Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the detection efficiency and clinical application value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for foetal copy number variants (CNVs) in clinical samples from 39,002 prospective cases. Methods A total of 39,002 pregnant women who received NIPT by next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a sequencing depth of 6 M reads in our centre from January 2018 to April 2020 were enrolled. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was further used to diagnose suspected chromosomal aneuploidies and chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication for consistency assessment. Results A total of 473 pregnancies (1.213%) were positive for clinically significant foetal chromosome abnormalities by NIPT. This group comprised 99 trisomy 21 (T21, 0.254%), 30 trisomy 18 (T18, 0.077%), 25 trisomy 13 (T13, 0.064%), 155 sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA, 0.398%), 69 rare trisomy (0.177%), and 95 microdeletion/microduplication syndrome (MMS, 0.244%) cases. Based on follow-up tests, the positive predictive values (PPVs) for the T21, T18, T13, SCA, rare trisomy, and MMS cases were calculated to be 88.89%, 53.33%, 20.00%, 40.22%, 4.88%, and 49.02%, respectively. In addition, the PPVs of CNVs of < 5 Mb, 5–10 Mb, and > 10 Mb were 54.55%, 38.46%, and 40.00%, respectively. Among the 95 cases with suspected CNVs, 25 were diagnosed as true positive and 26 cases as false positive; follow-up prenatal diagnosis by CMA was not performed for 44 cases. Moreover, among the 25 true positive cases, 10 were pathogenic, 3 were likely pathogenic, and 12 were of uncertain significance. Conclusion NIPT is not only suitable for screening T21, T18, T13, and SCA but also has potential significance for CNV detection. As combined with ultrasound, extended NIPT is effective for screening MMS. However, NIPT should not be recommended for whole-chromosome aneuploidy screening.

Background To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) according to the results of NIPT and pregnancy outcomes with different indications. Methods Between October 2014 and December 2020, 20,626 pregnant women who received NIPT were included in this study. The positive predictive value (PPV) of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, T13), sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs), other chromosomal aneuploidies, and chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication were calculated. The positive results of NIPT were confirmed by amniocentesis, Karyotype analysis, and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). Results In total, 263 positive cases (263/20,626, 1.28%) were detected by NIPT, of which T21, T18, and T13 were 69, 26, and 9 cases, respectively. Sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs), other chromosomal aneuploidies, and copy number variants (CNVs) were 69, 12, and 38 cases, respectively. There were true positive in 49 of T21, 13 of T18, 1 of T13, 32 of SCAs, 1 of other chromosomal aneuploidies, and 15 of CNVs. The NIPT sensitivity of T21, T18, T13, SCAs, other chromosomal aneuploidies, and CNVs was all 100%, the specialty was 99.90%, 99.94%, 99.96%, 99.82%, 99.95%, 99.89%, and the PPV was 71.01%, 50.00%, 11.11%, 46.38%, 8.33%, 39.47%, respectively. The PPV was high in T21, moderate in T18 and SCAs, and low in T13 and other chromosomal abnormalities. Conclusion NIPT has high accuracy, specificity and and can effectively avoid the occurrence of birth defects, but it cannot replace prenatal diagnosis. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of NIPT in detecting sex chromosomes, chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, and other chromosomal abnormalities should be improved. Noninvasive detection process to detect fetal free DNA in maternal plasma samples.

Background Copy number variations represent a key source of genomic variability, encompassing both benign and pathogenic alterations. Accurate interpretation of copy number variations identified through prenatal screening is critical for effective genetic consultation and clinical management. Microdeletions within the 16q24.3 locus remain understudied, thereby complicating genetic counseling for affected cases. Case presentation: This study describes the prenatal diagnostic workup and genetic counseling process for a Chinese family with a fetus carrying a de novo 16q24.3 microdeletion. Conclusion Conventional cytogenetic techniques exhibit limited sensitivity for the detection of chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications. A multimodal approach integrating prenatal ultrasound, karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, and genetic counseling enhances the diagnostic accuracy of such chromosomal anomalies during pregnancy.

Background Copy number variants (CNVs) represent a significant source of genomic diversity, encompassing both benign and pathogenic variations. The accurate interpretation of CNVs identified during prenatal diagnosis is crucial for appropriate genetic counseling and management. The literature on 5p13.3p13.2 microduplication is rare, which is a challenge for genetic counseling. Materials and methods A 35-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesi at 18 weeks of gestation due to advanced maternal age. We performed conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and quartet whole-exome sequencing (WES) on this family. Results We report a case of prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a paternally inherited 5p13.3p13.2 microduplication. In this family, both the father and the fetus carry the identical microduplication yet exhibit a normal phenotype. Conclusion Submicroscopic chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are often undetectable by conventional cytogenetics. The integration of prenatal ultrasound, karyotyping, CMA, and WES is therefore essential for accurate diagnosis.

Background Patients with deletions involving the long arm of chromosome 1 are rare. The PBX1 gene is located on chromosome 1q23.3. PBX1 encodes a transcription factor which promotes protein–protein interaction and plays a crucial role in several developmental processes. PBX1 haploinsufficiency had been reported to lead syndromic congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) in humans. Case presentation In this research, a 24-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) underwent amniocentesis at 22 weeks’ gestation because of a horseshoe kidney of the fetus on prenatal ultrasound. Results Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) from this family revealed a 1.14 Mb paternal inherited deletion on chromosome 1q23.3, spanning from position 163,620,000 to 164,760,000 (hg19). Trio whole-exome sequencing (WES) showed heterozygous deletions in exons 1–2 of the PBX1 in fetal and paternal samples. At the 3-year follow-up, the baby did not have an abnormal phenotype except a horseshoe kidney. Conclusion We provide a detailed description of the phenotype in a family with paternal inherited deletion of 1q23.3 encompassing exons 1–2 of the PBX1 gene. Combination of karyotype analysis, CMA, WES, prenatal ultrasound and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Background Proximal region of chromosome 15 long arm is rich in duplicons that, define five breakpoints (BP) for 15q rearrangements. 15q11.2 microdeletion has been previously associated with developmental delay, mental retardation, epilepsy, autism, schizophrenia and congenital heart defects. The literature on this microdeletion is extensive and confusing, which is a challenge for genetic counselling. Case presentation We have performed prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a paternally inherited 15q11.2 microdeletion. In this family, father with normal phenotype and fetus with abnormal phenotype have the same microdeletion. Conclusion Chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are difficult to detect by conventional cytogenetics, combination of prenatal ultrasound, karyotype analysis, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Background Unbalanced chromosome abnormalities (UBCA) are either gains or losses or large genomic regions, but the affected person is not or only minimally clinically affected. Copy number variants (CNVs) are an important source of normal and pathogenic genome variations. CNVs and UBCA identified in prenatal cases need careful considerations and correct interpretation if those are harmless or harmful variants from the norm. Case presentation A 25-year-old, gravida 1, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results revealed a 6.8 Mb duplication from 2q11.1 to 2q11.2. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on uncultured amniocytes. GTG-banding karyotype analysis on cultured amniocytes was performed. Results Chromosomal GTG-banding of the cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. CMA detected a 6.8-Mb chromosomal duplication in the region of 2q11.1q11.2 (arr[GRCh37] 2q11.1q11.2(95,327,873_102,088,148)x3). Conclusion Chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are difficult to detect by conventional cytogenetics, combination of prenatal ultrasound, karyotype analysis, NIPT, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of UBCA and chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Background With the development of whole-genome sequencing technology, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been applied gradually to screen chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications that cannot be detected by traditional karyotyping. However, in NIPT, some false positives and false negatives occur. This study aimed to investigate the applicability of extended NIPT (NIPT-PLUS) in the detection of chromosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion/microduplication syndrome (MMS). Methods A total of 452 pregnancies that underwent prenatal diagnostic testing (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), were screened by NIPT-PLUS from the peripheral blood sample of the pregnant women. The results of the two tested items were compared and analysed. Results Of the 452 cases, 335 (74.12%) had positive CMA results, and 117 (25.88%) had no abnormal results. A total of 86 cases of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were detected by CMA and NIPT-PLUS, with a detection rate of 96.51% (83/86). Among them, the detection rates of T18, T13; 47, XXY; 47, XXX and 47 XYY were 100%, and the detection rates of T21 and 45 XO were 96.55% and 90%, respectively. The detection sensitivity of rare chromosomal trisomy (RAT) was 80% (4/5). The positive predictive values of NIPT-PLUS for chromosome aneuploidy T21, T18 and T13 and for SCA and RAT were 90.32%, 87.50%, 25.00%, 88.89% and 50%, respectively. A total of 249 cases (74.32%) of chromosomal MMS were detected by CMA. The detection rate of NIPT-PLUS was 63.86% (159/249), and 90 cases (36.14%) were missed. The larger the MMS fragment, the higher the NIPT-PLUS detection sensitivity. In addition, most small fragments were of maternal origin. Conclusion The comparison between the CMA and NIPT-PLUS techniques shows that NIPT-PLUS has high sensitivity for detecting chromosomal aneuploidy and chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) with fragments > 5 M. However, the sensitivity of CNV for fragments < 5 M is low, and the missed detection rate is high. Additionally, confined placental mosaicism and foetal mosaicism are the key factors causing false negatives in NIPT-PLUS, while maternal chromosomal abnormalities and confined placental mosaicism are key contributors to false positives, so appropriate genetic counselling is especially important for pregnant women before and after NIPT-PLUS testing.

Background 1q21.1q21.2 microdeletions/microduplications are rare and incompletely penetrant genetic mutations, and only a few reports regarding their prenatal diagnosis are currently available. Here, we analyzed the ultrasonographic phenotypic characteristics of fetuses with these mutations to improve the understanding, diagnosis, and screening of these mutations during gestation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 8700 cases of pregnant women who underwent invasive prenatal screening by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) between November 2016 and November 2021. Results CMA revealed copy number changes in the 1q21.1q21.2 region of eleven fetuses, of which five had microdeletions and six had microduplications. These eleven fetuses exhibited variable ultrasonographic phenotypes. Of the five fetuses with the microdeletion, one exhibited a right-dominant heart, permanent right umbilical vein, and mild tricuspid regurgitation, another showed thickened nuchal translucency, and the remaining three had normal ultrasound phenotypes. Two of the six cases with 1q21.1q21.2 microduplication had structural malformations; one of them had a bilateral subependymal cyst, neck mass, and enlarged cardiothoracic ratio, while the other had right ventricular hypoplasia. Of the remaining four cases, two exhibited nasal bone dysplasia, one showed measurement slower than that during menopause and mild tricuspid regurgitation, and another did not show any notable abnormality in ultrasound examination. Among the eleven cases of 1q21.1q21.2 microdeletion/microduplication, only the parents of two fetuses underwent pedigree verification. The parents of these two fetuses with 1q21.1q21.2 microdeletion syndrome chose to continue the pregnancy, and all aspects of postnatal follow-up were normal. The parents of the other nine fetuses refused pedigree verification; of these cases, four cases terminated, and five cases continued the pregnancies. The five continued pregnancies were followed up after birth; no abnormalities were found. Conclusions Fetuses with 1q21.1q21.2 microdeletion/microduplication show different ultrasound characteristics and may have congenital heart disease, thickened nuchal translucency, and nasal bone dysplasia or show no notable abnormalities in an ultrasound examination. Our study highlights that CMA as a powerful diagnostic tool for these diseases can provide an accurate genetic diagnosis, while improving prenatal diagnosis standards.

This article reviews the current applications of the digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and explores its potential to complement or surpass the capabilities of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in prenatal testing. The growing incidence of genetic disorders in maternal–fetal medicine has intensified the demand for precise and accessible NIPT options, which aim to minimize the need for invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA), the core analyte in NIPT, is influenced by numerous factors such as maternal DNA contamination, placental health, and fragment degradation. dPCR, with its inherent precision and ability to detect low-abundance targets, demonstrates robustness against these interferences. Although NGS remains the gold standard due to its comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, its high costs limit widespread use, particularly in resource-limited settings. In contrast, dPCR provides comparable accuracy with lower complexity and expense, making it a promising alternative for prenatal testing.