Explore the vast range of titles available.

In patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, the use of inhaled recombinant granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor resulted in a significantly better alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient at 25 weeks than the use of placebo. The beneficial effect was not observed in smokers.

INTRODUCTION:Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) carries high 1-month mortality. Corticosteroids provide a modest 28-day but not 90-day survival benefit, due to development of infections and organ failures. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) has shown promise in patients with SAH by its immunomodulatory and regenerative capabilities. We studied the safety and efficacy of combination (GCSF + prednisolone, GPred) therapy in management of steroid-eligible patients with SAH.METHODS:Steroid eligible patients with SAH (discriminant function scores 32–90) were randomized to receive prednisolone (GrA, n = 42), GPred (GrB, n = 42), or GCSF alone (GrC, n = 42). GCSF was given as 150–300 mcg/d for 7 days followed by every third day for a maximum of 12 doses in 1 month. Prednisolone 40 mg/d was given for 7 days and continued for 28 days in responders (Lille score <0.45).RESULTS:Baseline characteristics of patient groups were comparable. On intention-to-treat analysis, the primary endpoint of 90-day survival was achieved in 64.3% (27/42) in prednisolone, 88.1% (37/42) in GPred, and 78.6%(33/42) in GCSF groups, respectively (P = 0.03, prednisolone vs GPred). The 28-day survival was not different between the groups (85.7%, 95.2%, and 85.7%, respectively [P = 0.27]). The GPred group had more responders by day 7 (71.4% vs 92.9% vs 76.2%, P = 0.037) and had greater reduction in discriminant function (−7.33 ± 4.78, −24.59 ± 3.7, −14.59 ± 3.41, P = 0.011) and MELDNa (−1.69 ± 1.26, −7.02 ± 1.24, −3.05 ± 0.83, P = 0.002) by day 90. The prednisolone-only group had higher incidence of new infections (35.7%, 19%, 7.1%, respectively, P < 0.002). Acute kidney injury (33.3%, 7.1%, 11.9%, P = 0.002), hepatic encephalopathy (35.7%, 9.5%, 26.2%, P = <0.001), and rehospitalizations (59.5%, 14.3%, 30.9%, P=<0.01) were lower in the GPred group.CONCLUSION:Addition of GCSF to prednisolone improves steroid responsiveness and 90-day survival with fewer infections and new onset complications in patients with SAH.

Background 8MW0511 is a novel, long-acting recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) produced by the fusion of the N-terminus of highly active modified G-CSF with the C-terminus of human serum albumin (HSA). Current G-CSF treatments require frequent administration and have limitations in efficacy and convenience, highlighting the need for a longer-acting alternative with fewer injections and improved outcomes. Here, we report a phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of 8MW0511 with those of the approved PEG-rhG-CSF. Methods Patients with breast cancer were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive either 8MW0511 or PEG-rhG-CSF after four cycles of standard chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide, with or without doxorubicin. The primary efficacy endpoint was to evaluate the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) between 8MW0511 and PEG-rhG-CSF during the first cycle. Results Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either 8MW0511 (n = 328) or PEG-rhG-CSF (n = 164). During the first cycle, the average DSN was 0.24 days for the 8MW0511 group and 0.25 days for the PEG-rhG-CSF group. The mean difference in DSN [-0.02 days (95% Confidence interval: -0.12, 0.08)] met the primary study endpoint. During cycles 2–4, the DSN results were consistent with those of cycle 1. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was lower in the 8MW0511 group than in the PEG-rhG-CSF group across all chemotherapy cycles. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) across all cycles showed no significant difference between the two groups. Other efficacy endpoints and adverse events were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions The study findings confirm that 8MW0511 is not inferior to PEG-rhG-CSF in terms of efficacy and shows comparable safety profiles. Additionally, 8MW0511 has the potential to significantly decrease the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, along with a reduction in the occurrence of FN and severe neutropenia.

To study the efficacy and safety of Polyethylene glycolated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in the prevention of neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study conducted from June 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022 on patients diagnosed with locally advanced NPC. Participants were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received PEG-rhG-CSF injections post-chemotherapy cycles, whereas the control group received standard care without additional intervention. Outcomes assessed included grade 3/4 neutropenia incidence, blood cell count changes, febrile neutropenia rates, delays or interruptions in chemotherapy/radiotherapy due to hematological toxicity, oral mucositis incidents, and bone pain occurrences, comparing these between both groups. 1. 88 patients with locally advanced NPC were included, the incidence of grade 3 neutropenia in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.026); 2. The white blood cell count and neutrophil count in D7, D10, D14, and D21 in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.01); 3. The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. The incidence of bone pain in the experimental group was 34.1%, of which most were mild bone pain, and no severe bone pain occurred. The leukocyte and neutrophil counts of the patients in the bone pain group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the no bone pain group, P(WBC) = 0.001, P(ANC) = 0.002. The preventive use of PEG-rhG-CSF decreases the incidence of neutropenia in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for NPC, thereby reducing rates of chemotherapy delays and radiotherapy interruptions, with mild adverse reactions that are tolerable by patients.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival for resected soft-tissue sarcoma remains unknown. We investigated the effect of intensive adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients after resection of high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas. In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with macroscopically resected, Trojani grade II–III soft-tissue sarcomas at any site, no metastases, performance status lower than 2 and aged between 16 and 70 years were eligible within 4 weeks of definitive surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy or no chemotherapy (control group). Randomisation was done with a minimisation technique, stratified by hospital, site of primary tumour, tumour size, planned radiotherapy, and isolated limb perfusion therapy. Chemotherapy consisted of five cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2, ifosfamide 5 g/m2, and lenograstim every 3 weeks. Patients in both groups received radiotherapy if the resection was marginal or the tumour recurrent. The primary endpoint was overall survival and analyses were done by intention to treat. The final results are presented. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00002641. Between February, 1995, and December, 2003, 351 patients were randomly assigned to the adjuvant chemotherapy group (175 patients) or to the control group (176). 258 (73%) of 351 patients received radiotherapy, 129 in each group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0·94 [95% CI 0·68–1·31], p=0·72) nor did relapse-free survival (HR 0·91 [0·67–1·22], p=0·51). 5-year overall survival rate was 66·5% (58·8–73·0) in the chemotherapy group and 67·8% (60·3–74·2) in the control group. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with 130 (80%) of 163 patients who started it completing all five cycles. 16 (10%) patients had grade 3 or 4 fever or infection, but no deaths due to toxic effects were recorded. Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide in resected soft-tissue sarcoma showed no benefit in relapse-free survival or overall survival. Future studies should focus on patients with larger, grade III, and extremity sarcomas. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Rhone-Poulenc-Rorer.

In fit patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care. For mobilization of CD34+ cells for ASCT, combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and G-CSF is commonly used. However, the importance of cytostatic chemotherapy for reliable mobilization remains unclear. This prospective randomized phase II non-inferiority trial compared G-GSF only (G) compared to standard chemotherapy/G-CSF (CG) for CD34+ mobilization. The primary endpoint was a less than 15% difference in successful stem cell collection ( ≥ 5.0 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg b.w. in a single day collection procedure without additional stimulation with plerixafor) with the G regimen. 136 patients were 1:1 randomized. With an 18% difference in favor of the CG therapy, the non-inferiority margin was not maintained (95% CI 1%, 34%, p  = 0.04). The median total CD34+ yield was 9.99 × 10 6 /kg b.w. in CG patients and 7.42 × 10 6 /kg b.w. in patients with G-CSF alone ( p  < 0.001). Ultimately, 130 (96%) patients proceeded to HDCT with ASCT. There were no differences in adverse events, hematologic engraftment, quality of life, or pain perception between the groups. Our data indicate that G-CSF only is inferior to chemotherapy with G-CSF for peripheral CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Trial registration SNCTP #: SNCTP000002952; Trials.gov #: NCT03442673.

Patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis received inhaled molgramostim or matching placebo for 24 weeks. Patients receiving molgramostim had greater improvement in pulmonary gas transfer and alleviation of symptoms than those receiving placebo.

Background F-627 (efbemalenograstim alfa) is a novel long acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) that contains two human G-CSF fused to a human immunoglobulin G2 (hIgG2) -Fc fragment with a peptide linker. This studyevaluated the efficacy and safety of F-627, also known as efbemalenograstim alfa (Ryzneuta®) in reducing neutropenia compared with filgrastim (GRAN®). Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled non-inferiority study. Two hundred thirty nine (239) patients were enrolled in thirteen centers and received the chemotherapy with epirubicin (100 mg/m 2 ) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive either a single 20 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of F-627 on day 3 of each cycle or daily s.c. injection of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/d starting from day 3 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1. The safety profile was also evaluated. Results The mean (SD) duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0.68 (1.10) and 0.71 (0.95) days for the F-627 and the filgrastim groups, respectively. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the between-group median difference (F-627 vs filgrastim) in the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0 day and the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% CI was 0 day, which was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1-day. Results for all efficacy endpoints in cycles 2 − 4 were consistent with the results in cycle 1, however a trend towards a lower incidence and a shorter duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia was observed in the F-627 group compared with the filgrastim group. The ANC nadir in the F-627 group was significantly higher than that in the filgrastim group in each cycle. A single fixed dose of F-627 was well tolerated and as safe as standard daily filgrastim. Conclusions A single fixed dose of 20 mg of F-627 in each cycle was as safe and effective as a daily dose of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of EC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04174599, on 22/11/2019.

Bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with myocardial infarction. We examined the feasibility and efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy and subsequent intracoronary infusion of collected peripheral blood stem-cells (PBSCs) in such patients. We prospectively randomised 27 patients with myocardial infarction who underwent coronary stenting for the culprit lesion of infarction into three groups; cell infusion (n=10), G-CSF alone (n=10), and control group (n=7). Changes in left ventricular systolic function and perfusion were assessed after 6 months. By December, 2003, seven patients from the cell infusion group, three from the G-CSF group, and one from the control group had been assessed. G-CSF injection and intracoronary infusion of the mobilised PBSC did not aggravate inflammation and ischaemia during the periprocedural period. Exercise capacity (mean treadmill exercise time: 450 s [SD 178] at baseline vs 578 s [168] at 6 months' follow-up, p=0·004), myocardial perfusion (perfusion defect 11·6% [9·6] vs 5·3% [5·0], p=0·020) and systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction 48·7% [8·3] vs 55·1% [7·4], p=0·005) improved significantly in patients who received cell infusion. However, we noted an unexpectedly high rate of in-stent restenosis at culprit lesion in patients who received G-CSF, and therefore we stopped enrolment. G-CSF therapy with intracoronary infusion of PBSC showed improved cardiac function, and promoted angiogenesis in patients with myocardial infarction. However, aggravation of restenosis could be a serious problem. In future studies with G-CSF based stem-cell therapy, patients should be carefully monitored for unexpected effects. Published online March 2, 2004 http://image.thelancet.com/extras/04art1325web.pdf

PurposeThis study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to evaluate the dynamic relationship between the concentrations of total and unbound paclitaxel, and the exposure-response analysis of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) after pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer.MethodsA total of 653 concentrations corresponding to total paclitaxel and 334 concentrations corresponding to unbound paclitaxel were analyzed in 24 subjects who randomized received a single 260 mg/m2 dose of two nab-paclitaxel formulations with a 21–35-day washout period. PEG-G-CSF was administered to all the patients in each cycle to prevent neutropenia. The exposure-response relationships were evaluated using the exposure to total, albumin-coated, and unbound paclitaxel, as well as the reduction in neutrophil count. The exposure data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. A linear regression model was used to test the statistical significance of the correlation between percentage of reduction in neutrophil count and exposure.ResultsThe PK characteristics of total paclitaxel were described using a three-compartment model with first-order elimination, and a mechanism-based model incorporating linear release of nab-paclitaxel and the saturated binding of unbound paclitaxel to plasma components was established. The release ratio of paclitaxel from nab-paclitaxel was estimated to be 4.60% and the maximum unbound fraction (2.76%) was reached at the end of the infusion. The study found that a longer duration of total paclitaxel concentration > 0.19 µmol/L was significantly correlated with a reduction in neutrophil count (r2 = 0.23, P = 0.00062). Specifically, a duration of > 8.6 h was a predictor of a decreased neutrophil count.ConclusionThe decrease in neutrophils induced by nab-paclitaxel was significantly correlated with the duration above a total paclitaxel concentration of 0.19 µmol/L despite the use of PEG-G-CSF.