Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The adductor canal block has been proven effective in controlling postoperative pain, but it requires additional space and manpower. In contrast, intraoperative or direct adductor canal block (D-ACB) is performed during the surgical procedure, eliminating additional time and cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-ACB. The authors hypothesized that adding D-ACB to periarticular injection (PAI) would help control postoperative pain and reduce opioid use after TKA without causing major side effects. Methods Among patients scheduled to undergo primary TKA from September 2023 to February 2024, 38 patients in the PAI-alone group and 40 patients in the D-ACB + PAI group were eligible for analysis. The PAI-alone group received only PAI, while the D-ACB + PAI group received an additional ACB intraoperatively. Pain VAS scores and opioid consumption from the day of operation to postoperative day 5 were collected. Neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity were considered major adverse events and were monitored along with postoperative motor weakness and fall-down events. Results The D-ACB + PAI group used less opioid compared to the PAI-alone group. No major adverse effects were observed in either group during the perioperative period. Conclusion Intraoperative direct ACB demonstrated an opioid-sparing effect when combined with PAI. By performing ACB intraoperatively, no additional space, cost, or manpower was required, and patients did not need an additional catheter for pain control. Direct ACB is a simple and safe procedure that can facilitate recovery after TKA. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered at the Clinical Research Information Service on April 5, 2024 (KCT0009311).

Background Acetaminophen is a widely used analgesic for postoperative pain management. However, data on its combined use with nefopam for managing postoperative pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy are limited. This study evaluated the effects of a single intravenous dose of acetaminophen combined with fentanyl- and nefopam-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 84 patients were randomized to receive either 1 g of intravenous acetaminophen (treatment group, n  = 42) or normal saline (control group, n  = 42) at the end of surgery. All patients received fentanyl and nefopam via PCA, postoperatively. PCA consumption, pain scores at rest, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) scores were assessed at 1, 6, and 24 h postoperatively. Patient satisfaction and opioid-related side effects were also evaluated. The primary outcome was the total PCA consumption within the first 24 h. Results No significant difference in 24-h PCA consumption was observed between the control and treatment groups (27.9 ± 16.6 vs . 26.4 ± 11.2, P  = 0.623). The pain scores at rest measured at 1, 6, and 24 h after surgery were also not significantly different between the two groups. There were no differences in the satisfaction scores, PONV scores, rescue analgesic use, adverse effects, or length of hospital stay between the groups. Conclusions A single intraoperative dose of intravenous acetaminophen, combined with nefopam- and fentanyl-based PCA, did not significantly reduce analgesic requirements, pain scores at rest, or opioid-related side effects compared with placebo in laparoscopic hysterectomy patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03644147 | August 21, 2018).

Abstract BACKGROUND The synergistic effect of clonidine with bupivacaine, well established in peripheral nerve blocks, remains controversial in local field block for postoperative analgesia. OBJECTIVE To investigate the potential analgesic benefit of adding clonidine to bupivacaine during preincisional field block in posterior approaches for spine surgeries. METHODS Two hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study and underwent lumbar spinal fusion (n = 80), lumbar laminectomy (n = 25), lumbar microdiscectomy (n = 94), or cervical laminectomy (n = 26). In each surgical subgroup, patients were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to receive either 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine alone (control group, n = 109) or with 150 μg clonidine (clonidine group, n = 116) in the form of a preincisional field block. Outcome parameters included area under the curve of pain from postoperative day D0 to D8 and rescue morphine consumption from D0 to D3. RESULTS The area under the curve was reduced in the clonidine group, particularly in the microdiscectomy subgroup, and without reaching statistical significance in the cervical laminectomy subgroup. Total rescue morphine consumption was reduced in the clonidine group, particularly at D1-D2, a benefit that was exclusive to the lumbar stenosis and lumbar fusion subgroups. Field block with clonidine, surgical subgroup, and the presence of preoperative spinal pain were factors independently influencing postoperative wound pain in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION The addition of clonidine to local preincisional field block with bupivacaine resulted in better and prolonged postoperative analgesia in posterior lumbar spine surgeries, an effect that was more pronounced in patients with no preoperative spinal pain.

Background:Both postoperative epidural analgesia and intravenous (IV) infusion of local anesthetic have been shown to shorten ileus duration and hospital stay after colon surgery when compared with the use of systemic narcotics alone. However, they have not been compared directly with each other.Methods:Prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted comparing the 2 treatments in open colon surgery patients. Before induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomized either to epidural analgesia (bupivacaine 0.125% and hydromorphone 6 μg/mL were started at 10 mL/hr within 1 hr of the end of surgery) or IV lidocaine (1 mg/min in patients <70 kg, 2 mg/min in patients ≥70 kg). Markers of return of bowel function, length of stay, postoperative pain scores, systemic analgesic requirements, and adverse events were recorded and compared between the 2 groups in an intent-to-treat analysis.Results:Study enrollment took place from April 2005 to July 2006. Twenty-two patients were randomized to IV lidocaine therapy and 20 patients to epidural therapy. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in time to return of bowel function or hospital length of stay. The median pain score difference was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in pain scores for any specific postoperative day or in analgesic consumption.Conclusions:No differences were observed between groups in terms of return of bowel function, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative pain control, suggesting that IV infusion of local anesthetic may be an effective alternative to epidural therapy in patients in whom epidural anesthesia is contraindicated or not desired.

BackgroundThe femoral nerve block (FNB) may be used for analgesia in hip fracture surgery. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional technique and may provide better pain reduction while preserving motor function, but these blocks have not been directly compared.MethodsIn a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial, patients presenting for hip fracture surgery received analgesia with either FNB or PENG block. The primary outcome measure was pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0 to 10). Secondary outcomes were postoperative quadriceps strength, opiate use, complications, length of hospital stay, and patient-reported outcomes.ResultsSixty patients were randomized and equally allocated between groups. Baseline demographics were similar. Postoperatively in recovery (day 0), the PENG group experienced less pain compared with the FNB group. (In the PENG group, 63% experienced no pain, 27% mild pain, and 10% moderate to severe pain. In comparison, 30% of the FNB group reported no pain, 27% mild pain, and 36% moderate to severe pain; p=0.04). This was assessed using an 11-point Likert NRS. Quadriceps strength was better preserved in the PENG group in the recovery unit (assessed using Oxford muscle strength grading, 60% intact in the PENG group vs none intact in the FNB group; p<0.001) and on day 1 (90% intact vs 50%, respectively; p=0.004). There was no difference in other outcomes.ConclusionsPatients receiving a PENG block for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia during hip fracture surgery experience less postoperative pain in the recovery room with no difference detected by postoperative day 1. Quadriceps strength was better preserved with the PENG block. Despite the short-term analgesic benefit and improved quadriceps strength, there were no differences detected in the quality of recovery.

Opioid-free anaesthesia may enhance postoperative recovery by reducing opioid-related side effects such as nausea, hyperalgesia or tolerance. The objective was to investigate the impact of multimodal opioid-free general anaesthesia on postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain and morphine consumption compared to the traditional opioid-based approach. This study was conducted as a prospective parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Perioperative Care. 152 adult women undergoing elective inpatient gynaecological laparoscopy. Patients were randomly assigned for opioid-free anaesthesia (Group OF) with dexmedetomidine, esketamine and sevoflurane or to have opioid-based anaesthesia (Group C) with sufentanil and sevoflurane. Primary outcome was the occurrence of nausea within 24 h after surgery. Patients were assessed for the incidence and severity of PONV, postoperative pain and morphine consumption and recovery characteristics. Patients in both groups had comparable clinical and surgical data. 69.7% of patients in the control group and 68.4% of patients in the opioid-free group met the primary endpoint (OR 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.53; 2.12) p = 0.86). The incidence of clinically important PONV defined by the PONV impact scale was 8.1% (Group C) vs 10.5% (OF); p = 0.57). Antiemetic requirements, pain scores and morphine consumption were equivalent in both groups. Postoperative sedation was significantly increased in group OF (p < 0.001), and the median length of stay at the post-anaesthesia care unit was 69.0 min (46.5–113.0) vs 50.0 (35.3–77.0) minutes in the control group (p < 0.001). Opioid-free multimodal general anaesthesia is feasible but did not decrease the incidence of PONV, or reduce pain scores and morphine consumption compared to an opioid-containing anaesthetic regimen. •This trial assessed opioid-free anaesthesia in comparison to opioid-based anaesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopy.•Both study groups did not differ with respect to postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain or morphine consumption.•Multimodal general anaesthesia was associated with an increased time to discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit.

BackgroundThis randomized trial compared ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. We selected the postoperative incidence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paresis or paralysis of knee extension) at 6 hours as the primary outcome. We hypothesized that, compared with suprainguinal fascia iliaca block, pericapsular nerve group block would decrease its occurrence from 70% to 20%.MethodsForty patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive a pericapsular nerve group block (n=20) using 20 mL of adrenalized levobupivacaine 0.50%, or a suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (n=20) using 40 mL of adrenalized levobupivacaine 0.25%. After the performance of the block, a blinded observer recorded pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours; cumulative breakthrough morphine consumption at 24 and 48 hours; opioid-related side effects; ability to perform physiotherapy at 24 and 48 hours; as well as length of stay. Furthermore, the blinded observer also carried out sensory assessment (of the anterior, lateral, and medial aspects of the mid-thigh) and motor assessment (knee extension and hip adduction) at 3, 6, and 24 hours.ResultsCompared with suprainguinal fascia iliaca block, pericapsular nerve group block resulted in a lower incidence of quadriceps motor block at 3 hours (45% vs 90%; p<0.001) and 6 hours (25% vs 85%; p<0.001). Furthermore, pericapsular nerve group block also provided better preservation of hip adduction at 3 hours (p=0.023) as well as decreased sensory block of the anterior, lateral, and medial thighs at all measurement intervals (all p≤0.014). No clinically significant intergroup differences were found in terms of postoperative pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, ability to perform physiotherapy, opioid-related side effects, and length of hospital stay.ConclusionFor primary total hip arthroplasty, pericapsular nerve group block results in better preservation of motor function than suprainguinal fascia iliaca block. Additional investigation is required to elucidate the optimal local anesthetic volume for motor-sparing pericapsular nerve group block and to compare the latter with alternate motor-sparing strategies such as periarticular local anesthetic infiltration.Trial registration number NCT04402450.

Delirium is a common and serious postoperative complication. Subanaesthetic ketamine is often administered intraoperatively for postoperative analgesia, and some evidence suggests that ketamine prevents delirium. The primary purpose of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of ketamine for prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults. The Prevention of Delirium and Complications Associated with Surgical Treatments [PODCAST] study is a multicentre, international randomised trial that enrolled adults older than 60 years undergoing major cardiac and non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence we randomly assigned patients to one of three groups in blocks of 15 to receive placebo (normal saline), low-dose ketamine (0·5 mg/kg), or high dose ketamine (1·0 mg/kg) after induction of anaesthesia, before surgical incision. Participants, clinicians, and investigators were blinded to group assignment. Delirium was assessed twice daily in the first 3 postoperative days using the Confusion Assessment Method. We did analyses by intention-to-treat and assessed adverse events. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01690988. Between Feb 6, 2014, and June 26, 2016, 1360 patients were assessed, and 672 were randomly assigned, with 222 in the placebo group, 227 in the 0·5 mg/kg ketamine group, and 223 in the 1·0 mg/kg ketamine group. There was no difference in delirium incidence between patients in the combined ketamine groups and the placebo group (19·45% vs 19·82%, respectively; absolute difference 0·36%, 95% CI −6·07 to 7·38, p=0·92). There were more postoperative hallucinations (p=0·01) and nightmares (p=0·03) with increasing ketamine doses compared with placebo. Adverse events (cardiovascular, renal, infectious, gastrointestinal, and bleeding), whether viewed individually (p value for each >0·40) or collectively (36·9% in placebo, 39·6% in 0·5 mg/kg ketamine, and 40·8% in 1·0 mg/kg ketamine groups, p=0·69), did not differ significantly across groups. A single subanaesthetic dose of ketamine did not decrease delirium in older adults after major surgery, and might cause harm by inducing negative experiences. National Institutes of Health and Cancer Center Support.

To evaluate if adding esketamine and clonidine has positive effects on postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and quality of recovery in patients who are at high risk for postoperative pain. Patient- and assessor-blinded, superiority, randomised controlled trial. Single centre between 2022 and 2024. 125 adult patients, ASA I – II, planned for elective laparoscopic surgery and risk-classified as high risk of pain, based on perceived pain associated with venous cannulation. Patients were randomised to either an anaesthesia protocol, including an intravenous bolus of esketamine (0.25 mg.kg−1) after induction and clonidine (1 μg.kg−1) during maintenance phase (EC), or standard of care (SOC) no esketamine or clonidine included. Primary outcome: worst pain intensity in the PACU. Secondary outcomes: worst pain, and proportion having NRS ≥ 4, at 24 h (during rest and movement), worst pain and proportion having NRS ≥ 1, at 3- and 6-months (during rest and movement), postoperative recovery at 24 h, PONV in the PACU and at 24 h. Rescue dose opioids in the PACU was an exploratory outcome. Worst pain scores in the PACU were 5.7 in the EC group and 5.5 in SOC group (P = 0.78). After 24 h, no difference in postoperative pain (rest; 5.8 vs 6.1, P = 0.35, movement; 6.1 vs 6.2, P = 0.68), postoperative recovery (P = 0.92) or PONV (P = 0.80) was found. Proportion of patients with NRS ≥ 4 in the PACU was 50 % vs 48 % (P = 0.55) and at 24 h 73 % vs 81 % at rest (P = 0.27) and 76 % vs 81 % during movement (P = 0.50). Rescue opioids in the PACU were similar (5.9 mg vs 6.6 mg, P = 0.47). There were no differences in persistent pain at 3 or 6 months at rest (P = 0.72, P = 0.12) or movement (P = 0.48, P = 0.18). Adding esketamine and clonidine, as an individualised multimodal anaesthesia strategy, did not influence acute or persistent postoperative pain, early recovery, need of rescue opioids or PONV in patients, who were assessed as high risk for APOP. [Display omitted] •Adding esketamine and clonidine did not improve APOP in patients predicted as high-risk for postoperative pain.•Adding esketamine and clonidine did not improve recovery or PONV in patients predicted as high-risk for postoperative pain.•The pursuit for individualised anaesthesia and analgesia needs further refinement.

BackgroundThe population undergoing cardiac surgery confronts challenges from uncontrolled post-sternotomy pain, with possible adverse effects on outcome. While the parasternal block can improve analgesia, its coverage may be insufficient to cover epigastric area. In this non-blinded randomized controlled study, we evaluated the analgesic and respiratory effect of adding a rectus sheath block to a parasternal block.Methods58 patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive parasternal block with rectus sheath block (experimental) or parasternal block with epigastric exit sites of chest drains receiving surgical infiltration of local anesthetic (control). The primary outcome of this study was pain at rest at extubation. We also assessed pain scores at rest and during respiratory exercises, opiate consumption and respiratory performance during the first 24 hours after extubation.ResultsThe median (IQR) maximum pain scores (on a 0–10 Numeric Rate Scale (NRS)) at extubation were 4 (4, 4) in the rectus sheath group and 5 (4, 5) in the control group (difference 1, p value=0.03). Rectus sheath block reduced opioid utilization by 2 mg over 24 hours (IC 95% 0.0 to 2.0; p<0.01), reduced NRS scores at other time points, and improved respiratory performance at 6, 12, and 24 hours after extubation.ConclusionThe addition of a rectus sheath block with a parasternal block improves analgesia for cardiac surgery requiring chest drains emerging in the epigastric area.Trial registration number NCT05764616.