Explore the vast range of titles available.

Locally advanced cervical cancer is treated with chemoradiotherapy (standard of care), but many patients still relapse and die from metastatic disease. We investigated chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy to determine whether induction chemotherapy improves both progression-free survival and overall survival. The INTERLACE trial was a multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial done at 32 medical centres in Brazil, India, Italy, Mexico, and the UK. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2008 stage IB1 disease with nodal involvement, or stage IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB, or IVA disease) were randomly assigned (1:1), by minimisation, using a central electronic system, to standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (once-a-week intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2 for 5 weeks with 45·0–50·4 Gy external beam radiotherapy delivered in 20–28 fractions plus brachytherapy to achieve a minimum total 2 Gy equivalent dose of 78–86 Gy) alone or induction chemotherapy (once-a-week intravenous carboplatin area under the receiver operator curve 2 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 6 weeks) followed by standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Stratification factors were recruiting site, stage, nodal status, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, age, tumour size, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival within the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01566240, and EUDRACT, 2011-001300-35. Between Nov 8, 2012, and Nov 17, 2022, 500 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy alone group (n=250) or the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group. Of 500 patients, 354 (70%) had stage IIB disease and 56 (11%) stage IIIB disease. Pelvic lymph nodes were positive in 215 (43%) patients. 230 (92%) patients who received induction chemotherapy had at least five cycles. Median interval between induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was 7 days. Four or more cycles of cisplatin were given to 212 (85%) participants in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and to 224 (90%) of participants in the chemoradiotherapy alone group. 462 (92%) participants received external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy with a median overall treatment time of 45 days. After a median follow-up of 67 months, 5-year progression-free survival rates were 72% in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and 64% in the chemoradiotherapy alone group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·65 (95% CI 0·46–0·91, p=0·013). 5-year overall survival rates were 80% in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and 72% in the chemoradiotherapy alone group, with an HR of 0·60 (95% CI 0·40–0·91, p=0·015). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported in 147 (59%) of 250 individuals in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group versus 120 (48%) of 250 individuals in the chemoradiotherapy alone group. Short-course induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer Research UK and University College London–University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.

At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We report the overall survival results from the second interim analysis of this study. Eligible patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2–IIB with node-positive disease or stage III–IVA regardless of nodal status), locally advanced, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive five cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Pembrolizumab or placebo and cisplatin were administered intravenously. Patients were stratified at randomisation by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cervical cancer stage at screening (FIGO 2014 stage IB2–IIB node positive vs III–IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy [equivalent dose of 2 Gy]). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by investigator or by histopathological confirmation of suspected disease progression and overall survival defined as the time from randomisation to death due to any cause. Safety was a secondary endpoint. Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 patients at 176 sites in 30 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 patients in the pembrolizumab–chemoradiotherapy group and 531 patients in the placebo–chemoradiotherapy group. At the protocol-specified second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 8, 2024), median follow-up was 29·9 months (IQR 23·3–34·3). Median overall survival was not reached in either group; 36-month overall survival was 82·6% (95% CI 78·4–86·1) in the pembrolizumab–chemoradiotherapy group and 74·8% (70·1–78·8) in the placebo–chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio for death was 0·67 (95% CI 0·50–0·90; p=0·0040), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. 413 (78%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab–chemoradiotherapy group and 371 (70%) of 530 in the placebo–chemoradiotherapy group had a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with anaemia, white blood cell count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased being the most common adverse events. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 206 (39%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab–chemoradiotherapy group and 90 (17%) of 530 patients in the placebo–chemoradiotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945. Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer These data, together with results from the first interim analysis, support this immuno-chemoradiotherapy strategy as a new standard of care for this population. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial that compared myomectomy with uterine-artery embolization in women who had symptomatic uterine fibroids and wanted to avoid hysterectomy, myomectomy resulted in a better fibroid-related quality of life at 2 years than uterine-artery embolization.

•Fiber consumption >18.7g/1000 kcal is associated with less frequency of constipation.•Diet modified in fiber, lactose, and fat lowers the risk of mild constipation.•During radiotherapy recommended avoiding fiber is not justified. The most frequent early gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity symptoms are nausea (58%), diarrhea (46.7%), and vomiting (45.5%) in patients with cervical cancer (CC). Approximately 90% of patients undergoing abdominopelvic radiotherapy present with changes in the GI tract, such as degenerative alterations in mucosal epithelial cells and nutrient malabsorption. To evaluate the effect of a diet modified in fiber, lactose, and fat on the prevention of chemoradiotherapy (QTRT)-induced GI toxicity compared to the usual prescription in women with locally advanced CC. A total of 134 women with a confirmed diagnosis of CC in locally advanced stages (IB2-IVA) were included in a randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2017 and March 2020. The intervention group (IG) received a modified diet of fiber, lactose, and fat, while the usual prescription group (UP) followed habitual nutritional recommendations. Toxicity was measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. A total of 134 women were included in the IG (65) and UP (69) groups. The mean age in the IG and UP groups were 47.2±13.4 and 49.7±14.2 years, respectively. Radiotherapy doses received by the IG and UP groups were 50.1±6.7 and 49.9±4.6 Gy, respectively. IG had a lower risk of presenting with mild constipation compared to the UP (hazard ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.28–0.76, P<0.01). Patients with locally advanced stages of CC undergoing QTRT who received fiber, lactose, and fat-modified diet may have a lower risk of mild constipation during abdominal radiotherapy.

Recurrent cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease, with limited treatment options available when disease progression occurs after first-line combination therapy. We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive tisotumab vedotin monotherapy (2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival. A total of 502 patients underwent randomization (253 were assigned to the tisotumab vedotin group and 249 to the chemotherapy group); the groups were similar with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the tisotumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (11.5 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.8 to 14.9] vs. 9.5 months [95% CI, 7.9 to 10.7]), results that represented a 30% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; two-sided P<0.001). The confirmed objective response rate was 17.8% in the tisotumab vedotin group and 5.2% in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.6; two-sided P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of patients in the tisotumab vedotin group and 99.2% in the chemotherapy group had at least one adverse event that occurred during the treatment period (defined as the period from day 1 of dose 1 until 30 days after the last dose); grade 3 or greater events occurred in 52.0% and 62.3%, respectively. A total of 14.8% of patients stopped tisotumab vedotin treatment because of toxic effects. In patients with recurrent cervical cancer, second- or third-line treatment with tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly greater efficacy than chemotherapy. (Funded by Genmab and Seagen [acquired by Pfizer]; innovaTV 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04697628.).

IntroductionCervical cancer is a major global health issue. The standard treatment for locally advanced disease involves radiochemotherapy followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy (UBT). UBT requires several days of hospitalisation and strict bed rest. UBT often induces pain, anxiety, stress, distress and a decline in physical capacity during and after treatment. Previous research suggests that non-pharmacological interventions, such as yoga, may help alleviate these issues. However, few studies have specifically evaluated their effectiveness in reducing stress during UBT. Furthermore, patient education has been shown to facilitate autonomous practice and to improve patient empowerment. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the KYOCOL protocol, which integrates both a physiotherapy-yoga intervention and an educational programme, on perceived stress and its correlates in patients undergoing UBT.Methods and analysisKYOCOL is an ongoing randomised, prospective trial carried out in three French comprehensive cancer centres, using a quantitative approach complemented by a qualitative component. Eighty patients are planned to be randomised (1:1) into a control arm (standard care) or an intervention arm. In the intervention arm, patients will be educated and supervised by a trained physiotherapist in a physiotherapy-yoga programme and will then perform daily autonomous sessions during UBT and for up to 15 days post-treatment. The primary objective is to assess the impact of the KYOCOL intervention compared with standard care during UBT, on perceived stress 15 days post-UBT, using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Secondary objectives include evaluating the safety of the intervention, its effects on stress, pain and fatigue during UBT, and patient adherence to the programme. Qualitative analyses based on semistructured interview surveys will be conducted to gather valuable information and analyse in depth patients’ experiences with the intervention and UBT.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the French ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ouest V, reference number 2023-A01491-44) on 22 February 2024 and will be carried out in accordance with the good clinical practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be shared with patients and healthcare professionals and published in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT06263283.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the response rate, toxicity, operability, and surgical complication rate of neoadjuvant concomitant radiochemotherapy (cRCH) (ifosfamide + carboplatin) followed by radical hysterectomy plus external-beam radiotherapy with curative intention in locally advanced primary inoperable stages IIB and IIIB squamous cell cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with cervical cancer from 8 departments were enrolled. Patients received 3 cycles of ifosfamide 1.2 mg/m2 (+mesna 20%) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 4), every 21 days, and concomitant external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy [1.8 Gy/d]). Operability and remission were evaluated by clinical gynecological examination in general anesthesia (magnetic resonance imaging was optional), 4 weeks after the third cycle of cRCH. In case of achieved operability, a radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed within 6 weeks after cRCH. If surgery was not performed because of incomplete remission or patient preferences, vaginal brachytherapy (15 Gy [5 Gy/d]) was given additionally.ResultsForty-four patients were enrolled. Distribution of FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) tumor stage was as follows: IIB (19 patients) and IIIB (25 patients). All patients completed cRCH. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities (% of all cycles) were moderate: leukopenia, 7.3; thrombocytopenia, 2.4; and anemia, 3.2. In 13.8%, treatment cycles were delayed because of hematologic toxicity. Blood transfusions were given in 17.7% and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in 39.5%. Overall, grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were seldom (6.5%). Clinical overall response rate was 95.2%. Operability was achieved in 85.7%. Surgery was performed in 83.3%. Pathological response rates were as follows: pathological complete remission, 33.3%; partial remission, 63.3%; stable disease, 3.3%.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that cRCH is an effective and tolerable regimen in locally advanced cervical cancer treatment.

Background: The current standard treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with standard antiemetics is insufficient. Rikkunshito, a Japanese traditional herbal medicine, has been shown to improve cisplatin-induced anorexia and functional dyspepsia, and our exploratory study found that rikkunshito has an additive beneficial effect on CINV in patients with uterine corpus and cervical cancer receiving cisplatin containing chemotherapy (JORTC KMP-02). Methods: One hundred eighty patients with uterine corpus or cervical cancer who were scheduled to receive treatment with a cisplatin based regimen as initial chemotherapy were enrolled across 17 Japanese institutions. Patients were randomized with a 1:1 equal allocation ratio to the rikkunshito group or placebo groups and given oral administration on days 1 to 5 with standard antiemetics (granisetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no vomiting or rescue medication) during the delayed phase (24-120 hours after cisplatin treatment). The secondary endpoints were complete control (CC; CR without significant nausea) and total control (TC; CR without nausea) rates during the overall (0-120 hours), acute (0-24 hours), and delayed phases, as well as the CR rate during the overall and acute phases, time to treatment failure, degree of nausea and appetite during the overall phase, and adherence to the intervention. Results: The CR rate in the delayed phase was similar between the rikkunshito group and control groups (50.6% vs 58.9%, P = .2631), as were the secondary endpoints: CR rates in the overall and acute phases, CC and TC rates in the overall, acute, and delayed phases, degrees of nausea and appetite, and time to treatment failure. Conclusion: Rikkunshito had no additive effect on CINV prevention in patients with uterine corpus or cervical cancer who were treated with a cisplatin based regimen and standard antiemetics. Clinical Trial Registration: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/re/reports/detail/66957, identifier jRCT1011190007

To explore the clinical efficacy of sodium cantharidate vitamin B6 combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of local advanced cervical cancer and its influence on tumor markers. A total of 120 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were enrolled at our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022, and these cases were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method. The control group was treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while the study group was treated with sodium cantharidate vitamin B6 on the basis of the control group. The clinical efficacy, changes in self-immune function (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ cells ratio), tumor marker levels [Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen (SCCA), Carbohydrate Antigen 125 (CA125), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)], quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire), and incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. After treatment, there was no significant difference in the overall efficacy and disease control rates between the two groups (P > .05). Before treatment, there was no difference in auto-immune function between the two groups (P > .05). However, after treatment, the study group showed a significant improvement in auto-immune function, and when compared to the control group, the levels of CD3+, CD4+ cells, and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ cells were higher in the study group (P < .05). Before treatment, there was no difference in tumor markers between the two groups (P > .05). While after treatment, tumor markers in both groups decreased significantly, and in comparison to the control group, the levels of SCCA, CA125, and CEA in the study group were lower (P < .05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the quality of life between the two groups (P > .05). However, after treatment, the quality of life in both groups improved, and the study group had a higher quality of life score than the control group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in thrombocytopenia between the two groups (P > .05). The total incidence of leukopenia, neutropenia, and radio-chemotherapy-related gastroenteritis in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P < .05). Sodium cantharidate vitamin B6 combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of local advanced cervical cancer can not only effectively enhance the autoimmune function, downregulate the level of tumor markers, and improve the quality of patient life, but also cause relatively few adverse reactions.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer 1 and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics define stage IB cervical cancer as invasive cancer that is confined to the cervix, with a depth of more than 5 mm and a width of more than 7 mm. In patients with large stage IB cervical cancers, local control and survival are poorer than in patients with smaller stage I cancers, whether treated by surgery or irradiation. 2 – 4 The optimal treatment of large stage IB cervical cancer has been a source of controversy since the late 1960s. 5 – 9 In a previous randomized trial of combined . . .