Explore the vast range of titles available.

Ischemic optic neuropathy is of two types: anterior and posterior. Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NA-AION) is the most common type of ischemic optic neuropathy. There are three major misconceptions about NA-AION: (1) that its pathogenesis is not known, (2) that NA-AION and ischemic cerebral stroke are similar in nature, pathogenetically and in management, and (3) that there is no treatment. All these misconceptions are based on lack of in-depth knowledge of the subject. They are discussed in the light of our current scientific knowledge. The pathogenesis of NA-AION is known but is highly complex. NA-AION and ischemic cerebral stroke are very different clinical entities, pathogenetically and in management. Aspirin has no beneficial effect. Corticosteroid therapy during the initial stages can be beneficial. To reduce the risk of development of NA-AION in the other eye or of further visual loss in the same eye, it is essential to reduce as many risk factors as possible. Management of arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and of posterior ischemic optic neuropathy is discussed.

Nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is the most common acute optic neuropathy in patients over the age of 50 and is the second most common cause of permanent optic nerve-related visual loss in adults after glaucoma. Patients typically present with acute, painless, unilateral loss of vision associated with a variable visual field defect, a relative afferent pupillary defect, a swollen, hyperaemic optic disc, and one or more flame-shaped peripapillary retinal haemorrhages. The pathogenesis of this condition is unknown, but it occurs primarily in patients with structurally small optic discs that have little or no cup and a variety of underlying vascular disorders that may or may not be known at the time of visual loss. There is no consistently beneficial medical or surgical treatment for the condition, but there are now animal models that allow testing of various potential therapies. About 40% of patients experience spontaneous improvement in visual acuity. Patients in whom NAION occurs in one eye have a 15–19% risk of developing a similar event in the opposite eye over the subsequent 5 years.

Purpose The purpose of our study was to describe the feature of acute non-arteritic or arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NA-AION and A-AION) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) and to compare it with fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Methods In this retrospective, observational case-control study four NA-AION patients and one A-AION patient were examined by FA, ICGA and OCT-A within 2 weeks from disease presentation. The characteristics of the images were analyzed. Optic nerve head (ONH) and radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC) vessel densities (VDs) were compared between NA-AION and controls. Results In two of four NA-AION cases and in the A-AION patient, OCT-A clearly identified the boundary of the ischemic area at the level of the optic nerve head, which was comparable to optic disc filling defects detected by FA. In the other two NA-AION cases, a generalized leakage from the disc was visible with FA, yet OCT-A still demonstrated sectorial peripapillary capillary network reduction. Both ONH and RPC VDs were reduced in NA-AION patients, when compared to controls. Conclusions OCT-A was able to identify microvascular defects and VD reduction in cases of acute optic disc edema due to NA-AION and A-AION. OCT-A provides additional information in ischemic conditions of the optic nerve head.

Abstract PurposeThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature is to evaluate the association between cardiometabolic risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and triglycerides) and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).MethodsPertinent publications were identified through a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases, without language restrictions. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean differences (SMD), with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random effects (DerSimonian Laird) models, as appropriate. A set of subgroup analyses and meta-regression analysis models were performed.ResultsTwenty-one studies (including 1560 patients with NAION and 2292 controls), examining the association between NAION and cardiometabolic risk factors, were eligible for the systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension (pooled OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.16–1.94), diabetes mellitus (pooled OR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.33–2.21), and hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia (pooled OR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.53–2.62) were associated with NAION. Among the components of dyslipidemia, higher serum triglycerides were associated with NAION, with a medium effect size (SMD =  + 0.58, 95% CI: + 0.12 to + 1.04), whereas synthesis of four studies reporting on HDL and LDL cholesterol did not reveal any significant associations. A significant association between NAION and higher serum lipoprotein(a) levels (pooled OR = 2.88; 95%CI: 1.01–8.21) was also noted.ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis found that NAION was associated with cardiometabolic factors, suggesting that vascular dysfunction may be implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease. Our findings may alert health care providers to try modifying these risk factors for NAION prevention.

PurposeTo summarize the existing treatment options regarding central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION), non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), and ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS), proposing an approach to manage and treat these patients.MethodsA systematic literature search of articles published since 1st January 2010 until 31st December 2020 was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science. Exclusion criteria included case reports, non-English references, articles not conducted in humans, and articles not including diagnostic or therapeutic options. Further references were gathered through citation tracking, by hand search of the reference lists of included studies, as well as topic-related European society guidelines.ResultsAcute ocular ischemia, with consequent visual loss, has a variety of causes and clinical presentations, with prognosis depending on an accurate diagnosis and timely therapeutic implementation. Unfortunately, most of the addressed entities do not have a standardized management, especially regarding their treatment, which often lacks good quality evidence on whether it should or not be used to treat patients.ConclusionOphthalmologic signs and symptoms may be a warning sign of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, namely stroke. Most causes of acute ocular ischemia do not have a standardized management, especially regarding their treatment. Timely intervention is essential to improve the visual, and possibly vital, prognosis. Awareness must be raised among non-ophthalmologist clinicians that might encounter these patients. Further research should focus on assessing the benefit of the management strategies already being employed .

AimTo evaluate the role of papillary vitreous detachment in the pathogenesis of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) by comparing the features of vitreopapillary interface between NAION patients and normal individuals.MethodsThis study included 22 acute NAION patients (25 eyes), 21 non-acute NAION patients (23 eyes) and 23 normal individuals (34 eyes). All study participants underwent swept-source optical coherence tomography to assess the vitreopapillary interface, peripapillary wrinkles and peripapillary superficial vessel protrusion. The statistical correlations between peripapillary superficial vessel protrusion measurements and NAION were analysed. Two NAION patients underwent standard pars plana vitrectomy.ResultsIncomplete papillary vitreous detachment was noted in all acute NAION patients. The prevalence of peripapillary wrinkles was 68% (17/25), 30% (7/23) and 0% (0/34), and the prevalence of peripapillary superficial vessel protrusion was 44% (11/25), 91% (21/23) and 0% (0/34) in the acute, non-acute NAION and control groups, respectively. The prevalence of peripapillary superficial vessel protrusion was 88.9% in the eyes without retinal nerve fibre layer thinning. Furthermore, the number of peripapillary superficial vessel protrusions in the superior quadrant was significantly higher than that in the other quadrants in eyes with NAION, consistent with the more damaged visual field defect regions. Peripapillary wrinkles and visual field defects in two patients with NAION were significantly attenuated within 1 week and 1 month after the release of vitreous connections, respectively.ConclusionPeripapillary wrinkles and superficial vessel protrusion may be signs of papillary vitreous detachment-related traction in NAION. Papillary vitreous detachment may play an important role in NAION pathogenesis.

Background The association of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with development of eye diseases is unclear. This current systematic review and meta-analysis attempts to summarize and analyze associations between OSA and ocular disorders in the literature. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web Of Science, and Scopus databases were searched from 1901 to July 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting in Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Our primary outcome assessed the association between OSA and the odds of developing floppy eyelid syndrome (FES), glaucoma, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), keratoconus (KC), idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSR) through odds ratio calculated at the 95% confidence interval. Results Forty-nine studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled OR estimate was highest for NAION [3.98 (95% CI 2.38, 6.66)], followed by FES [3.68 (95% CI 2.18, 6.20)], RVO [2.71(95% CI 1.83, 4.00)], CSR [2.28 (95% CI 0.65, 7.97)], KC [1.87 (95% CI 1.16, 2.99)], glaucoma [1.49 (95% CI 1.16, 1.91)], IIH [1.29 (95% CI 0.33, 5.01)], and AMD [0.92 [95% CI 0.24, 3.58] All observed associations were significant ( p  < 0.001) aside from IIH and AMD. Conclusion OSA is significantly associated with NAION, FES, RVO, CSR, KC, and glaucoma. Clinicians should be informed of these associations so early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of eye disorders can be addressed in at-risk groups, and early referral to ophthalmic services is made to prevent vision disturbances. Similarly, ophthalmologists seeing patients with any of these conditions should consider screening and referring patients for assessment of possible OSA.

Ischemic optic neuropathies (IONs) consist primarily of two types: anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION). AION comprises arteritic AION (A-AION: due to giant cell arteritis) and non-arteritic AION (NA-AION: due to other causes). PION consists of arteritic PION (A-PION: due to giant cell arteritis), non-arteritic PION (NA-PION: due to other causes), and surgical PION (a complication of several systemic surgical procedures). These five types of ION are distinct clinical entities etiologically, pathogenetically, clinically and from the management point of view. In the management of AION, the first crucial step with patients aged 50 and over is to identify immediately whether it is arteritic or not because A-AION is an ophthalmic emergency and requires urgent treatment with high-dose steroid therapy to prevent any further visual loss in one or both eyes. Patients with NA-AION, when treated with systemic corticosteroid therapy within first 2 weeks of onset, had significantly better visual outcome than untreated ones. Systemic risk factors, particularly nocturnal arterial hypotension, play major roles in the development of NA-AION; management of them is essential in its prevention and management. NA-PION patients, when treated with high-dose systemic steroid therapy during the very early stages of the disease, showed significant improvement in visual acuity and visual fields, compared to untreated eyes. A-PION, like A-AION, requires urgent treatment with high-dose steroid therapy to prevent any further visual loss in one or both eyes. There is no satisfactory treatment for surgical PION, except to take prophylactic measures to prevent its development.

Objectives We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of publications reporting the ophthalmologic presentation, clinical exam, and orbital MRI findings in patients with giant cell arteritis and ocular manifestations. Methods PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 16, 2022. Publications reporting patient-level data on patients with ophthalmologic symptoms, imaged with orbital MRI, and diagnosed with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis were included. Demographics, clinical symptoms, exam, lab, imaging, and outcomes data were extracted. The methodological quality and completeness of reporting of case reports were assessed. Results Thirty-two studies were included comprising 51 patients (females = 24; median age, 76 years). Vision loss (78%) and headache (45%) were commonly reported visual and cranial symptoms. Ophthalmologic presentation was unilateral (41%) or bilateral (59%). Fundus examination most commonly showed disc edema (64%) and pallor (49%). Average visual acuity was very poor (2.28 logMAR ± 2.18). Diagnoses included anterior (61%) and posterior (16%) ischemic optic neuropathy, central retinal artery occlusion (8%), and orbital infarction syndrome (2%). On MRI, enhancement of the optic nerve sheath (53%), intraconal fat (25%), and optic nerve/chiasm (14%) was most prevalent. Among patients with monocular visual symptoms, 38% showed pathologic enhancement in the asymptomatic orbit. Six of seven cases reported imaging resolution after treatment on follow-up MRIs. Conclusions Vision loss, pallid disc edema, and optic nerve sheath enhancement are the most common clinical, fundoscopic, and imaging findings reported in patients diagnosed with giant cell arteritis with ocular manifestations, respectively. MRI may detect subclinical inflammation and ischemia in the asymptomatic eye and may be an adjunct diagnostic tool. Clinical relevance statement Brain and orbital MRIs may have diagnostic and prognostic roles in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis who present with ophthalmic symptoms.

Purpose To offer a comprehensive review of the available data regarding non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and its phenocopies, focusing on the current evidence to support the different existing aetiopathogenic hypotheses for the development of these conditions. Conclusions and importance Due to the limited array of responses of the neural tissue and other retinal structures, different aetiopathogenic mechanisms may result in a similar clinical picture. Moreover, when the insult occurs within a confined space, such as the optic nerve or the optic nerve head, in which different tissues (neural, glial, vascular) are highly interconnected and packed together, determining the primary noxa can be challenging and may lead to misdiagnosis. Anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy is a condition most clinicians will face during their everyday work, and it is important to correctly differentiate among resembling pathologies affecting the optic nerve to avoid unnecessary diagnostic procedures. Combining a good clinical history and multimodal imaging can assist diagnosis in most cases. The key remains to combine demographic data (e.g. age), with ophthalmic data (e.g. refractive error), systemic data (e.g. comorbidities and medication), imaging data (e.g. retinal OCT) with topographic signs (e.g. focal neurology). Methodology Papers relevant for this work were obtained from the MEDLINE and Embase databases by using the PubMed search engine. One author (MPMG) performed the search and selected only publications with relevant information about the aetiology, pathogenic mechanisms, risk factors as well as clinical characteristics of phenocopies (such as vitreopapillary traction, intrapapillary haemorrhage with adjacent peripapillary subretinal haemorrhage or diabetic papillopathy) of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION). The terms “non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy/NAION”, “vitreopapillary traction”, “vitreopapillary traction AND non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy/NAION”, “posterior vitreous detachment AND non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy/NAION”, “central retinal vein occlusion AND non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy/NAION”, “disc oedema/disc oedema”, “diabetes mellitus AND non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy/NAION” and “diabetic papillopathy” were searched on PubMed. From each of these searches, publications were selected based on their title, obtaining a total of 115 papers. All papers not written in English were then excluded, and those whose abstracts were not deemed relevant for our review, according to the aforementioned criteria. Subsequent scrutiny of the main text of the remaining publications led us (MPMG, AP, ZS) to include references which had not been selected during our first search, as their titles did not contain the previously mentioned MeSH terms, due to their significantly relevant contents for our work. A total of 62 publications were finally consulted for our review. The literature review was last updated on 24-Aug-2022.