Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
1,952 result(s) for "Giant cell arteritis"
Sort by:
2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis
BackgroundSince the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) in 2009, several relevant randomised clinical trials and cohort analyses have been published, which have the potential to change clinical care and therefore supporting the need to update the original recommendations.MethodsUsing EULAR standardised operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations, the EULAR task force undertook a systematic literature review and sought opinion from 20 experts from 13 countries. We modified existing recommendations and created new recommendations.ResultsThree overarching principles and 10 recommendations were formulated. We recommend that a suspected diagnosis of LVV should be confirmed by imaging or histology. High dose glucocorticoid therapy (40–60 mg/day prednisone-equivalent) should be initiated immediately for induction of remission in active giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK). We recommend adjunctive therapy in selected patients with GCA (refractory or relapsing disease, presence of an increased risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse events or complications) using tocilizumab. Methotrexate may be used as an alternative. Non-biological glucocorticoid-sparing agents should be given in combination with glucocorticoids in all patients with TAK and biological agents may be used in refractory or relapsing patients. We no longer recommend the routine use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy for treatment of LVV unless it is indicated for other reasons.ConclusionsWe have updated the recommendations for the management of LVV to facilitate the translation of current scientific evidence and expert opinion into better management and improved outcome of patients in clinical practice.
2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis
ObjectiveTo develop and validate updated classification criteria for giant cell arteritis (GCA).MethodsPatients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in six phases: (1) identification of candidate items, (2) prospective collection of candidate items present at the time of diagnosis, (3) expert panel review of cases, (4) data‐driven reduction of candidate items, (5) derivation of a points‐based risk classification score in a development data set and (6) validation in an independent data set.ResultsThe development data set consisted of 518 cases of GCA and 536 comparators. The validation data set consisted of 238 cases of GCA and 213 comparators. Age ≥50 years at diagnosis was an absolute requirement for classification. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: positive temporal artery biopsy or temporal artery halo sign on ultrasound (+5); erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥50 mm/hour or C reactive protein ≥10 mg/L (+3); sudden visual loss (+3); morning stiffness in shoulders or neck, jaw or tongue claudication, new temporal headache, scalp tenderness, temporal artery abnormality on vascular examination, bilateral axillary involvement on imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography activity throughout the aorta (+2 each). A patient could be classified as having GCA with a cumulative score of ≥6 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.94) with a sensitivity of 87.0% (95% CI 82.0% to 91.0%) and specificity of 94.8% (95% CI 91.0% to 97.4%).ConclusionThe 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR GCA classification criteria are now validated for use in clinical research.
Subclinical giant cell arteritis increases the risk of relapse in polymyalgia rheumatica
ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of subclinical giant cell arteritis (GCA) in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and ascertain its optimal treatment approach.MethodsPatients with PMR who fulfilled the 2012 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Provisional Classification Criteria for PMR, did not have GCA symptoms and were routinely followed up for 2 years and were stratified into two groups, according to their ultrasound results: isolated PMR and PMR with subclinical GCA. The outcomes (relapses, glucocorticoid use and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatments) between groups were compared.ResultsWe included 150 patients with PMR (50 with subclinical GCA) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 22 (20–24) months. Overall, 47 patients (31.3 %) had a relapse, 31 (62%) in the subclinical GCA group and 16 (16%) in the isolated PMR group (p<0.001). Among patients with subclinical GCA, no differences were found in the mean (SD) prednisone starting dosage between relapsed and non-relapsed patients (32.4±15.6 vs 35.5±12.1 mg, respectively, p=0.722). Patients with subclinical GCA who relapsed had a faster prednisone dose tapering in the first 3 months compared with the non-relapsed patients, with a mean dose at the third month of 10.0±5.2 versus 15.2±7.9 mg daily (p<0.001). No differences were found between relapsing and non-relapsed patients with subclinical GCA regarding age, sex, C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.ConclusionsPatients with PMR and subclinical GCA had a significantly higher number of relapses during a 2-year follow-up than patients with isolated PMR. Lower starting doses and rapid glucocorticoid tapering in the first 3 months emerged as risk factors for relapse.
Recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica: an initiative from the international giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica study group
ObjectiveTo develop international consensus-based recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).MethodsA task force including 29 rheumatologists/internists, 4 general practitioners, 4 patients and a healthcare professional emerged from the international giant cell arteritis and PMR study group. The task force supplied clinical questions, subsequently transformed into Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format. A systematic literature review was conducted followed by online meetings to formulate and vote on final recommendations. Levels of evidence (LOE) (1–5 scale) and agreement (LOA) (0–10 scale) were evaluated.ResultsTwo overarching principles and five recommendations were developed. LOE was 4–5 and LOA ranged between 8.5 and 9.7. The recommendations suggest that (1) each individual with suspected or recently diagnosed PMR should be considered for specialist evaluation, (2) before referring an individual with suspected PMR to specialist care, a thorough history and clinical examination should be performed and preferably complemented with urgent basic laboratory investigations, (3) individuals with suspected PMR with severe symptoms should be referred for specialist evaluation using rapid access strategies, (4) in individuals with suspected PMR who are referred via rapid access, the commencement of glucocorticoid therapy should be deferred until after specialist evaluation and (5) individuals diagnosed with PMR in specialist care with a good initial response to glucocorticoids and a low risk of glucocorticoid related adverse events can be managed in primary care.ConclusionsThese are the first international recommendations for referral of individuals with suspected PMR, which complement the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology management guidelines for established PMR.
Monitoring and long-term management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common type of primary vasculitis in Western countries. Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the second most common inflammatory rheumatic disease of the elderly after rheumatoid arthritis. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of treatment for GCA and PMR, which are interrelated diseases. Glucocorticoids are effective, but adverse effects occur in a high proportion of patients. Careful use of glucocorticoids and the application of preventive strategies can minimize these adverse effects. Possible long-term complications of GCA include aneurysm and stenosis of vessels, even in patients with apparently clinically inactive disease; acute blindness is rare during glucocorticoid treatment. In PMR, whether subclinical chronic inflammation can lead to long-term damage is less clear. Management of both GCA and PMR is hampered by the lack of universally accepted definitions of remission and other disease states, such as low disease activity or vessel damage without active disease. In this Review, we outline current evidence on the monitoring and long-term management of patients with GCA and PMR, including the tapering of treatment.Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are heterogeneous, interrelated diseases. This Review outlines current evidence on the monitoring and long-term management of patients with GCA and PMR, including the tapering of treatment and the handling of complications.
Fast-track pathway for giant cell arteritis: Improved visual outcomes and reduced healthcare costs
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the leading vasculitis threatening vision in adults aged ≥ 50 years; permanent vision loss may occur within the first few days after symptom onset. We assessed the impact of a fast-track pathway (FTP) for early diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis in terms of hospitalization patterns and cost-effectiveness. We conducted a retrospective, single-center medico-economic study of consecutive patients referred to a neuro-ophthalmology tertiary center between Nov 1, 2016, and Dec 31, 2022. GCA was defined by ≥ 3 American College of Rheumatology criteria plus a positive temporal-artery biopsy or vascular imaging. An FTP-24/7 access to internal medicine specialists, priority magnetic-resonance imaging, and protocol-driven corticosteroid initiation-was launched on Nov 1, 2018. Demographic, clinical, biological, care-pathway, and cost data were compared before (pre-FTP) and after (post-FTP) implementation. Continuous variables were analyzed with two-sample t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; categorical variables with χ² or Fisher's exact test. We included 135 patients (mean age 76 ± 8 years, 61% women): 23 pre-FTP and 112 post-FTP. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with the pre-FTP period, the FTP reduced full hospitalizations (62% [69/112] vs 96% [22/23]; p < 0.01) and increased day-hospital or outpatient management (39% vs 4%; p < 0.01). More patients received treatment within one month of symptom onset (54% vs 22%; p < 0.01). Final visual acuity improved (median 2.0 vs 2.6 logMAR; p < 0.01), while cumulative intravenous corticosteroid exposure was significantly reduced (1679 ± 760 mg vs 2295 ± 1055 mg; p = 0.02). Reliance on temporal-artery biopsy fell (17% vs 91%; p < 0.01), owing to a four-fold rise in diagnostic MRI use. Mean total medical costs decreased by €814 per patient (€3672 ± 2861 vs €4486 ± 3193), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.23). A dedicated fast-track pathway for suspected GCA enables prompt, largely ambulatory care, halves unnecessary full hospitalizations, speeds treatment initiation, improves visual prognosis, and lowers overall expenditure. These findings support wider adoption of imaging-driven FTPs to mitigate the growing clinical and economic burden of GCA.
Endothelin-1 promotes vascular smooth muscle cell migration across the artery wall: a mechanism contributing to vascular remodelling and intimal hyperplasia in giant-cell arteritis
BackgroundGiant-cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory disease of large/medium-sized arteries, frequently involving the temporal arteries (TA). Inflammation-induced vascular remodelling leads to vaso-occlusive events. Circulating endothelin-1 (ET-1) is increased in patients with GCA with ischaemic complications suggesting a role for ET-1 in vascular occlusion beyond its vasoactive function.ObjectiveTo investigate whether ET-1 induces a migratory myofibroblastic phenotype in human TA-derived vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) leading to intimal hyperplasia and vascular occlusion in GCA.Methods and resultsImmunofluorescence/confocal microscopy showed increased ET-1 expression in GCA lesions compared with control arteries. In inflamed arteries, ET-1 was predominantly expressed by infiltrating mononuclear cells whereas ET receptors, particularly ET-1 receptor B (ETBR), were expressed by both mononuclear cells and VSMC. ET-1 increased TA-derived VSMC migration in vitro and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) expression and migration from the media to the intima in cultured TA explants. ET-1 promoted VSMC motility by increasing activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a crucial molecule in the turnover of focal adhesions during cell migration. FAK activation resulted in Y397 autophosphorylation creating binding sites for Src kinases and the p85 subunit of PI3kinases which, upon ET-1 exposure, colocalised with FAK at the focal adhesions of migrating VSMC. Accordingly, FAK or PI3K inhibition abrogated ET-1-induced migration in vitro. Consistently, ET-1 receptor A and ETBR antagonists reduced αSMA expression and delayed VSMC outgrowth from cultured GCA-involved artery explants.ConclusionsET-1 is upregulated in GCA lesions and, by promoting VSMC migration towards the intimal layer, may contribute to intimal hyperplasia and vascular occlusion in GCA.
Large-vessel vasculitis
Large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) manifests as inflammation of the aorta and its major branches and is the most common primary vasculitis in adults. LVV comprises two distinct conditions, giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, although the phenotypic spectrum of primary LVV is complex. Non-specific symptoms often predominate and so patients with LVV present to a range of health-care providers and settings. Rapid diagnosis, specialist referral and early treatment are key to good patient outcomes. Unfortunately, disease relapse remains common and chronic vascular complications are a source of considerable morbidity. Although accurate monitoring of disease activity is challenging, progress in vascular imaging techniques and the measurement of laboratory biomarkers may facilitate better matching of treatment intensity with disease activity. Further, advances in our understanding of disease pathophysiology have paved the way for novel biologic treatments that target important mediators of disease in both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. This work has highlighted the substantial heterogeneity present within LVV and the importance of an individualized therapeutic approach. Future work will focus on understanding the mechanisms of persisting vascular inflammation, which will inform the development of increasingly sophisticated imaging technologies. Together, these will enable better disease prognostication, limit treatment-associated adverse effects, and facilitate targeted development and use of novel therapies. Large-vessel vasculitis is the most common primary vasculitis in adults, manifesting as inflammation of the aorta and its major branches. This Primer reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of this disease, highlights its effects on patient quality of life, and discusses future research questions.
Specific microbiome profile in Takayasu’s arteritis and giant cell arteritis
Recent studies have provided evidence of a close link between specific microbiota and inflammatory disorders. While the vessel wall microbiota has been recently described in large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and controls, the blood microbiome in these diseases has not been previously reported (LVV). We aimed to analyse the blood microbiome profile of LVV patients (Takayasu’s arteritis [TAK], giant cell arteritis [GCA]) and healthy blood donors (HD). We studied the blood samples of 13 patients with TAK (20 samples), 9 patients with GCA (11 samples) and 15 HD patients. We assessed the blood microbiome profile by sequencing the 16S rDNA blood bacterial DNA. We used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with linear discriminant effect size measurement (LEfSe) to investigate the differences in the blood microbiome profile between TAK and GCA patients. An increase in the levels of Clostridia, Cytophagia and Deltaproteobacteria and a decrease in Bacilli at the class level were found in TAK patients compared with HD patients (LDA > 2, p  < 0.05). Active TAK patients had significantly lower levels of Staphylococcus compared with inactive TAK patients. Samples of GCA patients had an increased abundance of Rhodococcus and an unidentified member of the Cytophagaceae family. Microbiota of TAK compared with GCA patients was found to show higher levels of Candidatus Aquiluna and Cloacibacterium (LDA > 2; p  < 0.05). Differences highlighted in the blood microbiome were also associated with a shift of bacterial predicted metabolic functions in TAK in comparison with HD. Similar results were also found in patients with active versus inactive TAK. In conclusion, patients with TAK were found to present a specific blood microbiome profile in comparison with healthy donors and GCA subjects. Significant changes in the blood microbiome profiles of TAK patients were associated with specific metabolic functions.
Performance of the modified 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria without age restriction for discriminating from Takayasu arteritis
Objective To evaluate the ability to discriminate giant cell arteritis (GCA) from Takayasu arteritis (TAK) according to the modified 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) GCA classification criteria. Methods Patients enrolled in the Japanese nationwide retrospective registry were evaluated using the criteria with partial modification; wall thickening of descending thoracic-abdominal aorta were mainly diagnosed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging instead of evaluating with positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. The discriminability of the criteria was evaluated using C-statistic (> 0.7: good ability). Results Newly diagnosed patients with GCA ( n  = 139) and TAK ( n  = 129) were assessed, and 23.3% of TAK were aged 50 years or older at onset. The sensitivity of the modified 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria with a score ≥ 6 was 82.0%, 68.5%, and 32.1% in all GCA, GCA with large-vessel involvement, and GCA without cranial arteritis, respectively. The specificity of the modified criteria was 96.1% for the 129 TAK as controls. Five patients with late-onset TAK met the modified criteria, and four had cranial signs and symptoms, two had bilateral axillary artery involvement, and four had descending thoracic-abdominal aorta involvement. The discriminability of the criteria was good (C-statistic: 0.986, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.976–0.996) and remained good after excluding age (C-statistic: 0.927, 95% CI: 0.894–0.961). The discriminability of a set of large-vessel lesions (bilateral axillary artery and descending thoracic-abdominal aorta) and inflammatory markers was markedly decreased with poor C-statistic value (C-statistic: 0.598, 95% CI: 0.530–0.667). Discriminability was improved after adding polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (C-statistic: 0.757, 95% CI: 0.700–0.813) or age (C-statistic: 0.913, 95%CI: 0.874–0.951) to the set of large-vessel lesions. In GCA patients with a score ≤ 5, 52% had bilateral subclavian and/or axillary artery involvement. Conclusion The modified 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria well performed in classifying GCA and TAK without PET-CT in routine clinical practice. A set of items included in the modified GCA classification criteria had good discriminative ability for GCA and TAK, even when age was excluded. However, age restriction or PMR was required to distinguish GCA without cranial lesions from TAK.