Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this clinical trial, rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, was effective in the initial and continued treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism; it may become part of the treatment armamentarium for this common clinical problem. Acute venous thromboembolism (i.e., deep-vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism) is a common disorder with an annual incidence of approximately 1 or 2 cases per 1000 persons in the general population. 1 , 2 Short-term treatment is effective, with the risk of recurrent disease — the major complication — reduced from an estimated 25% to about 3% during the first 6 to 12 months of therapy. 3 The risk of recurrence remains after treatment ends and can reach 5 to 10% during the first year. 4 , 5 Standard treatment for acute venous thromboembolism is limited by the need for parenteral heparin initially, with overlapping . . .

In the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, the efficacy of rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, was similar to that of traditional anticoagulation therapy. There was less bleeding in the group receiving rivaroxaban, which supports its use in the treatment of this condition. Pulmonary embolism is a common disease, with an estimated annual incidence of 70 cases per 100,000 population. 1 , 2 The condition usually leads to hospitalization and may recur; it can be fatal. 3 For half a century, the standard therapy for most patients with pulmonary embolism has been the administration of heparin, overlapped and followed by a vitamin K antagonist. 4 , 5 This regimen is effective but complex. 5 – 9 Recently developed oral anticoagulants that are directed against factor Xa or thrombin overcome some limitations of standard therapy, including the need for injection and for regular dose adjustments on the basis of laboratory monitoring. . . .

Rivaroxaban is an orally administered direct inhibitor of factor Xa. As compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing venous thromboembolism after hip replacement, without a significant increase in major bleeding. Rivaroxaban is an orally administered direct inhibitor of factor Xa. As compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing venous thromboembolism after hip replacement, without a significant increase in major bleeding. Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is standard practice after total hip or knee arthroplasty, with a minimum recommended duration of 10 days. 1 After total hip arthroplasty, extended prophylaxis for 5 weeks after surgery reduces the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic venous thromboembolism more effectively than does short-term prophylaxis. 2 New deep-vein thromboses have been shown to form after the discontinuation of short-term prophylaxis. 3 Several meta-analyses suggest that extended thromboprophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty leads to a reduction in symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, without increasing the risk of major bleeding. 4 – 6 These findings led to a grade 1A recommendation for extended thromboprophylaxis after total . . .

The risk of venous thromboembolism is high after total hip arthroplasty and could persist after hospital discharge. Our aim was to compare the use of rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis with short-term thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin. 2509 patients scheduled to undergo elective total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned, stratified according to centre, with a computer-generated randomisation code, to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 31–39 days (with placebo injection for 10–14 days; n=1252), or enoxaparin 40 mg once daily subcutaneously for 10–14 days (with placebo tablet for 31–39 days; n=1257). The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic detected by mandatory, bilateral venography), non-fatal pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality up to day 30–42. Analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which consisted of all patients who had received at least one dose of study medication, had undergone planned surgery, and had adequate assessment of thromboembolism. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00332020. The modified intention-to-treat population for the analysis of the primary efficacy outcome consisted of 864 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 869 in the enoxaparin group. The primary outcome occurred in 17 (2·0%) patients in the rivaroxaban group, compared with 81 (9·3%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction 7·3%, 95% CI 5·2–9·4; p<0·0001). The incidence of any on-treatment bleeding was much the same in both groups (81 [6·6%] events in 1228 patients in the rivaroxaban safety population vs 68 [5·5%] of 1229 patients in the enoxaparin safety population; p=0·25). Extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than short-term enoxaparin plus placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism, including symptomatic events, in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bayer HealthCare AG, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3. This study evaluated the safety and antitumour activity of pemigatinib in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, multicohort, phase 2 study (FIGHT-202), patients aged 18 years or older with disease progression following at least one previous treatment and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2 recruited from 146 academic or community-based sites in the USA, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia were assigned to one of three cohorts: patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, patients with other FGF/FGFR alterations, or patients with no FGF/FGFR alterations. All enrolled patients received a starting dose of 13·5 mg oral pemigatinib once daily (21-day cycle; 2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or physician decision. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response among those with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, assessed centrally in all patients who received at least one dose of pemigatinib. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924376, and enrolment is completed. Between Jan 17, 2017, and March 22, 2019, 146 patients were enrolled: 107 with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, 20 with other FGF/FGFR alterations, 18 with no FGF/FGFR alterations, and one with an undetermined FGF/FGFR alteration. The median follow-up was 17·8 months (IQR 11·6–21·3). 38 (35·5% [95% CI 26·5–45·4]) patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements achieved an objective response (three complete responses and 35 partial responses). Overall, hyperphosphataemia was the most common all-grade adverse event irrespective of cause (88 [60%] of 146 patients). 93 (64%) patients had a grade 3 or worse adverse event (irrespective of cause); the most frequent were hypophosphataemia (18 [12%]), arthralgia (nine [6%]), stomatitis (eight [5%]), hyponatraemia (eight [5%]), abdominal pain (seven [5%]), and fatigue (seven [5%]). 65 (45%) patients had serious adverse events; the most frequent were abdominal pain (seven [5%]), pyrexia (seven [5%]), cholangitis (five [3%]), and pleural effusion (five [3%]). Overall, 71 (49%) patients died during the study, most frequently because of disease progression (61 [42%]); no deaths were deemed to be treatment related. These data support the therapeutic potential of pemigatinib in previously treated patients with cholangiocarcinoma who have FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. Incyte Corporation.

Amivantamab, an antibody against MET and EGFR, plus lazertinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induced a response in 86% of previously untreated patients and led to a median progression-free survival of nearly 2 years.

In this trial, 14,264 patients with atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin. In a per-protocol, as-treated analysis, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increase in the risk of ischemic stroke by a factor of four to five 1 and accounts for up to 15% of strokes in persons of all ages and 30% in persons over the age of 80 years. 2 The use of vitamin K antagonists is highly effective for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and is recommended for persons at increased risk. 3 – 5 However, food and drug interactions necessitate frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments, requirements that make it difficult for many patients to use such drugs in clinical practice. 6 – 8 Rivaroxaban is . . .

The tubulin polymerization and Src kinase inhibitor tirbanibulin was superior to placebo ointment in clearing actinic keratoses on the face and scalp at 2 months. As is typical of the disorder, lesions recurred in 47% of patients at 1 year. Adverse events were related to local irritation.

In acutely ill patients, 10 days of rivaroxaban was noninferior to 10 days of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis. Extended-duration rivaroxaban treatment (35 days) reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Patients with active cancer, stroke, myocardial infarction, or acute exacerbations of a variety of medical conditions are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism. 1 Prolonged immobilization and risk factors such as an age older than 75 years, chronic heart failure, a history of venous thromboembolism, and obesity can increase this risk further. 2 , 3 Randomized, controlled trials involving hospitalized patients at increased risk for venous thromboembolism have shown the benefits of administering anticoagulant agents for up to 14 days, 4 – 8 and guidelines recommend the use of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, or fondaparinux in such patients. 9 There is some evidence that the risk . . .

In patients with acute coronary syndromes, low doses of rivaroxaban were effective in reducing the primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Rivaroxaban also reduced overall mortality, although there was more bleeding. After an acute coronary syndrome, patients remain at risk for recurrent cardiovascular events despite standard medical therapy, including long-term antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and an adenosine diphosphate–receptor inhibitor. This risk may be related in part to excess thrombin generation that persists beyond the acute presentation in such patients. 1 As a result, there has been interest in evaluating the role of oral anticoagulants after an acute coronary syndrome. Improved cardiovascular outcomes were reported for patients who were treated with the anticoagulant warfarin in addition to aspirin. 2 However, widespread use of long-term warfarin in such patients has been limited by challenges associated . . .