Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time
Do you wish to request the book?
The isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time
2017
Overview
The mantle signatures of elements with distinct affinities for metal isotopically record different stages of Earth’s accretion, revealing that the Moon-forming impactor had a similar composition to the other impactors that made the Earth.
The isotopic composition of the Earth's building blocks
The bodies that formed the Earth have isotopic natures that have so far remained unclear. Here Nicolas Dauphas shows that elements with differing affinities for metal can be used to decipher the isotopic nature of the Earth's accreting material through time. He finds that the mantle signatures of lithophile, moderately siderophile and highly siderophile elements record different stages of the Earth's accretion, yet all the examined elements point to material that is isotopically most similar to enstatite meteorites. The author concludes that enstatite meteorites and the Earth were formed from the same isotopic reservoir but diverged in their chemical evolution as a result of subsequent fractionation by nebular and planetary processes.
The Earth formed by accretion of Moon- to Mars-size embryos coming from various heliocentric distances. The isotopic nature of these bodies is unknown. However, taking meteorites as a guide, most models assume that the Earth must have formed from a heterogeneous assortment of embryos with distinct isotopic compositions
1
,
2
,
3
. High-precision measurements, however, show that the Earth, the Moon and enstatite meteorites have almost indistinguishable isotopic compositions
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
. Models have been proposed that reconcile the Earth–Moon similarity with the inferred heterogeneous nature of Earth-forming material, but these models either require specific geometries for the Moon-forming impact
11
,
12
or can explain only one aspect of the Earth–Moon similarity (that is,
17
O)
1
,
2
,
3
. Here I show that elements with distinct affinities for metal can be used to decipher the isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time. I find that the mantle signatures of lithophile O, Ca, Ti and Nd, moderately siderophile Cr, Ni and Mo, and highly siderophile Ru record different stages of the Earth’s accretion; yet all those elements point to material that was isotopically most similar to enstatite meteorites. This isotopic similarity indicates that the material accreted by the Earth always comprised a large fraction of enstatite-type impactors (about half were E-type in the first 60 per cent of the accretion and all of the impactors were E-type after that). Accordingly, the giant impactor that formed the Moon probably had an isotopic composition similar to that of the Earth, hence relaxing the constraints on models of lunar formation. Enstatite meteorites and the Earth were formed from the same isotopic reservoir but they diverged in their chemical evolution owing to subsequent fractionation by nebular and planetary processes
13
.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
Subject
