Explore the vast range of titles available.

Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible inhibitor of the GTPase protein, KRASG12C. We compared the efficacy and safety of sotorasib with a standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs. We conducted a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial at 148 centres in 22 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, who progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Key exclusion criteria included new or progressing untreated brain lesions or symptomatic brain lesions, previously identified oncogenic driver mutation other than KRASG12C for which an approved therapy is available (eg EGFR or ALK), previous treatment with docetaxel (neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel was allowed if the tumour did not progress within 6 months after the therapy was terminated), previous treatment with a direct KRASG12C inhibitor, systemic anticancer therapy within 28 days of study day 1, and therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral sotorasib (960 mg once daily) or intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in an open-label manner using interactive response technology. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy in advanced disease (1 vs 2 vs >2), ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), and history of CNS metastases (present or absent). Treatment continued until an independent central confirmation of disease progression, intolerance, initiation of another anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was assessed by a blinded, independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303780, and is active but no longer recruiting. Between June 4, 2020, and April 26, 2021, 345 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib (n=171 [50%]) or docetaxel (n=174 [50%]). 169 (99%) patients in the sotorasib group and 151 (87%) in the docetaxel group received at least one dose. After a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 16·4–20·1), the study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant increase in the progression-free survival for sotorasib, compared with docetaxel (median progression-free survival 5·6 months [95% CI 4·3–7·8] vs 4·5 months [3·0–5·7]; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·51–0·86]; p=0·0017). Sotorasib was well tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or worse (n=56 [33%] vs n=61 [40%]) and serious treatment-related adverse events compared with docetaxel (n=18 [11%] vs n=34 [23%]). For sotorasib, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were diarrhoea (n= 20 [12%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (n=13 [8%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=9 [5%]). For docetaxel, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (n=13 [9%]), fatigue (n=9 [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=8 [5%]). Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favourable safety profile, compared with docetaxel, in patients with advanced NSCLC with the KRASG12C mutation and who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs. Amgen.

G12C is a mutation that occurs in approximately 3 to 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Monotherapy with KRAS G12C inhibitors has yielded only modest efficacy. Combining the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib with panitumumab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, may be an effective strategy. In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated G12C who had not received previous treatment with a KRAS G12C inhibitor to receive sotorasib at a dose of 960 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), sotorasib at a dose of 240 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), or the investigator's choice of trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib (standard care; 54 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Key secondary end points were overall survival and objective response. After a median follow-up of 7.8 months (range, 0.1 to 13.9), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 6.3) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.8) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab and 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab groups, respectively, as compared with 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9) in the standard-care group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group as compared with the standard-care group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; P = 0.006), and the hazard ratio in the 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.03). Overall survival data are maturing. The objective response was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3), 5.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 15.7), and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 6.6) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, and standard-care groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 35.8%, 30.2%, and 43.1% of patients, respectively. Skin-related toxic effects and hypomagnesemia were the most common adverse events observed with sotorasib-panitumumab. In this phase 3 trial of a KRAS G12C inhibitor plus an EGFR inhibitor in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, both doses of sotorasib in combination with panitumumab resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard treatment. Toxic effects were as expected for either agent alone and resulted in few discontinuations of treatment. (Funded by Amgen; CodeBreaK 300 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05198934.).

In a phase 1–2 trial involving patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, sotorasib (a KRAS G12C inhibitor) resulted in a response in 21% of the patients and a median progression-free survival of 4 months.

Among patients with cancers bearing the KRAS G12C mutation who received divarasib at a 400-mg dose, 56% with lung cancer, 36% with colorectal cancer, and 36% with other tumor types had a confirmed response.

Genomics has greatly improved how patients with cancer are being treated; however, clinical-grade genomic biomarkers for chemotherapies are currently lacking. Using whole-genome analysis of 37 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with the chemotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), we identified KRAS codon G12 ( KRAS G12 ) mutations as a potential biomarker of resistance. Next, we collected real-world data of 960 patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI and validated that KRAS G12 mutations were significantly associated with poor survival, also in analyses restricted to the RAS / RAF mutant subgroup. We next analyzed the data of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RECOURSE trial ( n  = 800 patients) and found that KRAS G12 mutations ( n  = 279) were predictive biomarkers for reduced overall survival (OS) benefit of FTD/TPI versus placebo (unadjusted interaction P  = 0.0031, adjusted interaction P  = 0.015). For patients with KRAS G12 mutations in the RECOURSE trial, OS was not prolonged with FTD/TPI versus placebo ( n  = 279; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73–1.20; P  = 0.85). In contrast, patients with KRAS G13 mutant tumors showed significantly improved OS with FTD/TPI versus placebo ( n  = 60; HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15–0.55; P  < 0.001). In isogenic cell lines and patient-derived organoids, KRAS G12 mutations were associated with increased resistance to FTD-based genotoxicity. In conclusion, these data show that KRAS G12 mutations are biomarkers for reduced OS benefit of FTD/TPI treatment, with potential implications for approximately 28% of patients with mCRC under consideration for treatment with FTD/TPI. Furthermore, our data suggest that genomics-based precision medicine may be possible for a subset of chemotherapies. A combination of real-world evidence and a reanalysis of phase 3 clinical trial data unveils KRAS codon G12 mutations as a biomarker of resistance to trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.

We aimed to evaluate whether different driver mutations have varying impacts on the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and whether the prognostic roles of PD-L1 amongst our patients were divergent. This was a single-institute study that included patients with NSCLC. Six driver mutations, PD-L1 status, and the outcomes of treatment were assessed. A total of 1,001 NSCLC patients were included for analysis. Overall, the PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥ 1%) and strong positive (TPS ≥ 50%) rates were 52.2% and 17.3%, respectively. As compared with wild type lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR -mutant and HER2 -mutant patients had similarly low PD-L1 and strong PD-L1 positive rates. BRAF -mutant patients had numerically higher PD-L1 and strong PD-L1 positive rates. Patients with fusion mutation ( ALK and ROS1 ) (aOR 2.32 [95% CI 1.10–4.88], P = 0.027 and 2.33 [95% CI 1.11–4.89], P = 0.026), KRAS mutation (aOR 2.58 [95% CI 1.16–5.75], P = 0.020 and 2.44 [95% CI 1.11–5.35], P = 0.026), and non-adenocarcinoma histology (aOR 2.73 [95% CI 1.72–4.34], P < 0.001 and 1.93 [95% CI 1.13–3.30], P = 0.016) all had significantly higher PD-L1 and strong PD-L1 positive rates. A trend towards longer survival was noted in ROS-1 rearranged and KRAS -mutant patients with strong PD-L1 expression who had received crizotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In conclusion, individual driver mutations had various impacts on the PD-L1 expression of NSCLC patients. The prognostic role of PD-L1 may also be divergent amongst patients harboring different driver mutations.

Oncogenic fusions are rare in colorectal carcinomas, but may be important for prognosis and therapy. An effective strategy for screening targetable oncogenic fusions in colorectal carcinomas is needed. Here, we investigate molecular genetic alterations in colorectal carcinomas based on their DNA mismatch repair status, and to effectively screen for targetable oncogenic fusions in colorectal carcinomas. In this retrospective study, the initial cohort included 125 consecutive mismatch repair-deficient and 238 randomly selected mismatch repair-proficient colorectal carcinomas diagnosed between July 2015 and December 2017 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Targeted sequencing was performed. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation analysis was further employed for subgrouping dMMR colorectal carcinomas. Clinicopathological characteristics, molecular features, and survival outcome of colorectal carcinomas harboring oncogenic fusions were assessed. A multicenter cohort comprised of 227 colorectal carcinomas with dual loss of MLH1/PMS2 was used to validate the efficacy of the proposed screening strategy for oncogenic fusions. Of the 363 patients in the initial cohort, 11(3.0%) harbored oncogenic fusions and were all mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinomas with hypermethylated MLH1 and wild-type BRAF and KRAS , comprising 55% (11/20) of this subgroup. These patients with oncogenic fusions showed poorer 3-year cancer-specific survival compared with other Stage III/IV mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma patients (40% vs. 97%), and significantly higher CD274(PD-L1) expression in tumor cells compared with other dMMR colorectal carcinoma patients (46% vs. 6.1%, P  < 0.001). An easy-to-perform and cost-efficient strategy for screening targetable fusions was proposed based on the current molecular testing algorithms for colorectal carcinomas, and validated in an independent multicenter cohort. In conclusion, oncogenic fusions were highly enriched and frequently detected in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinomas with MLH1 hypermethylation and wild-type BRAF and KRAS , and were associated with poor prognosis and high tumor CD274(PD-L1) expression.

Background We evaluated first-line treatment of metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer with short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with immune checkpoint blockade. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (the FLOX regimen; control group) or alternating two cycles each of FLOX and nivolumab (experimental group). Radiographic response assessment was done every eight weeks with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Cox proportional-hazards regression models estimated associations between PFS and relevant variables. A post hoc analysis explored C-reactive protein as signal of responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade. Results Eighty patients were randomised and 38 in each group received treatment. PFS was comparable—control group: median 9.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3–12.7); experimental group: median 9.2 months (95% CI, 4.5–15.0). The adjusted Cox model revealed that experimental-group subjects aged ≥60 had significantly lowered progression risk ( p  = 0.021) with hazard ratio 0.17 (95% CI, 0.04–0.76). Experimental-group patients with C-reactive protein <5.0 mg/L when starting nivolumab ( n  = 17) reached median PFS 15.8 months (95% CI, 7.8–23.7). One-sixth of experimental-group cases (all KRAS/BRAF -mutant) achieved complete response. Conclusions The investigational regimen did not improve the primary outcome for the intention-to-treat population but might benefit small subgroups of patients with previously untreated, metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03388190 (02/01/2018).

Background: The NORDIC-VII study is a randomised phase III trial of cetuximab plus continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) vs FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The present report presents an updated and final survival analysis with BRAF and extended RAS mutational status, 5 years after the primary analysis. Methods: A total of 566 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population of the NORDIC-VII study. Updated survival status was obtained from 176 patients who were alive in the primary survival analyses. Samples from 223 tumours previously found to be KRAS (exon 2) and BRAF (V600E) wild-type, were re-analysed for KRAS (exons 3 and 4) and NRAS (exons 2–4) mutations. Results: Including the extended RAS analyses, RAS and BRAF mutational status was available from 457 patients (81% of the ITT population). RAS was mutated in 46% and BRAF in 12% of the tumours. RAS and BRAF , if mutated, were negative prognostic factors. The updated analyses confirmed the finding of the primary report that cetuximab did not provide any additional benefit when added to FLOX in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours, neither on progression-free nor overall survival. However, the outcomes in a subset of patients, which, after the first eight treatment cycles, received cetuximab alone, suggested a beneficial effect of cetuximab monotherapy. Conclusions: Adding cetuximab to Nordic FLOX did not provide any clinical benefit, but the data suggested an effect of cetuximab monotherapy in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours in the NORDIC-VII cohort. The data were compatible with a negative interaction between cetuximab and the Nordic FLOX chemotherapy backbone.

Background KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are used as predictive biomarkers to select therapy with EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Other factors may be significant determinants of benefit. Methods Individual patient data from randomised trials with a head-to-head comparison between EGFR mAb versus no EGFR mAb (chemotherapy alone or best supportive care) in mCRC, across all lines of therapy, were pooled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups. Treatment effects within the predefined KRAS biomarker subsets were estimated by adjusted hazard ratio (HR adj ) and 95% confidence interval (CI). EGFR mAb efficacy was measured within the KRAS wild-type subgroup according to BRAF and NRAS mutation status. In both KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups, additional factors that could impact EGFR mAb efficacy were explored including the type of chemotherapy, line of therapy, age, sex, tumour sidedness and site of metastasis. Results 5675 patients from 8 studies were included, all with known mCRC KRAS mutation status. OS (HR adj 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.98, p  = 0.01) and PFS benefit (HR adj 0.73, 95% CI 0.68–0.79, p  < 0.001) from EGFR mAbs was observed in the KRAS wild-type group. PFS benefit was seen in patients treated with fluorouracil (HR adj 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.82) but not with capecitabine-containing regimens (HR adj 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.26) ( p interaction  = 0.002). Sidedness also interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy, with survival benefit restricted to left-sided disease ( p interaction  = 0.038). PFS benefits differed according to age, with benefits greater in those under 70 ( p interaction  = 0.001). The survival benefit was not demonstrated in those patients with mutations found in the KRAS, NRAS or BRAF genes. The presence of liver metastases interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy in patients with KRAS mutant mCRC ( p interaction  = 0.004). Conclusion The benefit provided by EGFR mAbs in KRAS WT mCRC is associated with left-sided primary tumour location, younger patient age and absence of NRAS or BRAF mutations. Survival benefit is observed with fluorouracil but not capecitabine. Exploratory results support further research in KRAS mutant mCRC without liver metastases.