Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Funding AI for Good: A Call for Meaningful Engagement
by
Lin, Hongjin
, D'Ignazio, Catherine
, Gajos, Krzysztof
, Kawakami, Anna
, Holstein, Kenneth
in
Artificial intelligence
/ Documents
/ Funding
2026
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Funding AI for Good: A Call for Meaningful Engagement
by
Lin, Hongjin
, D'Ignazio, Catherine
, Gajos, Krzysztof
, Kawakami, Anna
, Holstein, Kenneth
in
Artificial intelligence
/ Documents
/ Funding
2026
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Paper
Funding AI for Good: A Call for Meaningful Engagement
2026
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) is a growing area that explores AI's potential to address social issues, such as public health. Yet prior work has shown limited evidence of its tangible benefits for intended communities, and projects frequently face real-world deployment and sustainability challenges. While existing HCI literature on AI4SG initiatives primarily focuses on the mechanisms of funded projects and their outcomes, much less attention has been given to the upstream funding agendas that influence project approaches. In this work, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of 35 funding documents, representing about $410 million USD in total investments. We uncovered a spectrum of conceptual framings of AI4SG and the approaches that funding rhetoric promoted: from biasing towards technology capacities (more techno-centric) to emphasizing contextual understanding of the social problems at hand alongside technology capacities (more balanced). Drawing on our findings on how funding documents construct AI4SG, we offer recommendations for funders to embed more balanced approaches in future funding call designs. We further discuss implications for how the HCI community can positively shape AI4SG funding design processes.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.