Explore the vast range of titles available.

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia is a chemotherapy-sensitive subgroup of acute myeloid leukaemia characterised by the presence of the PML–RARA fusion transcript. The present standard of care, chemotherapy and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), results in a high proportion of patients being cured. In this study, we compare a chemotherapy-free ATRA and arsenic trioxide treatment regimen with the standard chemotherapy-based regimen (ATRA and idarubicin) in both high-risk and low-risk patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia. In the randomised, controlled, multicentre, AML17 trial, eligible patients (aged ≥16 years) with acute promyelocytic leukaemia, confirmed by the presence of the PML–RARA transcript and without significant cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities or active malignancy, and who were not pregnant or breastfeeding, were enrolled from 81 UK hospitals and randomised 1:1 to receive treatment with ATRA and arsenic trioxide or ATRA and idarubicin. ATRA was given to participants in both groups in a daily divided oral dose of 45 mg/m2 until remission, or until day 60, and then in a 2 weeks on–2 weeks off schedule. In the ATRA and idarubicin group, idarubicin was given intravenously at 12 mg/m2 on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 of course 1, and then at 5 mg/m2 on days 1–4 of course 2; mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2 on days 1–4 of course 3, and idarubicin at 12 mg/m2 on day 1 of the final (fourth) course. In the ATRA and arsenic trioxide group, arsenic trioxide was given intravenously at 0·3 mg/kg on days 1–5 of each course, and at 0·25 mg/kg twice weekly in weeks 2–8 of course 1 and weeks 2–4 of courses 2–5. High-risk patients (those presenting with a white blood cell count >10 × 109 cells per L) could receive an initial dose of the immunoconjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (6 mg/m2 intravenously). Neither maintenance treatment nor CNS prophylaxis was given to patients in either group. All patients were monitored by real-time quantitative PCR. Allocation was by central computer minimisation, stratified by age, performance status, and de-novo versus secondary disease. The primary endpoint was quality of life on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 global health status. All analyses are by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN55675535. Between May 8, 2009, and Oct 3, 2013, 235 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to ATRA and idarubicin (n=119) or ATRA and arsenic trioxide (n=116). Participants had a median age of 47 years (range 16–77; IQR 33–58) and included 57 high-risk patients. Quality of life did not differ significantly between the treatment groups (EORTC QLQ-C30 global functioning effect size 2·17 [95% CI −2·79 to 7·12; p=0·39]). Overall, 57 patients in the ATRA and idarubicin group and 40 patients in the ATRA and arsenic trioxide group reported grade 3–4 toxicities. After course 1 of treatment, grade 3–4 alopecia was reported in 23 (23%) of 98 patients in the ATRA and idarubicin group versus 5 (5%) of 95 in the ATRA and arsenic trioxide group, raised liver alanine transaminase in 11 (10%) of 108 versus 27 (25%) of 109, oral toxicity in 22 (19%) of 115 versus one (1%) of 109. After course 2 of treatment, grade 3–4 alopecia was reported in 25 (28%) of 89 patients in the ATRA and idarubicin group versus 2 (3%) of 77 in the ATRA and arsenic trioxide group; no other toxicities reached the 10% level. Patients in the ATRA and arsenic trioxide group had significantly less requirement for most aspects of supportive care than did those in the ATRA and idarubicin group. ATRA and arsenic trioxide is a feasible treatment in low-risk and high-risk patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia, with a high cure rate and less relapse than, and survival not different to, ATRA and idarubicin, with a low incidence of liver toxicity. However, no improvement in quality of life was seen. Cancer Research UK.

All- trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide was found to be noninferior to ATRA plus chemotherapy, and less toxic, in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. This is an early example of a curative therapy for acute leukemia without chemotherapy. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has become a highly curable disease with contemporary treatment, which consists of all- trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 1 , 2 As reported in several large multicenter trials, this combination results in overall remission rates of up to 95% and cure rates now exceeding 80%. 3 – 11 Thus, the combination of ATRA and chemotherapy is currently considered the standard of care for newly diagnosed APL. 12 Arsenic trioxide is also highly effective in the treatment of APL. Early studies conducted in China and the United States showed that this agent can induce sustained molecular remission when used as . . .

As all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) are widely accepted in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), deescalating toxicity becomes a research hotspot. Here, we evaluated whether chemotherapy could be replaced or reduced by ATO in APL patients at different risks. After achieving complete remission with ATRA-ATO–based induction therapy, patients were randomized (1:1) into ATO and non-ATO groups for consolidation: ATRA-ATO versus ATRA–anthracycline for low-/intermediate-risk patients, or ATRA-ATO–anthracycline versus ATRA–anthracycline–cytarabine for high-risk patients. The primary end point was to assess disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 y by a noninferiority margin of –5%; 855 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 54.9 mo, and 658 of 755 patients could be evaluated at 3 y. In the ATO group, 96.1% (319/332) achieved 3-y DFS, compared to 92.6% (302/326) in the non-ATO group. The difference was 3.45% (95% CI –0.07 to 6.97), confirming noninferiority (P < 0.001). Using the Kaplan–Meier method, the estimated 7-y DFS was 95.7% (95% CI 93.6 to 97.9) in ATO and 92.6% (95% CI 89.8 to 95.4) in non-ATO groups (P = 0.066). Concerning secondary end points, the 7-y cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in ATO (2.2% [95% CI 1.1 to 4.2]) than in non-ATO group (6.1% [95% CI 3.9 to 9.5], P = 0.011). In addition, grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicities were significantly reduced in the ATO group during consolidation. Hence, ATRA-ATO in both chemotherapy-replacing and -reducing settings in consolidation is not inferior to ATRA–chemotherapy (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT01987297).

Between April 2004 and December 2010, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled study comparing tamibarotene with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in the maintenance therapy of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and here report the final results of this study with a median follow-up of 7.3 years. Of 344 eligible patients who had received ATRA and chemotherapy, 319 (93%) achieved complete remission (CR). After completion of three courses of consolidation chemotherapy, 269 patients in molecular remission underwent maintenance randomization, 135 to ATRA (45 mg/m2 daily), and 134 to tamibarotene (6 mg/m2 daily) for 14 days every 3 months for 2 years. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The 7-year RFS was 84% in the ATRA arm and 93% in the tamibarotene arm (p = 0.027, HR = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.93). The difference was prominent in high-risk patients with initial leukocytes ≥ 10.0 × 109/L (62% vs. 89%; p = 0.034). Tamibarotene was significantly superior to ATRA by decreasing relapse in high-risk patients. Overall survival after randomization did not differ (96% vs. 97%; p = 0.520). Secondary hematopoietic disorders developed in nine patients, secondary malignancies in 11, and grade 3 or more late cardiac comorbidities in three. These late complications did not differ between the two arms.

The APL0406 study showed that arsenic trioxide (ATO) and all -trans retinoic acid (ATRA) are not inferior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in newly diagnosed, low–intermediaterisk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). We analysed the kinetics of promyelocytic leukaemia–retinoic acid receptor-α (PML–RARα) transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) in bone marrow samples from 184 patients and assessed the prognostic impact of fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 –internal tandem duplication ( FLT3 –ITD) in 159 patients enrolled in this trial in Italy. After induction therapy, the reduction of PML–RARα transcripts was significantly greater in patients receiving ATRA-CHT as compared with those treated with ATRA–ATO (3.4 vs 2.9 logs; P =0.0182). Conversely, at the end of consolidation, a greater log reduction of PML–RARα transcripts was detected in the ATRA–ATO as compared with the ATRA–CHT group (6.3 vs 5.3 logs; P =0.0024). FLT3 –ITD mutations had no significant impact on either event-free survival (EFS) or cumulative incidence of relapse in patients receiving ATRA–ATO, whereas a trend for inferior EFS was observed in FLT3 –ITD-positive patients receiving ATRA-CHT. Our study shows at the molecular level that ATRA–ATO exerts at least equal and probably superior antileukaemic efficacy compared with ATRA–CHT in low–intermediaterisk APL. The data also suggest that ATRA–ATO may abrogate the negative prognostic impact of FLT3 –ITD.

Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula (RIF) is a traditional Chinese medicine containing As4S4 and effective in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The dose of RIF remains to be determined in pediatric patients. Comparison of plasma arsenic concentrations and toxicity between RIF and arsenic trioxide (ATO) treatment in APL may help to establish an appropriate therapeutic dose of RIF for children. From October 2018 to March 2020, 19 pediatric patients with APL treated with SCCLG-APL protocol were included, 9 in RIF group at 135 mg/kg/day orally three times daily, and 10 in ATO group at 0.16 mg/kg/day intravenously over 12 h daily. Peak and trough plasma arsenic concentrations were assayed at D1, 2, 7 and 14 of induction treatment. Urine arsenic excretions were assessed with spot urine samples and the measurements were adjusted using creatinine. Toxicities were compared between two groups. The plasma arsenic concentration reached steady state at D7 either in the RIF or ATO group, and the mean peak and trough concentrations were similar between two groups (P > 0.05), which were 0.54 μmol/L and 0.48 μmol/L in RIF group, and 0.63 μmol/L and 0.51 μmol/L in ATO group, respectively. Urine arsenic excretion rate was positively correlated with the concentration of plasma arsenic. The rates of treatment-related adverse events were similar in two groups. In conclusion, the dose of RIF at 135 mg/kg/day may be an appropriate therapeutic dose in children with APL. Urine arsenic level can be used as an indicator to estimate plasma arsenic concentration. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02200978.

The combination of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has been demonstrated to have comparable effectiveness or better to ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, the efficacy of ATRA-ATO compared to ATRA-ATO plus CHT in high-risk APL remains unknown. Here we performed a randomized multi-center non-inferiority phase III study to compare the efficacy of ATRA-ATO and ATRA-ATO plus CHT in newly diagnosed all-risk APL to address this question. Patients were assigned to receive ATRA-ATO for induction, consolidation, and maintenance or ATRA-ATO plus CHT for induction followed by three cycles of consolidation therapy, and maintenance therapy with ATRA-ATO. In the non-CHT group, hydroxyurea was used to control leukocytosis. A total of 128 patients were treated. The complete remission rate was 97% in both groups. The 2-year disease-free, event-free survival rates in the non-CHT group and CHT group in all-risk patients were 98% vs 97%, and 95% vs 92%, respectively (P = 0.62 and P = 0.39, respectively). And they were 94% vs 87%, and 85% vs 78% in the high-risk patients (P = 0.52 and P = 0.44, respectively). This study demonstrated that ATRA-ATO had the same efficacy as the ATRA-ATO plus CHT in the treatment of patients with all-risk APL.

Very limited evidence is available on the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treated with arsenic trioxide (ATO). We performed an extended follow-up of the APL0406 randomized controlled trial to investigate HRQoL of patients treated with either ATO or chemotherapy. A secondary objective was to describe the prevalence of clinically important problems and symptoms of these patients by type of treatment. Overall, 117 patients were included in this analysis after a median follow-up of 10 years (IQR 8–11) since diagnosis. Of these, 60 (51.3%) were treated with ATO, and 57 (48.7%) with chemotherapy. A statistically significant and clinically relevant difference, favoring patients treated with ATO, was found in 2 of the 3 main prespecified EORTC QLQ-C30 scales, that is, cognitive functioning (∆ = 7.7; 95% CI 0.5 to 14.9; p = 0.036) and fatigue (∆ = -9.4; 95% CI -17.9 to -0.8; p = 0.031). The prevalence of clinically important problems and symptoms tended to be slightly higher in patients treated with chemotherapy. These findings suggest that previously observed HRQoL advantages of ATO therapy of patients included in the APL0406 trial are sustained over the long-term period. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03096496).

Background The combination of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has been suggested to be safe and effective for adult acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). As of 2010, the role of cytarabine (Ara-C) in APL was controversial. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of ATRA and ATO in paediatric APL patients. Also, we assessed whether Ara-C could be omitted in ATO and ATRA- based trials in children. Methods We performed a randomized controlled trial in paediatric APL patients (≤14 years of age) in our hospital from May 2010 to December 2016. All of the patients were assigned to receive ATRA plus ATO for induction followed by one course of idarubicin (IDA) and ATO (28 days). The patients were then randomly assigned to receive two courses of daunorubicin (DNR, no- Ara-C group) or DNR + Ara-C (Ara-C group). All of the patients were followed with maintenance therapy with oral ATRA, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate for 1.5 years. Results Among the 66 patients, 43 were male and 23 were female. All of the patients achieved complete remission (CR) with the exception of one who gave up the treatment. During induction therapy, all toxicity events were reversed after appropriate management. Thirty patients in the Ara-C group underwent 57 courses of treatment, and 35 patients in the no-Ara-C group underwent 73 courses of treatment. No significant differences in age, genders, white blood cell counts, haemoglobin levels, and platelet counts were found between the Ara-C and no-Ara-c groups. Greater myelosuppression and sepsis were observed in the Ara-C group during the consolidation courses. No patient died at consolidation, and only one patient relapsed. No differences were found in event-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Additionally, our analysis of the arsenic levels in the plasma, urine, hair and nails of the patients indicated that no significant accumulation of arsenic occurred after ATO was discontinued for 12 months. Conclusions Overall, ATO and ATRA are safe and effective for paediatric APL patients and Ara-C could be omitted when ATO is used for two courses. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01191541 , retrospectively registered on 18 August 2010).