown by increased levels of creatinine, urea, and MDA, along with reduced FRAP and CAT activity (p < 0.05). Co-treatment with A. pinnata extract, especially at 20 mg/kg, significantly lessened these effects by restoring kidney function markers, boosting antioxidant defenses, and lowering lipid peroxidation. The extract did not have a significant impact on either GPX activity or TNF-α levels. Histopathological analysis revealed that GM-induced tubular necrosis and glomerular damage were significantly ameliorated by A. pinnata in a dose-dependent manner.A. pinnata extract offers notable protection against kidney damage caused by gentamicin, mainly by enhancing the body's natural antioxidant defenses, decreasing lipid peroxidation, and maintaining the normal structure of kidney tissue. These findings suggest that A. pinnata could serve as a valuable complementary treatment to improve the safety of GM use.ConclusionA. pinnata extract offers notable protection against kidney damage caused by gentamicin, mainly by enhancing the body's natural antioxidant defenses, decreasing lipid peroxidation, and maintaining the normal structure of kidney tissue. These findings suggest that A. pinnata could serve as a valuable complementary treatment to improve the safety of GM use.

Gonorrhoea is a common sexually transmitted infection for which ceftriaxone is the current first-line treatment, but antimicrobial resistance is emerging. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of gentamicin as an alternative to ceftriaxone (both combined with azithromycin) for treatment of gonorrhoea. G-ToG was a multicentre, parallel-group, pragmatic, randomised, non-inferiority trial comparing treatment with gentamicin to treatment with ceftriaxone for patients with gonorrhoea. The patients, treating physician, and assessing physician were masked to treatment but the treating nurse was not. The trial took place at 14 sexual health clinics in England. Adults aged 16–70 years were eligible for participation if they had a diagnosis of uncomplicated genital, pharyngeal, or rectal gonorrhoea. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single intramuscular dose of either gentamicin 240 mg (gentamicin group) or ceftriaxone 500 mg (ceftriaxone group). All participants also received a single 1 g dose of oral azithromycin. Randomisation (1:1) was stratified by clinic and performed using a secure web-based system. The primary outcome was clearance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at all initially infected sites, defined as a negative nucleic acid amplification test 2 weeks post treatment. Primary outcome analyses included only participants who had follow-up data, irrespective of the baseline visit N gonorrhoeae test result. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was a lower confidence limit of 5% for the risk difference. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN51783227. Of 1762 patients assessed, we enrolled 720 participants between Oct 7, 2014, and Nov 14, 2016, and randomly assigned 358 to gentamicin and 362 to ceftriaxone. Primary outcome data were available for 306 (85%) of 362 participants allocated to ceftriaxone and 292 (82%) of 358 participants allocated to gentamicin. At 2 weeks after treatment, infection had cleared for 299 (98%) of 306 participants in the ceftriaxone group compared with 267 (91%) of 292 participants in the gentamicin group (adjusted risk difference −6·4%, 95% CI −10·4% to −2·4%). Of the 328 participants who had a genital infection, 151 (98%) of 154 in the ceftriaxone group and 163 (94%) of 174 in the gentamicin group had clearance at follow-up (adjusted risk difference −4·4%, −8·7 to 0). For participants with a pharyngeal infection, a greater proportion receiving ceftriaxone had clearance at follow-up (108 [96%] in the ceftriaxone group compared with 82 [80%] in the gentamicin group; adjusted risk difference −15·3%, −24·0 to −6·5). Similarly, a greater proportion of participants with rectal infection in the ceftriaxone group had clearance (134 [98%] in the ceftriaxone group compared with 107 [90%] in the gentamicin group; adjusted risk difference −7·8%, −13·6 to −2·0). Thus, we did not find that a single dose of gentamicin 240 mg was non-inferior to a single dose of ceftriaxone 500 mg for the treatment of gonorrhoea, when both drugs were combined with a 1 g dose of oral azithromycin. The side-effect profiles were similar between groups, although severity of pain at the injection site was higher for gentamicin (mean visual analogue pain score 36 of 100 in the gentamicin group vs 21 of 100 in the ceftriaxone group). Gentamicin is not appropriate as first-line treatment for gonorrhoea but remains potentially useful for patients with isolated genital infection, or for patients who are allergic or intolerant to ceftriaxone, or harbour a ceftriaxone-resistant isolate. Further research is required to identify and test new alternatives to ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea. UK National Institute for Health Research.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes gonorrhoea, a common sexually transmitted infection. Emerging strains resistant to first-line ceftriaxone threaten N gonorrhoeae management. Hence, alternative treatments are needed. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ertapenem, gentamicin, and fosfomycin as alternative treatments for anogenital N gonorrhoeae. In a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial (three experimental groups and one control group) at the Centre for Sexual Health in Amsterdam, Netherlands, we included adults aged 18 years or older, with anorectal or urogenital gonorrhoea. With random permuted blocks, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive intramuscular 500 mg ceftriaxone (control group), intramuscular 1000 mg ertapenem, intramuscular 5 mg/kg gentamicin (maximum 400 mg), or oral 6 g fosfomycin. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a negative nucleic acid amplification test of the predefined primary infected site, 7−14 days after treatment. The primary analysis was per protocol (ie, excluding those lost to follow-up). The modified intention-to-treat analysis included all randomly assigned patients with anogenital gonorrhoea considering those lost-to-follow-up as treatment failure. Non-inferiority was established if the lower Hochberg-corrected 95% CI for difference between the experimental and control groups was greater than −10%. For the analysis of adverse events, we included all participants who received medication. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03294395) and is complete. Between Sept 18, 2017, and June 5, 2020, from 2160 patients invited to participate, we assigned 346 (16%) participants to receive either ceftriaxone (n=103), ertapenem (n=103), gentamicin (n=102), or fosfomycin (n=38). The fosfomycin group was terminated early after interim analysis revealed less than 60% efficacy. In the primary per-protocol analysis, 93 (100%) of 93 patients in the ceftriaxone group, 86 (99%) of 87 patients in the ertapenem group, 79 (93%) of 85 patients in the gentamicin group, and four (12%) of 33 patients in the fosfomycin group cleared N gonorrhoeae (risk difference vs ceftriaxone −0·01 [95% CI −0·08 to 0·05] for ertapenem and −0·07 [−0·16 to −0·01] for gentamicin). Thus, ertapenem proved non-inferior to ceftriaxone. In mITT analysis, risk differences versus ceftriaxone were −0·08 (−0·17 to 0·003) for ertapenem and −0·11 (−0·21 to −0·04) for gentamicin. We observed a higher proportion of patients with at least one adverse event in the ertapenem group (58 [56%] of 103) and fosfomycin group (36 [95%] of 38) versus the ceftriaxone group (24 [23%] of 103). Single-dose 1000 mg ertapenem is non-inferior to single-dose 500 mg ceftriaxone in gonorrhoea treatment. Yet, 5 mg/kg gentamicin (maximum 400 mg) is not non-inferior to ceftriaxone. Ertapenem is a potential effective alternative for anogenital N gonorrhoeae infections and merits evaluation for ceftriaxone-resistant infections. ZonMw and GGD-Amsterdam. For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is an incurable disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding type VII collagen, the major component of anchoring fibrils (AF). We previously demonstrated that gentamicin produced functional type VII collagen in RDEB cells harboring nonsense mutations. Herein, we determined whether topical or intradermal gentamicin administration induces type VII collagen and AFs in RDEB patients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial assessed safety and efficacy of topical and intradermal gentamicin in 5 RDEB patients with nonsense mutations. The topical arm tested 0.1% gentamicin ointment or placebo application 3 times daily at 2 open erosion sites for 2 weeks. The intradermal arm tested daily intradermal injection of gentamicin solution (8 mg) or placebo into 2 intact skin sites for 2 days in 4 of 5 patients. Primary outcomes were induction of type VII collagen and AFs at the test sites and safety assessment. A secondary outcome assessed wound closure of topically treated erosions. Both topical and intradermal gentamicin administration induced type VII collagen and AFs at the dermal-epidermal junction of treatment sites. Newly created type VII collagen varied from 20% to 165% of that expressed in normal human skin and persisted for 3 months. Topical gentamicin corrected dermal-epidermal separation, improved wound closure, and reduced blister formation. There were no untoward side effects from gentamicin treatments. Type VII collagen induction did not generate anti-type VII collagen autoantibodies in patients' blood or skin. Topical and intradermal gentamicin suppresses nonsense mutations and induces type VII collagen and AFs in RDEB patients. Gentamicin therapy may provide a readily available treatment for RDEB patients with nonsense mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698735. Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Partnership, Epidermolysis Bullosa Medical Research Foundation, NIH, and VA Merit Award.

Postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) in neurosurgery remain a significant concern due to their associated high morbidity and mortality. Consequently, implementing the most effective preventive measures is essential. One such strategy, intraoperative antibiotic irrigation, has been widely employed; however, its efficacy continues to be debated. Numerous studies have examined the use of various antibiotics, including streptomycin, bacitracin, gentamicin, rifamycin, amikacin, and vancomycin. Among these, gentamicin has shown promising results in reducing SSI rates, although other antibiotics have also demonstrated potential. Further research is required to determine the most effective method for minimizing SSIs in neurosurgical procedures. To compare the postoperative outcomes of gentamicin irrigation versus normal saline irrigation in the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in neurosurgical procedures. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at Rajavithi Hospital between 2023 and 2025. A total of 136 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, using a block-of-four randomization method, into two groups: the gentamicin irrigation group (n = 68) and the normal saline irrigation group (n = 68). Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) rates were monitored and statistically analyzed. A total of 136 patients were included in this study, with 68 patients (50 %) receiving gentamicin irrigation and 68 patients (50 %) receiving normal saline irrigation. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body weight, underlying conditions, operative status, complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, or disease type. The postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) rate was 6 % in both groups (4 patients each; p = 0.443). In the gentamicin irrigation group, wound infection grade 3 was observed in 2 patients (3 %), and grade 4 in another 2 patients (3 %). In the normal saline group, 4 patients (6 %) developed grade 4 wound infections. Gentamicin irrigation did not demonstrate a significant advantage over normal saline irrigation in preventing postoperative surgical site infections when intravenous antibiotics were concurrently administered in neurosurgical patients. •Overall infection rates were similar between the two groups (6 %).•The incidence of meningitis was higher in the normal saline group compared to the antibiotic irrigation group.•No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics, operative conditions, complications, length of stay, or mortality between the groups.•The study's strengths include its prospective randomized design, standardized protocols, and careful analysis of clinically relevant outcomes.

Broad-spectrum antibiotics for suspected early-onset neonatal sepsis (sEONS) may have pronounced effects on gut microbiome development and selection of antimicrobial resistance when administered in the first week of life, during the assembly phase of the neonatal microbiome. Here, 147 infants born at ≥36 weeks of gestational age, requiring broad-spectrum antibiotics for treatment of sEONS in their first week of life were randomized 1:1:1 to receive three commonly prescribed intravenous antibiotic combinations, namely penicillin + gentamicin, co-amoxiclav + gentamicin or amoxicillin + cefotaxime (ZEBRA study, Trial Register NL4882). Average antibiotic treatment duration was 48 hours. A subset of 80 non-antibiotic treated infants from a healthy birth cohort served as controls (MUIS study, Trial Register NL3821). Rectal swabs and/or faeces were collected before and immediately after treatment, and at 1, 4 and 12 months of life. Microbiota were characterized by 16S rRNA-based sequencing and a panel of 31 antimicrobial resistance genes was tested using targeted qPCR. Confirmatory shotgun metagenomic sequencing was executed on a subset of samples. The overall gut microbial community composition and antimicrobial resistance gene profile majorly shift directly following treatment (R 2  = 9.5%, adjusted p -value = 0.001 and R 2  = 7.5%, adjusted p -value = 0.001, respectively) and normalize over 12 months (R 2  = 1.1%, adjusted p -value = 0.03 and R 2  = 0.6%, adjusted p -value = 0.23, respectively). We find a decreased abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. and increased abundance of Klebsiella and Enterococcus spp. in the antibiotic treated infants compared to controls. Amoxicillin + cefotaxime shows the largest effects on both microbial community composition and antimicrobial resistance gene profile, whereas penicillin + gentamicin exhibits the least effects. These data suggest that the choice of empirical antibiotics is relevant for adverse ecological side-effects. Here, in a randomized trial of 147 infants receiving distinct antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis, Reyman et al. characterize the gut microbiome and resistance profiles, finding differential effects of antibiotic combinations on microbial community composition and antimicrobial resistance genes.

Background.The safety of adding initial low-dose gentamicin to antistaphylococcal penicillins or vancomycin for treatment of suspected Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis is unknown. This study evaluated the association between this practice and nephrotoxicity. Methods.We performed a prospective cohort study of safety data from a randomized, controlled trial of therapy for S. aureus bacteremia and native valve infective endocarditis involving 236 patients from 44 hospitals in 4 countries. Patients either received standard therapy (antistaphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin) plus initial low-dose gentamicin (n=116) or received daptomycin monotherapy (n=120). We measured renal adverse events and clinically significant decreased creatinine clearance in patients (1) in the original randomized study arms and (2) who received any initial low-dose gentamicin either, as a study medication or <2 days before enrollment. Results.Renal adverse events occurred in 8 (7%) of 120 daptomycin recipients, 10 (19%) of 53 vancomycin recipients, and 11 (17%) of 63 antistaphylococcal penicillin recipients. Decreased creatinine clearance occurred in 9 (8%) of 113 of evaluable daptomycin recipients, 10 (22%) of 46 vancomycin recipients, and 16 (25%) of 63 antistaphylococcal penicillin recipients. An additional 21 patients received initial low-dose gentamicin <2 days before study enrollment. A total of 22% of patients who received initial low-dose gentamicin versus 8% of patients who did not receive initial low-dose gentamicin experienced decreased creatinine clearance (P=.005). Independent predictors of a clinically significant decrease in creatinine clearance were age ⩾65 years and receipt of any initial low-dose gentamicin. Conclusions.Initial low-dose gentamicin as part of therapy for S. aureus bacteremia and native valve infective endocarditis is nephrotoxic and should not be used routinely, given the minimal existing data supporting its benefit.

IntroductionMenière’s disease (MD) is a multifactorial disease characterised by recurring vertigo, tinnitus and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss as typical clinical symptoms. For patients with MD with poor response to non-invasive treatments, it is recommended to use intratympanic gentamicin treatment. The destruction of vestibular organs by gentamicin may cause residual vestibular symptoms, notably unsteadiness. However, most previous clinical studies paid little attention to this issue. Currently, vestibular rehabilitation treatment (VRT) has been proven to be an effective method for controlling vestibular symptoms and has been applied to patients with various vestibular diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of VRT versus usual care in MD patients who experience persistent unsteadiness for 1 month after intratympanic gentamicin treatment, in order to understand whether VRT has a positive impact on balance maintenance and vertigo control in patients with MD.Methods and analysisRandomised, assessor-blinded, controlled clinical trials will be used to compare the efficacy of balance function before and after VRT. Patients with MD who experience chronic unsteadiness for 1 month after intratympanic gentamicin treatment will be recruited and receive VRT, mainly including gaze stability training, gait rehabilitation, vestibular habituation training, etc. The outcomes assessments will be conducted at baseline and at eighth week and sixth month post-randomisation. The primary outcome will be the improvements in vestibular function quantified through the Functional Gait Assessment. The secondary outcomes will include sensory organisation test, vestibular laboratory tests (video head impulse test, caloric test and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials), Menière’s disease outcomes questionnaire, visual vertigo analogue scale and vestibular activities and participation measure.Ethics and disseminationThis trial received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (reference number 2024020). The study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Trial registration number NCT06143462.

Background. Ceftriaxone is the foundation of currently recommended gonorrhea treatment. There is an urgent need for backup treatment options for patients with cephalosporin allergy or infections due to suspected cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 2 combinations of existing non-cephalosporin antimicrobials for treatment of patients with urogenital gonorrhea. Methods. We conducted a randomized, multisite, open-label, noncomparative trial in 5 outpatient sexually transmitted disease clinic sites in Alabama, California, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Patients aged 15–60 years diagnosed with uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea were randomly assigned to either gentamicin 240 mg intramuscularly plus azithromycin 2 g orally, or gemifloxacin 320 mg orally plus azithromycin 2 g orally. The primary outcome was microbiological cure of urogenital infections (negative follow-up culture) at 10–17 days after treatment among 401 participants in the per protocol population. Results. Microbiological cure was achieved by 100% (lower 1-sided exact 95% confidence interval [CI] bound, 98.5%) of 202 evaluable participants receiving gentamicin/azithromycin, and 99.5% (lower 1-sided exact 95% CI bound, 97.6%) of 199 evaluable participants receiving gemifloxacin/azithromycin. Gentamicin/azithromycin cured 10 of 10 pharyngeal infections and 1 of 1 rectal infection; gemifloxacin/azithromycin cured 15 of 15 pharyngeal and 5 of 5 rectal infections. Gastrointestinal adverse events were common in both arms. Conclusions. Gentamicin/azithromycin and gemifloxacin/azithromycin were highly effective for treatment of urogenital gonorrhea. Gastrointestinal adverse events may limit routine use. These non-cephalosporin-based regimens may be useful alternative options for patients who cannot be treated with cephalosporin antimicrobials. Additional treatment options for gonorrhea are needed. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00926796.

Gentamicin is a potent broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotic whose use is hampered by ototoxic side-effects. Hospital gentamicin is a mixture of five gentamicin C-subtypes and several impurities of various ranges of nonexact concentrations. We developed a purification strategy enabling assaying of individual C-subtypes and impurities for ototoxicity and antimicrobial activity. We found that C-subtypes displayed broad and potent in vitro antimicrobial activities comparable to the hospital gentamicin mixture. In contrast, they showed different degrees of ototoxicity in cochlear explants, with gentamicin C2b being the least and gentamicin C2 the most ototoxic. Structure–activity relationships identified sites in the C4′-C6′ region on ring I that reduced ototoxicity while preserving antimicrobial activity, thus identifying targets for future drug design and mechanisms for hair cell toxicity. Structure–activity relationship data suggested and electrophysiological data showed that the C-subtypes both bind and permeate the hair cellmechanotransducer channel, with the stronger the binding the less ototoxic the compound. Finally, both individual and reformulated mixtures of C-subtypes demonstrated decreased ototoxicity while maintaining antimicrobial activity, thereby serving as a proof-of-concept of drug reformulation to minimizing ototoxicity of gentamicin in patients.