Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
120,212
result(s) for
"Questions"
Sort by:
Forcing “\\(\\mathrm {NS}_{\\omega _1}\\) is \\(\\omega _1\\)-Dense” from Large Cardinals
We answer a question of Woodin [3] by showing that “\\(\\mathrm {NS}_{\\omega _1}\\) is \\(\\omega _1\\)-dense” holds in a stationary set preserving extension of any universe with a cardinal \\(\\kappa \\) which is a limit of \\({<}\\kappa \\)-supercompact cardinals. We introduce a new forcing axiom \\(\\mathrm {Q}\\)-Maximum, prove it consistent from a supercompact limit of supercompact cardinals, and show that it implies the version of Woodin’s \\((*)\\)-axiom for \\(\\mathbb Q_{\\mathrm {max}}\\). It follows that \\(\\mathrm {Q}\\)-Maximum implies “\\(\\mathrm {NS}_{\\omega _1}\\) is \\(\\omega _1\\)-dense.” Along the way we produce a number of other new instances of Asperó–Schindler’s \\(\\mathrm {MM}^{++}\\Rightarrow (*)\\) (see [1]).To force \\(\\mathrm {Q}\\)-Maximum, we develop a method which allows for iterating \\(\\omega _1\\)-preserving forcings which may destroy stationary sets, without collapsing \\(\\omega _1\\). We isolate a new regularity property for \\(\\omega _1\\)-preserving forcings called respectfulness which lies at the heart of the resulting iteration theorem.In the second part, we show that the \\(\\kappa \\)-mantle, i.e., the intersection of all grounds which extend to V via forcing of size \\({<}\\kappa \\), may fail to be a model of \\(\\mathrm {AC}\\) for various types of \\(\\kappa \\). Most importantly, it can be arranged that \\(\\kappa \\) is a Mahlo cardinal. This answers a question of Usuba [2].Abstract prepared by Andreas LietzE-mail: andreas.lietz@tuwien.ac.at.URL: https://andreas-lietz.github.io/resources/PDFs/AJourneyGuidedByThe Stars.pdf.
Journal Article
Yo! wiksas? = Hi! how are you? : an illustrated conversation with the invisible girl Siri
\"Hello! Wik'sas? is a book for curious kids who ask big questions - and adults who help them discover the answers. It is an illustrated conversation between Isla and Ethan - son and daughter of Kwakwaka'wakw, Chief Rande Ola K'alapa (Cook), a much loved artist of mixed European and Indigenous decent - and their invisible friend Siri. Isabel Rogers, also a kid, is part of the storytelling process. We want this book to be a bridge, a route to one important thing: kindness... There are serious questions asked in this book, which provide an opportunity to discuss bullying, environmental protection, and inclusivity - all very important topics for children. We want lots and lots of kids to share in our fun and to think about their own questions, and discover the answers to them. This book will also be a useful classroom adjunct to interpersonal relationships and a key to opening the potential for student narratives.\"-- Provided by publisher.
Book
Réalités éphémères
These “RÉALITÉS ÉPHÉMÈRES” are not just the result of a photographer’s work; they are the fruit of a process of reflection that gradually took shape over the course of the photographs taken. It began with an aesthetic search and ended with a questioning of the consequences of grafting a multifactorial parergon, both natural and human, onto a simple advertising poster. Why, or in what way are these factors more questioning than others about our hyperconsumerist tendencies? What impact do these RÉALITÉS ÉPHÉMÈRES have on our economic, social, philosophical or artistic awareness of the world we live in? That’s what Jean-Philippe Ritz is trying to answer.
Journal Article
Little kids first big book of why 2
\"Following up on the best-selling Little Kids First Big Book of Why, the next book in the hit Little Kids First Big Book series features even more of the endless \"Why?\" questions preschoolers love to ask!\"--Publisher's description.
Book
A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960 (National bureau of economic research)
Writing in the June 1965 issue of theEconomic Journal, Harry G. Johnson begins with a sentence seemingly calibrated to the scale of the book he set himself to review: \"The long-awaited monetary history of the United States by Friedman and Schwartz is in every sense of the term a monumental scholarly achievement--monumental in its sheer bulk, monumental in the definitiveness of its treatment of innumerable issues, large and small . . . monumental, above all, in the theoretical and statistical effort and ingenuity that have been brought to bear on the solution of complex and subtle economic issues.\"
Friedman and Schwartz marshaled massive historical data and sharp analytics to support the claim that monetary policy--steady control of the money supply--matters profoundly in the management of the nation's economy, especially in navigating serious economic fluctuations. In their influential chapter 7,The Great Contraction--which Princeton published in 1965 as a separate paperback--they address the central economic event of the century, the Depression. According to Hugh Rockoff, writing in January 1965: \"If Great Depressions could be prevented through timely actions by the monetary authority (or by a monetary rule), as Friedman and Schwartz had contended, then the case for market economies was measurably stronger.\"
Milton Friedman won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2000 for work related toA Monetary Historyas well as to his other Princeton University Press book,A Theory of the Consumption Function(1957).
eBook
My book about me, by me myself : I wrote it! I drew it!
A series of questions for the reader to answer about himself: \"I have [teeth] up top. I have [teeth] downstairs.\"
Book
Peer review declaration
All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: We assign 2 different reviewers for 1 article. The reviewer can see whose article is it. Conference submission management system: http://ice-elinvo.uny.ac.id/ (our University has our own management system for reviewing articles) • Number of submissions received: 64 • Number of submissions sent for review: 57 (7 papers did not meet the requirement for further review) • Number of submissions accepted: 50 Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (50/64)*100% = 78% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 Any additional info on review process: Each reviewer gives a score and decides whether the article: 1. Accepted without correction 2. Accepted with a minor correction 3. Accepted with major correction, or 4. Rejected There are six questions for helping the reviewer to score the article: 1. Is the paper relevant to the conference theme? 2. Does it contribute to the theoretical or practical domains? 3. Does it state the problem statement? 4. Does it comprise an appropriate research methodology or proposed method? 5. Does it describe indicative results? 6. Does it fulfill the requirements of the paper template? 7. Each question has 4 scores (1-4) so the final score should be 4 – 24. Contact person for queries: Nurkhamid, Department of Electronics and Informatics Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Email: nurkhamid@uny.ac.id.
Journal Article
National Geographic little kids first big book of why
Using a question-and-answer format and content grounded in a child's immediate world this books delivers information on the world around us.
Book
Braucht es noch den Generalisten – oder können wir es uns leisten, ohne ihn auszukommen?
Seit einigen Jahren wird immer wieder die Frage gestellt, ob es einen Generalisten in der Chirurgie überhaupt noch braucht. Häufig werden diejenigen, die noch an einem Generalisten festhalten, als die Ewiggestrigen bezeichnet, denn modern sei allein die Spezialisierung. Dass die Spezialisierung voll im Gange und die Patientenversorgung dadurch besser geworden ist, ist sicherlich unstrittig. Dennoch bleibt die Frage, ob eine Versorgung der Bevölkerung flächendeckend und in allen Situationen, auf die wir uns vorbereiten müssen, zielführend ist. Und wenn der Generalist noch gebraucht wird, dann wofür, für welche Situation, für welche Aufgabe, und wie muss er fort- und weitergebildet sein? Diese Fragen sollen im vorliegenden Beitrag aufgegriffen und es soll versucht werden, eine Antwort darauf zu finden – ergänzt durch einen kleinen Blick in die Zukunft.
Journal Article