Explore the vast range of titles available.

This phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety and clinical efficacy of adipose‐derived stromal cells (ASCs) in osteoarthritis. Eighteen patients with severe knee osteoarthritis were treated with a single intra‐articular injection of autologous ASCs at low (2 × 106 cells), medium (10 × 106), or high (50 × 106) doses (n = 6 each). After 6 months, no serious adverse events were reported, and patients treated with low‐dose ASCs significantly improved in pain and function. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most widespread musculoskeletal disorder in adults. It leads to cartilage damage associated with subchondral bone changes and synovial inflammation, causing pain and disability. The present study aimed at evaluating the safety of a dose‐escalation protocol of intra‐articular injected adipose‐derived stromal cells (ASCs) in patients with knee OA, as well as clinical efficacy as secondary endpoint. A bicentric, uncontrolled, open phase I clinical trial was conducted in France and Germany with regulatory agency approval for ASC expansion procedure in both countries. From April 2012 to December 2013, 18 consecutive patients with symptomatic and severe knee OA were treated with a single intra‐articular injection of autologous ASCs. The study design consisted of three consecutive cohorts (six patients each) with dose escalation: low dose (2 × 106 cells), medium dose (10 × 106), and high dose (50 × 106). The primary outcome parameter was safety evaluated by recording adverse events throughout the trial, and secondary parameters were pain and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. After 6 months of follow‐up, the procedure was found to be safe, and no serious adverse events were reported. Four patients experienced transient knee joint pain and swelling after local injection. Interestingly, patients treated with low‐dose ASCs experienced significant improvements in pain levels and function compared with baseline. Our data suggest that the intra‐articular injection of ASCs is a safe therapeutic alternative to treat severe knee OA patients. A placebo‐controlled double‐blind phase IIb study is being initiated to assess clinical and structural efficacy. Significance Although this phase I study included a limited number of patients without a placebo arm, it showed that local injection of autologous adipose‐derived stem cells was safe and well tolerated in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study also provides encouraging preliminary evidence of efficacy. Larger and controlled long‐term studies are now mandatory to confirm whether this new strategy of cell therapy can improve pain and induce structural benefit in osteoarthritis.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been the focus of an emerging treatment for osteoarthritis. However, few studies reported about outcomes of an intra‐articular injection of autologous adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD‐MSCs). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single intra‐articular injection of AD‐MSCs for patients with knee osteoarthritis. It was a prospective double‐blinded, randomized controlled, phase IIb clinical trial. AD‐MSCs were administered for 12 patients (MSC group), and the group was compared with 12 knees with injection of normal saline (control group) up to 6 months. All procedures were performed in the outpatient clinic. Primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score. Secondary outcome measure included various clinical and radiologic examination, and safety after injection. Change of cartilage defect after injection was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Single injection of AD‐MSCs led to a significant improvement of the WOMAC score at 6 months. In the control group, there was no significant change in the WOMAC score at 6 months. No serious adverse events were observed in both groups during the follow‐up period. In MRI, there was no significant change of cartilage defect at 6 months in MSC group whereas the defect in the control group was increased. An intra‐articular injection of autologous AD‐MSCs provided satisfactory functional improvement and pain relief for patients with knee osteoarthritis in the outpatient setting, without causing adverse events at 6 months' follow‐up. Larger sample size and long‐term follow‐up are required. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:504–511 Autologous adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD‐MSCs) were administered for 12 patients, and the group was compared with 12 knees with injection of normal saline up to 6 months. The procedures were performed in an outpatient clinic. An intra‐articular injection of autologous AD‐MSCs provided satisfactory functional improvement and pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis without causing adverse events at 6 months' follow‐up.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) hold great potential for regenerative medicine because of their ability for self‐renewal and differentiation into tissue‐specific cells such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. MSCs orchestrate tissue development, maintenance and repair, and are useful for musculoskeletal regenerative therapies to treat age‐related orthopedic degenerative diseases and other clinical conditions. Importantly, MSCs produce secretory factors that play critical roles in tissue repair that support both engraftment and trophic functions (autocrine and paracrine). The development of uniform protocols for both preparation and characterization of MSCs, including standardized functional assays for evaluation of their biological potential, are critical factors contributing to their clinical utility. Quality control and release criteria for MSCs should include cell surface markers, differentiation potential, and other essential cell parameters. For example, cell surface marker profiles (surfactome), bone‐forming capacities in ectopic and orthotopic models, as well as cell size and granularity, telomere length, senescence status, trophic factor secretion (secretome), and immunomodulation, should be thoroughly assessed to predict MSC utility for regenerative medicine. We propose that these and other functionalities of MSCs should be characterized prior to use in clinical applications as part of comprehensive and uniform guidelines and release criteria for their clinical‐grade production to achieve predictably favorable treatment outcomes for stem cell therapy. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:2173–2185 Adopting a multifaceted approach for characterizing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is critical for the selection of best‐in‐class cells for therapeutic use. Assaying for surfactome, secretome, self‐renewal, colony formation, trophic factor secretion, and multilineage differentiation, all form part of an assessment of cellular naivety or “stemness.” When this status is combined with functional assays such as immunomodulation, and other key parameters of cellular health that include telomere length, they collectively help provide a robust assessment of characteristics that are increasingly becoming important indicators of clinical efficacy.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), also known as mesenchymal stem cells, have been intensely investigated for clinical applications within the last decades. However, the majority of registered clinical trials applying MSC therapy for diverse human diseases have fallen short of expectations, despite the encouraging pre-clinical outcomes in varied animal disease models. This can be attributable to inconsistent criteria for MSCs identity across studies and their inherited heterogeneity. Nowadays, with the emergence of advanced biological techniques and substantial improvements in bio-engineered materials, strategies have been developed to overcome clinical challenges in MSC application. Here in this review, we will discuss the major challenges of MSC therapies in clinical application, the factors impacting the diversity of MSCs, the potential approaches that modify MSC products with the highest therapeutic potential, and finally the usage of MSCs for COVID-19 pandemic disease.

Background COVID-19 is a highly infectious respiratory disease. No therapeutics have yet been proven effective for treating severe COVID-19. Objectives To determine whether human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell infusion may be effective and safe for the treatment of severe COVID-19. Methods Patients with severe COVID-19 were randomly divided into 2 groups: the standard treatment group and the standard treatment plus hUC-MSC infusion group. The incidence of progression from severe to critical illness, 28-day mortality, clinical symptom improvement, time to clinical symptom improvement, hematologic indicators including C-reactive protein, lymphocyte number, and interleukin 6, and imaging changes were observed and compared between the two groups. Measurements and main results The incidence of progression from severe to critical illness and the 28-day mortality rate were 0 in the hUC-MSC treatment group, while 4 patients in the control group deteriorated to critical condition and received invasive ventilation; 3 of them died, and the 28-day mortality rate was 10.34%. In the hUC-MSC treatment group, the time to clinical improvement was shorter than that in the control group. Clinical symptoms of weakness and fatigue, shortness of breath, and low oxygen saturation obviously improved beginning on the third day of stem cell infusion and reached a significant difference on day 7. CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly lower from day 3 of infusion, the time for the lymphocyte count to return to the normal range was significantly faster, and lung inflammation absorption was significantly shorter on CT imaging in the hUC-MSC group than in the control group. Conclusions Intravenous transplantation of hUC-MSCs is a safe and effective method that can be considered a salvage and priority treatment option for severe COVID-19. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registration; ChiCTR2000031494; Registered on 2 April 2020; http:// www.medresman.org

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of MR-MC-01, a mesenchymal stem cell therapy derived from human embryonic stem cells, in patients with interstitial cystitis (IC), particularly those with Hunner lesions unresponsive to pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS). Conducted as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I/IIa clinical trial, it enrolled 22 patients, with six completing phase I and 16 participating in phase IIa. Phase I tested 2 doses (2.0 × 107 and 5.0 × 107 cells) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), revealing no dose-limiting toxicities and only mild adverse events such as transient hemorrhage and bladder pain. In phase IIa, 12 participants received the MTD of 5.0 × 107 cells, and 4 received placebo. Significant reductions in interstitial cystitis questionnaire (ICQ) and pain urgency frequency (PUF) scores were observed in the treatment group. Improvements were noted in nocturnal voiding frequency and Hunner lesion size, with 8 patients showing either a reduction or complete resolution of lesions after 6 months. The global response assessment (GRA) reported moderate to marked improvement in 41.67% of treated patients versus 25% in the placebo group. MR-MC-01 demonstrated no serious drug-related adverse events, highlighting its favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that MR-MC-01 not only alleviates symptoms but also promotes structural recovery in IC, making it a promising treatment option. Further large-scale, long-term studies are warranted to confirm these results and optimize therapeutic protocols. (Identifier: NCT04610359)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are isolated from multiple biological tissues—adult bone marrow and adipose tissues and neonatal tissues such as umbilical cord and placenta. In vitro, MSCs show biological features of extensive proliferation ability and multipotency. Moreover, MSCs have trophic, homing/migration and immunosuppression functions that have been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. A number of clinical trials are using MSCs for therapeutic interventions in severe degenerative and/or inflammatory diseases, including Crohn’s disease and graft-versus-host disease, alone or in combination with other drugs. MSCs are promising for therapeutic applications given the ease in obtaining them, their genetic stability, their poor immunogenicity and their curative properties for tissue repair and immunomodulation. The success of MSC therapy in degenerative and/or inflammatory diseases might depend on the robustness of the biological functions of MSCs, which should be linked to their therapeutic potency. Here, we outline the fundamental and advanced concepts of MSC biological features and underline the biological functions of MSCs in their basic and translational aspects in therapy for degenerative and/or inflammatory diseases.

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and debilitating chronic degenerative disease of the joints. Currently, cell-based therapy is being explored to address the repair of damaged articular cartilage in the knee joint. Methods The in vitro differentiation potential of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel®) was determined by differentiating the cells toward the chondrogenic lineage and quantifying sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG). The mono-iodoacetate (MIA)-induced preclinical model of OA has been used to demonstrate pain reduction and cartilage formation. In the clinical study, 60 OA patients were randomized to receive different doses of cells (25, 50, 75, or 150 million cells) or placebo. Stempeucel® was administered by intra-articular (IA) injection into the knee joint, followed by 2 ml hyaluronic acid (20 mg). Subjective evaluations—visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC-OA) index—were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was performed at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up for cartilage evaluation. Results Stempeucel® differentiated into the chondrogenic lineage in vitro with downregulation of Sox9 and upregulation of Col2A genes. Furthermore, Stempeucel® differentiated into chondrocytes and synthesized a significant amount of sGAG (30 ± 1.8 μg/μg GAG/DNA). In the preclinical model of OA, Stempeucel® reduced pain significantly and also repaired damaged articular cartilage in rats. In the clinical study, IA administration of Stempeucel® was safe, and a trend towards improvement was seen in the 25-million-cell dose group in all subjective parameters (VAS, ICOAP, andWOMAC-OA scores), although this was not statistically significant when compared to placebo. Adverse events were predominant in the higher dose groups (50, 75, and 150 million cells). Knee pain and swelling were the most common adverse events. The whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score of the knee did not reveal any difference from baseline and the placebo group. Conclusion Intra-articular administration of Stempeucel® is safe. A twenty-five-million-cell dose may be the most effective among the doses tested for pain reduction. Clinical studies with a larger patient population are required to demonstrate a robust therapeutic efficacy of Stempeucel® in OA. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01453738 . Registered 13 October 2011.

To evaluate the efficacy of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) therapy on pain, function and disease modification in knee osteoarthritis. 30 participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were randomized into three groups. Two treatment groups received intra-articular ADMSC therapy consisting of either a single injection (100 × 10 ADMSCs) or two injections (100 × 10 ADMSCs at baseline and 6 months). The third group served as control and continued conservative management. No serious adverse events were observed. Both treatment groups receiving ADMSCs showed clinically significant pain and functional improvement at completion of follow-up at 12 months. Radiological analysis using the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score indicated modification of disease progression. Autologous ADMSC therapy appears to be a safe and effective therapy for knee osteoarthritis and may have the potential to prevent disease progression. Trial registration number: ACTRN12614000814673

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability. Although conventional treatments show modest benefits, pilot and phase I/II trials with bone marrow (BM) and adipose‐derived (AD) mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) point to the feasibility, safety, and occurrence of clinical and structural improvement in focal or diffuse disease. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the intra‐articular injection of single or repeated umbilical cord‐derived (UC) MSCs in knee OA. UC‐MSCs were cultured in an International Organization for Standardization 9001:2015 certified Good Manufacturing Practice‐type Laboratory. Patients with symptomatic knee OA were randomized to receive hyaluronic acid at baseline and 6 months (HA, n = 8), single‐dose (20 × 106) UC‐MSC at baseline (MSC‐1, n = 9), or repeated UC‐MSC doses at baseline and 6 months (20 × 106 × 2; MSC‐2, n = 9). Clinical scores and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were assessed throughout the 12 months follow‐up. No severe adverse events were reported. Only MSC‐treated patients experienced significant pain and function improvements from baseline (p = .001). At 12 months, Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC‐A; pain subscale) reached significantly lower levels of pain in the MSC‐2‐treated group (1.1 ± 1.3) as compared with the HA group (4.3 ± 3.5; p = .04). Pain Visual Analog scale was significantly lower in the MSC‐2 group versus the HA group (2.4 ± 2.1 vs. 22.1 ± 9.8, p = .03) at 12 months. For total WOMAC, MSC‐2 had lower scores than HA at 12 months (4.2 ± 3.9 vs. 15.2 ± 11, p = .05). No differences in MRI scores were detected. In a phase I/II trial (NCT02580695), repeated UC‐MSC treatment is safe and superior to active comparator in knee OA at 1‐year follow‐up. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:215&224