Explore the vast range of titles available.

Simplified treatment regimens for HIV-1 may have advantages. In this open-label, randomized, controlled trial, patients with HIV-1 infection who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy were given oral induction therapy, then treated with either monthly injections of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine or standard treatment. At 48 weeks, similar viral suppression was observed with the two regimens.

Phase 3 clinical studies showed non-inferiority of long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine dosed every 4 weeks to oral antiretroviral therapy. Important phase 2 results of every 8 weeks dosing, and supportive modelling, underpin further evaluation of every 8 weeks dosing in this trial, which has the potential to offer greater convenience. Our objective was to compare the week 48 antiviral efficacy of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting dosed every 8 weeks with that of every 4 weeks dosing. ATLAS-2M is an ongoing, randomised, multicentre (13 countries; Australia, Argentina, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the USA), open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority study of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting maintenance therapy administered intramuscularly every 8 weeks (cabotegravir 600 mg plus rilpivirine 900 mg) or every 4 weeks (cabotegravir 400 mg plus rilpivirine 600 mg) to treatment-experienced adults living with HIV-1. Eligible newly recruited individuals must have received an uninterrupted first or second oral standard-of-care regimen for at least 6 months without virological failure and be aged 18 years or older. Eligible participants from the ATLAS trial, from both the oral standard-of-care and long-acting groups, must have completed the 52-week comparative phase with an ATLAS-2M screening plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting every 8 weeks or every 4 weeks. The randomisation schedule was generated by means of the GlaxoSmithKline validated randomisation software RANDALL NG. The primary endpoint at week 48 was HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL (Snapshot, intention-to-treat exposed), with a non-inferiority margin of 4%. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03299049 and is ongoing. Screening occurred between Oct 27, 2017, and May 31, 2018. Of 1149 individuals screened, 1045 participants were randomised to the every 8 weeks (n=522) or every 4 weeks (n=523) groups; 37% (n=391) transitioned from every 4 weeks cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting in ATLAS. Median participant age was 42 years (IQR 34–50); 27% (n=280) female at birth; 73% (n=763) white race. Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting every 8 weeks was non-inferior to dosing every 4 weeks (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL; 2% vs 1%) with an adjusted treatment difference of 0·8 (95% CI −0·6–2·2). There were eight (2%, every 8 weeks group) and two (<1%, every 4 weeks group) confirmed virological failures (two sequential measures ≥200 copies per mL). For the every 8 weeks group, five (63%) of eight had archived non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations to rilpivirine at baseline. The safety profile was similar between dosing groups, with 844 (81%) of 1045 participants having adverse events (excluding injection site reactions); no treatment-related deaths occurred. The efficacy and safety profiles of dosing every 8 weeks and dosing every 4 weeks were similar. These results support the use of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting administered every 2 months as a therapeutic option for people living with HIV-1. ViiV Healthcare and Janssen.

Simplified treatment regimens for HIV management may increase adherence. In this open-label, randomized, controlled trial, longer-acting (monthly) injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine was compared with standard oral treatment. At 48 weeks, similar viral suppression was seen with the two regimens.

In this study involving 1257 pregnancies among persons treated for HIV-1 infection during pregnancy, dolutegravir was better at suppressing viral loads than other regimens, without evident safety concerns.

•There is a great preference for HIV regimens with less frequency of administration while maintaining high efficacy. Dual antiretroviral therapy have proven to be effective as the standard triple combined antiretroviral therapy.•This systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant difference in terms efficacy between the oral standard of care and cabotegravir/rilpivirine long acting injections. We found more treatment-related adverse effects with the oral therapy. Similarly, more participants withdrew in the oral arm withdrew from the study due adverse effects.•The pool estimates from this meta-analysis suggest that the long acting cabotegravir /rilpivirine injection is safe and equally effective as the oral standard of care. Thereby supporting evidence from clinical trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cabotegravir/rilpivirine long-acting formulation compared to oral standard of care at 48 and 52 weeks. We conducted an electronic search (2005–2024) across databases for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine with oral triple ART regimens. We analyzed efficacy and safety (treatment discontinuation and adverse effects). We used proportions of participants maintaining viral suppression, experiencing adverse drug effects or discontinuing treatment due to trial regimen, risk ratios, and 95% confidence intervals for pooled estimates. Five RCTs with 2215 participants were analyzed, with 1390 receiving cabotegravir/rilpivirine injections. The analysis found long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine as effective as oral ART for viral load suppression (RR [P = 0.23, 0.99 95% CI; 0.97–1.01], I2 = 0%) up to 52 weeks. However, more adverse effects were reported with the oral treatment [RR 1.32 (95% CI; 1.12–1.54), I2 = 56%]. Pooled reports showed a significant an increased risk of treatment withdrawal in the oral group, [RR 3.61 (95% CI; 0.87–14.98), I2 = 53 Findings from this meta-analysis emphasised the efficacy and safety of Cabotegravir/rilpivirine long-acting formulation in providing long-term maintenance of viral load suppression in HIV-1 infection with a tolerable safety profile.

The use of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (LA CAB/RPV) is a novel approach to manage human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This injectable regimen offers benefits such as an improved quality of life, reduced stigma and enhanced treatment satisfaction by minimising the need for daily medication adherence. This review summarises the findings of clinical trials and real-world studies on the safety, tolerability and metabolic effects of LA CAB/RPV, which are areas that have received less extensive coverage in previous reviews. Clinical trial data suggest that LA CAB/RPV is generally safe and well tolerated. The most common side effects were injection site reactions, affecting 70–97% of participants. However, these were typically mild and short lived, rarely leading to treatment discontinuation in fewer than 2–3% of cases. Systemic side effects were minimal and comparable to those observed with traditional oral antiretroviral therapy. Real-world studies corroborated these findings, reporting low discontinuation rates due to adverse events. Regarding metabolic impact, clinical trials showed minimal weight gain (an average increase of 1–2 kg over 48–96 weeks) with no significant differences or impact on lipid and glucose levels. Although real-world data are still emerging, they suggest similar trends, including a possible improvement in lipid profiles. Overall, LA CAB/RPV appears to be a safe, well-tolerated and effective treatment option, although longer-term follow-up is needed.

Background: Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) with cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB + RPV) has emerged as a promising alternative to daily oral regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH), particularly those facing adherence challenges. While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy, real-world evidence remains limited. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CAB + RPV in 160 virologically suppressed PLWH across eight Italian infectious disease units. Participants received intramuscular CAB (600 mg) and RPV (900 mg) every eight weeks without an oral lead-in phase. Clinical, immunological, and biochemical parameters were assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks. Results: At week 24, 96.25% of participants maintained virological suppression, and the proportion of individuals with target-not-detected viral load increased from 71% to 76%. Only one case of virological failure was observed. Significant immunological improvements included an increase in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio (p = 0.0038) and a reduction in CD8+ T-cell count (p = 0.0150). Biochemical analysis showed a decrease in serum creatinine (p < 0.0001) and an increase in HDL cholesterol (p = 0.0223). Treatment discontinuation occurred in 3.75% of participants, primarily due to adverse events or psychological factors. Conclusions: CAB + RPV demonstrated high efficacy and tolerability in a real-world setting, with favorable immunological and metabolic outcomes. These findings support its use as a viable therapeutic option for PLWH, especially those with adherence barriers. Further long-term studies are warranted to confirm these results across broader populations.

HIV prevention and treatment with injectable cabotegravir and/or rilpivirine administered once every 4 to 8 weeks is an attractive alternative to daily therapy. Prescribed dosage and drug concentrations in plasma are based on patient data collected in clinical trials, but actual patients are expected to exhibit more variability in drug concentrations, which is important to quantify. Here, we demonstrate the first quantitative point-of-care assay with a miniature mass spectrometer to assess these drug concentrations in whole blood. Quantitative performance is obtained using paper spray ionization in combination with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in the clinically relevant concentration range of both drugs. Limits of quantitation (LoQs) of cabotegravir and rilpivirine are measured to be 750 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL, respectively. The assay turnaround time is < 4 min, and strong linear relationships are established between MS/MS responses and concentration, with percentage of relative standard deviations (RSDs) that are <15% at concentrations above the LoQs. The speed, portability, low power consumption, and specificity offered by the miniature instrument should make it an appropriate platform for measuring drug concentrations in a walk-in clinic using small volumes of patient blood.

Background: The high effectiveness and safety of the two-drug (2DRs) strategy using dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (3TC) have led to international guidelines recommending their use for treatment-naive HIV patients. In virologically suppressed patients, de-escalating from 3DRs to DTG plus either rilpivirine (RPV) or 3TC has shown high rates of virological suppression. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the real-life data of two multicenter Spanish cohorts of PLWHIV treated with DTG plus 3TC (SPADE-3) or RPV (DORIPEX) as a switch strategy, not only in terms of virological suppression, safety, and durability but also in terms of immune restoration. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with virological suppression on DTG plus 3TC and DTG plus RPV at weeks 24 and 48. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who experienced the protocol-defined loss of virological control by week 48; changes in immune status in terms of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte counts and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio; the rate, incidence, and reasons for discontinuation of treatment over the 48-week study period; and safety profiles at weeks 24 and 48. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, multicenter study of 638 and 943 virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients in two cohorts who switched to 2DRs with DTG plus RPV or DTG plus 3TC. Results: The most frequent reasons for starting DTG-based 2DRs were treatment simplification/pill burden or drug decrease. The virological suppression rates were 96.9%, 97.4%, and 99.1% at weeks 24, 48, and 96, respectively. The proportion of patients with virological failure over the 48-week study period was 0.01%. Adverse drug reactions were uncommon. Patients treated with DTG+3TC increased CD4, CD8, and CD4/CD8 parameters at 24 and 48 weeks. Conclusions: We conclude that DTG-based 2DRs (combined with 3TC or RPV) in clinical practice were effective and safe as a switching strategy, with a low VF and high viral suppression rates. Both regimens were well tolerated, and ADR rates were low, including neurotoxicity and induced treatment discontinuations.

Little information is available on the efficacy and safety of the dual combination of ripivirine plus dolutegravir. This work aims at beginning to fill this gap. All HIV-1 infected subjects treated with ripivirine plus dolutegravir between October 2014 and September 2015 in eight Italian centres were included in an observational cohort. Data were collected at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. One hundred and thirty-two subjects were followed for a median of 24 months, mean 33 months. One subject discontinued the study drug at week 24 for headache, one for drug interaction and one died after week 24 of illicit drug abuse. The mean age was 51.8, females 31.7% and non-caucasians 10%. Fifty-seven (43.2%) had at least one failure in their treatment history. Reasons for switching were simplification (53.0%), toxicity (34.8%), drug interactions (n = 7), persistent low-level viremia (n = 4), non-adherence (n = 3) and viral failure (n = 2). Sixty patients (45.5%) had reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations and 69 (44,7%) had protease (PR) mutations. Sixteen had baseline viral replication, 27 had < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and in 89 (67.4%) no virus was detected (NVD, 0 copies/mL). At w4, 114 (86.4%) had NVD, 15 had 1 to 49 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and 3 had 50 to 57 copies/mL. At week 24 one subject had viral rebound without mutations due to missed drug refill, 19 had 1 to 49 copies/mL, and 112 had NVD. All 132 subjects were tested at weeks 4 and 24. Of the 50 subjects who had a 48-week follow-up, one had a treatment interruption, four had 1 to 49 copies/mL and 45 had NVD. Among the entire population, one subject had low-level, one intermediate and 4 high-level resistance to rilpivirine: none failed by week 48. Mean serum creatinine increased by +0.1 mg/dL. During the follow-up one patient reported headache and insomnia. Ripivirine plus dolutegravir proved safe and effective in this cohort of non-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects.