Explore the vast range of titles available.

Pharmacokinetic modelling with arterial sampling is the gold standard for analysing dynamic PET data of the brain. However, the invasive character of arterial sampling prevents its widespread clinical application. Several methods have been developed to avoid arterial sampling, in particular reference region methods. Unfortunately, for some tracers or diseases, no suitable reference region can be defined. For these cases, other potentially non-invasive approaches have been proposed: (1) a population based input function (PBIF), (2) an image derived input function (IDIF), or (3) simultaneous estimation of the input function (SIME). This systematic review aims to assess the correspondence of these non-invasive methods with the gold standard. Studies comparing non-invasive pharmacokinetic modelling methods with the current gold standard methods using an input function derived from arterial blood samples were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE (until December 2021). Correlation measurements were extracted from the studies. The search yielded 30 studies that correlated outcome parameters (VT, DVR, or BPND for reversible tracers; Ki or CMRglu for irreversible tracers) from a potentially non-invasive method with those obtained from modelling using an arterial input function. Some studies provided similar results for PBIF, IDIF, and SIME-based methods as for modelling with an arterial input function (R2 = 0.59–1.00, R2 = 0.71–1.00, R2 = 0.56–0.96, respectively), if the non-invasive input curve was calibrated with arterial blood samples. Even when the non-invasive input curve was calibrated with venous blood samples or when no calibration was applied, moderate to good correlations were reported, especially for the IDIF and SIME (R2 = 0.71–1.00 and R2 = 0.36–0.96, respectively). Overall, this systematic review illustrates that non-invasive methods to generate an input function are still in their infancy. Yet, IDIF and SIME performed well, not only with arterial blood calibration, but also with venous or no blood calibration, especially for some tracers without plasma metabolites, which would potentially make these methods better suited for clinical application. However, these methods should still be properly validated for each individual tracer and application before implementation.

Quantification of myocardial blood flow requires knowledge of the amount of contrast agent in the myocardial tissue and the arterial input function (AIF) driving the delivery of this contrast agent. Accurate quantification is challenged by the lack of linearity between the measured signal and contrast agent concentration. This work characterizes sources of non-linearity and presents a systematic approach to accurate measurements of contrast agent concentration in both blood and myocardium. A dual sequence approach with separate pulse sequences for AIF and myocardial tissue allowed separate optimization of parameters for blood and myocardium. A systems approach to the overall design was taken to achieve linearity between signal and contrast agent concentration. Conversion of signal intensity values to contrast agent concentration was achieved through a combination of surface coil sensitivity correction, Bloch simulation based look-up table correction, and in the case of the AIF measurement, correction of T2* losses. Validation of signal correction was performed in phantoms, and values for peak AIF concentration and myocardial flow are provided for 29 normal subjects for rest and adenosine stress. For phantoms, the measured fits were within 5% for both AIF and myocardium. In healthy volunteers the peak [Gd] was 3.5 ± 1.2 for stress and 4.4 ± 1.2 mmol/L for rest. The T2* in the left ventricle blood pool at peak AIF was approximately 10 ms. The peak-to-valley ratio was 5.6 for the raw signal intensities without correction, and was 8.3 for the look-up-table (LUT) corrected AIF which represents approximately 48% correction. Without T2* correction the myocardial blood flow estimates are overestimated by approximately 10%. The signal-to-noise ratio of the myocardial signal at peak enhancement (1.5 T) was 17.7 ± 6.6 at stress and the peak [Gd] was 0.49 ± 0.15 mmol/L. The estimated perfusion flow was 3.9 ± 0.38 and 1.03 ± 0.19 ml/min/g using the BTEX model and 3.4 ± 0.39 and 0.95 ± 0.16 using a Fermi model, for stress and rest, respectively. A dual sequence for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and AIF measurement has been optimized for quantification of myocardial blood flow. A validation in phantoms was performed to confirm that the signal conversion to gadolinium concentration was linear. The proposed sequence was integrated with a fully automatic in-line solution for pixel-wise mapping of myocardial blood flow and evaluated in adenosine stress and rest studies on N = 29 normal healthy subjects. Reliable perfusion mapping was demonstrated and produced estimates with low variability.

BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) scanning is an important diagnostic imaging technique used in disease diagnosis, therapy planning, treatment monitoring, and medical research. The standardized uptake value (SUV) obtained at a single time frame has been widely employed in clinical practice. Well beyond this simple static measure, more detailed metabolic information can be recovered from dynamic PET scans, followed by the recovery of arterial input function and application of appropriate tracer kinetic models. Many efforts have been devoted to the development of quantitative techniques over the last couple of decades.ChallengesThe advent of new-generation total-body PET scanners characterized by ultra-high sensitivity and long axial field of view, i.e., uEXPLORER (United Imaging Healthcare), PennPET Explorer (University of Pennsylvania), and Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers), further stimulates valuable inspiration to derive kinetics for multiple organs simultaneously. But some emerging issues also need to be addressed, e.g., the large-scale data size and organ-specific physiology. The direct implementation of classical methods for total-body PET imaging without proper validation may lead to less accurate results.ConclusionsIn this contribution, the published dynamic total-body PET datasets are outlined, and several challenges/opportunities for quantitation of such types of studies are presented. An overview of the basic equation, calculation of input function (based on blood sampling, image, population or mathematical model), and kinetic analysis encompassing parametric (compartmental model, graphical plot and spectral analysis) and non-parametric (B-spline and piece-wise basis elements) approaches is provided. The discussion mainly focuses on the feasibilities, recent developments, and future perspectives of these methodologies for a diverse-tissue environment.

•Conventional DCE analysis using AIF overestimates BBB permeability with scan time reduction.•Our AI network is trained to predict the local CIF from patches of tissue dynamics.•Network-predicted CIF achieved accurate estimation of BBB permeability with 10min.•Increased BBB permeability found in hippocampus, GM, and WM with aging. In Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), Arterial Input Function (AIF) has been shown to be a significant contributor to uncertainty in the estimation of kinetic parameters. This study is to assess the feasibility of using a deep learning network to estimate local Capillary Input Function (CIF) to estimate blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, while reducing the required scan time. A total of 13 healthy subjects (younger (<40 y/o): 8, older (> 67 y/o): 5) were recruited and underwent 25-min DCE-MRI scans. The 25 min data were retrospectively truncated to 10 min to simulate a reduced scan time of 10 min. A deep learning network was trained to predict the CIF using simulated tissue contrast dynamics with two vascular transport models. The BBB permeability (PS) was measured using 3 methods: (i) Ca-25min, using DCE-MRI data of 25 min with individually sampled AIF (Ca); (ii) Ca-10min, using truncated 10min data with AIF (Ca); and (iii) Cp-10min, using truncated 10 min data with CIF (Cp). The PS estimates from the Ca-25min method were used as reference standard values to assess the accuracy of the Ca-10min and Cp-10min methods in estimating the PS values. When compared to the reference method(Ca-25min), the Ca-10min and Cp-10min methods resulted in an overestimation of PS by 217 ± 241 % and 48.0 ± 30.2 %, respectively. The Bland Altman analysis showed that the mean difference from the reference was 8.85 ± 1.78 (x10−4 min−1) with the Ca-10min, while it was reduced to 1.63 ± 2.25 (x10−4 min−1) with the Cp-10min, resulting in an average reduction of 81%. The limits of agreement also reduced by up to 39.2% with the Cp-10min. We found a 75% increase of BBB permeability in the gray matter and a 35% increase in the white matter, when comparing the older group to the younger group. We demonstrated the feasibility of estimating the capillary-level input functions using a deep learning network. We also showed that this method can be used to estimate subtle age-related changes in BBB permeability with reduced scan time, without compromising accuracy. Moreover, the trained deep learning network can automatically select CIF, reducing the potential uncertainty resulting from manual user-intervention.

Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging combined with radiotracer kinetic modeling is a powerful technique for visualizing biological processes in the brain, offering valuable insights into brain functions and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Accurate kinetic modeling relies heavily on the use of a metabolite-corrected arterial input function (AIF), which typically requires invasive and labor-intensive arterial blood sampling. While alternative non-invasive approaches have been proposed, they often compromise accuracy or still necessitate at least one invasive blood sampling. In this study, we present the deep learning-derived arterial input function (DLIF), a deep learning framework capable of estimating a metabolite-corrected AIF directly from dynamic PET image sequences without any blood sampling. We validated DLIF using existing dynamic PET patient data. We compared DLIF and resulting parametric maps against ground truth measurements. Our evaluation shows that DLIF achieves accurate and robust AIF estimation. By leveraging deep learning’s ability to capture complex temporal dynamics and incorporating prior knowledge of typical AIF shapes through basis functions, DLIF provides a rapid, accurate, and entirely non-invasive alternative to traditional AIF measurement methods. •Developed DLIF, a deep learning framework for fully non-invasive estimation of arterial input functions in dynamic PET imaging for brain.•Employs Vision Transformer and learned basis functions for continuous, close-form, subject-specific AIF estimation.•Demonstrated superior accuracy over traditional image-derived and decomposition-based methods, achieving state-of-the-art kinetic modeling performance.•Introduced a new evaluation metric designed specifically for quantifying the accuracy of estimated AIFs relevant for downstream kinetic modeling analyses, such as Logan graphical analysis.•DLIF offers potential for broad clinical and research applications, helping improve dynamic PET neuroimaging workflows.

Purpose Functional PET (fPET) is a novel technique for studying dynamic changes in brain metabolism and neurotransmitter signaling. Accurate quantification of fPET relies on measuring the arterial input function (AIF), traditionally achieved through invasive arterial blood sampling. While non-invasive image-derived input functions (IDIF) offer an alternative, they suffer from limited spatial resolution and field of view. To overcome these issues, we developed and validated a scan protocol for brain fPET utilizing cardiac IDIF, aiming to mitigate known IDIF limitations. Methods Twenty healthy individuals underwent fPET/MR scans using [ 18 F]FDG or 6-[ 18 F]FDOPA, utilizing bed motion shuttling to capture cardiac IDIF and brain task-induced changes. Arterial and venous blood sampling was used to validate IDIFs. Participants performed a monetary incentive delay task. IDIFs from various blood pools and composites estimated from a linear fit over all IDIF blood pools (3VOI) and further supplemented with venous blood samples (3VOIVB) were compared to the AIF. Quantitative task-specific images from both tracers were compared to assess the performance of each input function to the gold standard. Results For both radiotracer cohorts, moderate to high agreement (r: 0.60–0.89) between IDIFs and AIF for both radiotracer cohorts was observed, with further improvement (r: 0.87–0.93) for composite IDIFs (3VOI and 3VOIVB). Both methods showed equivalent quantitative values and high agreement (r: 0.975–0.998) with AIF-derived measurements. Conclusion Our proposed protocol enables accurate non-invasive estimation of the input function with full quantification of task-specific changes, addressing the limitations of IDIF for brain imaging by sampling larger blood pools over the thorax. These advancements increase applicability to any PET scanner and clinical research setting by reducing experimental complexity and increasing patient comfort.

Quantitative PET studies require a measurement of the arterial input function (AIF), the time-dependent radiotracer concentration in arterial blood plasma. Several groups are developing non-invasive detectors to measure the AIF from the radial artery. This study quantifies the depth and cross-sectional area of the radial artery and accompanying veins at different wrist positions using ultrasound. These anatomical data will guide the design of a non-invasive, wrist-worn detector for AIF acquisition—a practical, patient-friendly alternative to invasive blood sampling. Ultrasound imaging of the wrist was performed on 154 healthy individuals at specified distances from the distal wrist crease (2 cm , 4 cm , and 6 cm ). The depths of the radial artery at distances of 2 cm , 4 cm , and 6 cm from the distal wrist crease are 3.36 (1.25) mm , 4.08 (1.81) mm , and 4.66 (2.23) mm , respectively (mean (SD)). Similarly, the cross-sectional areas of the radial artery at these distances are 4.23 (1.75) mm$$^{2}$$, 3.92 (1.71) mm$$^{2}$$, and 3.90 (1.88) mm$$^{2}$$, respectively. The radial artery becomes larger and more superficial near the wrist, suggesting a radiation detector be placed 2 cm from the distal wrist crease on the left arm, where it is generally more superficial than on the right.

Significance: The effects of varying the indocyanine green injection dose, injection rate, physiologic dispersion of dye, and intravenous tubing volume propagate into the shape and magnitude of the arterial input function (AIF) during intraoperative fluorescence perfusion assessment, thereby altering the observed kinetics of the fluorescence images in vivo. Aim: Numerical simulations are used to demonstrate the effect of AIF on metrics derived from tissue concentration curves such as peak fluorescence, time-to-peak (TTP), and egress slope. Approach: Forward models of tissue concentration were produced by convolving simulated AIFs with the adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model using input parameters representing six different tissue examples (normal brain, glioma, normal skin, ischemic skin, normal bone, and osteonecrosis). Results: The results show that AIF perturbations result in variations in estimates of total intensity of up to 80% and TTP error of up to 200%, with the errors more dominant in brain, less in skin, and less in bone. Interestingly, error in ingress slope was as high as 60% across all tissue types. These are key observable parameters used in fluorescence imaging either implicitly by viewing the image or explicitly through intensity fitting algorithms. Correcting by deconvolving the image with a measured subject-specific AIF provides an intuitive means of visualizing the data while also removing the source of variance and allowing intra- and intersubject comparisons. Conclusions: These results suggest that intraoperative fluorescence perfusion assessment should be corrected by patient-specific AIFs measured by pulse dye densitometry.

Purpose Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease characterized by inflammatory demyelinated lesions. New treatment strategies are being developed to stimulate myelin repair. Quantitative myelin imaging could facilitate these developments. This first-in-man study aimed to evaluate [ 11 C]MeDAS as a PET tracer for myelin imaging in humans. Methods Six healthy controls and 11 MS patients underwent MRI and dynamic [ 11 C]MeDAS PET scanning with arterial sampling. Lesion detection and classification were performed on MRI. [ 11 C]MeDAS time-activity curves of brain regions and MS lesions were fitted with various compartment models for the identification of the best model to describe [ 11 C]MeDAS kinetics. Several simplified methods were compared to the optimal compartment model. Results Visual analysis of the fits of [ 11 C]MeDAS time-activity curves showed no preference for irreversible (2T3k) or reversible (2T4k) two-tissue compartment model. Both volume of distribution and binding potential estimates showed a high degree of variability. As this was not the case for 2T3k-derived net influx rate (K i ), the 2T3k model was selected as the model of choice. Simplified methods, such as SUV and MLAIR2 correlated well with 2T3k-derived K i , but SUV showed subject-dependent bias when compared to 2T3k. Both the 2T3k model and the simplified methods were able to differentiate not only between gray and white matter, but also between lesions with different myelin densities. Conclusion [ 11 C]MeDAS PET can be used for quantification of myelin density in MS patients and is able to distinguish differences in myelin density within MS lesions. The 2T3k model is the optimal compartment model and MLAIR2 is the best simplified method for quantification. Trial registration. NL7262. Registered 18 September 2018.