Explore the vast range of titles available.

The development of large language models (LLMs) has promoted a transformation of human–computer interaction (HCI) models and has attracted the attention of scholars to the evaluation of personality traits of LLMs. As an important interface for the HCI and human–machine interface (HMI) in the future, the intelligent cockpit has become one of LLM’s most important application scenarios. When in-vehicle intelligent systems based on in-vehicle LLMs begin to become human assistants or even partners, it has become important to study the “personality” of in-vehicle LLMs. Referring to the relevant research on personality traits of LLMs, this study selected the psychological scales Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2), Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), and Short Dark Triad (SD-3) to establish a personality traits evaluation framework for in-vehicle LLMs. Then, we used this framework to evaluate the personality of three in-vehicle LLMs. The results showed that psychological scales can be used to measure the personality traits of in-vehicle LLMs. In-vehicle LLMs showed commonalities in extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and action patterns, yet differences in openness, perception, decision-making, information acquisition methods, and psychopathy. According to the results, we established anthropomorphic personality personas of different in-vehicle LLMs. This study represents a novel attempt to evaluate the personalities of in-vehicle LLMs. The experimental results deepen our understanding of in-vehicle LLMs and contribute to the further exploration of personalized fine-tuning of in-vehicle LLMs and the improvement in the user experience of the automobile in the future.

This paper introduces LLM4ATS, a framework integrating large language models, RAG, and closed-loop verification to automatically generate highly reliable automotive automated test scripts from natural language descriptions. Addressing the complex linguistic structure, strict rules, and strong dependency on the in-vehicle communication database inherent in ATS scripts, LLM4ATS innovatively employs fine-grained line-level generation and a rule-guided iterative refinement mechanism. The framework first enhances prompt context by retrieving relevant information from constructed syntax and case knowledge bases via RAG. Subsequently, each generated script line undergoes rigorous verification through a two-stage validator: initial syntax validation followed by semantic compliance checks against the communication database for signal paths and value domains. Any errors trigger structured feedback, driving iterative refinement by the large language model until fully compliant scripts are produced. This paper evaluated the framework’s effectiveness on real ATS datasets, testing models including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Qwen2.5-7B, and Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to zero-shot and few-shot baseline methods, the LLM4ATS framework significantly improves generation quality and pass rates across all models. Notably, the strongest GPT-4 model achieved a script pass rate of 91% with LLM4ATS, up from 42% in zero-shot mode, and validated functional effectiveness on a specified in-vehicle hardware platform (Chery Fengyun T28 dashboard). At the same time, expert manual evaluations confirmed the superior performance of the generated scripts in correctness, readability, and compliance with industry standards.

Advanced technology systems and neuroelectronics for crash risk assessment and anticipation may be a promising field for advancing responsible automated driving on urban roads. In principle, there are prospects of an artificially intelligent (AI)-powered automated vehicle (AV) system that tracks the degree of perceived crash risk (as either low, mid, or high) and perceived safety. As a result, communicating (verbally or nonverbally) this information to the user based on human factor aspects should be reflected. As humans and vehicle automation systems are prone to error, we need to design advanced information and communication technologies that monitor risks and act as a mediator when necessary. One possible approach is towards designing a crash risk classification and management system. This would be through responsible AI that monitors the user’s mental states associated with risk-taking behaviour and communicates this information to the user, in conjunction with the driving environment and AV states. This concept is based on a literature review and industry experts’ perspectives on designing advanced technology systems that support users in preventing crash risk encounters due to long-term effects. Equally, learning strategies for responsible automated driving on urban roads were designed. In a sense, this paper offers the reader a meticulous discussion on conceptualising a safety-inspired ‘ergonomically responsible AI’ concept in the form of an intelligent risk assessment system (iRisk) and an AI-powered Risk information Human–Machine Interface (AI rHMI) as a useful concept for responsible automated driving and safe human–automation interaction.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into in-vehicle conversational systems, identifying the optimal model remains challenging due to the lack of domain-specific evaluation standards tailored to real-world deployment requirements. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation framework for in-vehicle assistants, with a particular focus on Korean-language localization. Our empirical analysis reveals notable patterns in model behavior. First, fine-grained Korean honorific control remains unstable in current LLMs, indicating that precise speech-level realization must be explicitly evaluated in localization settings. Second, models exhibit weaker performance in strategic conversational metrics like clarification and proactivity. Our analysis suggests this stems from the inherent subjective complexity of these tasks, where our framework adopts a conservative evaluation stance to prioritize reliability. Together, our findings underscore that automotive AI must move beyond general competence toward precise linguistic tailoring and reliable, safety-oriented interaction management.

The Controller Area Network (CAN) is a safety-critical in-vehicle communication protocol that lacks built-in security mechanisms, making intrusion detection essential. Existing approaches predominantly formulate CAN intrusion detection as a classification task, mapping complex traffic patterns to attack labels. However, this formulation abstracts away the temporal and relational structure of CAN traffic and misaligns with real-world forensic workflows, which require systematic reasoning about traffic behavior. To address this gap, we introduce CAN-QA, the first benchmark that reformulates CAN traffic analysis as a question-answering (QA) task. CAN-QA converts raw CAN logs into temporally segmented windows and applies deterministic rule-based templates to generate natural-language questions paired with automatically derived ground-truth answers. The resulting dataset comprises 33,128 QA pairs across 10 categories, each targeting distinct semantic and temporal properties of CAN traffic. Using CAN-QA, we evaluate large language models across both True/False and multiple-choice formats. Our results indicate that, although these models capture superficial statistical regularities, they struggle with temporal reasoning, multi-condition inference, and higher-level behavioral interpretation. Our code is available at https://github.com/Kriiiiss/CAN-QA.

Research demonstrates that the proactivity of in-vehicle conversational assistants (IVCAs) can help to reduce distractions and enhance driving safety, better meeting users' cognitive needs. However, existing IVCAs struggle with user intent recognition and context awareness, which leads to suboptimal proactive interactions. Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential for generalizing to various tasks with prompts, but their application in IVCAs and exploration of proactive interaction remain under-explored. These raise questions about how LLMs improve proactive interactions for IVCAs and influence user perception. To investigate these questions systematically, we establish a framework with five proactivity levels across two dimensions-assumption and autonomy-for IVCAs. According to the framework, we propose a \"Rewrite + ReAct + Reflect\" strategy, aiming to empower LLMs to fulfill the specific demands of each proactivity level when interacting with users. Both feasibility and subjective experiments are conducted. The LLM outperforms the state-of-the-art model in success rate and achieves satisfactory results for each proactivity level. Subjective experiments with 40 participants validate the effectiveness of our framework and show the proactive level with strong assumptions and user confirmation is most appropriate.

Studies on in-vehicle conversational agents have traditionally relied on pre-scripted prompts or limited voice commands, constraining natural driver-agent interaction. To resolve this issue, the present study explored the potential of a ChatGPT-based in-vehicle agent capable of carrying continuous, multi-turn dialogues. Forty drivers participated in our experiment using a motion-based driving simulator, comparing three conditions (No agent, Pre-scripted agent, and ChatGPT-based agent) as a within-subjects variable. Results showed that the ChatGPT-based agent condition led to more stable driving performance across multiple metrics. Participants demonstrated lower variability in longitudinal acceleration, lateral acceleration, and lane deviation compared to the other two conditions. In subjective evaluations, the ChatGPT-based agent also received significantly higher ratings in competence, animacy, affective trust, and preference compared to the Pre-scripted agent. Our thematic analysis of driver-agent conversations revealed diverse interaction patterns in topics, including driving assistance/questions, entertainment requests, and anthropomorphic interactions. Our results highlight the potential of LLM-powered in-vehicle conversational agents to enhance driving safety and user experience through natural, context-rich interactions.