Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The evasion from apoptosis is a common strategy adopted by most tumors, and inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are among the most studied molecular and therapeutic targets. BIRC3 (cellular IAP2) and BIRC5 (survivin) are two of the eight members of the human IAPs family. This family is characterized by the presence of the baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains, involved in protein-protein interactions. In addition to the BIR domains, IAPs also contain other important domains like the C-terminal ubiquitin-conjugating (UBC) domain, the caspase recruitment (CARD) domain and the C-terminal Ring zinc-finger (RING) domain. Main body BIRC3 and BIRC5 have been characterized in some solid and hematological tumors and are therapeutic targets for the family of drugs called “Smac mimetics”. Many evidences point to the pro-survival and antiapoptotic role of BIRC3 in cancer cells, however, not all the data are consistent and the resulting picture is heterogeneous. For instance, BIRC3 genetic inactivation due to deletions or point mutations is consistently associated to shorter progression free survival and poor prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. BIRC3 inactivation has also been associated to chemoimmunotherapy resistance. On the contrary, the progression from low grade gliomas to high grade gliomas is accompanied by BIRC3 expression increase, which bears relevant prognostic consequences. Due to the relationship between BIRC3 , MAP3K14 and the non-canonical NF-kB pathway, BIRC3 inactivation bears consequences also on the tumor cells relying on NF-kB pathway to survive. BIRC5 , on the contrary, is commonly considered an anti-apoptotic molecule, promoting cell division and tumor progression and it is widely regarded as potential therapeutic target. Conclusions The present manuscript collects and reviews the most recent literature concerning the role played by BIRC3 and BIRC5 in cancer cells, providing useful information for the choice of the best therapeutic targets.

The reorganization of the cell cytoskeleton and changes in the content of cell adhesion molecules are crucial during the metastatic spread of tumor cells. Colorectal cancer (CRC) cells express high SMAD7, a protein involved in the control of CRC cell growth. In the present study, we evaluated whether SMAD7 regulates the cytoskeleton reorganization and dynamics in CRC. Knockdown of SMAD7 with a specific antisense oligonucleotide (AS) in HCT116 and DLD1, two human CRC cell lines, reduced the migration rate and the content of F-ACTIN filaments. A gene array, real-time PCR, and Western blotting of SMAD7 AS-treated cells showed a marked down-regulation of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family, which has been implicated in cancer cell migration. IL-6 and IL-22, two cytokines that activate STAT3, enhanced XIAP in cancer cells, and such induction was attenuated in SMAD7-deficient cells. Finally, in human CRC, SMAD7 mRNA correlated with XIAP expression. Our data show that SMAD7 positively regulates XIAP expression and migration of CRC cells, and suggest a mechanism by which SMAD7 controls the architecture components of the CRC cell cytoskeleton.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive bile duct cancer with a poor prognosis and high mortality rates, primarily due to the lack of early diagnosis and effective treatments. We have shown that cyclin D and CDK4/6, key regulators of cell cycle progression, are highly expressed in CCA patients. Moreover, high levels of cyclin D, CDK4, and CDK6 are associated with shorter survival in CCA patients, suggesting that cyclin D and CDK4/6 might be potential targets for CCA therapy. However, we have demonstrated that CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib monotherapy is less effective in CCA cells. We have identified Cellular Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins 1 and 2 (cIAP1/2), NF-κB target genes that their expression is associated with shorter survival in CCA patients, as potential key regulators of the CDK4/6 inhibitor response. We showed that palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, increases phosphorylated p65 and its nuclear translocation, resulting in cIAP1/2 upregulation in CCA cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that the combination of a cIAP1/2 antagonist and a CDK4/6 inhibitor might enhance the CDK4/6 inhibitor response. Interestingly, combined treatment with the Smac mimetic LCL161, a cIAP1/2 antagonist, and palbociclib synergistically inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell death in both 2D monolayer and 3D spheroid CCA cultures. We further showed that this combination treatment has less effect on non-tumor cholangiocytes and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Our findings demonstrate for the first time that the combined treatment of Smac mimetics and CDK4/6 inhibitors is a promising novel targeted therapy for CCA patients.

Macrophages serve as viral reservoirs due to their resistance to apoptosis and HIV-cytopathic effects. We have previously shown that inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) confer resistance to HIV-Vpr-induced apoptosis in normal macrophages. Herein, we show that second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetics (SM) induce apoptosis of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) infected in vitro with a R5-tropic laboratory strain expressing heat stable antigen, chronically infected U1 cells, and ex-vivo derived MDMs from HIV-infected individuals. To understand the mechanism governing SM-induced cell death, we show that SM-induced cell death of primary HIV-infected macrophages was independent of the acquisition of M1 phenotype following HIV infection of macrophages. Instead, SM-induced cell death was found to be mediated by IAPs as downregulation of IAPs by siRNAs induced cell death of HIV-infected macrophages. Moreover, HIV infection caused receptor interacting protein kinase-1 (RIPK1) degradation which in concert with IAP1/2 downregulation following SM treatment may result in apoptosis of macrophages. Altogether, our results show that SM selectively induce apoptosis in primary human macrophages infected in vitro with HIV possibly through RIPK1. Moreover, modulation of the IAP pathways may be a potential strategy for selective killing of HIV-infected macrophages in vivo.

Recently, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) and some IAP antagonists were found to regulate autophagy, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. WX20120108 is an analogue of GDC-0152 (a known IAP antagonist) and displays more potent anti-tumor and autophagy-regulating activity in tumor cells, we investigated the regulatory mechanisms underlying WX20120108-induced autophagy. Using molecular docking and fluorescence polarization anisotropy (FPA) competitive assay, we first demonstrated that WX20120108, acting as an IAP antagonist, bound to the XIAP-BIR3, XIAP BIR2-BIR3, cIAP1 BIR3, and cIAP2 BIR3 domains with high affinities. In six cancer cell lines, WX20120108 inhibited the cell proliferation with potencies two to ten-fold higher than that of GDC-0152. In HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells, WX20120108 induced caspase-dependent apoptosis and activated TNFα-dependent extrinsic apoptosis. On the other hand, WX20120108 induced autophagy in HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells in dose- and time-dependent manners. We revealed that WX20120108 selectively activated Foxo3, evidenced by Foxo3 nuclear translocation in both gene modified cell line and HeLa cells, as well as the upregulated expression of Foxo3-targeted genes ( Bnip3 , Pik3c3 , Atg5 , and Atg4b ), which played a key role in autophagy initiation. WX20120108-induced autophagy was significantly suppressed when Foxo3 gene was silenced. WX20120108 dose-dependently increased the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HeLa cells, and WX20120108-induced Foxo3 activation was completely blocked in the presence of catalase, a known ROS scavenger. However, WX20120108-induced ROS generation was not affected by cIAP1/2 or XIAP gene silencing. In conclusion, WX20120108-induced autophagy relies on activating ROS-Foxo3 pathway, which is independent of IAPs. This finding provides a new insight into the mechanism of IAP antagonist-mediated regulation of autophagy.

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have been used to treat blood cancers by producing a wide variety of cytokines. However, they are not effective in treating solid cancers and can cause severe side-effects, including cytokine release syndrome. TNFα is a tumoricidal cytokine, but it markedly increases the protein levels of cIAP1 and cIAP2, the members of inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family of E3 ubiquitin ligase that limits caspase-induced apoptosis. Degradation of IAP proteins by an IAP antagonist does not effectively kill cancer cells but enables TNFα to strongly induce cancer cell apoptosis. It would be a promising approach to treat cancers by targeted delivery of TNFα through an inactive adoptive cell in combination with an IAP antagonist.MethodsHuman dendritic cells (DCs) were engineered to express a single tumoricidal factor, TNFα, and a membrane-anchored Mucin1 antibody scFv, named Mucin 1 directed DCs expressing TNFα (M-DCsTNF). The efficacy of M-DCsTNF in recognizing and treating breast cancer was tested in vitro and in vivo.ResultsMucin1 was highly expressed on the surface of a wide range of human breast cancer cell lines. M-DCsTNF directly associated with MDA-MB-231 cells in the bone of NSG mice. M-DCsTNF plus an IAP antagonist, SM-164, but neither alone, markedly induce MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell apoptosis, which was blocked by TNF antibody. Importantly, M-DCsTNF combined with SM-164, but not SM-164 alone, inhibited the growth of patient-derived breast cancer in NSG mice.ConclusionAn adoptive cell targeting delivery of TNFα combined with an IAP antagonist is a novel effective approach to treat breast cancer and could be expanded to treat other solid cancers. Unlike CAR-T cell, this novel adoptive cell is not activated to produce a wide variety of cytokines, except for additional overexpressed TNF, and thus could avoid the severe side effects such as cytokine release syndrome.

Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) maintain the balance between cell proliferation and cell death by inhibiting caspase activities and mediating immune responses. In the present study, a homolog of IAP (designated as Es IAP1) was identified from Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis . Es IAP1 consisted of 451 amino acids containing two baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains with the conserved Cx2 Cx6 Wx3 Dx5 Hx6 C motifs. Es IAP1 mRNA was expressed in various tissues and its expression level in hemocytes increased significantly ( p  < 0.01) at 12–48 h after lipopolysaccharide stimulation. In the hemocytes, Es IAP1 protein was mainly distributed in the cytoplasm. The hydrolytic activity of recombinant Es Caspase-3/7-1 against the substrate Ac-DEVD- p NA decreased after incubation with r Es IAP1. Moreover, r Es IAP1 could directly combine with r Es Caspase-3/7-1 in vitro . After Es IAP1 was interfered by dsRNA, the mRNA expression and the hydrolytic activity of Es Caspase-3/7-1 increased significantly, which was 2.26-fold ( p  < 0.05) and 1.71-fold ( p  < 0.05) compared to that in the dsGFP group, respectively. These results collectively demonstrated that Es IAP1 might play an important role in apoptosis pathway by regulating the activity of Es Caspase-3/7-1 in E. sinensis .

Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins are a family comprised of a total of eight mammalian members that were initially described to act as endogenous inhibitors of caspases. In addition, extensive evidence has been accumulated over the last years showing that IAP proteins can regulate various signal transduction pathways, thereby exerting non-apoptotic functions beyond the inhibition of apoptosis. For example, IAP proteins have been implied in the control of cell motility, migration, invasion and metastasis. However, currently the question is controversially discussed whether or not they positively or negatively control these processes. As small-molecule inhibitors of IAP proteins have entered the stage of clinical evaluation as experimental cancer therapeutics, a better understanding of their various cellular effects will be critical for their rational use in the treatment of human diseases.

Abstract Tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)–associated factor 1 (TRAF1) regulates NF-κB signaling and is implicated in chronic autoimmune diseases characterized by persistent inflammation. In addition to its role in restraining linear ubiquitin assembly complex–mediated linear ubiquitination of apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC) to limit inflammasome activation, TRAF1 also stabilizes cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 2 (cIAP2) by protecting it from degradation. Notably, cIAP2 promotes inflammasome activation via K63-linked polyubiquitination of caspase-1. Here, we show that disrupting the TRAF1/cIAP2 interaction (V203A in humans; V196A in mice) reduces inflammasome activation. TRAF1V203A THP-1 cells exhibit diminished caspase-1 ubiquitination, leading to impaired IL-1β secretion. Similarly, TRAF1V196A mice produce significantly lower IL-1β levels after LPS challenge. In a monosodium urate crystal–induced arthritis model, TRAF1V196A mice show reduced joint inflammation, decreased synovial immune cell infiltration, and attenuated disease severity. These findings establish the TRAF1/cIAP2 axis as a key regulator of inflammasome activation and a potential therapeutic target for inflammasome-driven diseases such as gout. Graphical abstract

Aiming to promote cancer cell apoptosis is a mainstream strategy of cancer therapy. The second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC)/direct inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP)-binding protein with low pI (DIABLO) protein is an essential and endogenous antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). SMAC mimetics (SMs) are a series of synthetically chemical compounds. Via database analysis and literature searching, we summarize the potential mechanisms of endogenous SMAC inefficiency, degradation, mutation, releasing blockage, and depression. We review the development of SMs, as well as preclinical and clinical outcomes of SMs in solid tumor treatment, and we analyze their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats from our point of view. We also highlight several questions in need of further investigation.