Explore the vast range of titles available.

Invasive rats are one of the world's most successful animal groups that cause native species extinctions and ecosystem change, particularly on islands. On large islands, rat eradication is often impossible and population control, defined as the local limitation of rat abundance, is now routinely performed on many of the world's islands as an alternative management tool. However, a synthesis of the motivations, techniques, costs, and outcomes of such rat-control projects is lacking. We reviewed the literature, searched relevant websites, and conducted a survey via a questionnaire to synthesize the available information on rat-control projects in island natural areas worldwide to improve rat management and native species conservation. Data were collected from 136 projects conducted over the last 40 years; most were located in Australasia (46%) and the tropical Pacific (25%) in forest ecosystems (65%) and coastal strands (22%). Most of the projects targeted Rattus rattus and most (82%) were aimed at protecting birds and endangered ecosystems. Poisoning (35%) and a combination of trapping and poisoning (42%) were the most common methods. Poisoning allows for treatment of larger areas, and poison projects generally last longer than trapping projects. Second-generation anticoagulants (mainly brodifacoum and bromadiolone) were used most often. The median annual cost for rat-control projects was US$17,262 or US$227/ha. Median project duration was 4 years. For 58% of the projects, rat population reduction was reported, and 51% of projects showed evidence of positive effects on biodiversity. Our data were from few countries, revealing the need to expand rat-control distribution especially in some biodiversity hotspots. Improvement in control methods is needed as is regular monitoring to assess short- and long-term effectiveness of rat-control. Las ratas invasoras son uno de los grupos animales más exitosos a nivel mundial que ocasionan la extinción de especies nativas y cambios en los ecosistemas, particularmente en las islas. En las islas grandes, la erradicación de las ratas es generalmente imposible y el control de población, definido como la limitación local de la abundancia de ratas, hoy en día se practica rutinariamente en muchas de las islas del mundo como una herramienta alternativa de manejo. Sin embargo, se carece de una síntesis de motivaciones, técnicas, costos y resultados de dichos proyectos de control de ratas. Revisamos la literatura, buscamos sitios web relevantes, y realizamos una encuesta por medio de un cuestionario para sintetizar la información disponible sobre los proyectos de control de ratas en las áreas naturales isleñas en todo el mundo para así mejorar el manejo de ratas y la conservación de especies nativas. Se recolectaron datos de 136 proyectos que se realizaron en los últimos 40 años; la mayoría se ubicaron en Australasia (46 %) y el Pacífico tropical (25 %) en ecosistemas boscosos (65 %) y franjas costeras (22 %). La mayoría de los proyectos estaban enfocados en Rattus rattus, y la mayoría (82 %) estaban centrados en la protección de aves y ecosistemas en peligro de extinción. Los métodos más comunes fueron el envenenamiento (35 %) y una combinación de trampas y veneno (42 %). El envenenamiento permite tratar con áreas más grandes y generalmente dura más tiempo que el trampeo. Los anti-coagulantes de segunda generación (principalmente el brodifacoum y la briomadiolona) fueron los más usados. El costo medio anual de los proyectos de control de ratas fue de US$17,262 o de US$227/ha. La duración media de los proyectos fue de cuatro años. Para el 58 % de los proyectos, se reportó una reducción en la población de ratas, y el 51 % de los proyectos mostró evidencias de un efecto positivo sobre la biodiversidad. Nuestros datos provienen de pocos países, lo que revela la necesidad de expandir la distribución del control de ratas, especialmente en algunos puntos calientes de biodiversidad. Se necesita mejorar los métodos del control, así como un monitoreo regular para evaluar la efectividad del control de ratas a corto y largo plazo.

Seabirds are the most threatened group of marine animals; 29% of species are at some risk of extinction. Significant threats to seabirds occur on islands where they breed, but in many cases, effective island conservation can mitigate these threats. To guide island‐based seabird conservation actions, we identified all islands with extant or extirpated populations of the 98 globally threatened seabird species, as recognized on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, and quantified the presence of threatening invasive species, protected areas, and human populations. We matched these results with island attributes to highlight feasible island conservation opportunities. We identified 1362 threatened breeding seabird populations on 968 islands. On 803 (83%) of these islands, we identified threatening invasive species (20%), incomplete protected area coverage (23%), or both (40%). Most islands with threatened seabirds are amenable to island‐wide conservation action because they are small (57% were <1 km²), uninhabited (74%), and occur in high‐ or middle‐income countries (96%). Collectively these attributes make islands with threatened seabirds a rare opportunity for effective conservation at scale. La Biogeografía de Aves Marinas Amenazadas Globalmente y las Oportunidades de Conservación en Islas

The first confirmed nesting location of the Hawaiian population of the Band-rumped Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma castro), an endangered seabird, was recently discovered on Hawai‘i island after decades of searching. Following the discovery, we analyzed nest site preferences of the Band-rumped Storm-Petrel at this site using a paired design. Band-rumped Storm-Petrels preferred deeper crevices compared with those available within 100 m of the nest sites. Physical and environmental characteristics of Hawaiian Bandrumped Storm-Petrel nest sites may aid conservation efforts including on-the-ground searches, removal of invasive mammalian predators, identification of potential translocation sites, and habitat restoration for this endangered species.

Oceanic island ecosystems are a significant and unique part of the earth's biota. Characteristics of the archipelagoes of Hawaii and the Galapagos are discussed and compared. References.

Allozyme data, combined with traditional morphological and anatomical data, were used to evaluate the genetic status of the island endemic, Cercocarpus traskiae (Catalina mahogany). Comprising only seven adult plants and close to 70 seedlings, C. traskiae is confined to Wild Boar Gully on the southwest side of Santa Catalina Island in Los Angeles Country, California. Electrophoretic examination of 22 enzyme loci revealed that all but two of the seven adult C. traskiae trees were unique allozymically. Furthermore, four of the seven C. traskiae individuals were morphologically and/or anatomically intermediate between \"true\" C. traskiae and the more abundant Cercocarpus species on Santa Catalina, C. betuloides var. blancheae. Further electrophoretic analyses revealed that two of these four individuals possessed an additive \"hybrid\" enzyme phenotype, indicating that these individuals were hybrids. Twenty-five of the seedlings were also assayed, but none of the seedlings displayed hybrid enzyme phenotypes. Given the evidence for hybridization described herein, we make two suggestions to enhance the long-term preservation of C. traskiae. First, it may be desirable to eliminate the single C. betuloides var. blancheae individual in Wild Boar Gully. Second, we suggest that established cuttings of true C. traskiae be transplanted to areas on Santa Catalina where the probability of hybridization is minimal. Our data further demonstrate that accurate taxonomic identification and an understanding of population genetic structure are necessary for the enlightened management of small relict populations or island endemics.