Explore the vast range of titles available.

The co-administration of the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenACWY-TT, with a licensed hepatitis A and B vaccine, HepA/B ( Twinrix ® ), was compared to their separate administration in this open, randomised, controlled study. Healthy subjects 11–17 years of age ( n = 611) were randomised (3:1:1) to receive both vaccines, MenACWY-TT alone or HepA/B alone. The co-administration of both vaccines was shown to be non-inferior to their individual administration. At seven months after the first vaccination, 99.4–100% of the subjects who received both vaccines co-administered showed seroprotection against all meningococcal serogroups and at least 99.1% of them were seropositive for hepatitis A and seroprotected against hepatitis B. This study suggests that MenACWY-TT vaccine could be co-administered with HepA/B without adversely impacting the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of either of the vaccines.

► We randomized primary school children into four groups to receive either live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (H 2 strain), domestic inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive ®), or imported inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix ®) and hepatitis B vaccine (Control group). ► We compared groups at 7, 14 and 28 days in terms of proportion of sero-conversions. ► Our study was not able to identify differences between Havrix ®, Healive ® and the H 2 vaccine in terms of sero-conversion proportion and GMC between 7 and 28 days While three types of hepatitis A vaccines are available in China, little data are available to compare them in terms of early antibody response. We conducted a trial to compare antibody response at 7, 14 and 28 days. We randomized primary school children in Gansu and Jilin provinces into four groups to receive either (1) Chinese live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (H2 strain), (2) domestic inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive ®), (3) imported inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix ®) or (4) hepatitis B vaccine (Control group). We compared groups at 7, 14 and 28 days in terms of proportion of sero-conversions (≥10 mUI/ml), and Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) of antibodies measured with a Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay (MEIA). We compared rates of self-reported adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in the first three days. 204 children received the H2 vaccine, 208 received Healive ®, 214 received Havrix ®, and 215 received hepatitis B vaccine (no differences across groups in terms of age, sex, weight and height). At seven days, sero-conversion proportions were 25%, 35%, 27% and 2% ( p < 0.0001) with GMC of 6 mIU/ml, 8 mIU/ml, 6 mIU/ml and 3 mIU/ml, respectively for the four groups. At 28 days, sero-conversion proportions were 98%, 100%, 93% and 3% ( p < 0.0001) with GMC of 47 mIU/ml, 71 mIU/ml, 67 mIU/ml and 3 mIU/ml, respectively. AEFI were benign and did not differ across groups ( p = 0.94). While our study was not able to identify differences between Havrix ®, Healive ® and H2 vaccine in terms of sero-conversion proportion and GMC between seven and 28 days, further studies should evaluate non-inferiority or equivalence of the Chinese vaccines, particularly with respect to the GMC concentration for the H2 vaccine since it could affect long-term protection.

Challenged by contrasting data on low immune responses in the elderly with a combined hepatitis A/B vaccine, a randomised, controlled study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity of three hepatitis A and B vaccination regimens (group 1: combined hepatitis A/B vaccine Twinrix™ [GSK]; group 2: co-administered hepatitis A vaccine, Havrix™ [GSK] + hepatitis B vaccine Engerix™-B [GSK], group 3: co-administered hepatitis A vaccine, Vaqta™ [Sanofi-Pasteur MSD] + hepatitis B vaccine HB VAX PRO™ [Sanofi-Pasteur MSD]) and the effect of influencing factors in subjects >40 years. On completion of the full vaccination course, anti-HBs seroprotection (SP) rates were 92, 80 and 71% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; anti-HAV seropositivity (S+) rates were 97, 99 and 99%, respectively. In group 1, anti-HBs SP rate was non-inferior as well as superior and anti-HAV S+ rate was non-inferior to that in groups 2 and 3. Anti-HBs response was most significantly influenced by the vaccine regimen, followed by age, gender and BMI (stepwise multiple regression analysis). BMI had the most significant influence on HAV response followed by age, gender and vaccine regimen. In conclusion, Twinrix™ induced superior hepatitis B SP rates and similar hepatitis A S+ rates compared to concomitant administration of monovalent vaccines in subjects aged >40 years.

300 adolescents aged 12–15 years were randomised (1:1) into two groups to compare the long-term (10 years) immunogenicity profile of two doses of an Adult formulation [Group HAB_2D: 150; 0–6 months] vs. three doses of a Paediatric formulation [Group HAB_3D: 150; 0–1–6 months] of a combined hepatitis A and B (HAB) vaccine. At Year 10, anti-HAV seropositivity rate was 100% in both groups, while 85.9% and 85.1% subjects in the HAB_2D and HAB_3D groups, respectively, had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL. The anti-HAV antibody GMCs (HAB_2D: 429.3 mIU/mL; HAB_3D: 335.5 mIU/mL) and anti-HBs antibody GMCs (HAB_2D: 50.6 mIU/mL; HAB_3D: 60.1 mIU/mL) were similar in both groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Hence, with respect to long-term antibody persistence, the two-dose schedule of the combined HAB vaccine Adult formulation is an effective alternative to the conventional three-dose schedule of the Paediatric formulation in adolescents.

The hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine is highly immunogenic in general, yet data on its use in liver-transplanted (LT) children is limited. This study aimed to determine the seroimmunity to HAV in all LT children, and the immunogenicity of an inactivated HAV vaccine in seronegative LT children at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Seronegative LT children received the inactivated HAV vaccine at 0 and 6–8 months with adverse events monitored for 3 days post-immunization. The result reviewed that among 105 LT children, vaccination records were available for 81%, of which 7.1% and 16.5% with one and two doses of HAV vaccine were immunized before transplantation, respectively. Post-transplantation, 20.1% were seropositive for HAV, with 9.5% due to pre-transplant immunization. Eighty-three seronegative LT children (aged 7.25 ± 4.40 years; 48.6% male) received two vaccine doses. The seropositive rate increased following the first and second doses and reached to 51.5%, and 92.9%, respectively ( p  < 0.001), with no serious adverse events reported. Age at vaccination and the interval from transplantation to vaccination were risk factors for non-responsiveness ( p  < 0.001). The study highlighted inadequate HAV vaccination coverage, leaving most LT children susceptible to infection. HAV vaccine proved highly immunogenic and safe, emphasizing the need for improved vaccination strategies before and after liver transplantation. Trial registration TCTR20220110001.

This study compared the long-term persistence of anti-hepatitis A (anti-HAV) and B (anti-HBs) antibodies, 5 years after vaccination of subjects aged 1–11 years with a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine either in a two-dose (0, 6 months, Adult formulation) or a three-dose (0, 1, 6 months, Paediatric formulation) schedule. At the end of the 5 years, all subjects (100%) in both groups continued to have anti-HAV antibodies ≥15 mIU/mL, while 94–97% of subjects in both groups had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL. Subjects with anti-HBs antibody concentration ≤10 mIU/mL were administered a challenge dose of hepatitis B vaccine. All subjects mounted a vigorous immune response to the challenge indicating the presence of immunological memory to HBV.

Patients with advanced fibrosis are at increased risk of severe outcomes if they develop acute infection with hepatitis A (HAV) or hepatitis B (HBV) viruses. There are no data on the efficacy of combined HAV/HBV vaccination in patients with advanced fibrosis. Our aim was to evaluate the response to the HAV and HBV vaccine alone or in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and advanced fibrosis and to evaluate the impact of administering the vaccine while patients were receiving peginterferon for treatment of chronic HCV. In this prospective study of patients with advanced fibrosis (Ishak 3-6), those without serologic evidence of prior exposure were vaccinated with either Havrix® HAV, Engerix® HBV, or the TWINRIX® HAV/HBV combination vaccine as appropriate, and response was defined as the development of anti-HAV or anti-HBV surface antibodies. Of the 162 eligible patients, the prevalence of prior exposure to HAV and HBV was 30 and 18%, respectively. Of the 84 patients vaccinated, 38% received Havrix, 14% Engerix, and 48% TWINRIX®. The response to the HAV vaccine was 75% in those receiving Havrix® compared to 78% receiving TWINRIX®. In contrast, the response to HBV vaccination was 42% in patients receiving Engerix® compared to 60% in those vaccinated with TWINRIX® (difference 18.3%; OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.57-7.79). The presence of diabetes was the only risk factor identified for reduced HBV response (P = 0.01). Responses to both HAV and HBV vaccines when administered alone or in combination were lower than expected in patients with HCV and advanced fibrosis, especially in those with diabetes. The observation that the decline in HBV vaccine response was somewhat lower when this was administered alone as opposed to the combination A/B vaccine suggests that the administration of a combination vaccine may enhance the vaccination response to HBV.

ObjectivesPopulations who seek HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are disproportionately affected by hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV). We examined immunity/vaccination against these infections among participants in the Ontario PrEP cohort study (ON-PrEP).MethodsON-PrEP is a prospective cohort of HIV-negative PrEP users from 10 Ontario clinics. We descriptively analysed baseline immunity/vaccination against HAV (IgG reactive), HBV (hepatitis B surface antibody >10) and HPV (self-reported three-dose vaccination). We further performed multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with baseline immunity/vaccination. We used cumulative incidence functions to describe vaccine uptake among participants non-immune at baseline.ResultsOf 633 eligible participants, 59.1% were white, 85.8% were male and 79.6% were gay. We found baseline evidence of immunity/vaccination against HAV, HBV and HPV in 69.2%, 81.2% and 16.8% of PrEP-experienced participants and 58.9%, 70.3% and 10.4% of PrEP-naïve participants, respectively. Characteristics associated with baseline HAV immunity were greater PrEP duration (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.41/year, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.84), frequent sexually transmitted and bloodborne infection (STBBI) testing (aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.92) and HBV immunity (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 2.09 to 5.98). Characteristics associated with baseline HBV immunity were living in Toronto (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.87 to 6.70) or Ottawa (aOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.40), self-identifying as racialised (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.18), greater PrEP duration (aOR 1.39/year, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.90) and HAV immunity (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 2.19 to 6.41). Characteristics associated with baseline HPV vaccination were being aged ≤26 years (aOR 9.28, 95% CI 2.11 to 40.77), annual income between CAD$60 000 and CAD$119 000 (aOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.40 to 8.34), frequent STBBI testing (aOR 7.00, 95% CI 1.38 to 35.46) and HAV immunity (aOR 6.96, 95% CI 2.00 to 24.25). Among those non-immune at baseline, overall cumulative probability of immunity/vaccination was 0.70, 0.60 and 0.53 among PrEP-experienced participants and 0.93, 0.80 and 0.70 among PrEP-naïve participants for HAV, HBV and HPV, respectively.ConclusionsBaseline immunity to HAV/HBV was common, and a sizeable proportion of non-immune participants were vaccinated during follow-up. However, HPV vaccination was uncommon. Continued efforts should be made to remove barriers to HPV vaccination such as cost, inclusion in clinical guidelines and provider recommendation.

Background. Follow-up studies of recipients of hepatitis B vaccine from endemic areas have reported loss of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) in a high proportion of persons vaccinated at birth. In contrast, the long-term durability of antibody in persons vaccinated as adults in nonendemic areas is not well defined. We aimed to assess the durability of anti-HBs among healthcare workers (HCWs) vaccinated as adults and response to a booster among those without protective levels of antibody. Methods. Adult HCWs aged 18–60 at the time of initial vaccination were recruited. All were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and anti-HBs level. HCWs with anti-HBs <12 mIU/mL were offered a booster and levels were measured 1, 7, and 21 days afterward. Results. Anti-HBs levels were <12 mIU/mL in 9 of 50 (18%), 13 of 50 (26%), and 14 of 59 (24%) HCWs 10–15, 16–20, and >20 years postvaccination, respectively, (P = ns). Four HCWs were anti-HBc positive; none had HBsAg. By logistic regression, older age at vaccination was the only predictor of inadequate anti-HBs level (P = .0005). Thirty-four of 36 subjects with inadequate anti-HBs levels received a booster and 32 (94%) developed levels >12 mIU/mL within 3 weeks. Conclusions. Anti-HBs levels decrease after 10–31 years and fall below a level considered protective in approximately 25% of cases. The rapid and robust response to a booster vaccine suggests a long-lasting amnestic response. Hepatitis B vaccination provides long-term protection against hepatitis B and booster vaccination does not appear to be necessary in HCWs.

Previous studies have shown that high-dose vitamin supplements can improve vaccine-induced immune responses and pathogen protection in the context of vitamin deficiencies. To further elucidate the influence of vitamin supplements on immune responses toward pediatric vaccines, we performed a randomized controlled clinical trial (PCVIT) of 20 healthy children 1–4 years of age in Memphis, Tennessee. Study participants received a booster vaccine for pneumococcus and a primary vaccine for hepatitis A virus with or without a high-dose, oral, liquid supplement of 10,000 IU retinyl palmitate. We found that the children enrolled in PCVIT had higher baseline vitamin levels than previously described older children and adults living in Memphis. Only one child in PCVIT had a serum retinol level of less than 0.3 µg/mL. The children frequently consumed milk and baby foods that were likely vitamin-fortified, providing an explanation for the relatively high vitamin levels. Most children in PCVIT responded well to pneumococcus and hepatitis A vaccines by pathogen-specific antibody upregulation. The one child with a serum retinol level below 0.3 µg/mL did not receive a vitamin supplement and exhibited the lowest fold-change in antibody responses toward pneumococcal serotypes. A correlation matrix encompassing demographics, vitamin levels, vaccine-induced immune responses, C-reactive protein, and total serum immunoglobulin isotypes, including IgG2 and IgA, identified variables associated with vaccination outcomes. Perhaps because children were predominantly retinol-sufficient at baseline, the high-dose vitamin A supplement exhibited no benefit to vaccine-induced immune responses. In fact, when vitamin supplemented and vitamin unsupplemented groups were compared among participants with the highest baseline retinol levels, there was a trend toward weaker vaccine-induced immune responses in the vitamin supplemented group. Results encourage the performance of larger clinical studies before high-dose vitamin supplements are recommended for populations that are otherwise vitamin-replete.