Explore the vast range of titles available.

Delayed admission of myocardial infarction (MI) patients is an important prognostic factor. In the present nationwide registry (TURKMI-2), we evaluated the treatment delays and outcomes of patients with acute MI during the Covid-19 pandemic and compaired with a recentpre-pandemic registry (TURKMI-1). The pandemic and pre-pandemic studies were conducted prospectively as 15-day snapshot registries in the same 48 centers. The inclusion criteria for both registries were aged ≥18 years and a final diagnosis of acute MI (AMI) with positive troponin levels. The only difference between the 2 registries was that the pre-pandemic (TURKMI-1) registry (n=1872) included only patients presenting within the first 48 hours after symptom-onset. TURKMI-2 enrolled all consecutive patients (n=1113) presenting with AMI during the pandemic period. A comparison of the patients with acute MI presenting within the 48-hour of symptom-onset in the pre-pandemic and pandemic registries revealed an overall 47.1% decrease in acute MI admissions during the pandemic. Median time from symptom-onset to hospital-arrival increased from 150 min to 185 min in patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI) and 295 min to 419 min in patients presenting with non-STEMI (NSTEMI) (p-values <0.001). Door-to-balloon time was similar in the two periods (37 vs. 40 min, p=0.448). In the pandemic period, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreased, especially in the NSTEMI group (60.3% vs. 47.4% in NSTEMI, p<0.001; 94.8% vs. 91.1% in STEMI, p=0.013) but the decrease was not significant in STEMI patients admitted within 12 hours of symptom-onset (94.9% vs. 92.1%; p=0.075). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly increased during the pandemic period [4.8% vs. 8.9%; p<0.001; age- and sex-adjusted Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.96 (1.20-3.22) for NSTEMI, p=0.007; and 2.08 (1.38-3.13) for STEMI, p<0.001]. The present comparison of 2 nationwide registries showed a significant delay in treatment of patients presenting with acute MI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PCI was performed in a timely fashion, an increase in treatment delay might be responsible for the increased risk of MACE. Public education and establishing COVID-free hospitals are necessary to overcome patients' fear of using healthcare services and mitigate the potential complications of AMI during the pandemic. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 334-42).

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and its associated restrictions could affect ischemic times in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on ischemic times in consecutive all-comer STEMI patients. We included consecutive STEMI patients (n = 163, median age: 61 years, 27% women) who were referred to seven tertiary care hospitals across Austria for primary percutaneous coronary intervention between 24 February 2020 (calendar week 9) and 5 April 2020 (calendar week 14). The number of patients, total ischemic times and door-to-balloon times in temporal relation to COVID-19-related restrictions and infection rates were analyzed. While rates of STEMI admissions decreased (calendar week 9/10 (n = 69, 42%); calendar week 11/12 (n = 51, 31%); calendar week 13/14 (n = 43, 26%)), total ischemic times increased from 164 (interquartile range (IQR): 107–281) min (calendar week 9/10) to 237 (IQR: 141–560) min (calendar week 11/12) and to 275 (IQR: 170–590) min (calendar week 13/14) (p = 0.006). Door-to-balloon times were constant (p = 0.60). There was a significant difference in post-interventional Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 in patients treated during calendar week 9/10 (97%), 11/12 (84%) and 13/14 (81%; p = 0.02). Rates of in-hospital death and re-infarction were similar between groups (p = 0.48). Results were comparable when dichotomizing data on 10 March and 16 March 2020, when official restrictions were executed. In this cohort of all-comer STEMI patients, we observed a 1.7-fold increase in ischemic time during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Austria. Patient-related factors likely explain most of this increase. Counteractive steps are needed to prevent further cardiac collateral damage during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To find out the association of total ischemic time with no-reflow phenomenon, in terms of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, in patients presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(PPCI). Study Design: Analytical Cross-Sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Diseases Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Nov, 2022 to Jan, 2023. Methodology: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on n=184 patients, recruited through consecutive sampling technique to collect data prospectively. Patients were divided into no-reflow and normal flow group. Patients’ total ischemic time was documented and pre & post-procedural TIMI flow was noted. SPSS version-24:00 was used to enter and analyze data. Chi-square, Fisher exact test and t-test were applied and p-value≤0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of 184 study participants, 17(9.2%) were females as compared to 167(90.8%) males. The mean age was 60.23±10.28 years. No-reflow phenomenon was observed in 20(10.9%) patients. The mean age was higher in the no-reflow group than that of the normal flow group (62.65±11.61 vs 59.94±10.12 years). Total ischemic time, pre & post-procedural TIMI flow were found to be significantly associated with no-reflow phenomenon (p<0.05). Conclusion: There exists a strong association between total ischemic time and the occurrence of no-reflow phenomenon. Patients with delayed reperfusion present with greater frequency of no-reflow and low TIMI grade and vice versa.

In this study, we aimed to analyze the TURKMI registry to identify the factors associated with delays from symptom onset to treatment that would be the focus of improvement efforts in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Turkey. The TURKMI study is a nation-wide registry that was conducted in 50 centers capable of 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All consecutive patients (n=1930) with AMI admitted to coronary care units within 48 hours of symptom onset were prospectively enrolled during a predefined 2-week period between November 1, 2018, and November 16, 2018. All the patients were examined in detail with regard to the time elapsed at each step from symptom onset to initiation of treatment, including door-to-balloon time (D2B) and total ischemic time (TIT). After excluding patients who suffered an AMI within the hospital (2.6%), the analysis was conducted for 1879 patients. Most of the patients (49.5%) arrived by self-transport, 11.8% by emergency medical service (EMS) ambulance, and 38.6% were transferred from another EMS without PCI capability. The median time delay from symptom-onset to EMS call was 52.5 (15-180) min and from EMS call to EMS arrival 15 (10-20) min. In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the median D2B time was 36.5 (25-63) min, and median TIT was 195 (115-330) min. TIT was significantly prolonged from 151 (90-285) min to 250 (165-372) min in patients transferred from non-PCI centers. The major significant factors associated with time delay were patient-related delay and the mode of hospital arrival, both in STEMI and non-STEMI. The baseline evaluation of the TURKMI study revealed that an important proportion of patients presenting with AMI within 48 hours of symptom onset reach the PCI treatment center later than the time proposed in the guidelines, and the use of EMS for admission to hospital is extremely low in Turkey. Patient-related factors and the mode of hospital admission were the major factors associated with the time delay to treatment.

Compared with traditional static ice storage, controlled hypothermic storage (CHS) at 4-10°C may attenuate cold-induced lung injury between procurement and implantation. In this study, we describe the first European lung transplant (LTx) experience with a portable CHS device. A prospective observational study was conducted of all consecutively performed LTx following CHS (11 November 2022 and 31 January 2024) at two European high-volume centers. The LUNGguard device was used for CHS. The preservation details, total ischemic time, and early postoperative outcomes are described. The data are presented as median (range: minimum-maximum) values. A total of 36 patients underwent LTx (i.e., 33 bilateral, 2 single LTx, and 1 lobar). The median age was 61 (15-68) years; 58% of the patients were male; 28% of the transplantations had high-urgency status; and 22% were indicated as donation after circulatory death. In 47% of the patients, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used for perioperative support. The indications for using the CHS device were overnight bridging (  = 26), remote procurement (  = 4), rescue allocation (  = 2), logistics (  = 2), feasibility (  = 1), and extended-criteria donor (  = 1). The CHS temperature was 6.5°C (3.7°C-9.3°C). The preservation times were 11 h 18 (2 h 42-17 h 9) and 13 h 40 (4 h 5-19 h 36) for the first and second implanted lungs, respectively, whereas the total ischemic times were 13 h 38 (4 h 51-19 h 44) and 15 h 41 (5 h 54-22 h 48), respectively. The primary graft dysfunction grade 3 (PGD3) incidence rates were 33.3% within 72 h and 2.8% at 72 h. Intensive care unit stay was 8 (4-62) days, and the hospital stay was 28 (13-87) days. At the last follow-up [139 (7-446) days], three patients were still hospitalized. One patient died on postoperative day 7 due to ECMO failure. In-hospital Clavien-Dindo complications of 3b were observed in six (17%) patients, and 4a in seven (19%). CHS seems safe and feasible despite the high-risk recipient and donor profiles, as well as extended preservation times. PGD3 at 72 h was observed in 2.8% of the patients. This technology could postpone LTx to daytime working hours. Larger cohorts and longer-term outcomes are required to confirm these observations.

Background: Cardiovascular diseases have now become the leading cause of mortality in India. The mortality rate is observed to be higher in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) patients with longer total ischemic time (TIT). The lack of awareness about the symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) delays the identification of this medical emergency and prolongs the TIT. The study of composition of TIT and the reasons for its prolongation will help to improve the outcome of ACS. Objectives: The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to estimate the mean TIT and the proportion of patients with TIT <1 h (the golden hour), admitted to Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent PPCI and (2) to study the factors influencing the TIT as those in the (a) prehospital phase - the time from the onset of chest pain till arrival to the hospital where intervention is being carried out and (b) hospital phase - the time from the arrival at the hospital to the time of intervention. Methodology: The study assessed total ischemic time in STEMI patients who underwent PPCI, through a cross-sectional study investigating mean TIT, influencing factors, and proportion of Patients with TIT <1 h (the golden hour). The calculated sample size, 104, was met using a questionnaire and the case records. The data were entered in Excel and analyzed using SPSS. Results: No patients in the study population arrived within 1 h of symptom onset. The mean TIT was 363.10 min with standard deviation of 156.809 and the median TIT was 330.00 min (interquartile range is 225.00). Unlike other similar studies, there were no significant associations with age, gender, and social and educational status of the patient. Majority of the study population were not aware about the symptoms of ACS. Mode of transport, past history, family history, time of onset of symptoms, and time of arrival at the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center were found to be significantly associated with TIT. Conclusion: This study assessed the major patient-related and system-related factors causing the prolongation in TIT. This will help us to formulate and implement the strategies to significantly shorten the delay in revascularization and improve the outcome of patients admitted with STEMI. For decreasing the patient-related delay, creating public awareness regarding the identification of ischemic symptoms and accessing immediate medical care is paramount The early diagnosis and referral from the first medical contact or non-PCI center and rapid triage at the PCI center improves the system-related delay and will improve the mortality rate and outcomes of the patients.

Background: The influence of the early COVID-19 pandemic on non-COVID-19 emergencies is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, management, and prognosis of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases from January to August 2020. A meta-analysis of studies comparing the profile, STEMI severity at presentation, reperfusion delay, and in-hospital mortality for patients presenting before and during the early COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. Fifteen cross-sectional observational studies including 20,528 STEMI patients from the pre-COVID period and 2190 patients diagnosed and treated during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic met the inclusion criteria. Results: Patients presenting with STEMI during the pandemic were younger and had a higher comorbidity burden. The time interval between symptoms and first medical contact increased from 93.22 ± 137.37 min to 142 ± 281.60 min (p < 0.001). Door-to-balloon time did not differ significantly between the two periods (p = 0.293). The pooled odds ratio (OR) for low left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation during the pandemic was 2.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54–3.26) and for a presentation delay >24 h was 2.9 (95% CI 1.54–5.45) relative to before the pandemic. In-hospital mortality did not increase significantly during the outbreak (p = 0.97). Conclusion: During the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients presenting with STEMI were addressed later in the course of the disease with more severe left ventricular impairment. In-hospital emergency circuits and care functioned properly with no increase in door-to-balloon time and early mortality.

Background Significance of total ischemic time (TIT) in the context of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is still controversial. Therefore, in this study, we have evaluate the association of TIT with immediate outcomes in STEMI patients in whom recommended door to balloon (DTB) time of less than 90 min was achieved. Results A total of 5730 patients were included in this study, out of which 80.9% were male and median age was 55 [61–48] years. The median DTB was observed to be 60 [75–45] min and onset of chest pain to emergency room (ER) arrival time was 180 [300–120] min. Prolonged TIT was associated with poor pre-procedure thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade ( p  = 0.022), number of diseased vessels ( p  = 0.002), use of intra-aortic balloon pump ( p  = 0.003), and in-hospital mortality ( p  = 0.002). Mortality rate was 4.5%, 5.7%, and 7.8% for the patients with TIT of ≤ 120 min, 121 to 240 min, and > 240 min, respectively. Thirty days’ risk of mortality on TIMI score was 4.97 ± 7.09%, 5.01 ± 6.99%, and 7.12 ± 8.64% for the patients with TIT of ≤ 120 min, 121 to 240 min, and > 240 min, respectively. Conclusions Prolonged total ischemic was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Therefore, TIT can also be considered in the matrix of focus, along with DTB time and other clinical determinants to improve the survival from STEMI.

ABSTRACT Objective: To find out the association of total ischemic time with no-reflow phenomenon, in terms of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, in patients presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(PPCI). Study Design: Analytical Cross-Sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Diseases Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Nov, 2022 to Jan, 2023. Methodology: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on n=184 patients, recruited through consecutive sampling technique to collect data prospectively. Patients were divided into no-reflow and normal flow group. Patients' total ischemictime was documented and pre and post-procedural TIMI flow was noted. SPSS version-24:00 was used to enter and analyze data. Chi-square, Fisher exact test and t-test were applied and p-value≤0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of 184 study participants, 17(9.2%) were females as compared to 167(90.8%) males. The mean age was 60.23±10.28 years. No-reflow phenomenon was observed in 20(10.9%) patients. The mean age was higher in the no-reflow group than that of the normal flow group (62.65±11.61 vs 59.94±10.12 years). Total ischemic time, pre and post-procedural TIMI flow were found to be significantly associated with no-reflow phenomenon (p<0.05). Conclusion: There exists a strong association between total ischemic time and the occurrence of no-reflow phenomenon. Patients with delayed reperfusion present with greater frequency of no-reflow and low TIMI grade and vice versa.

This study is aimed at assessing trends and relations between total ischemic time, the major quality measure of systemic delay, and case-fatality at the population or patient level in response to growing cardiovascular risk and a constant need to shorten the time to treatment in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Data from a prospective nationwide registry of STEMI patients admitted between 2006 and 2013 who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were analyzed. Total ischemic time was calculated as the time from the onset of symptoms to primary PCI and was determined as individual and annual. The primary end-point was one-year, all-cause case-fatality. Among the total 70,093 analyzed patients, temporal trends showed significant decrease in total ischemic time (268 vs. 230 minutes, p < 0.001), a worsening of the risk profile and an increase in one-year case-fatality (7.1% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, longer individual total ischemic time was a risk factor for higher mortality (HR 1.024, 95%CI 1.015–1.034, p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment for the year of admission. An inverse relation was observed for the median annual time (HR 0.992, 95%CI 0.989–0.994, p < 0.001). Thus, the observed increasing annual trends in case-fatality cannot directly measure the quality of STEMI network performance.