Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction Concerns have been raised about the limited health system capacity for identification of patients who are eligible for a disease‐modifying Alzheimer's treatment (DMT). Blood‐based biomarker (BBBM) tests are a promising tool to improve triaging at the primary care level. We projected their impact on cost of and wait times during the diagnostic process. Methods We compare four scenarios for triaging patients at the primary care level from the perspective of the U.S. health care system: (1) cognitive test only (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE]), (2) BBBM test only, (3) MMSE followed by BBBM if positive, and (4) BBBM followed by MMSE if positive. Results Referring patients to dementa specialists based on MMSE or BBBM results alone would continuously require more specialist appointments than projected to be available until 2050. Combining MMSE and BBBM would eliminate wait lists after the first 3 years and reduce average annual cost by $400 to 700 million, while increasing correctly identified cases by about 120,000 per year. Discussion The combination BBBM with MMSE is projected to increase the efficiency and value of the triage process for DMT eligibility.

INTRODUCTION Incorporating blood‐based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers such as tau and amyloid beta (Aβ) into screening algorithms may improve screening efficiency. METHODS Plasma Aβ, phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181, and p‐tau217 concentration levels from AHEAD 3–45 study participants were measured using mass spectrometry. Tau concentration ratios for each proteoform were calculated to normalize for inter‐individual differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for each biomarker against amyloid positivity, defined by > 20 Centiloids. Mixture of experts analysis assessed the value of including tau concentration ratios into the existing predictive algorithm for amyloid positron emission tomography status. RESULTS The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.87 for Aβ42/Aβ40, 0.74 for phosphorylated variant p‐tau181 ratio (p‐tau181/np‐tau181), and 0.92 for phosphorylated variant p‐tau217 ratio (p‐tau217/np‐tau217). The Plasma Predicted Centiloid (PPC), a predictive model including p‐tau217/np‐tau217, Aβ42/Aβ40, age, and apolipoprotein E improved AUC to 0.95. DISCUSSION Including plasma p‐tau217/np‐tau217 along with Aβ42/Aβ40 in predictive algorithms may streamline screening preclinical individuals into anti‐amyloid clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04468659 Highlights The addition of plasma phosphorylated variant p‐tau217 ratio (p‐tau217/np‐tau217) significantly improved plasma biomarker algorithms for identifying preclinical amyloid positron emission tomography positivity. Prediction performance at higher NAV Centiloid levels was improved with p‐tau217/np‐tau217. All models generated for this study are incorporated into the Plasma Predicted Centiloid (PPC) app for public use.

Blood‐based biomarkers (BBM) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are being increasingly used in clinical practice to support an AD diagnosis. In contrast to traditional diagnostic modalities, such as amyloid positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, BBMs offer a more accessible and lower cost alternative for AD biomarker testing. Their unique scalability addresses the anticipated surge in demand for biomarker testing with the emergence of disease‐modifying treatments (DMTs) that require confirmation of amyloid pathology. To facilitate the uptake of BBMs in clinical practice, The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease convened a BBM Workgroup to provide recommendations for two clinical implementational pathways for BBMs: one for current use for triaging and another for future use to confirm amyloid pathology. These pathways provide a standardized diagnostic approach with guidance on interpreting BBM test results. Integrating BBMs into clinical practice will simplify the diagnostic process and facilitate timely access to DMTs for eligible patients.

INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate clinical interpretation cutpoints for two plasma phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)217 assays (ALZpath and Lumipulse) as predictors of amyloid status for implementation in clinical practice. METHODS Clinical performance of plasma p‐tau217 against amyloid positron emission tomography status was evaluated in participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (n = 427). RESULTS Using a one‐cutpoint approach (negative/positive), neither assay achieved ≥ 90% in both sensitivity and specificity. A two‐cutpoint approach yielding 92% sensitivity and 96% specificity provided the desired balance of false positives and false negatives, while categorizing 20% and 39% of results as indeterminate for the Lumipulse and ALZpath assays, respectively. DISCUSSION This study provides a systematic framework for selection of assay‐specific cutpoints for clinical use of plasma p‐tau217 for determination of amyloid status. Our findings suggest that a two‐cutpoint approach may have advantages in optimizing diagnostic accuracy while minimizing potential harm from false positive results. Highlights Phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)217 cutpoints for detection of amyloid pathology were established. A two‐cutpoint approach exhibited the best performance for clinical laboratory use. p‐tau217 assays differed in the percentage of results categorized as intermediate.

Blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction is recognized as an early step in the development of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Biomarkers are needed to monitor BBB integrity over time, better understand the role of the BBB in neurodegeneration, potentially help define long‐term ADRD risk, and monitor effects of therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the current biomarkers used to detect human BBB dysfunction in the context of cognitive decline and dementia. We also discuss promising candidate fluid biomarkers to detect BBB dysfunction in blood. Highlights BBB permeability occurs during normal aging and is further exacerbated in ADRD. In this review, we discuss in vivo imaging and CSF biomarkers of BBB dysfunction currently used in the setting of aging and ADRD in humans. We also review promising candidate blood‐based biomarkers that may represent BBB dysfunction.

Introduction: Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may be associated with amyloid burden, neurodegeneration, and stroke but its specificity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population is unclear. We examined associations of plasma GFAP with amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET), cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Methods: The study included 200 individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent amyloid and tau PET and magnetic resonance imaging and had plasma GFAP concurrently assayed; multiple linear regression and hurdle model analyses were used to investigate associations controlling for age and sex. Results: GFAP was associated with amyloid and tau PET in multivariable models. After adjusting for amyloid, the association with tau PET was no longer significant. GFAP was associated with cortical thickness, WMH, and lobar CMBs only among those who were amyloid‐positive. Discussion: This cross‐sectional analysis demonstrates the utility of GFAP as a plasma biomarker for AD‐related pathologies.

Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses significant challenges to health care, often resulting in delayed or inadequate patient care. The clinical integration of blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) for AD holds promise in enabling early detection of pathology and timely intervention. However, several critical considerations, such as the lack of consistent guidelines for assessing cognition, limited understanding of BBM test characteristics, insufficient evidence on BBM performance across diverse populations, and the ethical management of test results, must be addressed for widespread clinical implementation of BBMs in the United States. The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease BBM Workgroup convened to address these challenges and provide recommendations that underscore the importance of evidence‐based guidelines, improved training for health‐care professionals, patient empowerment through informed decision making, and the necessity of community‐based studies to understand BBM performance in real‐world populations. Multi‐stakeholder engagement is essential to implement these recommendations and ensure credible guidance and education are accessible to all stakeholders.

BACKGROUND This study investigated the potential of phosphorylated plasma Tau217 ratio (pTau217R) and plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/Aβ40 in predicting brain amyloid levels measured by positron emission tomography (PET) Centiloid (CL) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging and screening. METHODS Quantification of plasma pTau217R and Aβ42/Aβ40 employed immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry. CL prediction models were developed on a cohort of 904 cognitively unimpaired, preclinical and early AD subjects and validated on two independent cohorts. RESULTS Models integrating pTau217R outperformed Aβ42/Aβ40 alone, predicting amyloid levels up to 89.1 CL. High area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values (89.3% to 94.7%) were observed across a broad CL range (15 to 90). Utilizing pTau217R‐based models for low amyloid levels reduced PET scans by 70.5% to 78.6%. DISCUSSION pTau217R effectively predicts brain amyloid levels, surpassing cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42/Aβ40's range. Combining it with plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 enhances sensitivity for low amyloid detection, reducing unnecessary PET scans and expanding clinical utility. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIERS NCT02956486 (MissionAD1), NCT03036280 (MissionAD2), NCT04468659 (AHEAD3‐45), NCT03887455 (ClarityAD) Highlights Phosphorylated plasma Tau217 ratio (pTau217R) effectively predicts amyloid‐PET Centiloid (CL) across a broad spectrum. Integrating pTau217R with Aβ42/Aβ40 extends the CL prediction upper limit to 89.1 CL. Combined model predicts amyloid status with high accuracy, especially in cognitively unimpaired individuals. This model identifies subjects above or below various CL thresholds with high accuracy. pTau217R‐based models significantly reduce PET scans by up to 78.6% for screening out individuals with no/low amyloid.

OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE A panel of clinicians, subject‐matter experts, and guideline methodologists convened by the Alzheimer's Association conducted a systematic review and formulated evidence‐based recommendations for using blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) in the diagnostic workup of suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD) within specialized care settings. The scope focuses on individuals with objective cognitive impairment, including those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, who are undergoing evaluation by providers trained and experienced in memory disorders, where AD is the suspected underlying etiology. METHODS The panel conducted a systematic review to assess the diagnostic accuracy of BBMs in detecting AD pathology. The BBMs of interest included plasma phosphorylated‐tau (p‐tau) and amyloid‐beta (Aβ) tests measuring the following analytes: p‐tau217, ratio of p‐tau217 to non‐p‐tau217 ×100 (%p‐tau17), p‐tau181, p‐tau231, and ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40. The reference standard tests included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), or neuropathology. The panel applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and the GRADE evidence‐to‐decision (EtD) Framework to develop its recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS The key recommendations in this Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) are: (1) BBM tests with ≥90% sensitivity and ≥75% specificity can be used as a triaging test and (2) BBM tests with ≥90% sensitivity and specificity can serve as a substitute for amyloid PET imaging or CSF AD biomarker testing in patients with cognitive impairment presenting to specialized care for memory disorders. The panel cautions users of this guideline that there is significant variability in diagnostic test accuracy and many commercially available BBM tests do not meet these thresholds, especially using a single cutoff. Additionally, these tests do not serve as a substitute for comprehensive clinical evaluation by a healthcare professional and should be used only as part of a full diagnostic workup of patients with cognitive impairment presenting to specialized care settings, and with careful consideration of pretest probability of AD pathology. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS This CPG provides performance‐based, brand‐agnostic recommendations for the use of BBMs in the diagnostic workup of suspected AD within specialized care settings. By linking recommendations to a systematic review and associated living updates, and using a robust and transparent methodology, the guideline ensures scientific rigor, adaptability, and sustained relevance as evidence evolves. Clinicians are encouraged to stay informed about emerging paradigms—such as biomarker combinations or ratios and multi‐threshold testing—that may further refine the diagnostic accuracy of BBMs as the field evolves.

INTRODUCTION Blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) can enable early detection of brain amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology in cognitively unimpaired individuals. However, the extent to which common medical conditions affect biomarker performance remains unclear. METHODS Participants (n = 348) included individuals without cognitive impairment. We studied how brain Aβ associated with BBMs (Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau [p‐tau] 181 and 217, p‐tau217/Aβ42, glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], and neurofilament light [NfL]) and optimal BBM thresholds for predicting brain Aβ positivity and whether they are obscured by the presence of common medical conditions. RESULTS Plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau217, and GFAP, but not NfL, were significantly associated with brain Aβ. P‐tau217/Aβ42 showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve: 0.91). The strength of p‐tau217–brain Aβ associations were obscured by diabetes and cardiovascular conditions. DISCUSSION These results suggest BBMs may help detect early Aβ pathology but suggest caution in their use due to common medical conditions that could affect accuracy. Highlights Plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau217, and GFAP but not NfL showed significant associations with brain Aβ. BBMs were more strongly associated with the level of brain Aβ in those without diabetes and cardiovascular conditions. P‐tau217/Aβ42 showed the best performance (AUC = 0.91) in discriminating Aβ presence with an optimal cut‐off of >1.2, followed by p‐tau217 at >0.46 pg/mL, with performance slightly improving when excluding participants with cardiovascular conditions.