Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Extreme rainstorms: Comparing regional envelope curves to stochastically generated events
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Extreme rainstorms: Comparing regional envelope curves to stochastically generated events
Do you wish to request the book?
Extreme rainstorms: Comparing regional envelope curves to stochastically generated events
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Extreme rainstorms: Comparing regional envelope curves to stochastically generated events
2012
Overview
The depth‐duration envelope curves (DDECs) are regional upper bounds on observed rainfall maxima for several durations. Recently, a probabilistic interpretation has been proposed in the literature in order to associate a recurrence interval T to the DDECs and, consequently, to retrieve point rainfall quantiles for ungauged sites. Alternatively, extreme rainfall quantiles can be retrieved from long synthetic rainfall series obtained with stochastic rainfall generators calibrated to local time series of rainfall events. While DDECs are sensitive to outliers and data errors, the stochastic rainfall generator performance is affected by the limited record lengths used for calibration. The objective of this study is to assess the reliability of the two alternative methods by verifying if they give consistent results for a wide study region in Austria. Relative to previous studies, we propose some generalizations of the DDEC procedure in order to better represent the Austrian data. The comparison of rainfall quantiles estimated with the two methods for large T shows an excellent agreement for intermediate durations (from 1 to 6 h), while the agreement worsen for very short (15 min) and long (24 h) durations. The results are scrupulously analyzed and discussed in light of the exceptionality of rainfall events that set the regional envelopes and the characteristics of the stochastic generator used. Our study points out that the combined use of these regional and local methods can be very useful for estimating reliable point rainfall quantiles associated with large T within regions where many rain gauges are available, but with limited record lengths. Key Points Estimation of point rainfall quantiles for very high recurrence intervals Combination of two independent methods to increase estimates accuracy Generalization of one of the methods relative to its original formulation
