Explore the vast range of titles available.

Lyzenga’s method is used widely for radiative transfer analysis because of its simplicity of application to cases of shallow-water coral reef ecosystems with limited information of water properties. WorldView-2 imagery has been used previously to study bottom-type identification in shallow-water coral reef habitats. However, this is the first time WorldView-2 imagery has been applied to bottom-type identification using Lyzenga’s method. This research applied both of Lyzenga’s methods: the original from 1981 and the one from 2006 with improved noise correction that uses the near-infrared (NIR) band. The objectives of this study are to examine whether the utilization of NIR bands in the correction of atmospheric and sea-surface scattering improves the accuracy of bottom classification, and whether increasing the number of visible bands also improves accuracy. Firstly, it has been determined that the improved 2006 correction method, which uses NIR bands, is only more accurate than the original 1981 correction method in the case of three visible bands. When applying six bands, the accuracy of the 1981 correction method is better than that of the 2006 correction method. Secondly, the increased number of visible bands, when applied to Lyzenga’s empirical radiative transfer model, improves the accuracy of bottom classification significantly.

The goal of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is to investigate the brain's functional connections by using the temporal similarity between blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals in different regions of the brain “at rest” as an indicator of synchronous neural activity. Since this measure relies on the temporal correlation of fMRI signal changes between different parts of the brain, any non-neural activity-related process that affects the signals will influence the measure of functional connectivity, yielding spurious results. To understand the sources of these resting-state fMRI confounds, this article describes the origins of the BOLD signal in terms of MR physics and cerebral physiology. Potential confounds arising from motion, cardiac and respiratory cycles, arterial CO2 concentration, blood pressure/cerebral autoregulation, and vasomotion are discussed. Two classes of techniques to remove confounds from resting-state BOLD time series are reviewed: 1) those utilising external recordings of physiology and 2) data-based cleanup methods that only use the resting-state fMRI data itself. Further methods that remove noise from functional connectivity measures at a group level are also discussed. For successful interpretation of resting-state fMRI comparisons and results, noise cleanup is an often over-looked but essential step in the analysis pipeline. •Resting-state fMRI measures temporal similarity between BOLD signals.•Confounds can arise that affect the BOLD signals leading to spurious results.•Motion, cardiac/respiration, arterial CO2 concentration & blood pressure are sources.•Techniques to remove resting-state fMRI confounds are reviewed.•Noise correction is an essential step for resting-state fMRI analyses.

Noise correction is a critical step towards accurate mapping of resting state BOLD fMRI connectivity. Noise sources related to head motion or physiology are typically modelled by nuisance regressors, and a generalised linear model is applied to regress out the associated signal variance. In this study, we use independent component analysis (ICA) to characterise the data variance typically discarded in this pre-processing stage in a cohort of 12 healthy volunteers. The signal variance removed by 24, 12, 6, or only 3 head motion parameters demonstrated network structure typically associated with functional connectivity, and certain networks were discernable in the variance extracted by as few as 2 physiologic regressors. Simulated nuisance regressors, unrelated to the true data noise, also removed variance with network structure, indicating that any group of regressors that randomly sample variance may remove highly structured “signal” as well as “noise.” Furthermore, to support this we demonstrate that random sampling of the original data variance continues to exhibit robust network structure, even when as few as 10% of the original volumes are considered. Finally, we examine the diminishing returns of increasing the number of nuisance regressors used in pre-processing, showing that excessive use of motion regressors may do little better than chance in removing variance within a functional network. It remains an open challenge to understand the balance between the benefits and confounds of noise correction using nuisance regressors. •Data variance removed by nuisance regressors contains network structure.•Simulated regressors unrelated to noise also extract data with network structure.•Random sampling of original data (as few as 10% of volumes) reveals robust networks.•After optimal number, motion regressors remove similar variance as simulated ones.•Excessive nuisance regressors extract random signal variance with network structure.

Of the sources of noise affecting blood oxygen level‐dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), respiration and cardiac fluctuations are responsible for the largest part of the variance, particularly at high and ultrahigh field. Existing approaches to removing physiological noise either use external recordings, which can be unwieldy and unreliable, or attempt to identify physiological noise from the magnitude fMRI data. Data‐driven approaches are limited by sensitivity, temporal aliasing, and the need for user interaction. In the light of the sensitivity of the phase of the MR signal to local changes in the field stemming from physiological processes, we have developed an unsupervised physiological noise correction method using the information carried in the phase and the magnitude of echo‐planar imaging data. Our technique, Physiological Regressor Estimation from Phase and mAgnItude, sub‐tR (PREPAIR) derives time series signals sampled at the slice TR from both phase and magnitude images. It allows physiological noise to be captured without aliasing, and efficiently removes other sources of signal fluctuations not related to physiology, prior to regressor estimation. We demonstrate that the physiological signal time courses identified with PREPAIR agree well with those from external devices and retrieve challenging cardiac dynamics. The removal of physiological noise was as effective as that achieved with the most used approach based on external recordings, RETROICOR. In comparison with widely used recording‐free physiological noise correction tools—PESTICA and FIX, both performed in unsupervised mode—PREPAIR removed significantly more respiratory and cardiac noise than PESTICA, and achieved a larger increase in temporal signal‐to‐noise‐ratio at both 3 and 7 T. We have developed an unsupervised physiological noise correction method using the information carried in the phase and the magnitude of echo‐planar imaging data. We demonstrate that the physiological signal time courses identified with Physiological Regressor Estimation from Phase and mAgnItude, sub‐tR (PREPAIR) not only agree well with those from external devices, but also retrieve challenging cardiac dynamics.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely viewed as the gold standard for studying brain function due to its high spatial resolution and non-invasive nature. However, it is well established that changes in breathing patterns and heart rate strongly influence the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal and this, in turn, can have considerable effects on fMRI studies, particularly resting-state studies. The dynamic effects of physiological processes are often quantified by using convolution models along with simultaneously recorded physiological data. In this context, physiological response function (PRF) curves (cardiac and respiratory response functions), which are convolved with the corresponding physiological fluctuations, are commonly employed. While it has often been suggested that the PRF curves may be region- or subject-specific, it is still an open question whether this is the case. In the present study, we propose a novel framework for the robust estimation of PRF curves and use this framework to rigorously examine the implications of using population-, subject-, session- and scan-specific PRF curves. The proposed framework was tested on resting-state fMRI and physiological data from the Human Connectome Project. Our results suggest that PRF curves vary significantly across subjects and, to a lesser extent, across sessions from the same subject. These differences can be partly attributed to physiological variables such as the mean and variance of the heart rate during the scan. The proposed methodological framework can be used to obtain robust scan-specific PRF curves from data records with duration longer than 5 min, exhibiting significantly improved performance compared to previously defined canonical cardiac and respiration response functions. Besides removing physiological confounds from the BOLD signal, accurate modeling of subject- (or session-/scan-) specific PRF curves is of importance in studies that involve populations with altered vascular responses, such as aging subjects. •Physiological response functions (PRF) vary considerably across subjects/sessions.•Scan-specific PRF curves can be obtained from data records longer than 5 min.•The shape of the cardiac response function is linked to the mean heart rate (HR).•Brain regions affected by HR and breathing patterns exhibit substantial overlap.•HR and breathing patterns affect distinct regions as compared to cardiac pulsatility.

This paper presents a solution for implementing a power measurement receiver made with PlutoSDR. The paper proposes the dynamic elimination of the contribution of internal noise to the measured signal level by compensating with the level of internal noise produced by the receiver in the adjacent RF band. Our approach is based on the fact that the internal noise level in the working band is approximately equal to that in the frequency band in the immediate vicinity. As far as we know, our work is the first to use the idea of measuring the noise in an adjacent band to estimate the internal noise of the measuring instrument. Another aspect necessary to ensure a complete measurement solution that does not require pre-measurement calibration concerns the compensation of the nonlinearities of the reception path. The compensation was automatically performed by modifying the amplification of the reception path depending on the working frequency. For high levels of the measured CW signal (-50 dBm ... -10 dBm) the solution allows obtaining measurement errors of less than 0.55 dB. From the perspective of measurement uncertainty, with a value of U = ±1 dB (k=2), the instrument with the method used fits very well into the requirements for pre -compliance EMC measurements. For levels lower than -60 dBm, the error starts to increase rapidly, so that at values of -70 dBm the signal can no longer be measured.

The blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast mechanism allows the noninvasive monitoring of changes in deoxyhemoglobin content. As such, it is commonly used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study brain activity since levels of deoxyhemoglobin are indirectly related to local neuronal activity through neurovascular coupling mechanisms. However, the BOLD signal is severely affected by physiological processes as well as motion. Due to this, several noise correction techniques have been developed to correct for the associated confounds. The present study focuses on cardiac pulsatility fMRI confounds, aiming to refine model-based techniques that utilize the photoplethysmograph (PPG) signal. Specifically, we propose a new technique based on convolution filtering, termed cardiac pulsatility model (CPM) and compare its performance with the cardiac-related RETROICOR (Card-RETROICOR), which is a technique commonly used to model fMRI fluctuations due to cardiac pulsatility. Further, we investigate whether variations in the amplitude of the PPG pulses (PPG-Amp) covary with variations in amplitude of pulse-related fMRI fluctuations, as well as with the systemic low frequency oscillations (SLFOs) component of the fMRI global signal (GS – defined as the mean signal across all gray matter voxels). Capitalizing on 3T fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project, CPM was found to explain a significantly larger fraction of the fMRI signal variance compared to Card-RETROICOR, particularly for subjects with larger heart rate variability during the scan. The amplitude of the fMRI pulse-related fluctuations did not covary with PPG-Amp; however, PPG-Amp explained significant variance in the GS that was not attributed to variations in heart rate or breathing patterns. Our results suggest that the proposed approach can model high-frequency fluctuations due to pulsation as well as low-frequency physiological fluctuations more accurately compared to model-based techniques commonly employed in fMRI studies.

The evolution of cameras and LiDAR has propelled the techniques and applications of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. However, due to inherent sensor limitations and environmental interference, the reconstruction process often entails significant texture noise, such as specular highlight, color inconsistency, and object occlusion. Traditional methodologies grapple to mitigate such noise, particularly in large-scale scenes, due to the voluminous data produced by imaging sensors. In response, this paper introduces an omnidirectional-sensor-system-based texture noise correction framework for large-scale scenes, which consists of three parts. Initially, we obtain a colored point cloud with luminance value through LiDAR points and RGB images organization. Next, we apply a voxel hashing algorithm during the geometry reconstruction to accelerate the computation speed and save the computer memory. Finally, we propose the key innovation of our paper, the frame-voting rendering and the neighbor-aided rendering mechanisms, which effectively eliminates the aforementioned texture noise. From the experimental results, the processing rate of one million points per second shows its real-time applicability, and the output figures of texture optimization exhibit a significant reduction in texture noise. These results indicate that our framework has advanced performance in correcting multiple texture noise in large-scale 3D reconstruction.

This study presents an innovative temperature‐induced random noise correction method for complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) spatial cameras using an attention mechanism‐enhanced long short‐term memory (LSTM) model. The model, specifically designed to address pixel drift and random noise issues in CMOS space cameras due to temperature variations, incorporates a multilayer LSTM network with an attention mechanism. This study comprehensively examines the temperature‐induced variations in noise characteristics of CMOS cameras across diverse thermal conditions, encompassing in‐depth analyses of both dark‐field and light‐field scenarios. Through detailed pixel‐level analysis, the study quantifies the influence of temperature on pixel values and critical performance parameters such as internal nonuniformity within the camera. The experimental results show that under the dark field condition, the fitting variance between the predicted value and the measured value ranges from 0.29585 to 5.798307. After correction in light field conditions, the average variance of images decreases to 0.29, the mean signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) increases to 80, and the photo response nonuniformity (PRNU) mean drops to 0.0161%. Compared to precorrection levels, these key metrics show significant improvements, with an average 83.57‐fold reduction, 1.89‐fold increase, and 84.98‐fold decrease, respectively. These results confirm the effectiveness of the deep learning method in correcting temperature‐induced noise, highlighting the potential for practical engineering applications.

In crowdsourcing scenarios, we can obtain each instance’s multiple noisy labels from different crowd workers and then infer its integrated label via label aggregation. In spite of the effectiveness of label aggregation methods, there still remains a certain level of noise in the integrated labels. Thus, some noise correction methods have been proposed to reduce the impact of noise in recent years. However, to the best of our knowledge, existing methods rarely consider an instance’s information from both its features and multiple noisy labels simultaneously when identifying a noise instance. In this study, we argue that the more distinguishable an instance’s features but the noisier its multiple noisy labels, the more likely it is a noise instance. Based on this premise, we propose a label distribution similarity-based noise correction (LDSNC) method. To measure whether an instance’s features are distinguishable, we obtain each instance’s predicted label distribution by building multiple classifiers using instances’ features and their integrated labels. To measure whether an instance’s multiple noisy labels are noisy, we obtain each instance’s multiple noisy label distribution using its multiple noisy labels. Then, we use the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to calculate the similarity between the predicted label distribution and multiple noisy label distribution and define the instance with the lower similarity as a noise instance. The extensive experimental results on 34 simulated and four real-world crowdsourced datasets validate the effectiveness of our method.