Explore the vast range of titles available.

Using an in situ method of time-resolved Mie scattering indicatrix registration, the dynamics of micro- and nanoparticle formation during the explosive boiling of a solution of ibuprofen in subcritical carbon dioxide (T[sub.0] = 302 K, P[sub.0] = 71 bar) were investigated. The process is found to exhibit multistage behavior. At the jet front, ibuprofen microaggregates with a mean radius of 1.4 ± 0.2 μm are formed, maintaining a stable size over the initial 100 ms. Subsequent reduction in boiling intensity results in a decrease in the particle radius to 650 ± 100 nm. In the following stage, nanoscale CO[sub.2] clusters (20–50 nm) are detected by the Mie scattering technique. The findings indicate that the final size of the resulting ibuprofen particles is governed not only by the initial thermodynamic conditions but also by the boiling dynamics of the ibuprofen-saturated CO[sub.2] solution during the pulsed ejection process.

In preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus, expectant management was noninferior to ibuprofen therapy with respect to necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or death at 36 weeks.

Early treatment with ibuprofen for a large patent ductus arteriosus did not result in a lower risk of death or moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia than placebo at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age.

In this prospective study, we compared the efficacy and side effects of indomethacin, ibuprofen, and paracetamol in patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure in preterm neonates. Three hundred preterm neonates with hemodynamically significant PDA (hs-PDA) admitted at our neonatal intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into three groups. Group I (paracetamol group) received 15 mg/kg/6 h IV paracetamol infusion for 3 days. Group II (ibuprofen group) received 10 mg/kg IV ibuprofen infusion followed by 5 mg/kg/day for 2 days. Group III (indomethacin group) received 0.2 mg/kg/12 h indomethacin IV infusion for three doses. Laboratory investigations such as renal function test, liver function test, complete blood count, and blood gases were conducted in addition to echocardiographic examinations. All investigations were done before and 3 days after treatment. There was no significant difference between all groups regarding efficacy of PDA closure ( P  = 0.868). There was a significant increase in serum creatinine levels and serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in the ibuprofen and indomethacin groups ( P  < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in platelet count and urine output (UOP) in both ibuprofen and indomethacin groups ( P  < 0.001). There was a significant increase in bilirubin levels in only the ibuprofen group ( P  = 0.003). No significant difference of hemoglobin (HB) level or liver enzymes in all groups ( P  > 0.05). Ventilatory settings improved significantly in patients with successful closure of PDA than those with failed PDA closure ( P  < 0.001). Conclusion : Paracetamol is as effective as indomethacin and ibuprofen in closure of PDA in preterm neonates and has less side effects mainly on renal function, platelet count, and GIT bleeding. What is Known: • Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus has many complications for preterm and low birth weight neonates and better to be closed. Many drugs were used for medical closure of PDA e.g. indomethacin, ibuprofen and recently paracetamol. Many studies compare safety and efficacy of paracetamol with either indomethacin or ibuprofen. What is New: • It is the first large study that compares the efficacy and side effects of the three drugs in one study.

This randomized trial involving patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis who were at increased cardiovascular risk showed the noninferiority of celecoxib to naproxen or ibuprofen with respect to cardiovascular safety. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were introduced in the 1960s and became the most widely prescribed class of drugs in the world, with more than 100 million prescriptions issued annually in the United States alone. 1 NSAIDs inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX), which reduces pain and inflammation through the inhibition of prostaglandins. However, the COX enzyme is also present in gastric mucosa, where it stimulates gastroprotective prostaglandins. The identification of two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, and the recognition that antiinflammatory and analgesic effects are mediated through COX-2 inhibition — whereas the gastrointestinal toxic effects are linked to COX-1 inhibition — resulted in the development . . .

PurposeEffect size estimates of analgesic drugs can be misleading. Ibuprofen (400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg), paracetamol (1000 mg, 500 mg), paracetamol 1000 mg/codeine 60 mg, and placebo were investigated to establish the multidimensional pharmacodynamic profiles of each drug on acute pain with calculated effect size estimates.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre, outpatient, and single-dose study used 350 patients (mean age 25 year, range 18 to 30 years) of homogenous ethnicity after third molar surgery. Primary outcome was sum pain intensity over 6 h. Secondary outcomes were time to analgesic onset, duration of analgesia, time to rescue drug intake, number of patients taking rescue drug, sum pain intensity difference, maximum pain intensity difference, time to maximum pain intensity difference, number needed to treat values, adverse effects, overall drug assessment as patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), and the effect size estimates NNT and NNTp.ResultsIbuprofen doses above 400 mg do not significantly increase analgesic effect. Paracetamol has a very flat analgesic dose–response profile. Paracetamol 1000/codeine 60 mg gives similar analgesia as ibuprofen from 400 mg, but has a shorter time to analgesic onset. Active drugs show no significant difference in maximal analgesic effect. Other secondary outcomes support these findings. The frequencies of adverse effects were low, mild to moderate in all active groups. NNT and NTTp values did not coincide well with PROMs.ConclusionIbuprofen doses above 400 mg for acute pain offer limited analgesic gain. Paracetamol 1000 mg/codeine 60 mg is comparable to ibuprofen doses from 400 mg. Calculated effect size estimates and PROM in our study seem not to relate well as clinical analgesic efficacy estimators.Trial registrationNCT00699114.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are often used as components of multimodal therapy for postoperative pain management, but their use is currently limited by its side effects. The specific objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of intravenous (IV) ibuprofen for the management of postoperative pain in a European population. A total of 206 patients from both abdominal and orthopedic surgery, were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive 800 mg IV-ibuprofen or placebo every 6 hours; all patients had morphine access through a patient controlled analgesia pump. The primary outcome measure was median morphine consumption within the first 24 hours following surgery. The mean±SEM of morphine requirements was reduced from 29,8±5,25 mg to 14,22±3,23 mg (p = 0,015) and resulted in a decrease in pain at rest (p = 0,02) measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from mean±SEM 3.34±0,35 to 0.86±0.24, and also in pain during movement (p = 0,02) from 4.32±0,36 to 1.90±0,30 in the ibuprofen treatment arm; while in the placebo group VAS score at rest ranged from 4.68±0,40 to 2.12±0,42 and during movement from 5.66±0,42 to 3.38±0,44. Similar treatment-emergent adverse events occurred across both study groups and there was no difference in the overall incidence of these events. Perioperative administration of IV-Ibuprofen 800 mg every 6 hours in abdominal surgery patient's decreases morphine requirements and pain score. Furthermore IV-Ibuprofen was safe and well tolerate. Consequently we consider appropriate that protocols for management of postoperative pain include IV-Ibuprofen 800 mg every 6 hours as an option to offer patients an analgesic benefit while reducing the potentially risks associated with morphine consumption. EU Clinical Trials Register 2011-005007-33.

Background and Objectives Previously published studies have suggested the lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between ibuprofen and paracetamol when they are delivered as a fixed-dose oral combination. The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of a fixed-dose intravenous (IV) combination, containing 3 mg/mL ibuprofen and 10 mg/mL paracetamol, in comparison with its individual components. The study also assessed the relative bioavailability of the same doses of the active ingredients when they were administered as an oral formulation. Methods A single-dose, open-label, randomized, five-period cross-over sequence pharmacokinetic study was undertaken in 30 healthy volunteers. Serial plasma samples were assayed for both paracetamol and ibuprofen concentrations, using validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed using standard non-compartmental analyses. Adverse events were also assessed. The ratios of the maximum measured plasma concentration ( C max ), the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration (AUC t ) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC ∞ ) were analysed for bioequivalence as determined by 90 % confidence intervals. Results The pharmacokinetic parameters of ibuprofen and paracetamol were very similar for the combination and monotherapy IV preparations; the ratios of the C max , AUC t and AUC ∞ values fell within the 80–125 % acceptable bioequivalence range. Precise dose proportionality for both compounds was also determined for the half dose of the IV formulation in comparison with the full dose. The relative bioavailability of paracetamol (93.78 %) and ibuprofen (96.45 %) confirmed the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the oral and IV formulations of the fixed-dose combination. Conclusion Concomitant administration of 3 mg/mL ibuprofen and 10 mg/mL paracetamol in a fixed-dose IV combination does not alter the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug. The IV and oral dose forms of such a combination are pharmacokinetically equivalent.

Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of single versus combination non-prescription oral analgesics in community-derived people aged 40 years and older with chronic knee pain. Methods A randomised, double-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, active controlled trial investigating short-term (day 10) and long-term (week 13) benefits and side-effects of four regimens, each taken three times a day: ibuprofen (400 mg); paracetamol (1000 mg); one fixed-dose combination tablet (ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg); two fixed-dose combination tablets (ibuprofen 400 mg/paracetamol 1000 mg). Results There were 892 participants (mean age 60.6, range 40–84 years); 63% had radiographic knee osteoarthritis and 85% fulfilled American College of Rheumatology criteria for osteoarthritis. At day 10, two combination tablets were superior to paracetamol (p<0.01) for pain relief (determined by mean change from baseline in WOMAC pain; n=786). At 13 weeks, significantly more participants taking one or two combination tablets rated their treatment as excellent/good compared with paracetamol (p=0.015, p=0.0002, respectively; n=615). The frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups. However, by 13 weeks, decreases in haemoglobin (≥1 g/dl) were observed in some participants in all groups. Twice as many participants taking two combination tablets had this decrease compared with those on monotherapy (p<0.001; paracetamol, 20.3%; ibuprofen, 19.6%; one or two combination tablets, 24.1%, 38.4%, respectively). Conclusions Ibuprofen/paracetamol combination analgesia, at non-prescription doses, confers modest short-term benefits for knee pain/osteoarthritis. However, in this population, paracetamol 3 g/day may cause similar degrees of blood loss as ibuprofen 1200 mg/day, and the combination of the two appears to be additive. Study no ISRCTN77199439