Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
245,724
result(s) for
"Semantics."
Sort by:
Retraction Notice: A Review of Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Methods for 2D Data in the Context of Deep Learning
We, the Publisher, have retracted the following article: Meng Gao, Haifeng Sima(2025). A Review of Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Methods for 2D Data in the Context of Deep Learning. EAI Endorsed Trans e-Learn. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetel.8433The article has been retracted due to misconduct during the peer review process. This does not implicate any wrongdoing from the author’s side.We informed the authors about this decision. The retracted article will remain, and it has been watermarked as “RETRACTED”.
Journal Article
INDEXICALS: A PROBLEM FOR CHALMERS' TWO-DIMENSIONAL SEMANTICS
Como el propio Chalmers señala, su semántica bidimensional conduce al problema de cómo los escenarios–es decir, los mundos epistémicamente posibles– pueden representar de la mejor manera la información acerca de quién soy, dónde estoy y qué hora es ahora. Para Chalmers, la solución natural a este problema de la indexicalidad consiste en identificar los escenarios con mundos centrados-, tupias ordenadas de mundos (posibles), individuos, tiempos y lugares. Según esta solución, dos casos arbitrarios de \"ahora\" y \"aquí\" (respectivamente) tienen la misma intensión primaria (o epistémica), al designar el tiempo o el lugar marcados en el centro de cualquier escenario dado. Frente a esto, objetaré que hayr enunciados de \"Ahora = ahora\" y \"Aquí = aquí\" que son verdaderos a posteriori, es decir, epistémicamente contingentes. Dado que identificar los escenarios con mundos centrados parece ser la solución natural al problema de la indexicalidad, esto socavará la semántica bidimensional de Chalmers. PALABRAS CLAVE: mundos centrados, posibilidad epistémica, enunciados de identidad, verdades necesarias a posteriori, intensiones primarias SUMMARY: As Chalmers himself notes, his two-dimensional semantics leads to the problem of how scenarios, i.e. epistemically possible worlds, can best represent the information who I am, where I am, and what time it is now. For Chalmers, the natural solution to this problem of indexicality is to identify scenarios with centered worlds: ordered tuples of (possible) worlds, individuals, times, and places. According to such a solution, two arbitrary tokens of 'now' and 'here' (respectively) have the same primary (or epistemic) intension, picking out the time/place marked at the center of any given scenario. Against this, I will object that there are a posteriori true, i.e. epistemically contingent, utterances of both 'Now = now' and 'Here = here'. Since identifying scenarios with centered worlds seems to be the natural solution to the problem of indexicality, this will undermine Chalmers' two-dimensional semantics. KEYWORDS: centered worlds, epistemic possibility, identity statements, necessary a posteriori truths, primary' intensions
Journal Article
Correction: Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217051.].
Journal Article
