Explore the vast range of titles available.

The interaction of T-cell receptors with peptide-major histocompatibility complex molecules (TCR-pMHC) plays a crucial role in adaptive immune responses. Currently there are various models aiming at predicting TCR-pMHC binding, while a standard dataset and procedure to compare the performance of these approaches is still missing. In this work we provide a general method for data collection, preprocessing, splitting and generation of negative examples, as well as comprehensive datasets to compare TCR-pMHC prediction models. We collected, harmonized, and merged all the major publicly available TCR-pMHC binding data and compared the performance of five state-of-the-art deep learning models (TITAN, NetTCR-2.0, ERGO, DLpTCR and ImRex) using this data. Our performance evaluation focuses on two scenarios: 1) different splitting methods for generating training and testing data to assess model generalization and 2) different data versions that vary in size and peptide imbalance to assess model robustness. Our results indicate that the five contemporary models do not generalize to peptides that have not been in the training set. We can also show that model performance is strongly dependent on the data balance and size, which indicates a relatively low model robustness. These results suggest that TCR-pMHC binding prediction remains highly challenging and requires further high quality data and novel algorithmic approaches.

T cell receptors (TCR) define the specificity of T cells and are responsible for their interaction with peptide antigen targets presented in complex with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Understanding the rules underlying this interaction hence forms the foundation for our understanding of basic adaptive immunology. Over the last decade, efforts have been dedicated to developing assays for high throughput identification of peptide-specific TCRs. Based on such data, several computational methods have been proposed for predicting the TCR-pMHC interaction. The general conclusion from these studies is that the prediction of TCR interactions with MHC-peptide complexes remains highly challenging. Several reasons form the basis for this including scarcity and quality of data, and ill-defined modeling objectives imposed by the high redundancy of the available data. In this work, we propose a framework for dealing with this redundancy, allowing us to address essential questions related to the modeling of TCR specificity including the use of peptide- versus pan-specific models, how to best define negative data, and the performance impact of integrating of CDR1 and 2 loops. Further, we illustrate how and why it is strongly recommended to include simple similarity-based modeling approaches when validating an improved predictive power of machine learning models, and that such validation should include a performance evaluation as a function of “distance” to the training data, to quantify the potential for generalization of the proposed model. The conclusion of the work is that, given current data, TCR specificity is best modeled using peptide-specific approaches, integrating information from all 6 CDR loops, and with negative data constructed from a combination of true and mislabeled negatives. Comparing such machine learning models to similarity-based approaches demonstrated an increased performance gain of the former as the “distance” to the training data was increased; thus demonstrating an improved generalization ability of the machine learning-based approaches. We believe these results demonstrate that the outlined modeling framework and proposed evaluation strategy form a solid basis for investigating the modeling of TCR specificities and that adhering to such a framework will allow for faster progress within the field. The final devolved model, NetTCR-2.1, is available at https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetTCR-2.1 .

Predicting the interaction between Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I-presented peptides and T-cell receptors (TCR) holds significant implications for vaccine development, cancer treatment, and autoimmune disease therapies. However, limited paired-chain TCR data, skewed towards well-studied epitopes, hampers the development of pan-specific machine-learning (ML) models. Leveraging a larger peptide-TCR dataset, we explore various alterations to the ML architectures and training strategies to address data imbalance. This leads to an overall improved performance, particularly for peptides with scant TCR data. However, challenges persist for unseen peptides, especially those distant from training examples. We demonstrate that such ML models can be used to detect potential outliers, which when removed from training, leads to augmented performance. Integrating pan-specific and peptide-specific models alongside with similarity-based predictions, further improves the overall performance, especially when a low false positive rate is desirable. In the context of the IMMREP22 benchmark, this modeling framework attained state-of-the-art performance. Moreover, combining these strategies results in acceptable predictive accuracy for peptides characterized with as little as 15 positive TCRs. This observation places great promise on rapidly expanding the peptide covering of the current models for predicting TCR specificity. The NetTCR 2.2 model incorporating these advances is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/mnielLab/NetTCR-2.2 ) and as a web server at https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetTCR-2.2/ .

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are key mediators of peripheral self-tolerance and alterations in their frequencies, stability, and function have been linked to autoimmunity. The antigen-specific induction of Tregs is a long-envisioned goal for the treatment of autoimmune diseases given reduced side effects compared to general immunosuppressive therapies. However, the translation of antigen-specific Treg inducing therapies for the treatment or prevention of autoimmune diseases into the clinic remains challenging. In this mini review, we will discuss promising results for antigen-specific Treg therapies in allergy and specific challenges for such therapies in autoimmune diseases, with a focus on type 1 diabetes (T1D). We will furthermore discuss opportunities for antigen-specific Treg therapies in T1D, including combinatorial strategies and tissue-specific Treg targeting. Specifically, we will highlight recent advances in miRNA-targeting as a means to foster Tregs in autoimmunity. Additionally, we will discuss advances and perspectives of computational strategies for the detailed analysis of tissue-specific Tregs on the single-cell level.

Rapid identification of T cell receptors (TCRs) that specifically bind patient-unique neoepitopes is a critical challenge for personalized TCR-based therapies in oncology. Due to enormous diversity of both TCR and neoepitope repertoires, a machine learning predictor of TCR-pMHC specificity for personalized therapy must generalize to TCRs and epitopes not seen in the training data. We estimate the necessary size of such training data. We first confirm that published models fail to generalize beyond a single-residue dissimilarity to the epitope training set distribution. We then impute the point-mutation ligandome across the 34 most prevalent human MHC alleles and represent it as a graph based on our established dissimilarity cutoff. By finding the dominating set of this graph, we estimate that between one and 100 million epitopes are required to train a generalizable sequence-based TCR specificity prediction model—1000 times the size of current public data.

Accurate modeling of T cell receptor (TCR)–peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interactions is critical for understanding immune recognition. In this study, we present advances in structural modeling of TCR-pMHC class I complexes focusing on improving docking quality scoring and structural model selection using graph neural networks (GNN). We find that AlphaFold-Multimer’s confidence score in certain cases correlates poorly with DockQ quality scores, leading to overestimation of model accuracy. Our proposed GNN solution achieves a 25% increase in Spearman’s correlation between predicted quality and DockQ (from 0.681 to 0.855) and improves docking candidate ranking. Additionally, the GNN completely avoids selection of failed structures. Additionally, we assess the ability of our models to distinguish binding from non-binding TCR-pMHC interactions based on their predicted quality. Here, we demonstrate that our proposed model, particularly for high-quality structural models, is capable of discriminating between binding and non-binding complexes in a zero-shot setting. However, our findings also underlined that the structural pipeline struggled to generate sufficiently accurate TCR-pMHC models for reliable binding classification, highlighting the need for further improvements in modeling accuracy.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic offers a powerful opportunity to develop methods for monitoring the spread of infectious diseases based on their signatures in population immunity. Adaptive immune receptor repertoire sequencing (AIRR-seq) has become the method of choice for identifying T cell receptor (TCR) biomarkers encoding pathogen specificity and immunological memory. AIRR-seq can detect imprints of past and ongoing infections and facilitate the study of individual responses to SARS-CoV-2, as shown in many recent studies. Methods The new batch effect correction method allowed us to use data from different batches together, as well as combine the analysis for data obtained using different protocols. Proper standardization of AIRR-seq batches, access to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, and the use of both α- and β-chain sequences of TCRs resulted in a high-quality biomarker database and a robust and highly accurate classifier for COVID-19 exposure. Results Here, we have applied a machine learning approach to two large AIRR-seq datasets with more than 1,200 high-quality repertoires from healthy and COVID-19-convalescent donors to infer TCR repertoire features that were induced by SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Conclusions This developed classifier is applicable to individual TCR repertoires obtained using various protocols, paving the way to AIRR-seq-based immune status assessment in large cohorts of donors.

Advancements in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics algorithms have expanded our ability to identify tumor-specific somatic mutation-derived antigens (neoantigens). While recent studies have shown neoantigens to be compelling targets for cancer immunotherapy due to their foreign nature and high immunogenicity, the need for increasingly accurate and cost-effective approaches to rapidly identify neoantigens remains a challenging task, but essential for successful cancer immunotherapy. Currently, gene expression analysis and algorithms for variant calling can be used to generate lists of mutational profiles across patients, but more care is needed to curate these lists and prioritize the candidate neoantigens most capable of inducing an immune response. A growing amount of evidence suggests that only a handful of somatic mutations predicted by mutational profiling approaches act as immunogenic neoantigens. Hence, unbiased screening of all candidate neoantigens predicted by Whole Genome Sequencing/Whole Exome Sequencing may be necessary to more comprehensively access the full spectrum of immunogenic neoepitopes. Once putative cancer neoantigens are identified, one of the largest bottlenecks in translating these neoantigens into actionable targets for cell-based therapies is identifying the cognate T cell receptors (TCRs) capable of recognizing these neoantigens. While many TCR-directed screening and validation assays have utilized bulk samples in the past, there has been a recent surge in the number of single-cell assays that provide a more granular understanding of the factors governing TCR-pMHC interactions. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of existing strategies to identify candidate neoantigens using genomics-based approaches and methods for assessing neoantigen immunogenicity. Additionally, applications, prospects, and limitations of some of the current single-cell technologies will be discussed. Finally, we will briefly summarize some of the recent models that have been used to predict TCR antigen specificity and analyze the TCR receptor repertoire.

There is accumulating evidence that T regulatory cells have an important role in maintaining immune tolerance of innocuous environmental antigens, preventing autoimmune diseases, and regulating clinical responses to environmental allergens. The numerous factors postulated to influence the risk of allergic diseases and asthma (prenatal, perinatal, genetic, dietary, and environmental) may well all operate, at least in part, through an influence on T regulatory cell function. It is therefore important to understand these interactions so that they can be manipulated to prevent or cure allergy.

Predicting the binding specificity of T Cell Receptors (TCR) to MHC-peptide complexes (pMHCs) is essential for the development of repertoire-based biomarkers. This affinity may be affected by different components of the TCR, the peptide, and the MHC allele. Historically, the main element used in TCR-peptide binding prediction was the Complementarity Determining Region 3 (CDR3) of the beta chain. However, recently the contribution of other components, such as the alpha chain and the other V gene CDRs has been suggested. We use a highly accurate novel deep learning-based TCR-peptide binding predictor to assess the contribution of each component to the binding. We have previously developed ERGO-I (pEptide tcR matchinG predictiOn), a sequence-based T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide binding predictor that employs natural language processing (NLP) -based methods. We improved it to create ERGO-II by adding the CDR3 alpha segment, the MHC typing, V and J genes, and T cell type (CD4+ or CD8+) as to the predictor. We then estimate the contribution of each component to the prediction. ERGO-II provides for the first time high accuracy prediction of TCR-peptide for previously unseen peptides. For most tested peptides and all measures of binding prediction accuracy, the main contribution was from the beta chain CDR3 sequence, followed by the beta chain V and J and the alpha chain, in that order. The MHC allele was the least contributing component. ERGO-II is accessible as a webserver at http://tcr2.cs.biu.ac.il/ and as a standalone code at https://github.com/IdoSpringer/ERGO-II.