Explore the vast range of titles available.

Several vaccines are approved in the United States for seasonal influenza vaccination every year. Here we compare the impact of repeat influenza vaccination on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers, antibody binding and affinity maturation to individual hemagglutinin (HA) domains, HA1 and HA2, across vaccine platforms. Fold change in HI and antibody binding to HA1 trends higher for H1N1pdm09 and H3N2 but not against B strains in groups vaccinated with FluBlok compared with FluCelvax and Fluzone. Antibody-affinity maturation occurs against HA1 domain of H1N1pdm09, H3N2 and B following vaccination with all vaccine platforms, but not against H1N1pdm09-HA2. Importantly, prior year vaccination of subjects receiving repeat vaccinations demonstrated reduced antibody-affinity maturation to HA1 of all three influenza virus strains irrespective of the vaccine platform. This study identifies an important impact of repeat vaccination on antibody-affinity maturation following vaccination, which may contribute to lower vaccine effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in humans Here, Khurana et al. report the results of a phase 4 clinical trial with three FDA approved influenza vaccines and show that repeat influenza vaccination results in reduced antibody affinity maturation to hemagglutinin domain 1 irrespective of vaccine platform.

\"Learn all about the flu, from what causes it and how it affects people to how it is diagnosed and treated\"-- Provided by publisher.

In a multinational trial in children, a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (with both Victoria and Yamagata influenza B lineages, only one of which is included in the current trivalent vaccine) had about 59% efficacy. The incidence of influenza among children is high, and the illness is associated with substantial increases in outpatient visits and hospitalizations during the influenza season. 1 – 4 Routine vaccination of children against influenza is recommended in the United States 5 and some other countries, despite limited evidence of the efficacy of inactivated influenza vaccine from randomized, controlled trials involving children. 6 When trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) are used, there is a possibility of a mismatch between circulating and vaccine B strains, which results in inadequate protection from the vaccine. 7 – 10 A quadrivalent vaccine containing both B lineages would eliminate B-lineage mismatch. This may . . .

Inclusion of additional influenza A/H3N2 strains in seasonal influenza vaccines could expand coverage against multiple, antigenically distinct, cocirculating A/H3N2 clades and potentially replace the no longer circulating B/Yamagata strain. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of three next-generation seasonal influenza mRNA vaccines with different compositions that encode for haemagglutinins of multiple A/H3N2 strains, with or without the B/Yamagata strain, in adults. This randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 trial enrolled healthy adults aged 50–75 years across 22 sites in the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1:1) via interactive response technology to receive a single dose of mRNA-1011.1 (pentavalent; containing one additional A/H3N2 strain [Newcastle]), mRNA-1011.2 (quadrivalent; B/Yamagata replaced with one additional A/H3N2 strain [Newcastle]), mRNA-1012 at one of two dose levels (pentavalent; B/Yamagata replaced with two additional A/H3N2 strains [Newcastle and Hong Kong]), or one of three quadrivalent mRNA-1010 controls each encoding one of the A/H3N2 study strains. The primary outcomes were safety, evaluated in all randomly assigned participants who received a study vaccination (safety population), and reactogenicity, evaluated in all participants from the safety population who contributed any solicited adverse reaction data (solicited safety population). The secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity of investigational mRNA vaccines at day 29 versus mRNA-1010 control vaccines based on haemagglutination inhibition antibody (HAI) assay in the per-protocol population. Here, we summarise findings from the planned interim analysis after participants had completed day 29. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05827068, and is ongoing. Between March 27 and May 9, 2023, 1183 participants were screened for eligibility, 699 (59·1%) were randomly assigned, and 696 (58·8%) received vaccination (safety population, n=696; solicited safety population, n=694; per-protocol population, n=646). 382 (55%) of the 696 participants in the safety population self-reported as female and 314 (45%) as male. Frequencies of solicited adverse reactions were similar across vaccine groups; 551 (79%) of 694 participants reported at least one solicited adverse reaction within 7 days after vaccination and 83 (12%) of 696 participants reported at least one unsolicited adverse event within 28 days after vaccination. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. All three next-generation influenza vaccines elicited robust antibody responses against vaccine-matched influenza A and B strains at day 29 that were generally similar to mRNA-1010 controls, and higher responses against additional A/H3N2 strains that were not included within respective mRNA-1010 controls. Day 29 geometric mean fold rises in HAI titres from day 1 against vaccine-matched A/H3N2 strains were 3·0 (95% CI 2·6–3·6; Darwin) and 3·1 (2·6–3·8; Newcastle) for mRNA-1011.1; 3·3 (2·7–4·1; Darwin) and 4·2 (3·4–5·2; Newcastle) for mRNA-1011.2; 3·4 (2·9–4·0; Darwin), 4·5 (3·6–5·5; Newcastle), and 5·1 (4·2–6·2; Hong Kong) for mRNA-1012 50·0 μg; and 2·6 (2·2–3·1; Darwin), 3·7 (3·0–4·6; Newcastle), and 4·1 (3·3–5·1; Hong Kong) for mRNA-1012 62·5 μg. Inclusion of additional A/H3N2 strains did not reduce responses against influenza A/H1N1 or influenza B strains, and removal of B/Yamagata did not affect responses to B/Victoria. These data support the continued clinical development of mRNA-based next-generation seasonal influenza vaccines with broadened influenza A/H3N2 strain coverage. Moderna.

The source, timing, and geographical origin of the 1918–1920 pandemic influenza A virus have remained tenaciously obscure for nearly a century, as have the reasons for its unusual severity among young adults. Here, we reconstruct the origins of the pandemic virus and the classic swine influenza and (postpandemic) seasonal H1N1 lineages using a host-specific molecular clock approach that is demonstrably more accurate than previous methods. Our results suggest that the 1918 pandemic virus originated shortly before 1918 when a human H1 virus, which we infer emerged before ∼1907, acquired avian N1 neuraminidase and internal protein genes. We find that the resulting pandemic virus jumped directly to swine but was likely displaced in humans by ∼1922 by a reassortant with an antigenically distinct H1 HA. Hence, although the swine lineage was a direct descendent of the pandemic virus, the post-1918 seasonal H1N1 lineage evidently was not, at least for HA. These findings help resolve several seemingly disparate observations from 20th century influenza epidemiology, seroarcheology, and immunology. The phylogenetic results, combined with these other lines of evidence, suggest that the high mortality in 1918 among adults aged ∼20 to ∼40 y may have been due primarily to their childhood exposure to a doubly heterosubtypic putative H3N8 virus, which we estimate circulated from ∼1889–1900. All other age groups (except immunologically naive infants) were likely partially protected by childhood exposure to N1 and/or H1-related antigens. Similar processes may underlie age-specific mortality differences between seasonal H1N1 vs. H3N2 and human H5N1 vs. H7N9 infections.

The history of influenza outbreaks.

Background. Data on the efficacy of trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in HIV-infected adults, particularly in Africa, are limited. This study evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of TIV in HIV-infected adults. Methods. In Johannesburg, South Africa, we undertook a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 506 HIV-infected adults. Subjects included 157 individuals who were antiretroviral treatment (ART) naive and 349 on stable-ART. Participants were randomly assigned to receive TIV or normal saline intramuscularly. Oropharyngeal swabs were obtained at illness visits during the influenza season and tested by shell vial culture and RT PCR assay for influenza virus. Immune response was evaluated by hemagglutinin antibody inhibition assay (HAI) in a nested cohort. The primary study outcome involved vaccine efficacy against influenza confirmed illness. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00757900. Results. The efficacy of TIV against confirmed influenza illness was 75.5% (95% CI: 9.2%—95.6%); with a risk difference of 0.18 per 100 person-weeks in TIV recipients. Among TIV recipients, seroconversion, measured by HAI titers, was evident in 52.6% for H1N1, 60.8% for H3N2, and 53.6% for influenza B virus. This compared with 2.2%, 2.2%, and 4.4% of placebo recipients (P < .0001). The frequency of local and systemic adverse events postimmunization was similar between study groups. Conclusions. TIV immunization is safe and efficacious in African HIV-infected adults without underlying comorbidities. Further evaluation of effectiveness is warranted in severely immunocompromized HIV-infected adults and those with co-morbidities such as tuberculosis.