Explore the vast range of titles available.

Accurate and efficient determination of neutralizing antibody (nAb) is critical for assessing individual immune status of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) and identifying key ecological reservoirs of the SFTS virus (SFTSV). However, conventional virus neutralization tests (cVNT) require live virus and are limited by their inability to support rapid, high-throughput screening. Here, we report a novel SFTSV virus neutralization test targeting the interaction between the SFTSV Gn protein and its receptor (LRP1). The test, which has been validated with SFTS patient plasma, achieves a sensitivity of 96.79% and a specificity of 100%. It also shows good correlation with cVNT, with an value of 0.8902 in head-to-head comparison. This platform offers a safe, rapid, and high-throughput alternative for large-scale population screening and the real-time monitoring of immune responses in SFTS patients.

Background: Several commercial surrogate Virus Neutralization Tests (sVNTs) have been developed in the last year. Neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies through interaction with Spike protein Receptor Binding Domain (S-RBD) can block the virus from entering and infecting host cells. However, there is a lack of information about the functional activity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that may be associated with protective responses. For these reasons, to counteract viral infection, the conventional virus neutralization test (VNT) is still considered the gold standard. The aim of this study was to contribute more and detailed information about sVNTs’ performance, by determining in vitro the anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody concentration using four different commercial assays and then comparing the obtained data to VNT. Methods: Eighty-eight samples were tested using two chemiluminescence assays (Snibe and Mindray) and two ELISA assays (Euroimmun and Diesse). The antibody titers were subsequently detected and quantified by VNT. Results: The overall agreement between each sVNT and VNT was 95.45% for Euroimmun and 98.86% for Diesse, Mindray and Snibe. Additionally, we investigated whether the sVNTs were closer to the gold standard than traditional anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays S-RBD or S1 based, finding a higher agreement mean value for sVNTs (98.01 ± 1.705% vs 95.45 ± 1.921%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, Spearman’s statistical analysis for the correlation of sVNT versus VNT showed r = 0.666 for Mindray; r = 0.696 for Diesse; r = 0.779 for Mindray and r = 0.810 for Euroimmun. Conclusions: Our data revealed a good agreement between VNT and sVNTs. Despite the VNT still remains the gold standard, the sVNT might be a valuable tool for screening wider populations.

Virus-specific antibodies are crucial for protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Assessing functional antibodies through conventional or pseudotyped virus neutralisation tests (pVNT) requires high biosafety levels. Alternatively, the virus-free surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT) quantifies antibodies interfering with spike binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. We evaluated secreted nanoluciferase-tagged spike protein fragments as diagnostic antigens in the sVNT in a vaccination cohort. Initially, spike fragments were tested in a capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA), identifying the receptor binding domain (RBD) as the optimal diagnostic antigen. The sensitivity of the in-house sVNT applying the nanoluciferase-labelled RBD equalled or surpassed that of a commercial sVNT (cPass, GenScript Diagnostics) and an in-house pVNT four weeks after the first vaccination (98% vs. 94% and 72%, respectively), reaching 100% in all assays four weeks after the second and third vaccinations. When testing serum reactivity with Omicron BA.1 spike, the sVNT and pVNT displayed superior discrimination between wild-type- and variant-specific serum reactivity compared to a capture EIA. This was most pronounced after the first and second vaccinations, with the third vaccination resulting in robust, cross-reactive BA.1 construct detection. In conclusion, utilising nanoluciferase-labelled antigens permits the quantification of SARS-CoV-2-specific inhibitory antibodies. Designed as flexible modular systems, the assays can be readily adjusted for monitoring vaccine efficacy.

Standard precautions to minimize the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission implies that infected cell cultures and clinical specimens may undergo some sort of inactivation to reduce or abolish infectivity. We evaluated three heat inactivation protocols (56 °C-30 min, 60 °C-60 min and 92 °C-15 min) on SARS-CoV-2 using (i) infected cell culture supernatant, (ii) virus-spiked human sera (iii) and nasopharyngeal samples according to the recommendations of the European norm NF EN 14476-A2. Regardless of the protocol and the type of samples, a 4 Log10 TCID50 reduction was observed. However, samples containing viral loads > 6 Log10 TCID50 were still infectious after 56 °C-30 min and 60 °C-60 min, although infectivity was < 10 TCID50. The protocols 56 °C-30 min and 60 °C-60 min had little influence on the RNA copies detection, whereas 92 °C-15 min drastically reduced the limit of detection, which suggests that this protocol should be avoided for inactivation ahead of molecular diagnostics. Lastly, 56 °C-30 min treatment of serum specimens had a negligible influence on the results of IgG detection using a commercial ELISA test, whereas a drastic decrease in neutralizing titers was observed.

Here we propose a strategy allowing implementing efficient and practicable large-scale seroepidemiological studies for Zika Virus (ZIKV). It combines screening by a commercial NS1 protein-based Zika IgG ELISA, and confirmation by a cytopathic effect-based virus neutralization test (CPE-based VNT). In post-epidemic samples from Martinique Island blood donors (a population with a dengue seroprevalence above 90%), this strategy allowed reaching specificity and sensitivity values over 98%. The CPE-based VNT consists of recording CPE directly under the optical microscope, which is easy to identify with ZIKV strain H/PF/2013 at day 5 pi. Overall, considered that CPE-based VNT is cost effective and widely automatable, the NS1 protein-based Zika IgG ELISA+CPE-based VNT combination strategy represents a convenient tool to expedite ZIKV seroprevalence studies.

Since 2018, autochthonous West Nile virus (WNV) infections have been regularly reported in eastern–central Germany. While clinically apparent infections in humans and horses are not frequent, seroprevalence studies in horses may allow the tracing of WNV and related flaviviruses transmission, such as tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and Usutu virus (USUV), and consequently help to estimate the risk of human infections. Hence, the aim of our study was to follow the seropositive ratio against these three viruses in horses in Saxony, Saxony Anhalt, and Brandenburg and to describe their geographic distribution for the year 2021. In early 2022, i.e., before the virus transmission season, sera from 1232 unvaccinated horses were tested using a competitive pan-flavivirus ELISA (cELISA). In order to estimate the true seropositive ratio of infection with WNV, TBEV, and USUV for 2021, positive and equivocal results were confirmed by a virus neutralization test (VNT). In addition, possible risk factors for seropositivity using questionnaires were analyzed using logistic regression based on questionnaires similar to our previous study from 2020. In total, 125 horse sera reacted positive in the cELISA. Based on the VNT, 40 sera showed neutralizing antibodies against WNV, 69 against TBEV, and 5 against USUV. Three sera showed antibodies against more than one virus, and eight were negative based on the VNT. The overall seropositive ratio was 3.3% (95% CI: 2.38–4.40) for WNV, 5.6% (95% CI: 4.44–7.04) for TBEV, and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.14–0.98) for USUV infections. While age and number of horses on the holding were factors predicting TBEV seropositivity, no risk factors were discovered for WNV seropositivity. We conclude that horses are useful sentinels to determine the flavivirus circulation in eastern–central Germany, as long as they are not vaccinated against WNV.

Senecavirus A (SVA), also known as Seneca Valley virus, is an emerging virus that causes vesicular disease in pigs. This virus belongs to the genus Senecavirus in the family Picornaviridae. The SVA CH-LX-01-2016 was isolated from Guangdong Province of China in 2016. In this study, a recombinant SVA CH-LX-01-2016 was constructed using reverse genetics, and proven to be able to express efficiently an enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in vitro. This eGFP-tagged recombinant SVA (rSVA-eGFP) exhibited a high capacity for viral replication. Its fluorescence-tracked characteristics greatly facilitated both virus neutralization test (VNT) and antiviral assay. The rSVA-eGFP-based VNT was used to detect eight porcine serum samples, out of which four were determined to be neutralization titer-positive. Subsequently, two antiviral drugs, ribavirin and apigenin, were assayed for evaluating both effects against the rSVA-eGFP in vitro. The result showed that only the ribavirin exhibited an anti-SVA activity.

Serological assessment of antibody levels is a crucial measure of immunity in vaccinated animals. Establishing the level of antibodies considered protective is essential for vaccine standardization and evaluation of efficacy. The virus neutralization test (VNT), recognized as the gold standard for detecting virus-specific antibodies able to neutralize virus. This study evaluated the effect of viral dose on the detection of humoral immune responses in rabbits vaccinated with a cowpox virus-based vaccine. Blood serum samples were collected on days 14, 21, and 28 post-vaccination. VNT was conducted using viral doses of 100, 50, 25, and 10 TCID . Additionally, the infectious dose 50 (ID ) of the challenge virus was determined based on the induction of skin necrosis in 50% of infected animals. This dose (316 ID per 0.1 mL) was then used to challenge vaccinated rabbits in order to determine the protective antibody titer threshold. Lower viral doses (25 and 10 TCID ) demonstrated higher sensitivity, with neutralizing antibody titers detected at 1:16 and above, significantly exceeding those obtained using 50 and 100 TCID . Based on these findings, 25 TCID was selected as the optimal dose for future VNT. Following cowpox virus challenge, rabbits with neutralizing titers ≥1:16 were protected from skin necrosis, while non-immunized animals developed characteristic lesions. These results suggest that a low-dose (25 TCID ) VNT improves the sensitivity and that a titer of 1:16 can be considered a protective threshold. This approach provides a reliable laboratory model for assessing the immunogenicity and efficacy of cowpox virus vaccines. The results obtained in this study allow for an objective assessment of the immunity elicited from a cowpox vaccine using a laboratory model.

Long-term serologic surveillance of red-legged partridges suggests emergence of Bagaza virus in Portugal in 2021, associated with disease outbreaks in this species. Results also reveal sporadic circulation of Usutu virus and endemic circulation of West Nile virus, highlighting the role of red-legged partridges in the transmission and maintenance cycle and as sentinels of orthoflaviviruses.

Background Viral neutralization (NT) assays can be used to determine the immune status of patients or assess the potency of candidate vaccines or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT) is a conventional neutralization test (cVNT) with superior specificity for measurement of neutralizing antibodies against a specific virus. Unfortunately, the application of FRNT to the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) involves a highly pathogenic bio-agent requiring biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facilities, which inevitably imposes high costs and limits accessibility. In this study, we evaluated a safe surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) that uses novel CHIKV replicon particles (VRPs) expressing eGFP and luciferase (Luc) to enable the rapid detection and quantification of neutralizing activity in clinical human serum samples. Methods This unmatched case-control validation study used serum samples from laboratory-confirmed cases of CHIKV ( n  = 19), dengue virus (DENV; n  = 9), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV; n  = 5), and normal individuals ( n  = 20). We evaluated the effectiveness of sVNT, based on mosquito cell-derived CHIK VRPs (mos-CHIK VRPs), in detecting (eGFP) and quantifying (Luc) neutralizing activity, considering specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. We conducted correlation analysis between the proposed rapid method (20 h) versus FRNT assay (72 h). We also investigated the correlation between sVNT and FRNT in NT titrations in terms of Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( r ) and sigmoidal curve fitting. Results In NT screening assays, sVNT-eGFP screening achieved sensitivity and specificity of 100%. In quantitative neutralization assays, we observed a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.83 for NT50 values between sVNT-Luc and FRNT. Conclusions Facile VRP-based sVNT within 24 h proved highly reliable in the identification and quantification of neutralizing activity against CHIKV in clinical serum samples.