Explore the vast range of titles available.

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery is associated with substantial pain that can impair pulmonary function. Fascial plane blocks may offer a favorable alternative to opioids, but conventional local anesthetics provide a limited duration of analgesia. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that a mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine improves the overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) during the first three postoperative days compared to bupivacaine alone. Secondarily, we tested the hypotheses that liposomal bupivacaine improves respiratory mechanics, and decreases opioid consumption. Adults scheduled for robotically or video-assisted thoracic surgery with combined ultrasound-guided pectoralis II and serratus anterior plane block were randomized to bupivacaine or bupivacaine combined with liposomal bupivacaine. OBAS was measured on postoperative days 1–3 and was analyzed with a linear mixed regression model. Postoperative respiratory mechanics were estimated using a linear mixed model. Total opioid consumption was estimated with a simple linear regression model. We analyzed 189 patients, of whom 95 were randomized to the treatment group and 94 to the control group. There was no significant treatment effect on total OBAS during the initial three postoperative days, with an estimated geometric mean ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.14; p = 0.485). There was no observed treatment effect on respiratory mechanics, total opioid consumption, or pain scores. Average pain scores were low in both groups. Liposomal bupivacaine did not improve OBAS during the initial postoperative three days following minimally invasive thoracic procedures. Furthermore, there was no improvement in respiratory mechanics, no reduction in opioid consumption, and no decrease in pain scores. Thus, the data presented here does not support the use of liposomal bupivacaine over standard bupivacaine to enhance analgesia after minimally invasive thoracic surgery. For minimally invasive thoracic procedures, addition of liposomal bupivacaine to plain bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks does not improve OBAS, reduce opioid requirements, improve postoperative respiratory mechanics, or decrease pain scores. [Display omitted] •Overall benefit of analgesia scores (OBAS) were similar with plain and liposomal bupivacaine.•Respiratory mechanics, total opioid consumption, and pain scores were also similar.•Pain scores were low with each type of local anesthetic.•Liposomal bupivacaine did not provide benefit over plain bupivacaine.

Background In the NAPOLI‐1 phase 3 trial, liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) +5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (5‐FU/LV) significantly increased mPFS versus 5‐FU/LV (3.1 vs. 1.5 months [unstratified HR = 0.56, p = 0.0001]) in patients with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine‐based therapy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV tolerability (Part 1), safety, and efficacy (Part 2; outcomes reported here) in Japanese patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine‐based therapy. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs. ≥90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dl vs. <4.0 g/dl). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA19‐9 response, and QoL. The ITT population comprised all randomized patients. Results Patient characteristics differed between nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV (n = 40) and 5‐FU/LV (n = 39) arms, including baseline hepatic lesions (63% vs. 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs. 51%), and post‐study anticancer therapy (55% vs. 72%). Investigator‐assessed mPFS increase with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant versus 5‐FU/LV (2.7 vs. 1.5 months, HR = 0.60). Independently assessed mPFS showed similar trends (1.7 vs. 1.6 months, HR = 0.79). mOS was 6.3 months with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV and not reached with 5‐FU/LV. ORR increased significantly with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV versus 5‐FU/LV (18% vs. 0, rate difference 17.5). Commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent AEs were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs. 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs. 0), and diarrhea (17% vs. 3%). Conclusions In conclusion, clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator‐assessed PFS and ORR were observed with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV versus 5‐FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02697058). The phase 3 NAPOLI‐1 trial has previously shown the efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI)+5‐FU/LV in treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that has progressed on gemcitabine‐based therapy, but did not include any Japanese patients. This randomized phase 2 trial demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival and objective response rate with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV vs 5‐FU/LV in Japanese patients. No novel or unexpected safety signals were observed in this population.

To investigate the timing of peak blood concentrations and potential toxicity when using a combination of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks. Pharmacokinetic analysis. Operating room. Eighteen adult patients undergoing robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery. Ultrasound-guided pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane blocks using a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl up to 2.5 mg/kg and liposomal bupivacaine up to 266 mg. Arterial plasma bupivacaine concentration. Samples from 13 participants were analyzed. There was substantial inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations. A geometric mean maximum bupivacaine concentration was 1492 ng/ml (range 660 to 4650 ng/ml) at median time of 30 min after injection. In 4/13 (31%) patients, plasma bupivacaine concentrations exceeded our predefined 2000 ng/ml toxic threshold. A second much smaller peak was observed about 32 h after the injection. No obvious signs of local anesthetic toxicity were observed. Combined injection of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for pecto-serratus/serratus anterior plane blocks produced a biphasic pattern, with the highest arterial plasma concentrations observed within 30 min. Maximum concentrations exceeded the potential toxic threshold in nearly a third of patients, but without clinical evidence of toxicity. Clinicians should not assume that routine combinations of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks are inherently safe. [Display omitted] •A combination of plain and liposomal bupivacaine is used for fascial plane blocks•Local anesthetic mixture produces a biphasic concentration pattern•Peak arterial plasma concentration is reached in 30 min•Toxic concentration is surpassed in a third of patients•No clinically obvious consequences were observed

In nanoparticle (NP)-mediated drug delivery, liposomes are the most widely used drug carrier, and the only NP system currently approved by the FDA for clinical use, owing to their advantageous physicochemical properties and excellent biocompatibility. Recent advances in liposome technology have been focused on bioconjugation strategies to improve drug loading, targeting, and overall efficacy. In this review, we highlight recent literature reports (covering the last five years) focused on bioconjugation strategies for the enhancement of liposome-mediated drug delivery. These advances encompass the improvement of drug loading/incorporation and the specific targeting of liposomes to the site of interest/drug action. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of bioconjugation strategies in liposome systems currently being evaluated for clinical use and a forward-looking discussion of the field of liposomal drug delivery.

Curcumin (CUR) is a yellow polyphenolic compound derived from the plant turmeric. It is widely used to treat many types of diseases, including cancers such as those of lung, cervices, prostate, breast, bone and liver. However, its effectiveness has been limited due to poor aqueous solubility, low bioavailability and rapid metabolism and systemic elimination. To solve these problems, researchers have tried to explore novel drug delivery systems such as liposomes, solid dispersion, microemulsion, micelles, nanogels and dendrimers. Among these, liposomes have been the most extensively studied. Liposomal CUR formulation has greater growth inhibitory and pro-apoptotic effects on cancer cells. This review mainly focuses on the preparation of liposomes containing CUR and its use in cancer therapy.

Research on liposome formulations has progressed from that on conventional vesicles to new generation liposomes, such as cationic liposomes, temperature sensitive liposomes, and virosomes, by modulating the formulation techniques and lipid composition. Many research papers focus on the correlation of blood circulation time and drug accumulation in target tissues with physicochemical properties of liposomal formulations, including particle size, membrane lamellarity, surface charge, permeability, encapsulation volume, shelf time, and release rate. This review is mainly to compare the therapeutic effect of current clinically approved liposome-based drugs with free drugs, and to also determine the clinical effect via liposomal variations in lipid composition. Furthermore, the major preclinical and clinical data related to the principal liposomal formulations are also summarized.

Elastic liposomes (EL) are some of the most versatile deformable vesicular carriers that comprise physiologically biocompatible lipids and surfactants for the delivery of numerous challenging molecules and have marked advantages over other colloidal systems. They have been investigated for a wide range of applications in pharmaceutical technology through topical, transdermal, nasal, and oral routes for efficient and effective drug delivery. Increased drug encapsulation efficiency, enhanced drug permeation and penetration into or across the skin, and ultradeformability have led to widespread interest in ELs to modulate drug release, permeation, and drug action more efficiently than conventional drug-release vehicles. This review provides insights into the versatile role that ELs play in the delivery of numerous drugs and biomolecules by improving drug release, permeation, and penetration across the skin as well as stability. Furthermore, it provides future directions that should ensure the widespread use of ELs across all medical fields.

Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles (LPHNPs) are next-generation core-shell nanostructures, conceptually derived from both liposome and polymeric nanoparticles (NPs), where a polymer core remains enveloped by a lipid layer. Although they have garnered significant interest, they remain not yet widely exploited or ubiquitous. Recently, a fundamental transformation has occurred in the preparation of LPHNPs, characterized by a transition from a two-step to a one-step strategy, involving synchronous self-assembly of polymers and lipids. Owing to its two-in-one structure, this approach is of particular interest as a combinatorial drug delivery platform in oncology. In particular, the outer surface can be decorated in multifarious ways for active targeting of anticancer therapy, delivery of DNA or RNA materials, and use as a diagnostic imaging agent. This review will provide an update on recent key advancements in design, synthesis, and bioactivity evaluation as well as discussion of future clinical possibilities of LPHNPs.

Among many nanoparticle-based delivery platforms, liposomes have been particularly successful with many formulations passed into clinical applications. They are well-established and effective gene and/or drug delivery systems, widely used in cancer therapy including breast cancer. In this review we discuss liposome design with the targeting feature and triggering functions. We also summarise the recent progress (since 2014) in liposome-based therapeutics for breast cancer including chemotherapy and gene therapy. We finally identify some challenges on the liposome technology development for the future clinical translation.

Transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, often fatal disease. Nexiguran ziclumeran (nex-z) is an investigational therapy based on CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and associated Cas9 endonuclease) targeting the gene encoding transthyretin ( ). In this phase 1, open-label trial, we administered a single intravenous infusion of nex-z to patients with ATTR-CM. Primary objectives included assessment of the effect of nex-z on safety and pharmacodynamics, including the serum TTR level. Secondary end points included changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels, the 6-minute walk distance, and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. A total of 36 patients received nex-z and completed at least 12 months of follow-up. Of these patients, 50% were in NYHA class III and 31% had variant ATTR-CM. The mean percent change from baseline in the serum TTR level was -89% (95% confidence interval [CI], -92 to -87) at 28 days and -90% (95% CI, -93 to -87) at 12 months. Adverse events were reported in 34 patients. Five had transient infusion-related reactions, and two had transient liver-enzyme elevations that were assessed as treatment-related. Serious adverse events, most of which were consistent with ATTR-CM, were reported in 14 patients. The geometric mean factor change from baseline to month 12 was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.17) in the NT-proBNP level and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.01) in the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level. The median change from baseline to month 12 in the 6-minute walk distance was 5 m (interquartile range, -33 to 49). A total of 92% of the patients had either improvement or no change in their NYHA class. In this phase 1 study involving patients with ATTR-CM, treatment with a single dose of nex-z was associated with transient infusion-related reactions and consistent, rapid, and durable reductions in serum TTR levels. (Funded by Intellia Therapeutics and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04601051.).