Explore the vast range of titles available.

Detailed perceptual discrimination is suggested to be inferior in peripheral vision, with sensitivity declining continuously as retinal eccentricity increases. Yet most ecologically relevant events, including imminent threats, are first signaled in the periphery, raising the possibility that peripheral capabilities for threat processing have been underestimated. Here, we tested whether peripheral vision preserves discrimination sensitivity to the trajectories of looming stimuli—visual patterns simulating collision—which are known to engage rapid subcortical visual pathways with large receptive fields. Across five psychophysical experiments in desktop and virtual reality (VR) settings, we consistently found that discrimination sensitivity for looming stimuli remained stable from parafoveal to near-peripheral eccentricities (2° to 14.5°) and declined only at the far periphery (30°). In contrast, physically matched receding stimuli showed typical eccentricity-dependent decline, ruling out general motion sensitivity as the source of preserved performance. Pupil responses further supported the affective salience of looming stimuli. These findings suggest that peripheral vision may be selectively optimized for detecting biologically relevant threats via subcortical mechanisms, challenging the traditional fovea-centered view of visual discrimination.

The center‐periphery visual field axis guides early visual system organization with enhanced resources devoted to central vision leading to reduced peripheral performance relative to that of central vision (i.e., behavioral eccentricity effect) for many visual functions. The center‐periphery organization extends to high‐order visual cortex where, for example, the well‐studied face‐sensitive fusiform face area (FFA) shows sensitivity to central vision and the place‐sensitive parahippocampal place area (PPA) shows sensitivity to peripheral vision. As we have recently found that face perception is more sensitive to eccentricity than place perception, here we examined whether these behavioral findings reflect differences in FFA's and PPA's sensitivities to eccentricity. We assumed FFA would show higher sensitivity to eccentricity than PPA would, but that both regions' modulation by eccentricity would be invariant to the viewed category. We parametrically investigated (fMRI, n = 32) how FFA's and PPA's activations are modulated by eccentricity (≤8°) and category (upright/inverted faces/houses) while keeping stimulus size constant. As expected, FFA showed an overall higher sensitivity to eccentricity than PPA. However, both regions' activation modulations by eccentricity were dependent on the viewed category. In FFA, a reduction of activation with growing eccentricity (“BOLD eccentricity effect”) was found (with different amplitudes) for all categories. In PPA however, qualitatively different BOLD eccentricity effect modulations were found (e.g., at 8° mild BOLD eccentricity effect for houses but a reverse BOLD eccentricity effect for faces and no modulation for inverted faces). Our results emphasize that peripheral vision investigations are critical to further our understanding of visual processing. Here, we find with parafoveal stimulation that high‐order visual fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA) are differently affected by eccentricity where PPA's modulation shows qualitative different BOLD eccentricity effects for different visual categories. Our results emphasize that peripheral vision investigations are critical to further our understanding of visual processing.

Background: The macula is located at the center of the retina and is crucial for high-resolution color vision. Its complex anatomical structure supports a dense array of cone photoreceptors and specialized neuronal pathways essential for central vision. A thorough understanding of macular microanatomy is vital for accurate interpretation of retinal imaging and effective management of macular diseases. This narrative review provides a detailed and integrative overview of macular anatomy, emphasizing clinically relevant microanatomical features and their implications in retinal imaging and macular disease management. Methods: A PubMed/MEDLINE search was performed using relevant keywords (e.g., “anatomy,” “fovea,” “foveal avascular zone,” “foveola,” “Henle fiber layer,” “macula,” “macular anatomy,” “macula lutea,” “optical coherence tomography,” “parafovea,” “perifovea,” and “retina”) to identify English-language articles published up to February 28, 2025. The reference lists of the included papers were manually reviewed to identify additional relevant sources. The review considered a wide range of study types, including clinical trials, systematic and narrative reviews, meta-analyses, observational studies, case series, and experimental animal studies. Results: This review highlights the remarkable characteristics of the fovea and foveola, which are densely packed with cone photoreceptors, making them uniquely suited for sharp vision. The surrounding parafoveal and perifoveal regions offer critical structural and functional support, while the Henle fiber layer facilitates the oblique course of photoreceptor axons, further refining central vision. Moreover, high-resolution optical coherence tomography has revolutionized visualization of the macular architecture, enabling a detailed assessment of previously undetectable retinal layers. This review explores key anatomical features, such as the foveal avascular zone, precise photoreceptor organization, and the role of Muller glial cells, in the context of high-resolution imaging. These associations between anatomy and imaging enhance diagnostic precision and may inform targeted treatment approaches for macular diseases. Conclusions: Comprehensive knowledge of macular anatomy is crucial for the accurate interpretation of retinal imaging and management of central retinal disorders. The bridging of classic histological findings with modern imaging enhances comprehension of the healthy macula and the detection and management of pathological changes. This review serves as a practical anatomical reference for clinicians and researchers in macular diagnostics and therapeutics. Further studies are warranted to explore how emerging imaging technologies can enhance early detection and treatment strategies for macular disorders.

Two different forms of parafoveal dysfunction have been hypothesized as core deficits of dyslexic individuals: reduced parafoveal preview benefits (Btoo little parafovea^) and increased costs of parafoveal load (Btoo much parafovea^).We tested both hypotheses in a single eye-tracking experiment using a modified serial rapid automatized naming (RAN) task. Comparisons between dyslexic and non-dyslexic adults showed reduced parafoveal preview benefits in dyslexics, without increased costs of parafoveal load. Reduced parafoveal preview benefits were observed in a naming task, but not in a silent letter-finding task, indicating that the parafoveal dysfunction may be consequent to the overload with extracting phonological information from orthographic input. Our results suggest that dyslexics’ parafoveal dysfunction is not based on strict visuo-attentional factors, but nevertheless they stress the importance of extra-phonological processing. Furthermore, evidence of reduced parafoveal preview benefits in dyslexia may help understand why serial RAN is an important reading predictor in adulthood.

Purpose This cross-sectional optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) study aimed to assess the macular and optic nerve head (ONH) vascular density, foveal avascular zone, and outer retina and choriocapillaris flow in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (oJIA). Study design Prospective. Methods Twenty-two eyes of 22 oJIA patients with uveitis (oJIA-U), 20 eyes of 20 oJIA patients without uveitis (isolated oJIA), and 26 healthy volunteers of similar ages and sexes were investigated. The superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP), ONH, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters, the flow area of the outer retina, and choriocapillaris were evaluated. Results Compared with the control group, both the oJIA-U group and isolated oJIA group showed significantly decreased vessel density of parafovea ( p  = 0.031 and p  = 0.047, respectively) in DCP. Choriocapillaris flow area at 1 mm radius was significantly lower in the oJIA-U group compared to the control group ( p  = 0.001). Choriocapillaris flow area at 2- and 3-mm radius were significantly lower in the oJIA-U group compared to the control group ( p  < 0.001, for both) and isolated oJIA-U group compared to the control group ( p  = 0.008 and p  = 0.001, respectively). The VD and thickness parameters of SCP and ONH, FAZ, and outer retina flow area were similar between the groups. Conclusions oJIA patients with and without uveitis revealed a decreased vessel density in the deep parafoveal region and choriocapillaris flow. Our findings suggest that retinal choroidal microvascular changes could be evident in oJIA-U patients without posterior segment involvement as well as oJIA patients without uveitis.

The accommodative response of the human eye is predominantly driven by foveal vision, but reacts also to off-foveal stimuli. Here, we report on monocular accommodation measurements using parafoveal and perifoveal annular stimuli centered around the fovea and extending up to 8° radial eccentricity for young emmetropic and myopic subjects. The stimuli were presented through a sequence of random defocus step changes induced by a pupil-conjugated tunable lens. A Hartmann–Shack wavefront sensor with an infrared beacon was used to measure real-time changes in ocular aberrations up to and including the fourth radial order across a 3 mm pupil at 20 Hz. Our findings show a significant reduction in accommodative response with increased radial eccentricity.

Efficient word recognition is important to facilitate reading comprehension. Two important factors influence word recognition—word frequency (WF) and contextual diversity (CD)—but studies have not reached consistent conclusions on their role. Based on previous studies, the present study strictly controlled the anticipation of sentence context on target words. In the context of the semantic incongruence of Chinese sentences—that is, when the context is equivalent and low in anticipation of the target noun—CD effects were found on late processing indicators of the eye movement data of parafoveal words, and the CD feature of parafoveal words led to a significant parafoveal‐on‐foveal effect. However, none of these results were found in the semantically reasonable (semantic congruence) context. The results suggested that high CD words are better at adapting to unexposed or learned contexts, which was not the case for high WF words.

Recent evidence suggests that, compared with hearing people, deaf people have enhanced visual attention to simple stimuli viewed in the parafovea and periphery. Although a large part of reading involves processing the fixated words in foveal vision, readers also utilize information in parafoveal vision to preprocess upcoming words and decide where to look next. In the study reported here, we investigated whether auditory deprivation affects low-level visual processing during reading by comparing the perceptual span of deaf signers who were skilled and less-skilled readers with the perceptual span of skilled hearing readers. Compared with hearing readers, the two groups of deaf readers had a larger perceptual span than would be expected given their reading ability. These results provide the first evidence that deaf readers' enhanced attentional allocation to the parafovea is used during complex cognitive tasks, such as reading.

This study explores whether semantic processing in parafoveal reading in the Italian language is modulated by the perceptual and lexical features of stimuli by analyzing the results of the rapid parallel visual presentation (RPVP) paradigm experiment, which simultaneously presented two words, with one in the fovea and one in the parafovea. The words were randomly sampled from a set of semantically related and semantically unrelated pairs. The accuracy and reaction times in reading the words were measured as a function of the stimulus length and written word frequency. Fewer errors were observed in reading parafoveal words when they were semantically related to the foveal ones, and a larger semantic facilitatory effect was observed when the foveal word was highly frequent and the parafoveal word was short. Analysis of the reaction times suggests that the semantic relation between the two words sped up the naming of the foveal word when both words were short and highly frequent. Altogether, these results add further evidence in favor of the semantic processing of words in the parafovea during reading, modulated by the orthographic and lexical features of the stimuli. The results are discussed within the context of the most prominent models of word processing and eye movement controls in reading.

The macula, as the central part of the retina, plays an important role in the reading process. However, its morphology has not been previously studied in the context of dyslexia. In this research, we compared the thickness of the fovea, parafovea and perifovea between dyslexic subjects and normal controls, in 11 retinal segmentations obtained by optical coherence tomography (OCT). With this aim, we considered the nine sectors of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid and also summarized data from sectors into inner ring subfield (parafovea) and outer ring subfield (perifovea). The thickness in all the four parafoveal sectors was significantly thicker in the complete retina, inner retina and middle retina of both eyes in the dyslexic group, as well as other macular sectors (fovea and perifovea) in the inner nuclear layer (INL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), IPL + INL and outer plexiform layer + outer nuclear layer (OPL + ONL). Additionally, the inner ring subfield (parafovea), but not the outer ring subfield (perifovea), was thicker in the complete retina, inner retina, middle retina (INL + OPL + ONL), OPL + ONL, IPL + INL and INL in the dyslexic group for both eyes. In contrast, no differences were found between the groups in any of the sectors or subfields of the outer retina, retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer or ganglion cell complex in any eye. Thus, we conclude from this exploratory research that the macular morphology differs between dyslexic and normal control subjects, as measured by OCT, especially in the parafovea at middle retinal segmentations.